Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
Well, the main purpose of the 9mm round in a light compact carbine is for home defense, or any other indoor CQB. It's a NATO caliber, has light recoil for easy follow up's, even with the petite or aged(a concern, should my family members need to use it), safer to fire indoors, better on the old ears, ammo is interchangeable with my serious sidearm, the USF9F, and with 9mm 124 gr. Hydrashoks in either one, and the acceptable velocity from a "16 bbl, I wouldn't feel underarmed in most situations.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not giving up my 5.56 AR's for anything, but the advantages I listed above are compelling enough that I feel that either one fills a niche in my arsenal.
Now, as to which one to get, I'm still torn. I didn't hear any serious objections to either the AR or the HK, and didn't really expect to. Pros and cons, I already had pretty much figured out, and none of them, or anything added by you guys really "makes or breaks" the deal. I'm probably going to go with the AR15, as I can't really see the compelling advantage right now, that's worth the extra cost of an HK94. (OK, so I was stretching it when I indicated that price was not an object. Reliability is the main concern, but I'm not covinced that I can get a reliable 9mm AR15, and save some cash for an Aimpoint).
One of the slightly more major concerns is magazines, as I don't feel comfortable without a large supply of mags for any serious "social" weapon. 30 and 40 round mil. contract mags now run at $25 and $30, respectively.
Thanks for your input, all.
Juggernaut