SEIZED FIREARMS STILL HELD DESPITE COURT ORDER - Page 2

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SEIZED FIREARMS STILL HELD DESPITE COURT ORDER (Page 2 of 2)

Posted: 8/27/2004 11:51:11 AM EDT

[#1]

Quoted:
He says he's going to sue and that Johnnie Cochran is interested in his case.

I wonder if Johnny will use the "Chewbacca Defense"??

Posted: 8/27/2004 11:54:18 AM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:
Soooo..................

You people in Kali:

You actually going to DO anything about this to help, or just sit back in the peanut gallery?

What if you are next? Who is going to help you or sit back and think they are "ok because they are under 'le radar'"?

It is Game Over guys. Enjoy the time you have with your toys, they will be gone soon, and if you think otherwise, you will be in jail because you refuse to give up McDonalds, Cable TV, Internet, easy Transportation, Central Heating and A/C....

When you decide what you entirely believe in, you will support that belief to the end. Otherwise, it is a passing hobby.

To paraphrase an old axiom:

"The guy who stays under 'le radar' the longest is the last loser."

Posted: 8/27/2004 12:07:35 PM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:
Soooo..................

You people in Kali:

You actually going to DO anything about this to help, or just sit back in the peanut gallery?

What if you are next? Who is going to help you or sit back and think they are "ok because they are under 'le radar'"?

It is Game Over guys. Enjoy the time you have with your toys, they will be gone soon, and if you think otherwise, you will be in jail because you refuse to give up McDonalds, Cable TV, Internet, easy Transportation, Central Heating and A/C....

When you decide what you entirely believe in, you will support that belief to the end. Otherwise, it is a passing hobby.

Brass,

It's *easy* to say "Do Something!". But what will be effective? Let's here a practical answer that will actually have a chance of achieving the goal, and has at least a possibility of actually happening.

Let me know when you come up with something.

-Troy

Posted: 8/27/2004 12:13:24 PM EDT

[#4]

California should be disbanded from the Union, seeing as they no longer pledge allegiance to the Federal government or the Constituion of the United States of America.

Posted: 8/27/2004 12:18:21 PM EDT

[#5]

Let me know when you come up with something.

...I can think of a few things... Namely removing your oppressors (which is exactly what the governing body of California is) from power.

Seriously, you can't do anything with the ballot in California anymore; which leads me to a favorite phrase of mine: "When all else fails, vote from the rooftops."

Posted: 8/27/2004 2:28:52 PM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
The people doing that to him are the enemies of the constitution and of America. They should be slain where they stand the very instant they come onto his property to do him harm in any way. I have no sympathy for them.

Okay dickweed, you got first watch on guard duty. Make sure you're locked and loaded when you stand guard mount.

Posted: 8/28/2004 10:25:29 PM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:

- nobody deems shit illegal - it's judges and leglisators enforcing and passing laws that make something illegal.

Uh...not in California. Read RR. The legislators explicitly granted the State Attorney General the power to decide which specific weapons would be on the list, AND the authority to add more to the list as he sees fit.

No fooling, look it up.

Posted: 8/29/2004 11:51:25 AM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:
Let me know when you come up with something.

...I can think of a few things... Namely removing your oppressors (which is exactly what the governing body of California is) from power.

Seriously, you can't do anything with the ballot in California anymore; which leads me to a favorite phrase of mine: "When all else fails, vote from the rooftops."

What I'm looking for here is a PLAN to accomplish this. It's easy to say "you guys should do this." It's much harder to describe a plan that has even a remote chance of success.

-Troy

Posted: 8/29/2004 11:54:19 AM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
Let me know when you come up with something.

...I can think of a few things... Namely removing your oppressors (which is exactly what the governing body of California is) from power.

Seriously, you can't do anything with the ballot in California anymore; which leads me to a favorite phrase of mine: "When all else fails, vote from the rooftops."

so you're saying they should start assasinating politicians?

Posted: 8/31/2004 2:32:28 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Quoted:

- nobody deems shit illegal - it's judges and leglisators enforcing and passing laws that make something illegal.

Uh...not in California. Read RR. The legislators explicitly granted the State Attorney General the power to decide which specific weapons would be on the list, AND the authority to add more to the list as he sees fit.

No fooling, look it up.

Due process? It's a stretch, at best, but that's all I can think of...........

Posted: 8/31/2004 3:16:04 PM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:
I can think of a good reply, but it would get my account locked.

There are sometimes when I'm glad I don't own a voice activated keyboard too.

Posted: 9/2/2004 1:42:01 PM EDT

[#12]

Quoted:

so you're saying they should start assasinating politicians?

...No. I'm asking where do you draw the line between "representitive government" and "tyranny"?

Posted: 9/4/2004 6:28:36 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:
Quoted:

so you're saying they should start assasinating politicians?

...No. I'm asking where do you draw the line between "representitive government" and "tyranny"?

That's pretty easy to define, if those are the categories you are using; when they suspend elections and emplace leaders at the barrel of a gun or through violent overthrow of the legitimate government, you have tyranny.

Posted: 9/4/2004 6:32:45 AM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

so you're saying they should start assasinating politicians?

...No. I'm asking where do you draw the line between "representitive government" and "tyranny"?

That's pretty easy to define, if those are the categories you are using; when they suspend elections and emplace leaders at the barrel of a gun or through violent overthrow of the legitimate government, you have tyranny.

"They" have elections in France, England, Russia, etc. It is called Socialist Democracy, and we are moving steadily toward it.,

Posted: 9/4/2004 8:13:31 AM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

so you're saying they should start assasinating politicians?

...No. I'm asking where do you draw the line between "representitive government" and "tyranny"?

That's pretty easy to define, if those are the categories you are using; when they suspend elections and emplace leaders at the barrel of a gun or through violent overthrow of the legitimate government, you have tyranny.

"They" have elections in France, England, Russia, etc. It is called Socialist Democracy, and we are moving steadily toward it.,

I would take that to be the voice and will of the people then, as long as the elections are being held fairly.

Posted: 9/4/2004 8:21:19 AM EDT

[#16]

19 firearms is an arsenal?

Posted: 9/4/2004 8:54:18 AM EDT

[#17]

Quoted:
19 firearms is an arsenal?

All in the definition I would say; I would say that 19 individually owned ( versus the total collectively owned within a family, for instance ) firearms is probably more than the quantity of guns you'd find in 3/4 of all gun owning households.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - SEIZED FIREARMS STILL HELD DESPITE COURT ORDER (Page 2 of 2)

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us