im almost to the point i cant stand living in this world. people in general make me sick. i cant turn on the news without seeing some senseless rape and murder of a beautiful promising young woman, or beating deaths of a old couple by a meth-head for the $14.09 they had in their dresser drawer.
One on the news today, the girls name was Immett. a boucner at a club was asked to escort her to her car. she dissapeared at that time. she was found dumped, bound, raped and murdered. they linked the murder to the bouncer, due to DNA evidence on the zip ties used to restrain her. im so thankful they have a suspect, but so sad this girl had to go through this.
this guy should NOT have been on the streets. i watched the story at the gym so i couldnt get all the details, it looks like the guy is linked to other possible rapes, possibly a murder.... well, they listed SEVEN felonies from the guys past. he should have already taken a dirt nap.
so heres where my question starts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you dissagree with the government obtaining DNA from EVERY person and storing it in case of a later need? and if NOT, why do you dissagree? i feel fingerprints and DNA should be collected from everyone, not just AFTER theyve already committed a crime.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
imagine how many past crimes could be solved, and how many more just may be prevented with people knowing how much more info they could leave behind in a crime. now, i realized people arent always rational or care in most of these, but think of all the unsolved crimes that could be closed.
after all, the only people it would HURT could be the criminals right? not like they are putting a tracker on you... and, in the case of missing persons / jon does / jane does, it could help identify them.