Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/7/2007 10:15:44 PM EDT
Story from Strategypage.com.





ARH-70 Lost In Development Hell
by James Dunnigan
March 6, 2007

The U.S. Army was supposed to get the first of its new ARH-70 scout helicopters by September, 2008. But now it looks like the first one won't be ready until 2010. It gets worse. The ARH-70 was supposed to cost $5.2 million each. But now the manufacturer, Bell Helicopter, wants nearly $10 million per aircraft. The army originally wanted to buy 368 ARH-70s. But with the delays and price increases, that number will likely shrink. Bell got the contract in July, 2005.

The 2.8 ton ARH-70A is a militarized Bell 407. The helicopter it is replacing, the OH-58D, is itself a militarized version of the older Bell 206. ARH stands for or armed reconnaissance helicopter. ARH-70 has a max speed of 243 kilometers an hour, and max range of 577 kilometers. It was supposed to be a straightforward conversion. A new engine and tail assembly, plus adding a fire control and weapons system similar to that installed in the OH-58D. But problems were encountered, that will take time, and a lot of money, to fix. If you follow defense procurement, you've heard that many times before.

The OH-58D Kiowa Warrior has a top speed of 226 kilometers per hour, and a range of 241 kilometers. It has a mast-mounted sight, which carries a powerful FLIR (heat sensing camera) and a laser designator. The OH-58D is lightly armed, and usually only carries four Hellfire (anti-vehicle) or Stinger (anti-aircraft) missiles, or 70mm unguided 14 rockets.

The delays and price increases are attributed to the usual problems. The manufacturer over-promised, and the army keeps adding new features to the fire control and cockpit electronics. The manufacturer knows how this works, and has lawyers, tech writers and public relations teams standing by to come up with perfectly good, and legal, reasons for the delays and cost increases. The military, and the taxpayers, usually relent and pay up. Not always, but usually. Collective amnesia then sets in, and the process is repeated endlessly.


Sigh. Better be leaps and bounds better than the Kiowa Warrior to justify those costs.
3/7/2007 10:20:33 PM EDT
[#1]
Especially since it's the same airframe...

'Super Kiowa'...
3/7/2007 10:22:40 PM EDT
[#2]
we new scarier looking helicopters for the .mil.

I know the old airframes are "proven" but come on...If we are going to be the premier world power we gotta look the part.
3/7/2007 10:39:46 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Especially since it's the same airframe...

'Super Kiowa'...


Indeed. I can see problems with the V-22 (even though a few decades on, it should be somewhat more reliable by now...), but converting an existing airframe balloons into some price-doubling clusterfuck? Sheesh.
3/8/2007 2:06:01 AM EDT
[#4]
I'm 41.  I saw 407s when I was a KID!  WTF?????
3/8/2007 2:25:23 AM EDT
[#5]
After seeing how Apaches are built, I understand why aircraft cost so much. They cobble them together by hand. It reminded me of the pre-depression era luxury car market. They waste hours doing things by hand that could be done in seconds by a robot arm.

Galland
3/8/2007 2:39:04 AM EDT
[#6]
Why get this



when you can get this



or even this

3/8/2007 2:48:31 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
Why get this

img136.imageshack.us/img136/8269/airarhbell407lgpj4.jpg

when you can get this

www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/md500_vue2.jpg

or even this

www.copyright-free-pictures.org.uk/helicopters/westland-lynx-helicopter.jpg


We have #2... MH-6/AH-6

Big Army likes the '58... So they rebuilt it - no bigger, slightly better and A HELL OF A LOT MORE EXPENSIVE...
3/8/2007 2:50:53 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
After seeing how Apaches are built, I understand why aircraft cost so much. They cobble them together by hand. It reminded me of the pre-depression era luxury car market. They waste hours doing things by hand that could be done in seconds by a robot arm.

Galland


You should see how we fix them, then!!!

When it comes to '64s... One word: GLUE!

(Ok, technically it's Hysol EA9309.3 or 960F epoxy resins... But in simple terms, it's expensive, smelly, sticky GLUE... The Apache is very composite-heavy...)....

3/8/2007 3:05:15 AM EDT
[#9]
Skids are for kids.
3/8/2007 3:07:00 AM EDT
[#10]
Should have bought these…

3/8/2007 3:08:14 AM EDT
[#11]
Nice...$10 million for a 70's era airframe
3/8/2007 3:10:43 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
Should have bought these…

www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/mh-6_001.jpg


Don't Brits use Gazelles for observation?
3/8/2007 3:14:39 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Should have bought these…

www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/mh-6_001.jpg


Don't Brits use Gazelles for observation?


Nah… too fragile and slow…

AH-9 Lynxs… the worlds fastest helicopter…



And these updated babies have been ordered…



3/8/2007 3:20:52 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
Nah… too fragile and slow…

AH-9 Lynxs… the worlds fastest helicopter…

www.operations.mod.uk/telic/images/misc/649aac.jpg

And these updated babies have been ordered…

www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_Future_Lynx_Concept_Naval_lg.jpg



What's the fly-away price for one of those? And what did you do with your Gazelles?

ETA: Just because they are nice-looking helicopters...
3/8/2007 3:22:25 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
Should have bought these…

www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/mh-6_001.jpg


That would make too much SENSE since we allready fly them, just upgrade the shit out of the engine, and go...

But NOOO, we need to be able to carry pax INSIDE our RECON helo, and we like the 58 too much...

So we get this GREAT IDEA - why not take the chin-ball off the '6, stick it on a beefed up 58, and call it ARH!!!!
3/8/2007 4:28:14 AM EDT
[#16]
The ARH is actually a militarized 417, not 407.  (Although that picture in the first post is a modded 407.)  I think the original idea behind using the chin-mounted sight that it is newer than the old mast-mounted sight, yet still "off the shelf."

Bell has a new CEO as of January 18th.

The Lynx looks considerably larger than the ARH.  The OH-6 doesn't have the space to carry passengers like the ARH.
3/8/2007 5:04:48 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Nah… too fragile and slow…

AH-9 Lynxs… the worlds fastest helicopter…

www.operations.mod.uk/telic/images/misc/649aac.jpg

And these updated babies have been ordered…

www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_Future_Lynx_Concept_Naval_lg.jpg



What's the fly-away price for one of those? And what did you do with your Gazelles?

ETA: Just because they are nice-looking helicopters...
img443.imageshack.us/img443/8279/img9626hy9.jpg


The new Super Lynx's are a $12.5 million a pop…

The Gazelles were all sold off… Aerospatiale Squirells and Bell 412's replaced them.

ANdy
3/8/2007 5:08:07 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
The ARH is actually a militarized 417, not 407.  (Although that picture in the first post is a modded 407.)  I think the original idea behind using the chin-mounted sight that it is newer than the old mast-mounted sight, yet still "off the shelf."

Bell has a new CEO as of January 18th.

The Lynx looks considerably larger than the ARH.  The OH-6 doesn't have the space to carry passengers like the ARH.


Sure it does, it's just a little less comfortable for them:



The MH-6M has plenty of power and lift with a 6 blade main and 4 blade tail rotor and upgraded engine.
3/8/2007 5:18:36 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:


The Lynx looks considerably larger than the ARH.  The OH-6 doesn't have the space to carry passengers like the ARH.


Specifications (Bell 407)

Length (with main rotor): 41 ft 8 in
Main rotor diameter: 35 ft 0 in
Height: 11 ft 8 in
Maximum takeoff: 5,000 lb
Powerplant: 1x Allison 250-C47 turboshaft, 700 shp (520 kW)
Max Speed: 140 kts

Specifications (Super Lynx Series 100)

Length: 50 ft
Rotor diameter: 42 ft
Height: 12 ft 0.5 in
Max takeoff weight: 11,750 lb
Powerplant: 2× Rolls-Royce Gem, 835 kW (1,120 shp) each
Speed: 200 kts
3/8/2007 5:22:05 AM EDT
[#20]
You can paint your bell helo here

www.bellhelicopter.com/en/aircraft/commercial/config.cfm

Good source for "black helos"


3/8/2007 5:28:06 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:


The Lynx looks considerably larger than the ARH.  The OH-6 doesn't have the space to carry passengers like the ARH.


Specifications (Bell 407)

Length (with main rotor): 41 ft 8 in
Main rotor diameter: 35 ft 0 in
Height: 11 ft 8 in
Maximum takeoff: 5,000 lb
Powerplant: 1x Allison 250-C47 turboshaft, 700 shp (520 kW)
Max Speed: 140 kts

Specifications (Super Lynx Series 100)

Length: 50 ft
Rotor diameter: 42 ft
Height: 12 ft 0.5 in
Max takeoff weight: 11,750 lb
Powerplant: 2× Rolls-Royce Gem, 835 kW (1,120 shp) each
Speed: 200 kts


That's pretty close, and I'm pretty sure the ARH rotor disk is a little bigger than the 407, so even closer yet.
3/8/2007 5:44:48 AM EDT
[#22]
They should have stuck with the 58 “Alpha‘s“ and “Charlie‘s“.      I miss them so.  





When they got rid of the -58A’s and C’s it was time for me to ETS. Then as a civilian I ended up working on these..................  






3/8/2007 6:21:42 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

img136.imageshack.us/img136/8269/airarhbell407lgpj4.jpg

Sigh. Better be leaps and bounds better than the Kiowa Warrior to justify those costs.


I look at that pic and all I can think is "What can that heli do that a HueyCobra can't do better?

6klbs, FFAR's, and targeting pods.... Ok, so they might be able to use the guided versions of the FFAR's but it's still a lot less whoopass than a 'Cobra can bring to a game of Touch Football.
3/8/2007 6:45:55 AM EDT
[#24]
I'm pretty sure all military procurement contracts go like this:

Bell: How much do you want to spend?
.Mil: $5.5mil a piece.
Bell: Do you want lube with that?
.Mil: Yes, please.
Bell: Sounds good to me(w/ a wink and his fingers crossed).


3/8/2007 7:07:39 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:
After seeing how Apaches are built, I understand why aircraft cost so much. They cobble them together by hand. It reminded me of the pre-depression era luxury car market. They waste hours doing things by hand that could be done in seconds by a robot arm.

Galland


Sorry, but I can't think of a single aricraft that's assembled by robot.  There's simply not enough repetition (sales volume) to justify automation.  Big difference when you're making MILLIONS of them.
3/8/2007 7:18:54 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
You should see how we fix them, then!!!
When it comes to '64s... One word: GLUE!
(Ok, technically it's Hysol EA9309.3 or 960F epoxy resins... But in simple terms, it's expensive, smelly, sticky GLUE... The Apache is very composite-heavy...)....


I never worked with Hysol until I worked on Prowlers.
I learned to love the stuff.

If you can't fix it with ordi tape, MIL-S-8802, Scotch Weld, Cherry Max rivits and now Hysol it has no place in the military.  
3/8/2007 10:14:19 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:

img136.imageshack.us/img136/8269/airarhbell407lgpj4.jpg

Sigh. Better be leaps and bounds better than the Kiowa Warrior to justify those costs.


I look at that pic and all I can think is "What can that heli do that a HueyCobra can't do better?

6klbs, FFAR's, and targeting pods.... Ok, so they might be able to use the guided versions of the FFAR's but it's still a lot less whoopass than a 'Cobra can bring to a game of Touch Football.



A Cobra could do everything a Kiowa can and is faster, more survivable and carries more firepower…

However!!!!

It's not a 'Cheaper, off the shelf answer', which as we know is Procurement Speak for, we take an unsuitable cheap commercial product, spend a shitload of money to turn it into a barely satisfactory militarized version that ends up costing more than a genuine military product would have in the first place.

And the advantage of this procurement system?

Simple enough…

When the new improved 'cheap' version ends up costing so much they reduce the number purchased, you absolutely KNOW the .Mil will issue ANOTHER requirment for a newer 'cheap, off the shelf option' to replace it…

Experts claim there is no such thing as 'perpetual motion'… well there is, it's the .Mils policy of 'perpetual procurement'.

ANdy