User Panel
Posted: 1/6/2006 6:49:22 PM EDT
By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer
1 hour, 19 minutes ago WASHINGTON - An unreleased Pentagon study of fatal torso wounds to Marines killed in Iraq found that most might have been prevented or minimized if they had been wearing improved body armor. The study last summer by the Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner looked at 93 fatal wounds from the start of the war in March 2003 through June 2005 and concluded that 74 of them were bullet or shrapnel wounds to shoulders or areas of the torso not protected by ceramic armor plating. The findings underscore the difficulty facing the Army and Marine Corps in providing the optimum level of body armor protection in a war against an insurgency whose tactics are constantly changing. Both the Army and the Marine Corps have weighed the expected payoff in additional safety from extra armor against the measurable loss of combat effectiveness from too much armor. <snip> eta: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060107/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/iraq_body_armor Didn't know if this might be a dupe. Seems straight forward enough. My daughter is headed for the sandbox in a couple of months with her unit (second trip). Helo mechanic. As I have been retired for some time, would someone give a brief on the current body armor? The daughter-unit says she has "air warrior" type gear. Thanks in advance |
|
this idiot seems to want these guys to get ceramic armor body casts or something
|
|
Air warior is good stuff, same level of protection as "interceptor" armor. level 3 kevlar vest, trauma plate over torso, integrated extraction harness. camel back slot, no shoulder protection that I know of. If she has any extra kevlar have her sit on it to protect from small arms fire , unless of course her bird has BASS; in which case she is flying in a tank.
tell her good luck safe skies. also if you google FT Rucker and air warrior you can find all the high speed kit they issue out these days vin |
|
No warfighter would ever die in conflict if we encased them in a vest made from 12" of rolled homogenous steel. But that's just not practical. Body armor is a compromise between protection and weight & mobility.
Kharn |
|
what i dont understand is....
why they havent started issuing loaves of bread to duct tape to LBV's |
|
|
|
|
Indeed; however, if death could be prevented by providing our soldiers with better body armor, or, in some cases, any body armor at all, and we fail to provide it, we are added to the list of those responsible for our men's deaths. My motto is,"if you say you support the war, PROVE IT!". Either join the military yourself or donate to those that are fighting for your freedom, otherwise your words ring hollow. |
|
|
One vote for accelerating all research leading upto our Mk.1 (first operational) Power Armor unit.
|
|
Body Armor causes causality's. Isn't that like guns causes crime.
|
|
+1 The reality of war is unfortunetly that men die. You just have to kill more of the motherfuckers than they kill of yours. |
|
|
I think that old_painless disproved that old wives tale. Contrary to popular belief, wonderbread will not stop a bullet. |
|
|
no, but it does cause the bullet to start tumbling prior to contacting the vest, giving it more surface area to "catch" it on |
||
|
If that is directed at me, I've all ready submitted my application to the Marine Corps for the officer PLC program, thanks. |
||
|
True, I hadn't thought about how well it would work when paired with standard armor. |
|||
|
There is a point at which loss of combat effectiveness is more likely to get you killed… no matter what body armor you have. To protect those Marines from “bullet or shrapnel wounds to shoulders or areas of the torso not protected by ceramic armor plating” would probably weight them down to the extent that they become more likely to be killed. There is absolutely a point at which the extra weight becomes a liability and not an asset. |
|
|
Even 7.62 x 39? |
|||
|
they dont call it "wonder" bread for nothing |
||||
|
I think I would blame the bullets and sharpnel from IEDs/VBIEDs.
|
|
I guess so... I will have to get a couple of loafs for the nightstand. |
|||||
|
|
I 'donate' every two weeks when I get a pay stub, under the heading 'FICA' Every taxpayer is a supporter, whether they like it or not. You don't have to join, not that I haven't thought about it, or even donate extra to suppport our troops to support them. The moral and emotional support is just as important. To say otherwise is a slap in the face to all the military wives and familes. |
||
|
You know, that is going to sound like the stupidest thing someone ever read, if that someone does not spend way the hell too much time on AR15.com. |
|
|
That deserves a full power shot. |
||
|
and you dont have a fucking clue as to what FICA is this might help a bit |
|
|
Just as you must support abortion since you pay tax dollars that end up going towards abortions, or support welfare because your taxes go to that too. No, tax dollars are something that are taken from us whether we support the war or not, so it really doesn't show you support the troops. As for the families of our soldiers, I think that the sacrifice and committment of their brother/father/husband/son to the war in Iraq is enough of a support. |
|||
|
hey guy... I work 14 hours a day and pay taxes on the money I earn. I support the war and so do my tax dollars. My tax dollars (40k per year) go to paying for things like war. |
|
|
You know, I bet a lot of guys got killed by their inability to fly, as well.
Some people just need to STFU. This has become a nation of spineless pussies. Oh noes! It's a bloodbath! Somebody forgot to issue superman suits!!1!11 ETA: I'm all for body armor and all that, but it doesn't matter. You could ship people off in armor that stopped everything short of an RPG head to toe, and you'd read reports about how our new Heavy Armored Infantry Starcraft Space Marines are insufficiently protected against direct hits from RPGs, a common weapon used by the enemy. You could have an a Humvee run over a small tactical nuke, and Wolf Blitzer would have been complaining about the lack of armor on the vehicle, when that was the bitch. Fortunately, that bullshit is passe, now. |
|
While I'm sure that the troops would love to be encased in armor head to toe, it just isn't practical with our current technology. The armor load is heavy enough. If you increase it much more you reduce mobility and increase fatigue.
I'm sure this debate went on in Roman times too you know. So and so wanted better armor for the troops, when the current issue was what, 60 lbs? So it didn't cover the arms so well, or the legs. It was the best they could do at the time...now if someone invents a new steel alloy that is 1/10th the weight of regular steel, heck even a ceramic composite that's 25% the weight of current designs, great. It's easy to stand on the sidelines and bitch about this and that, when you've never even tried on the current issue armor. Load that critic up with current issue armor, and a typical combat load, and then see if he wants to add 10-20lbs more to that. Now wear it in 120 degrees dude... |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.