Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 7/24/2001 4:04:17 AM EDT
Check out the latest updates here, including these two cases (Bean v. BATF/USA & U.S. v. White) involving Judges on the Emerson 3-Judge panel and an update on an anti-gun U.S. attorney (Bill Mateja) being denied a higher DOJ position!: [url]https://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=1763[/url]
View Quote
Link Posted: 7/24/2001 4:23:01 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 7/24/2001 4:21:31 AM EDT by Admiral_Crunch]
Link was a little scrawed. Had two "http"'s. I think the url tags don't work right if you put the http inside. [url]www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=1763[/url]
Link Posted: 7/24/2001 4:23:26 AM EDT
Let's try it like this. Norm [url]www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=1763[/url]
Link Posted: 7/24/2001 5:14:29 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 7/24/2001 5:12:59 AM EDT by mtnpatriot]
I always forget that there is an extra http included when you "cut" from a secured site. Thanks. Edited cause I aint great at spellin
Link Posted: 7/24/2001 4:52:21 PM EDT
Man, those people are going to give me heart disease! Why wont they hurry up already!
Link Posted: 7/24/2001 4:59:41 PM EDT
Ya know, if I'm not mistaken there are three or five judges. There must be a split with the middle guy not sure yet, otherwise they probably would have had a decision by know. But what do I know...
Link Posted: 7/24/2001 8:43:19 PM EDT
Originally Posted By mtnpatriot: Ya know, if I'm not mistaken there are three or five judges. There must be a split with the middle guy not sure yet, otherwise they probably would have had a decision by know. But what do I know...
View Quote
It was a three judge panel, two of which own guns. One commented on Mateja's position that it shouldn't bother him (Mateja) that between the two of them they had enough guns to "supply a South American revolution" or something to that effect. The longer it takes the more I fear that they are trying to come up with legalese weasle-words that will state "Yes, the right to possess firearms is an individual one, but the government has compelling state interest in regulating them that overreaches the "shall not be infringed" clause". And I keep hoping I'm wrong, that they're finally going to make the Supreme Court answer the damned question.
Top Top