USS Iowa battleship to become monument to homosexuals? - Page 2

General » General Discussion

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - USS Iowa battleship to become monument to homosexuals? (Page 2 of 3)

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:11:27 AM EDT

[#1]

Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

+1 what they are wanting to do with her is not only a disgrace to the ship but a slap in the face to every soldier and sailor that has served.

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:22:50 AM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
fuck, drag her up the muddy miss and dock her in Iowa

I'll be the people of Iowa would love this idea! And they would take proper care of her too. Not this sick shit SF has in mind.

Ummm...would it actually make it up the Mississippi to Iowa???

Muddy bottom or mud sharks. I think she'd rather face the Mississippi.

Draft: 35,7 feet (10.9 meters)

I doubt she'd make it all the way to Davenport, but it would be interesting to see how far up the Mississippi she would make it.

airlift. one ch-53 with a marine crew and they'll get her the rest of the way!

ooorah! semper fi!

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:27:00 AM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:
I would rather spend my taxes to dismantle that son-of-bitch, ship it to Des Moines and reassemble it there in a goddamn koi pond.

I'm in. Let's get the money up.

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:33:34 AM EDT

[#4]

I really FUCKING HATE Kommiefornicatelikehomos.

HOW CAN ANYONE LIVE THERE?

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:34:09 AM EDT

[#5]

Quoted: should have the battleship open up on San Francisco.....help solve the problem.

They should target 37º 47' 20" N, 122º 24' 07" W, fused to explode approx. 90 meters above sea level. It's Diane Feinswine's office.

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:34:52 AM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
Bring her to the coast of Virginia and make a museum out of her.

But it would be far more dignified to scuttle the ship in the deepest part of the Pacific before allowing it to become a floating monument to political correctness.

Let me know where to send the check....

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:36:50 AM EDT

[#7]

YES! Send her to SF! Let her then shell the crap out of those Commie, lib-fag-loven trators...

I, for one, am getting tired of waiting for the great quake to slide 'em into the Pasific...

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:37:47 AM EDT

[#8]

I believe Stockton, CA is still the current lead contender, given the SF Board of Governor's position.

I think you guys are looking at it the wrong way. There are people in SF who object to the Blue Angels visiting every year. (Not many, but a vocal amount). Can you imagine the finger it would give them if all of a sudden every time they looked out of their Nob Hill window, there's this dirty great battlewagon sitting on the edge of their city, for all time?

NTM

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:42:06 AM EDT

[#9]

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a former San Francisco mayor, helped secure $3 million to tow the Iowa from Rhode Island to the Bay Area in 2001 in hopes of making touristy Fisherman's Wharf its new home.

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:44:12 AM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a former San Francisco mayor, helped secure $3 million to tow the Iowa from Rhode Island to the Bay Area in 2001 in hopes of making touristy Fisherman's Wharf its new home.

I also believe she had that appropriation written so by law the Iowa must stay in CA.

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:45:22 AM EDT

[#11]

I hate Talifornia and "their people" more and more each day.

Call me what you want but I could care less if the whole state imploded.

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:47:27 AM EDT

[#12]

Are they going to film gay porn on it, too?

Posted: 1/31/2006 8:53:37 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a former San Francisco mayor, helped secure $3 million to tow the Iowa from Rhode Island to the Bay Area in 2001 in hopes of making touristy Fisherman's Wharf its new home.

I also believe she had that appropriation written so by law the Iowa must stay in CA.

The SF LGBT doesn't want it....this is Feinstein's bright idea to attract tourists. She trying to make it attractive to the SF LGBT and she trying to make this a gay thing to get the SF supervisors to buy off on it.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:14:08 AM EDT

[#14]

I saw a bunch of self important leftist homo assholes on T.V. talking about this. What a sick bunch of fairy fucks. I was truly disgusted by them. hate filled bigots and poo stabbers YUCK. Fuck san fran. Let the Iowa go to Stockton.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:21:12 AM EDT

[#15]

Move her to New Orleans. Next time there is looting the good guys will have some fire support.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:23:44 AM EDT

[#16]

Quoted:
I really FUCKING HATE Kommiefornicatelikehomos.

HOW CAN ANYONE LIVE THERE?

unfortunately prk is a beautiful state. it's just the stupid people far outnumber the good people.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:24:00 AM EDT

[#17]

We will take here in TX for sure!

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:25:20 AM EDT

[#18]

Quoted:
Move her to New Orleans. Next time there is looting the good guys will have some fire support.

good plan!

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:25:52 AM EDT

[#19]

Quoted:
fuck, drag her up the muddy miss and dock her in Iowa

+1, it belongs in Iowa

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:26:39 AM EDT

[#20]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a former San Francisco mayor, helped secure $3 million to tow the Iowa from Rhode Island to the Bay Area in 2001 in hopes of making touristy Fisherman's Wharf its new home.

I also believe she had that appropriation written so by law the Iowa must stay in CA.

The SF LGBT doesn't want it....this is Feinstein's bright idea to attract tourists. She trying to make it attractive to the SF LGBT and she trying to make this a gay thing to get the SF supervisors to buy off on it.

Right.

The liberals out in San Fran DO NOT WANT IT.

Only Feinstein did and she was rejected.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:30:50 AM EDT

[#21]

I want the USS Iowa preserved and will more then happy to donate money ......we just need to find a good place to put her.

Or better yet....put her back in service, I can think of a few places that 16 in guns would come in handy.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:39:26 AM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:
I want the USS Iowa preserved and will more then happy to donate money ......we just need to find a good place to put her.

Or better yet....put her back in service, I can think of a few places that 16 in guns would come in handy.

And if she MUST be scrapped, use the scrap metal to make missiles to fight the war in Iraq.

What better way to piss off the peaceniks.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:42:10 AM EDT

[#23]

Hey here is an idea.........lets make a historical cruise ship out of her. Keep her just as she is and charter her out for cruises.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:45:33 AM EDT

[#24]

Quoted:
I really FUCKING HATE Kommiefornicatelikehomos.

HOW CAN ANYONE LIVE THERE?

Easy, San FAGcisco isn't California. it's a lil fag nation within California.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:47:34 AM EDT

[#25]

Quoted:
I hate Talifornia and "their people" more and more each day.

Call me what you want but I could care less if the whole state imploded.

That's ok Pal, we hate you too!

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:54:45 AM EDT

[#26]

Quoted:
Hey here is an idea.........lets make a historical cruise ship out of her. Keep her just as she is and charter her out for cruises.

I'll buy stock in that venture.

She can cruise the beaches of Normandy, stand watch at Iwo Jima, steam up and down the coasts of Iraq, circumnavigate the boot of Italy, - you know, all the vacation spots AMERICANS have created out of socialist dictatorship crap holes.

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:55:58 AM EDT

[#27]

Posted: 1/31/2006 9:57:39 AM EDT

[#28]

Aren't these ships as a general rule still the property of the US government? If so, I could see the Navy reclaiming their vessel before a museum like that was founded. Look at how the Air Force relocated a B-36 Peacemaker because of the problems involving the community and it's storage, I could see the Navy doing that with the Iowa.

Posted: 1/31/2006 10:00:54 AM EDT

[#29]

Quoted:
Hey here is an idea.........lets make a historical cruise ship out of her. Keep her just as she is and charter her out for cruises.

That's not a half bad idea.

And for a fee, let someone pull the trigger on one of them big guns.

Hell! I hate the water and even I would sign up for a cruise like that just to pull the trigger on the biggest gunpowder powered can of whupass ever made.

But I have to watch what I am saying here!

I might give someone further evidence of my supporting the "gay agenda".....

Posted: 1/31/2006 10:09:49 AM EDT

[#30]

Maybe we should fill it up with homosexuals, and then sink it.

Posted: 1/31/2006 10:14:09 AM EDT

[#31]

Quoted:
Hey here is an idea.........lets make a historical cruise ship out of her. Keep her just as she is and charter her out for cruises.

heh, can you see somali pirates trying to hijack that cruise ship?

Posted: 1/31/2006 10:15:07 AM EDT

[#32]

What a disgrace....

ANdy

Posted: 1/31/2006 10:42:13 AM EDT

[#33]

Quoted:
What a disgrace....

ANdy

Hey man, we might need your help with funds to drag old girl up to Iowa. Since the exchange rate is about one pound for a dollar eighty, support from that side of the Atlantic would give us a bigger bang for the buck, er pound.

Posted: 1/31/2006 11:27:14 AM EDT

[#34]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey here is an idea.........lets make a historical cruise ship out of her. Keep her just as she is and charter her out for cruises.

I'll buy stock in that venture.

She can cruise the beaches of Normandy, stand watch at Iwo Jima, steam up and down the coasts of Iraq, circumnavigate the boot of Italy, - you know, all the vacation spots AMERICANS have created out of socialist dictatorship crap holes.

Heck...who wouldn't want to take a cruise like that.

Posted: 1/31/2006 11:56:30 AM EDT

[#35]

HELL NO !

Sink her first ,she deserves that much respect.

Filling a large ship with homos and then sinking it sounds like
a good idea ,but not this ship

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:01:01 PM EDT

[#36]

Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:06:23 PM EDT

[#37]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

advocates of the move are trying to woo the supervisors with a promise to create a privately funded dockside museum that will tell the story of minorities in the military, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:10:35 PM EDT

[#38]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

advocates of the move are trying to woo the supervisors with a promise to create a privately funded dockside museum that will tell the story of minorities in the military, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.

What about alcoholics? Alcoholics have served with distinction. Where's their museum?

Bullshit. Placing a special-interest museum alongside (and having an annual "peace conference" on board, as well) is an attempt to coopt the battleship for political reasons.

The Iowa was able to float on her own, she should be able dock on her own.

Let the ass pirates find another national treasure to desecrate.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:15:24 PM EDT

[#39]

Quoted: What about the gay veterans that served on the ship?

They don't count. They're gay. They are a drain on resources. Gays in the military should be used for important functions only such as: target practice, cannon fodder, labor, human shields, ballast, etc.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:16:18 PM EDT

[#40]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

advocates of the move are trying to woo the supervisors with a promise to create a privately funded dockside museum that will tell the story of minorities in the military, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.

Are you a sleeper agent from DU?

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:20:13 PM EDT

[#41]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

advocates of the move are trying to woo the supervisors with a promise to create a privately funded dockside museum that will tell the story of minorities in the military, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.

What about alcoholics? Alcoholics have served with distinction. Where's their museum?

Bullshit. Placing a special-interest museum alongside (and having an annual "peace conference" on board, as well) is an attempt to coopt the battleship for political reasons.

The Iowa was able to float on her own, she should be able dock on her own.

Let the ass pirates find another national treasure to desecrate.

Well actually the only reason they trying to have the Iowa there is about tourism....not political reasons. The ass pirates [your term] don't care about the ship and I'm sure would rather see the money spend on alot of other things.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:20:57 PM EDT

[#42]

Quoted:
Quoted:
What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

What about alcoholics? Alcoholics have served with distinction. Where's their museum?

Bullshit. .

This is the problem with all this "army of one" crap.

EVERY FRIGGEN special interest group is gonna want recognition.

The military ain;t about validating homosexuality (or heterosexuality for that matter)

Its about killing people and breaking things in defense of the nation.

It is NO ONES political hammer.

Individualists can go elsewhere. Our military is about collective defense, NOT personal expression.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:24:33 PM EDT

[#43]

Quoted:
Quoted: What about the gay veterans that served on the ship?
They don't count. They're gay. They are a drain on resources. Gays in the military should be used for important functions only such as: target practice, cannon fodder, labor, human shields, ballast, etc.

Well since you put it that way......I hope they do dock it in SF........should make a great makeout spot.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:26:52 PM EDT

[#44]

Quoted:
Well actually the only reason they trying to have the Iowa there is about tourism....not political reasons. The ass pirates [your term] don't care about the ship and I'm sure would rather see the money spend on alot of other things.

here is my main problem with this. 1 week ago the city leaders were raising hell about how hell would freeze over before they EVER let a symbol of american imperialism and the US military reside in their city.

Fast forward 1 week and they are more than happy to allow it on the basis that it is a HOMOSEXUAL monument. Allowing this peice of history to be used as a promotion of a sexual lifestyle is wrong, period. I don't care if it's a tribute to to straight soldiers or those that prefer s&m. ANY sexual theme of ANY kind in such a memorial and display of our nations history is inappropriate and an insult to ALL who have served in the past.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:28:56 PM EDT

[#45]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

advocates of the move are trying to woo the supervisors with a promise to create a privately funded dockside museum that will tell the story of minorities in the military, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.

What about alcoholics? Alcoholics have served with distinction. Where's their museum?

Bullshit. Placing a special-interest museum alongside (and having an annual "peace conference" on board, as well) is an attempt to coopt the battleship for political reasons.

The Iowa was able to float on her own, she should be able dock on her own.

Let the ass pirates find another national treasure to desecrate.

Well actually the only reason they trying to have the Iowa there is about tourism....not political reasons. The ass pirates [your term] don't care about the ship and I'm sure would rather see the money spend on alot of other things.

Again, Bullshit.
They don't want it there, agreed. The people that do want the tourism that it will generate.
But they do care about it. If it's coming, they cannot let the opportunity pass to make yet another statement. It's as undeniable as their promiscuity.

Posted: 1/31/2006 12:52:45 PM EDT

[#46]

To hell with those douche bags.

What they are doing is tantamount to spitting in the face in the face of every veteran and trodding up the graves of good men and women who gave their life in service to the ideals of this country.

Men and women died, in distant lands, far from home and family in order that ALL Americans might live on to enjoy the freedoms we seem to take for granted these days.

That includes the freedom to act like a raving lunatic, froth at the mouth, wear birkenstocks, save the whales and parrot the latest barking-moonbat battle-cry.

You think it's bad being gay or transgender or whatever the fuck else you are here in the United States, go try in some Worker's Paradise like China. Really...I mean, have at it. Go stand in Tianamen Sqaure and champion gay rights at the top of your lungs. Be sure to write back and tell all us knuckle-draggin' red-staters what it feels like to be mashed into putty under the treads of a T-72.

Better yet, invent a time-machine, go back in time and tell all those boys who are just about to jump off the Higgin's Boats at Omaha Beach just not to bother, since the military has been so nasty to you here in your latte-sipping future. When you come back to a Nazi-dominated western hemisphere, ring up Himmler's great-grandson and tell him you need him to get gay rights on his agenda ASAP. Maybe he'll send you to one of those snazzy "resort" camps, or more likely, he'll just send some nice men in jackboots to tattoo your forearm and present you with your pink triangle that you must wear on every article of clothing....while you are waiting for your slot in the oven.

I don't care one way or another what your personal preference runs to regarding bedroom antics. I do care when idiots dishonor the service of those who sacrifed thier youth, and in many cases, thier lives, so that you could be free today to do pretty much whatever you please.

I swear, some people just need a good, solid kick in the teeth. /Rant off.

Sheep

Posted: 1/31/2006 1:01:12 PM EDT

[#47]

Is it totally out of the question to nuke san francisco?

Posted: 1/31/2006 1:04:58 PM EDT

[#48]

Quoted:
Quoted:
fuck, drag her up the muddy miss and dock her in Iowa

+1, it belongs in Iowa

Yeah forget doing somehting that would make sense.

This makes me

Posted: 1/31/2006 1:31:22 PM EDT

[#49]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Well actually the only reason they trying to have the Iowa there is about tourism....not political reasons. The ass pirates [your term] don't care about the ship and I'm sure would rather see the money spend on alot of other things.

here is my main problem with this. 1 week ago the city leaders were raising hell about how hell would freeze over before they EVER let a symbol of american imperialism and the US military reside in their city.

Fast forward 1 week and they are more than happy to allow it on the basis that it is a HOMOSEXUAL monument. Allowing this peice of history to be used as a promotion of a sexual lifestyle is wrong, period. I don't care if it's a tribute to to straight soldiers or those that prefer s&m. ANY sexual theme of ANY kind in such a memorial and display of our nations history is inappropriate and an insult to ALL who have served in the past.

No the main problem here is simple..........WE [gays] DIDN'T ASK TO HAVE THE FUCKING THING IN THE FIRST FUCKING PLACE...But Swinestein wants the city of SF in move it and pay for its up keep so she can get more tourist dollars.....and she is COMING TO US for our support. WE didn't ask the Navy for a Battleship....but if WE are going to have to pay our tax dollars for it up keep then WE want our little LGBT sign on it.

Posted: 1/31/2006 1:37:24 PM EDT

[#50]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I rather see her sunk than boarded by libtards.

My thoughts exactly. Could you imagine the insult to the men who served on her?

What about the gay veterans that served on the ship? also they are not talking about hanging a Gay Pride flag from the Iowa

advocates of the move are trying to woo the supervisors with a promise to create a privately funded dockside museum that will tell the story of minorities in the military, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender troops.

What about alcoholics? Alcoholics have served with distinction. Where's their museum?

Bullshit. Placing a special-interest museum alongside (and having an annual "peace conference" on board, as well) is an attempt to coopt the battleship for political reasons.

The Iowa was able to float on her own, she should be able dock on her own.

Let the ass pirates find another national treasure to desecrate.

Well actually the only reason they trying to have the Iowa there is about tourism....not political reasons. The ass pirates [your term] don't care about the ship and I'm sure would rather see the money spend on alot of other things.

Again, Bullshit.
They don't want it there, agreed. The people that do want the tourism that it will generate.
But they do care about it. If it's coming, they cannot let the opportunity pass to make yet another statement. It's as undeniable as their promiscuity.

THEY ARE SELLING GAYS THE BATTLESHIP........IT DIDN'T JUST SHOW UP AND WE TOOK IT OVER

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - USS Iowa battleship to become monument to homosexuals? (Page 2 of 3)

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us