Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 3
Next Page
6/7/2006 8:05:21 AM EDT




Fort Lewis Soldier Says He'll Refuse To Go To Iraq

June 6, 2006

By Keith Eldridge

An Army lieutenant based at Ft. Lewis has such serious objections to the war in Iraq, and is refusing to deploy, the soldier's lawyer said.

SEATTLE - As thousands of Fort Lewis Army troops prepare to head back to Iraq, one of their officers is making a stand.

A lieutenant says he is going to refuse to go, saying it's an unjust war. Anti-war groups are rallying to his defense.

Lt. Ehren Watada of the Stryker Brigade writes, "I refuse to be silent any longer. I refuse to watch families torn apart, while the President tells us to ‘stay the course.’ I refuse to be party to an illegal and immoral war against people who did nothing to deserve our aggression.

"I wanted to be there for my fellow troops. But the best way was not to help drop artillery and cause more death and destruction. It is to help oppose this war and end it so that all soldiers can come home." - signed LT.

His name had been kept a secret until now, but Lt. Watada's father confirms that his son is taking this bold step and told the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper that he's proud of his son.

Fort Lewis says since the lieutenant hasn't done anything official yet, there's no violation. But should he decide to go ahead with this, he could be charged with 'desertion' or more likely with 'missing the movement' of his unit.

It's happened before with a sergeant who refused to go. Sgt. Kevin Benderman was sentenced to 15 months for refusing to go to Iraq.

Lt. Watada asked for reassignment and tried resigning his commission, but the Army refused. His attorney tells us from Hawaii that Watada is not against all wars, just this one.

"I've been doing this for nearly 40 years and I'm somewhat astounded that in the context of a war that is becoming increasing unpopular that they are relatively unsophisticated in addressing these issues," said attorney Eric Seitz from Hawaii.

This doesn't sit well with fellow soldiers.

"We're here to serve our country and fight and that's his job," said Private Nathan Hanson. "It's his duty."

Anti-war protestors, many of which demonstrated at the Port of Olympia recently, are rushing to his aid. They have put up a Web site believing he's the first commissioned officer to refuse to go.

The lieutenant says he'll make his intentions official Wednesday at noon and that's when his defense team will kick into gear.

For More Information: www.thankyouLT.org


6/7/2006 8:06:12 AM EDT
[#1]
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.
6/7/2006 8:06:21 AM EDT
[#2]
Make space for him in Leavenworth.
6/7/2006 8:09:39 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.



yep ordering for deployment is NOT and unlawful order. Wonder if this guy is an ROTC idot.
6/7/2006 8:10:01 AM EDT
[#4]
Big Chicken Dinner
6/7/2006 8:10:34 AM EDT
[#5]

The article says the Army wouldn't let him resign his commission.  I thought that that was ALWAYS an option for officers?

6/7/2006 8:10:36 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.



yep ordering for deployment is NOT and unlawful order. Wonder if this guy is an ROTC idot.



Well, we know he is an idiot. Just not the specific genus of idiot...
6/7/2006 8:12:39 AM EDT
[#7]
if he does deploy i feel sorry for the troops tha must follow that shithead into combat. nothing like being led by an incompetant coward that doesn't understand DUTY.
6/7/2006 8:13:06 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.



Wonder if this guy is an ROTC idot.






on another note, have fun in Leavenworth, private.  
6/7/2006 8:13:27 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
The article says the Army wouldn't let him resign his commission.  I thought that that was ALWAYS an option for officers?




A Commission is for life. I assume stop loss measures include Officers.
6/7/2006 8:15:39 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
The article says the Army wouldn't let him resign his commission.  I thought that that was ALWAYS an option for officers?




___

Depends upon circumstances.  First, completion of your tour (as he's an Lt, I can't imagine he has completed the obligation he signed-up for).  Second, satisfaction of additional service duty for education subsidy (ROTC, for example).  Third, the needs of the service and his particular specialty, which in this case includes whininng, which the service doesn't recognize.



6/7/2006 8:16:21 AM EDT
[#11]

Stop Loss is probably the answer.  I hadn't thought of that.  I knew a squared away CPL who went to OCS and came back to the unit, only to resign his commission within a year after some woman got ahold of him and screwed up his priorities.  We were not in Stop Loss status at that time, though.

6/7/2006 8:17:42 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
The article says the Army wouldn't let him resign his commission.  I thought that that was ALWAYS an option for officers?




At the Army's discretion i believe. he is an officer in a combat unit during a war. Frankly we would be better off without him in charge of anything. His duty is to deploy and fight where ever he is ordered to go. As an officer in the USARMY you DO NOT publically discuss the politics of such things, nor do you show weakness to those you command.

his ability to command a fighting force is now lost. he will have ZERO credibilty with those under him.
6/7/2006 8:18:48 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The article says the Army wouldn't let him resign his commission.  I thought that that was ALWAYS an option for officers?




A Commission is for life. I assume stop loss measures include Officers.



___

A Commision is for life (with exemptions and if that officer has a specialty direly needed for re-call to active duty) only when the officer accepts a regular commission, as opposed to a reserve commission.

6/7/2006 8:28:29 AM EDT
[#14]
Let's just set up an internment camp for all deserters. Make it someplace with horrible weather so the protesters can freeze/fry while protesting.
6/7/2006 8:30:12 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.



yep ordering for deployment is NOT and unlawful order. Wonder if this guy is an ROTC idot.



Easy on the ROTC bashing.  He was OTS.  
I'm going to take some flack for saying this, but I kind of respect this guy because I respect people who stand up for what they believe, even if I don't agree with their beliefs.  Of course I also believe this guy should spend several years in Leavenworth.  In fact, if he gets away with this without going to Leavenworth, I won't have any respect for him.  
6/7/2006 8:31:17 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.



+1

6/7/2006 8:33:00 AM EDT
[#17]
Here's a thought... If you do not want to go to war, DON'T JOIN THE ARMY.  It's not rocket science.

If he is an Lt (barring prior service or bootstrap) that tells me he joined during or just before the war.
6/7/2006 8:33:30 AM EDT
[#18]
He'll end up on the moonbat speaking circuit as soon as he's "loose" and i'm sure the anti-war and anti-american groups will all make him their latest "cause celebre".

I've already heard too much about this moonbat wanna-be....



- CD
6/7/2006 8:33:51 AM EDT
[#19]
Alright so cut his orders for "Cell duty" at Leavenworth, until his unit returnes from the combat zone!

Sorry dude you took the job, do the job!!!! You signed over your right to an opinion that matters when you joined the military.
6/7/2006 8:34:04 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
The article says the Army wouldn't let him resign his commission.  I thought that that was ALWAYS an option for officers?




He probably has a minimum service commitment due to ROTC.

His behavior could also be conduct unbecoming an officer, failure to go/missing movement, failure to obey two lawful orders: one to STFU over his differences, and the other re: missing movement.

His behavior is also not condusive to maintaining good order and discipline in his unit and among the troops, especially his, who will now have more respect for whaleshit than they do him.

The tard is fucked and I hope they make an example of him by throwing the book at him.

The most depressing thing?  After serving his time he'll go back to that liberal bastion we call Hawaii and bask in his new found glory as a "war protester," bang lots of smelly hippy chick groupies, and probably be plastered all over TV as some kind of left wing military affairs/war protest expert.

F-him
6/7/2006 8:40:07 AM EDT
[#21]
He apparently still has 3 years to go on his full time committment.
6/7/2006 8:43:17 AM EDT
[#22]
If that's the way the Army is going to be run we'll never have to worry about recruits. I can hear it now. KP is wrong, hiking in cold weather is wrong, running in the early morning is wrong, Etc., Etc. We'll have plenty of people but no army.
6/7/2006 8:44:58 AM EDT
[#23]
I want to see his branch.
6/7/2006 8:45:14 AM EDT
[#24]
Heh perfect canidate for "pound him in the ass" Prison. He takes the check he does the job. Or BEND OVER BITCH is his new handle.
6/7/2006 8:51:49 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Have fun in Leavenworth.

What a 'tard.



yep ordering for deployment is NOT and unlawful order. Wonder if this guy is an ROTC idot.



You mean like Gen Colin Powell or Gen Hugh Shelton (a Spec Ops god)

Or maybe an OCS idiot like Gen George C. Marshall or Gen Tommy Franks....

This guy is an Idiot, but that has nothing to do with the source of his commission.  After 8.5 years on active duty, I found that incomptence is no respecter of comissioning source.
6/7/2006 8:52:29 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Here's a thought... If you do not want to go to war, DON'T JOIN THE ARMY.  It's not rocket science.

If he is an Lt (barring prior service or bootstrap) that tells me he joined during or just before the war.




I'm thinking the same thing. Didn't he read the brochure?
6/7/2006 8:52:48 AM EDT
[#27]
Bring back the firing squad.  Air it live on C-SPAN.

This whole thing looks politically motivated - but even Sen. Kerry had the balls to actually DEPLOY and thus lend SOME credibility to his "cause."
6/7/2006 8:57:45 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
I want to see his branch.



He talks about arty-he needs some "wall to wall" counseling with the CSM of 4-3 FA circa '91-a 5'8" no neck hardcore with jailhouse knuckle tattoos.
6/7/2006 8:59:06 AM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
I want to see his branch.



"I wanted to be there for my fellow troops. But the best way was not to help drop artillery and cause more death and destruction. It is to help oppose this war and end it so that all soldiers can come home." - signed LT.

Sounds like he is a least inferring that he is FA.

Whatever he is / does by trade - he has probably already been assigned as the assistant Brigade S-4 or such nonsense - so at least we can rest assured he will not be adversely effecting the readiness or proficiency of a combat organization by leaving.
6/7/2006 8:59:27 AM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:
if he does deploy i feel sorry for the troops tha must follow that shithead into combat. nothing like being led by an incompetant coward that doesn't understand DUTY.



yeah no shit what a lousy cocksucker, way to set a good example LT.
6/7/2006 9:02:34 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
I want to see his branch.



Artillery, and I think he was OCS.
6/7/2006 9:09:36 AM EDT
[#32]
Officers incur an 8 year statutory obligation, and they can't resign during that time.  If he's OCS, the 8 years would have started at his date of enlistment.  But, even if his 8 years is up, the Army can always not accept his resignation.  (In fact, if the officer hasn't been to Iraq or Afghanistan, and has no compelling personal hardship, Army policy is to disapprove the resignation request.)

I have no sympathy for this guy, and he deserves his punishment.  He's not disobeying an illegal order, he's disobeying an order he doesn't agree with.  Whatever his personal beliefs may be, he has a sworn duty to uphold.

I hope he has fun with whatever new job his commander gives him until his court-martial, jail, and elimination from the service.  Here's a suggestion:

6/7/2006 9:29:47 AM EDT
[#33]
Couldn't he just apply for Conscientious Objector status? That basically sounds like what he is saying already, if he really wants out that would probably be his best bet. Or can't officers do that?

ETA: Never mind, it says he is only opposed to this particular conflict, I understand that to be a CO you need to be opposed to all wars.
6/7/2006 9:35:56 AM EDT
[#34]
Someone might want to remind him that Pvt. Eddie Slovik already tried that....things didn't work out so well .
6/7/2006 9:37:35 AM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:
if he does deploy i feel sorry for the troops tha must follow that shithead into combat. nothing like being led by an incompetant coward that doesn't understand DUTY.

+1 !!
6/7/2006 9:39:54 AM EDT
[#36]
Funny I've heard more about him on the news then I did about soldiers who've won the medal of honor in this conflict...
6/7/2006 9:42:44 AM EDT
[#37]
Whoops!  I posted this topic in the HoH forum and didn't check in here for dupage.



Does he really think that our troops indiscriminately rain down artillery on civilians at random?

IMHO,

1. Him not going means another soldier would have to go in his place. I couldn't send someone else to do my job.

2. He is refusing to fulfill his job of supporting the infantry, which, if done on a larger scale, would endanger the lives of those troops by denying them needed fire support.

3. They should drum people like him out of the service like in the old days. Strip off his rank & unit insignia and march him out the gate in disgrace.
6/7/2006 9:44:43 AM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:
Make space for him in Leavenworth.



till the last solider returns from Iraq and Afghanistan
6/7/2006 9:57:19 AM EDT
[#39]
Serving in the US military is an honor beset with duty, sacrifice and tradition.  Many whom live in this country, a few even on this site, with medical disqualifiers have none the less tried to get into that military without success, knowing full well they would be put into harm’s way and ordered to do things they disagree with.

This ignoramus, this air thief deserves Leavenworth.
6/7/2006 10:01:46 AM EDT
[#40]
What a POS.  
6/7/2006 10:03:27 AM EDT
[#41]
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I thought officers could resign their commission at any time?

ETA: I see others have attempted to answer this question.
6/7/2006 10:06:15 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I thought officers could resign their commission at any time?



I'm really starting to understand how some of you get the postcounts you get .
6/7/2006 10:07:57 AM EDT
[#43]
The sad part is he just fucked up a chunk of his future over a deployment.  Why do these guys always say "...I don't support this war."  Is your support of a war (for or against) based only on participation?  If he had a brain he could have deployed and requested to be the mess officer or some such shit.  But no, he needs to try and place cowerdice under a banner of moral courage against a war.  
6/7/2006 10:08:52 AM EDT
[#44]
As The song goes:

Ho ho ho, not this time, my friend.
You'll be in lockdown dy ten
I'm afraid you can't talk your way outta this one, son.
You have four walls are your
twenty-four hour-a-day-constant-compa-nion

Hey, Bwana, I'll see you in'a Walla-Walla (Leavenworth)
Slap on the wrist, well not this time
Hey, Bwana, I'll see you in'a Walla-Walla (Leavenworth)
Folsom Prison is the destination.

HAVE A NICE LIFE IN LEAVENWORTH, PRIVATE WATADA.
Should've thought about that wne you decided to become a US Army Officer, ya turd!
6/7/2006 10:09:09 AM EDT
[#45]
Odd he joined after we began the Iraqi campaign- Perhaps he is a plant -perhaps the anti-war movement hopes this mindset  will spread throughout the military.


I say court marshal him -maximum prison time -dishonorable discharge.
6/7/2006 10:22:48 AM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:
Perhaps I am mistaken, but I thought officers could resign their commission at any time?



___

Officers do not have arbitrary ability to resign their Commissions.

As I posted earlier, Officers are required to fulfill their contractual obligations.  These obligations may be incurred through U.S. Government subsidies through education (R.O.T.C., Military Academies, Officer Training School, Medical, etc.) for starters.  

Further professional military education (Pilot/Navigator Training, etc.) also incurs further obligations that are contractual.  An officer is required to fulfill these commitments, or the officer may be obliged, dependant upon the obligation, to restitute to the U.S. Government the funds that would otherwise be forfeit then lost due to non-compliance of the officers commitment.

There are two categories of officers; those holding a Reserve or Regular Commission.

Officers holding a Regular Commission are those who have graduated from Military Academies.  Generally, those graduating from ROTC or OTS are granted Reserve Commissions.  The latter group may be offered Regular Commissions at some point in their careers.

Officers who accept a Regular Commission also incur the obligation, at the discretion of the President and Congress, to be re-called to active duty status, despite prior separation from service.  





6/7/2006 10:26:44 AM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:
The sad part is he just fucked up a chunk of his future over a deployment.  Why do these guys always say "...I don't support this war."  Is your support of a war (for or against) based only on participation?  If he had a brain he could have deployed and requested to be the mess officer or some such shit.  But no, he needs to try and place cowerdice under a banner of moral courage against a war.  



___

True, and more than that I would suspect.  If he's seperated with a less than honorable discharge, it will haunt him the rest of his life...as it should.



6/7/2006 10:27:57 AM EDT
[#48]

Quoted:
There are two categories of officers; those holding a Reserve or Regular Commission.

Officers holding a Regular Commission are those who have graduated from Military Academies.  Generally, those graduating from ROTC or OTS are granted Reserve Commissions.  The latter group may be offered Regular Commissions at some point in their careers.

Officers who accept a Regular Commission also incur the obligation, at the discretion of the President and Congress, to be re-called to active duty status, despite prior separation from service.  

So what advantage does a Regular Commission have? (Besides being a ring-knocker for the USMA grads)

Kharn
6/7/2006 10:29:08 AM EDT
[#49]

...Serving in the US military is an honor beset with duty, sacrifice and tradition.  Many whom live in this country, a few even on this site, with medical disqualifiers have none the less tried to get into that military without success...


I know several, and they are still patriotic and willing to defend this country should the situation arise. I know one guy that went though OCS twice because of shin splints and he wouldn't give up. I know another guy that was turned down by the Army because of a bee sting allergy, so he joined the Air Force and after it was found out about the bee sting allergy he was discharged. I know one guy that was in the Air Force with a bad knee that really pushed himself and three days short of graduating was discharged. There are many more stories of people that WANT to serve this country and medically couldn't join the military.

So this guy doesn't believe in "this" war. Well, which war would he believe in? Germany never attacked us, and other than that shit in Hawaii, Japan never really attacked us. Hell, other than the British on two occasions, nobody ever really attacked the continental USA. So, what war would this lieutenant ever support?
6/7/2006 10:30:18 AM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:

Quoted:
The sad part is he just fucked up a chunk of his future over a deployment.  Why do these guys always say "...I don't support this war."  Is your support of a war (for or against) based only on participation?  If he had a brain he could have deployed and requested to be the mess officer or some such shit.  But no, he needs to try and place cowerdice under a banner of moral courage against a war.  



___

True, and more than that I would suspect.  If he's seperated with a less than honorable discharge, it will haunt him the rest of his life...as it should.






I can see him having to serve maximum sentances from a Court-Martial, he will be gray when he gets out of Leavenworth.
Previous Page
/ 3
Next Page