I think it depends on just how much of the IP and institutional knowledge that we can extract from the place.  If we were able to get plans and the people with the knowledge then I do believe we could have something up and running sooner.  It might well be a few generations back, but it wouldn’t be stone aged.

The company I’m at has some backend software we need to deploy soon and I was relieved when the powers that be wanted to avoid cloud. On-prem will still be gtg after the party starts, but I have my doubts about cloud.  I’ve been trying to get my hands on inexpensive spares for hardware when the opportunity arises.

We could do far better if we didn’t have all the problems we’re having - many of which are self imposed but I’m looking at how things are rather than I wished them to be

Actually he is a spring chicken at 70.  I think his parents lived until their 90s.  Mother still alive..

Been there.  Impressive amount of work going on.

I figure China already has spies working inside who can thwart any move to disable or destroy the equipment.

What makes you think the control is in country?

Sometimes I think one of the reasons the US stayed in Afghanistan for twenty years was to prevent a pipeline being built through there to connect Iran and China.  Yes, the US is not toothless, the war would be horrible, I don't think the CCP would survive, but if we dodged a nuclear exchange whatever polity emerged in China would have a good industrial stance to build up from, and it will still be just antagonistic to us as the CCP is or the ROC would have been if it had won their Civil War.

China definitely wishes it could get there

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/05/27/tech/china-semiconductor-investment-fund-intl-hnk

Attached File

There is more to Taiwan than computer chips or China's goal of reunification, and it is a similar issue to what is driving the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Not the sole reason, but a strong contributing factor: maintaining access to the sea for trade.

Look at a map of Asia, and notice that China has various other nations on all the islands that surround their coast. Taiwan is key because if China possessed it, it would give them a buffer of access, it is right in the center of sea access bounded by Japan to the north, and the Philippines to the south. China is a nation dependent on sea trade, both in and out of the country.

Similarly, Russia is even more heavily constrained. Though it is the largest country on earth, it has surprisingly few seaports in the west. And these very few ports are within waters with multiple potentially contested seas between them and the open ocean. It is a potential choke point to their economy that the US cannot relate to. We have thousands of miles of uncontested coastline. When the Key Bridge was destroyed, we considered it a national imperative to restore it, but realistically, the nation has literally dozens of other port cities. Russia has a mere handful of port cities, so they are going to react very differently to even a perceived loss of access.

I'm not saying that both Russia and China could not still be secure by simply being peaceful and more cooperative with their neighbors, or that I agree with their actions. Both are also authoritarian states, and most authoritarian states do not want to rely on trust and cooperation, they have to have control.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/05/29/asia/chinese-ships-japan-senkaku-islands-intl-hnk-ml

Attached File


Attached File

Current Pacific theater commander - PACOM

Japanese newspaper

https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Picks/Interview/China-s-drills-appear-to-be-rehearsal-for-Taiwan-invasion-U.S.-admiral

Attached File


Attached File

EUV’s are extremely sensitive.  You don’t need fancy software to brick them, and you don’t need to blow them up.  They require a clean room to operate in.  Very little damage to them or their buildings would make them inoperable.

Read a article a few years back that all the machine operators would have to do is,walk away and disappear.
Supposedly they are pretty complex and running them preety much takes a expert trained in each proprietary machine.

So just evact the operators state side and the machines would lay dormant or ruined if not run correctly.
Was something they were gaming out about a invasion.
If the operators were held at gunpoint everything could run as normal but removing the operators was the equivelant of grenading each machine.

Seems these chip making machines only exist there well most of them from what the article said.

Correctly placed thermite grenades.

You don't need grenades or to sabotage the tools. You don't need a single thing. Those tools require maintenance all the time. Precision parts that China will immediately be sanctioned from being able to get. Two weeks, maybe a month, and those tools start dropping like flies. An EUV scanner is an entirely different beast than everything else before it.

I’m still ok with us expending the munitions so as to guarantee there is zero chance of reverse engineering anything from the equipment.

It would have been better to leave Taiwan with Japan after the World War.

@jimmybcool


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/how-chinese-attack-taiwan-could-lead-direct-war-us-beijing.amp


Attached File


Attached File

It takes almost a decade to setup fab up and running for the latest chips.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/06/02/taiwan-separatists-will-be-crushed-to-pieces-warns-china/
Attached File




https://breakingdefense.com/2024/06/chinas-defense-minister-hammers-away-on-taiwan-says-peaceful-unification-chances-eroded/?amp=1


Attached File


Attached File


Attached File