Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
4/26/2005 12:37:12 AM EDT
[#1]
That thing has grifter scam written all over it.
4/26/2005 12:40:39 AM EDT
[#2]
I was just wondering if the math held up as I am math impared.
4/26/2005 3:02:09 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
I was just wondering if the math held up as I am math impared.



3 laws of thermodynamics:

- You can't exceed 100% efficiency in doing any work i.e. you can't get more out than you put in.

- You can't even get to 100%

- You can't even get close.


Therefore, claims of "1400% efficiency" = massive BS.

My .02.

Merlin
4/26/2005 3:06:12 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I was just wondering if the math held up as I am math impared.



3 laws of thermodynamics:

- You can't exceed 100% efficiency in doing any work i.e. you can't get more out than you put in.

- You can't even get to 100%

- You can't even get close.


Therefore, claims of "1400% efficiency" = massive BS.

My .02.

Merlin



+1
4/26/2005 5:26:28 AM EDT
[#5]
I see friction in that device.

It's BS.
4/26/2005 5:49:17 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I was just wondering if the math held up as I am math impared.



3 laws of thermodynamics:

- You can't exceed 100% efficiency in doing any work i.e. you can't get more out than you put in.

- You can't even get to 100%

- You can't even get close.


Therefore, claims of "1400% efficiency" = massive BS.

My .02.

Merlin



I'm always willing to consider magical engines, but they always let me down.  So far the laws of thermodynamics seem to be pretty consistent on this issue.

Jim
4/26/2005 5:51:14 AM EDT
[#7]

The second law of thermodynamics ARFCOM:
The disorder in a system is always increasing.

4/26/2005 5:52:20 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

The second law of thermodynamics ARFCOM:
The disorder in a system is always increasing.




Astute observation, sir......
4/26/2005 5:55:30 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:

The second law of thermodynamics ARFCOM:
The disorder in a system is always increasing.




Astute observation, sir......




I think Sarge did a movie about it once. And stop calling me astute.
4/26/2005 5:56:48 AM EDT
[#10]

Efficiency work out / work in * 100 = 211.8HP / 15.41 HP * 100 = 1,374.43%
Fluid Motor/Pump  work out /  work in * 100 = 60.53HP / 12.84 HP *100 = 471.42%

The efficiency of a machine, which is defined as the ratio of the work output to the work input, is always less than one, since some of the input is invariably wasted in overcoming friction.



 Um, the last sentence is true, but it completely contradicts the claimed data right above it, if I'm reading it right.
4/26/2005 6:04:59 AM EDT
[#11]
OMG  a math topic and CK hasn't been here yet?
Say it isn't so.
4/26/2005 7:55:25 AM EDT
[#12]
Woah, a topic I feel knowledgeable about (unlike spelling).

Ok, he claims a 1400% ratio of work in to work out.


Wout/Win=14

Right?

Well efficiency is Wnet/Qin   or  The net work of the system over the amount of heat put into the system.

So without doing any math, that claim of high work ratio could happen I guess, but there is still gobs of heat that must be used, thus lots of fuel.

lemme look at it some more and Ill edit more in.

EDIT

Ok, there is nothing on that site that gives me anything I can use. It is all conversions and straight formulas that I havent learned yet. But he is still not using the right efficiency formula.

work out should always be more than work in, other wise you dont get anywhere. But it is the thermal input that he is not using.

Maybe I dont understand what he is saying, but it all looks like he is making the number say what he wants to hear.
4/26/2005 8:34:17 AM EDT
[#13]

Put it this way.  If you get 1400 units of energy out for 100 units of energy put in, then you could recycle 100 units of the 1400 to power the machine.

It would then run forever, pumping out 1300 units of energy every cycle.

The site is either playing the numbers game on purpose (throw down a lot of math looking stuff and hope the gullible will buy it) or they don't knwo what they're talking about at all and are copying constants and formulas from the inside cover of a first year thermodynamics text.

Jim