Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
Posted: 12/20/2005 10:38:59 AM EDT
Link Posted: 12/20/2005 10:46:23 AM EDT
Care to elaborate?
Link Posted: 12/20/2005 10:47:55 AM EDT
November 6, 2003

Rockefeller memo (or, our strategy on politicizing the Senate intelligence committee and undermining the war effort)

We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard.

For example, in addition to the President's State of the Union speech, the chairman [Sen. Pat Roberts] has agreed to look at the activities of the office of the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department.

The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and cosigns our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. [We can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.]

2) Assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it.

In that regard we may have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims. We will contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry.

The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an Independent Commission [i.e., the Corzine Amendment.]

3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation of the administration's use of intelligence at any time. But we can only do so once.

The best time to do so will probably be next year, either:

A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report, thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public. Additional views on the interim report (1). The announcement of our independent investigation (2). And (3) additional views on the final investigation. Or:

B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue, we would attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the use of intelligence.

In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter footdragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman. We have independently submitted written requests to the DOD and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war.

The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives.
Link Posted: 12/20/2005 10:49:44 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/20/2005 10:50:11 AM EDT by CRC]
He knew all along about Bush's 'spying' and he recently produced a letter making him out to look like an ignorant idiot on the issue.


He was totally 'in the loop' about Bush's NSA dealings
Link Posted: 12/20/2005 10:55:49 AM EDT

Originally Posted By CRC:
He knew all along about Bush's 'spying' and he recently produced a letter making him out to look like an ignorant idiot on the issue.


He was totally 'in the loop' about Bush's NSA dealings



It's a really weird document. Is this sort of thing normal? It's dated July 17, 2003

wid.ap.org/documents/051219rockefeller.pdf

It's a letter to Cheney, basically it says "Gosh this is all over my head since I'm neither a technician nor a lawyer, so I'm not going to walk where angels fear to tread and bow out from all this. BTW, I made a copy of this letter and am sealing it in an envelope in case anything we discussed comes to pass so there's a record we talked about this."
Top Top