Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 14
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 9:02:04 AM EDT
[#1]
Shotguns are fucking epic. Run it.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 9:14:33 AM EDT
[#2]
I think one of the things lost in the argument in AR vs Shotgun is that shotguns have changed....we aren't talking about Daddy's double barrel, or even an 870 or Ithaca M37 from the 70's.

The Benelli's, Berettas, and Mossberg's are way ahead of the old "riot gun".

Interestingly, I have an OLD Hi Standard semi auto shotgun stamped Police Special. I believe it is from the 70's. I got it from a tiny town here in Michigan when the department sold a few firearms. If it wasn't so damned complicated to take down for cleaning I would stash it somewhere in the HD rotation.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 9:20:03 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We are talking about any scenario that can likely happen while in the home. I see your attempt at a defection. A struggle downstairs involving another family member with an intruder is something that can realistically happen.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Are we talking about LARP'ing or home defense?

https://media.tenor.com/wTt1BwZfkfUAAAAC/pulp-fiction-it-aint-the-same-league.gif

We are talking about any scenario that can likely happen while in the home. I see your attempt at a defection. A struggle downstairs involving another family member with an intruder is something that can realistically happen.



Umm, we train for headshots with buckshot. Quite doable at in home distances. Try it sometime at 15' and measure the hole.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 10:33:41 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Umm, we train for headshots with buckshot. Quite doable at in home distances. Try it sometime at 15' and measure the hole.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Are we talking about LARP'ing or home defense?

https://media.tenor.com/wTt1BwZfkfUAAAAC/pulp-fiction-it-aint-the-same-league.gif

We are talking about any scenario that can likely happen while in the home. I see your attempt at a defection. A struggle downstairs involving another family member with an intruder is something that can realistically happen.



Umm, we train for headshots with buckshot. Quite doable at in home distances. Try it sometime at 15' and measure the hole.


I think people believe the shotgun spread in movies = real life
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 10:47:17 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Umm, we train for headshots with buckshot. Quite doable at in home distances. Try it sometime at 15' and measure the hole.
View Quote

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.

Link Posted: 6/6/2023 10:58:07 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That's a poor spread.  You basically get no assistance with your aim from that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not arf Millionaire but there's 10yds with my 1100 12" and Flite Control and that's a long shot indoors.
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/490499/IMG_0145_jpeg-2841803.JPG
Still would like to try some FC #1
That's a poor spread.  You basically get no assistance with your aim from that.

I don’t want help aiming I can aim, I want to deliver a nice solid payload exactly where I intend to.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:09:27 AM EDT
[#7]
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:25:36 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not arf Millionaire but there’s 10yds with my 1100 12” and Flite Control and that’s a long shot indoors.
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/490499/IMG_0145_jpeg-2841803.JPG
Still would like to try some FC #1
View Quote



I regret not buying a case when I had the chance. I hope they start making it again.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:44:58 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? Yes I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.

View Quote


I did it multiple times yesterday. I trained two teenage boys to do it yesterday. What's obvious to me is, that you have not kept up with or ever been shown the capabilities of modern shotguns with modern ammunition. 10 yards precision head shots with buckshot are routine in 2023. Also, there is much less chance of a non instant incapacitation shot using 00 buck. No need to hit the ocular cavity. It's fine if you don't want to run one, but don't shit in threads where you don't know what you are talking about.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:45:47 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:



Umm, we train for headshots with buckshot. Quite doable at in home distances. Try it sometime at 15' and measure the hole.

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.


I have done shoot no shoot close proximity with shotguns. Sighting method is generally the only difference making one shot or the other between the two. One needs height over bore compensated 2” high the other needs a 2-3” opening for pellets. Sighting system with either can be the same if you set them up the same. Now change that to outdoor surgical precision and I agree with you the shotgun begins to quickly be the wrong tool unless you have the ability to transition to slug and even then it’s not as good for me at distance but realistically how many of those are being made even by teams. I won’t disagree this is a rifle world at this stage in the tactical community but there’s still quite a few who kick doors and serve warrants who gravitate to a shotgun for indoor work.

Also I believe a big portion of why that rifles rule in the CQB community is their overall mission. If your training regularly for a variety of scenarios and multiples of those scenarios means a rifle is the better tool for the team then it just makes the most sense to spend all the time on it because it is effective in all of the scenarios. Rather than the mission drive the gear and everyone be 100% on each it makes more sense to say this works for them all and we can maximize time with it. Lots of places did the same with sub guns they weren’t the best in every scenario but if in every training you ran a Mp5 or a UMP you got pretty damn good at making it work at everything. Plus at this stage many of the instructors are GWOT operators who spent many years behind rifles it’s what they know and what they perfected so it’s what they teach to others. Similarly it’s what the average folks who took classes requested so there’s less shotgun classes available these days.

Look at the number of LE agencies who’ve dropped shotguns all together if we can spend X amount of ammo per officer in ammo for long guns and we can say ok we only have to buy M193 vs M193 and Flite control Buck and Truball Slugs means we can have mediocre training with both or moderately ok with one.

ETA: the 2-3” gets smaller as range decreases 10yds is a damn long shot inside most houses least in my area.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:49:34 AM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.

View Quote



Thank God you have a job.  Mine involved years of range instruction and shoothouses.  As for shotguns, perhaps you should stick to subjects you know something about.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:50:54 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I have done shoot no shoot close proximity with shotguns. Sighting method is generally the only difference making one shot or the other between the two. One needs height over bore compensated 2” high the other needs a 2-3” opening for pellets. Sighting system with either can be the same if you set them up the same. Now change that to outdoor surgical precision and I agree with you the shotgun begins to quickly be the wrong tool unless you have the ability to transition to slug and even then it’s not as good for me at distance but realistically how many of those are being made even by teams. I won’t disagree this is a rifle world at this stage in the tactical community but there’s still quite a few who kick doors and serve warrants who gravitate to a shotgun for indoor work.

Also I believe a big portion of why that rifles rule in the CQB community is their overall mission. If your training regularly for a variety of scenarios and multiples of those scenarios means a rifle is the better tool for the team then it just makes the most sense to spend all the time on it because it is effective in all of the scenarios. Rather than the mission drive the gear and everyone be 100% on each it makes more sense to say this works for them all and we can maximize time with it. Lots of places did the same with sub guns they weren’t the best in every scenario but if in every training you ran a Mp5 or a UMP you got pretty damn good at making it work at everything. Plus at this stage many of the instructors are GWOT operators who spent many years behind rifles it’s what they know and what they perfected so it’s what they teach to others. Similarly it’s what the average folks who took classes requested so there’s less shotgun classes available these days.

Look at the number of LE agencies who’ve dropped shotguns all together if we can spend X amount of ammo per officer in ammo for long guns and we can say ok we only have to buy M193 vs M193 and Flite control Buck and Truball Slugs means we can have mediocre training with both or moderately ok with one.
View Quote


Everything you said is valid. We need more posters like you.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:52:36 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Everything you said is valid. We need more posters like you.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I have done shoot no shoot close proximity with shotguns. Sighting method is generally the only difference making one shot or the other between the two. One needs height over bore compensated 2” high the other needs a 2-3” opening for pellets. Sighting system with either can be the same if you set them up the same. Now change that to outdoor surgical precision and I agree with you the shotgun begins to quickly be the wrong tool unless you have the ability to transition to slug and even then it’s not as good for me at distance but realistically how many of those are being made even by teams. I won’t disagree this is a rifle world at this stage in the tactical community but there’s still quite a few who kick doors and serve warrants who gravitate to a shotgun for indoor work.

Also I believe a big portion of why that rifles rule in the CQB community is their overall mission. If your training regularly for a variety of scenarios and multiples of those scenarios means a rifle is the better tool for the team then it just makes the most sense to spend all the time on it because it is effective in all of the scenarios. Rather than the mission drive the gear and everyone be 100% on each it makes more sense to say this works for them all and we can maximize time with it. Lots of places did the same with sub guns they weren’t the best in every scenario but if in every training you ran a Mp5 or a UMP you got pretty damn good at making it work at everything. Plus at this stage many of the instructors are GWOT operators who spent many years behind rifles it’s what they know and what they perfected so it’s what they teach to others. Similarly it’s what the average folks who took classes requested so there’s less shotgun classes available these days.

Look at the number of LE agencies who’ve dropped shotguns all together if we can spend X amount of ammo per officer in ammo for long guns and we can say ok we only have to buy M193 vs M193 and Flite control Buck and Truball Slugs means we can have mediocre training with both or moderately ok with one.


Everything you said is valid. We need more posters like you.

Your username is 100% and thanks

I’m just a guy who uses both and still grabs the shotgun more going inside. I have both because I like options.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:55:15 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I think people believe the shotgun spread in movies = real life
View Quote



That's exactly it.  No first hand experience.

Same with the "brutal recoil" etc comments.  If I can take a troop of Boy Scouts (the oldest being 14) and find that I burn 250 rounds of buckshot when they have no problem at all  making COM hits after 20 minutes of instruction,  then GD just may be wrong.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 11:57:10 AM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



That's exactly it.  No first hand experience.

Same with the "brutal recoil" etc comments.  If I can take a troop of Boy Scouts (the oldest being 14) and find that I burn 250 rounds of buckshot when they have no problem at all  making COM hits after 20 minutes of instruction,  then GD just may be wrong.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


I think people believe the shotgun spread in movies = real life



That's exactly it.  No first hand experience.

Same with the "brutal recoil" etc comments.  If I can take a troop of Boy Scouts (the oldest being 14) and find that I burn 250 rounds of buckshot when they have no problem at all  making COM hits after 20 minutes of instruction,  then GD just may be wrong.

The biggest issue recoil wise imo is the fact the average shotgun didn’t fit the average person. Plus you had instructors pushing the this is a different gun it has to be held differently. Make it fit you then mount it like a rifle and train the way you fight.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:03:53 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The biggest issue recoil wise imo is the fact the average shotgun didn’t fit the average person. Plus you had instructors pushing the this is a different gun it has to be held differently. Make it fit you then mount it like a rifle and train the way you fight.
View Quote



Yep.  Anyone I hear complain about "brutal recoil" is someone whose training I immediately find suspect.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:06:27 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So you think a 300 BLK Black Tip won't stop them?

You can easily fire off 3 rounds of 300 BLK with more precise placement for every shot of 00 from a shotgun.

And be shorter and more maneuverable.

So not sure why your 300 BLK doesn't fit the bill.
View Quote


I like shotguns.
I like 300 blk.

Could we get a shotgun in 300 blk?  Like eight .30 cal bullets in a tight spread?



ETA: after further consideration, I think I'll just go with automated turrets a la  Fallout.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:15:40 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:



Umm, we train for headshots with buckshot. Quite doable at in home distances. Try it sometime at 15' and measure the hole.

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.



It's actually easier as the hight over bore is significantly less.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:17:20 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


To be fair, firing any firearm without a suppressor, (and some with), inside a house is a very bad idea.  Shotguns are not as obnoxious as many rifles and some handguns.

My .45 AR15 is probably as good a combination of terminal ballistics and unsuppressed audio survivability and magazine capacity as there is.  It will still ring your ears.

Sometimes a bad idea is necessary to overcome a bad situation.
View Quote

I found a 410 with 000 Buck is less punishing.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:22:52 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Now would you use that same shotgun for hostage rescue? It's baffling the level of disingenuousness being displayed to win internet arguments. It's not the best tool for every job in a close quarters environment. If you want to argue that it is, I'm not going to entertain it.

You know the truth.
View Quote

Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:27:54 PM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:27:57 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ever run drills in a shoot no shoot house? I can’t take anyone serious who would prefer headshots with buckshot on close proximity encounters requiring surgical precision. It’s the reason why I took my ball home last night. The level of disingenuousness displayed here by the shotgun crowd to win an argument or to justify their crappy decisions that go against what top tier CQB specialists actually use for good reason is telling.

I’m going to work now.

View Quote


Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:46:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I have done shoot no shoot close proximity with shotguns. Sighting method is generally the only difference making one shot or the other between the two. One needs height over bore compensated 2” high the other needs a 2-3” opening for pellets. Sighting system with either can be the same if you set them up the same. Now change that to outdoor surgical precision and I agree with you the shotgun begins to quickly be the wrong tool unless you have the ability to transition to slug and even then it’s not as good for me at distance but realistically how many of those are being made even by teams. I won’t disagree this is a rifle world at this stage in the tactical community but there’s still quite a few who kick doors and serve warrants who gravitate to a shotgun for indoor work.

Also I believe a big portion of why that rifles rule in the CQB community is their overall mission. If your training regularly for a variety of scenarios and multiples of those scenarios means a rifle is the better tool for the team then it just makes the most sense to spend all the time on it because it is effective in all of the scenarios. Rather than the mission drive the gear and everyone be 100% on each it makes more sense to say this works for them all and we can maximize time with it. Lots of places did the same with sub guns they weren’t the best in every scenario but if in every training you ran a Mp5 or a UMP you got pretty damn good at making it work at everything. Plus at this stage many of the instructors are GWOT operators who spent many years behind rifles it’s what they know and what they perfected so it’s what they teach to others. Similarly it’s what the average folks who took classes requested so there’s less shotgun classes available these days.

Look at the number of LE agencies who’ve dropped shotguns all together if we can spend X amount of ammo per officer in ammo for long guns and we can say ok we only have to buy M193 vs M193 and Flite control Buck and Truball Slugs means we can have mediocre training with both or moderately ok with one.

ETA: the 2-3” gets smaller as range decreases 10yds is a damn long shot inside most houses least in my area.
View Quote


@Gunnie357 thanks, that's all good info and makes sense.

I set up my Rattler for HD because I'm a former 3gunner. I wanted something I was familiar with (AR rifle) as I shot a billion rounds through the platform in training and matches. I thought something that's use would occupy as little of my mind during a bad event made the most sense. I wanted something that could do work inside the house (big house, I have a ~25 yard shot possibility front door to back) but still reach out as far as I can see in my wooded neighborhood.  I get the idea of "get both" but was thinking any second of indecision on what to grab during an event would slow me down.

My neighbor became an active shooter a few months ago and killed 2 cops in my front yard. So got to put the theories to the test. My mind was all fucked up and listening and calling 911 but I was able to be pretty instantly comfortable with the rifle in my hands. I didn't need it thank goodness, but was nice to know it was something that could do work.

Upon reflection, I mostly posted up between my door and my kids and trained the rattler at the window next to the direction they would be coming from. I could have used almost anything. Part of me is now thinking the 12 gauge semi would be a good option, as if things transitioned outside and/or more than 50 yards away they aren't really my problem anymore.

I haven't shot much shotgun in a while but an SLP/A300 manual of arms is in my brain there somewhere. Hell I could quad load at one point
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:47:53 PM EDT
[#25]
Memes and disingenuousness is what you get here for justification. Yeah. The potential for a fier and a shot cup hitting an innocent is peak performance over a superior surgical instrument in a shoot no shoot house or at home in a shoot with innocents nearby.

The 9th pellet flier phenomenon doesn’t exist. Even with the top of the line flite control that has groups half of what other loads pattern.




Shotguns rule over rifles for CQB. I have spoken.


Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:55:14 PM EDT
[#26]
my housing projects get invaded daily, by bears, so there is a shotgun at each man door

i have a rack of rifles at my bedroom exit for the other types that might show up
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:55:22 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Memes and disingenuousness is what you get here for justification. Yeah. The potential for a fier and a shot cup hitting an innocent is peak performance over a superior surgical instrument in a shoot no shoot scenario.

The 9th pellet flier phenomenon doesn’t exist. Even with the top of the line flite control that has groups half of what other loads pattern.

https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/fed-flitectrl-9p-pattern.jpg


Shotguns rule over rifles for CQB. I have spoken.


View Quote



Gotta double down I see.  How is work going?
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 12:57:59 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Gotta double down I see.  How is work going?
View Quote

Quite well actually. Those that know know. Those that pretend for winning arguments or for personal justifications pretend.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:15:41 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I found a 410 with 000 Buck is less punishing.
View Quote


What length barrel?
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:19:12 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Quite well actually. Those that know know. Those that pretend for winning arguments or for personal justifications pretend.
View Quote



It's quite a job cleaning the grill after the lunch rush, isn't it?
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:19:37 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I prefer high mounted optics indoors because of the situational awareness the head position gives you.

Height over bore doesn’t matter if you know it exists.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


It's actually easier as the hight over bore is significantly less.


I prefer high mounted optics indoors because of the situational awareness the head position gives you.

Height over bore doesn’t matter if you know it exists.


I prefer higher mounts on ARs too. With a shotgun a little tighter cheek weld helps with recoil and the way they're designed you don't need a higher mount to keep your head up.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:21:29 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Memes and disingenuousness is what you get here for justification. Yeah. The potential for a fier and a shot cup hitting an innocent is peak performance over a superior surgical instrument in a shoot no shoot house or at home in a shoot with innocents nearby.

The 9th pellet flier phenomenon doesn’t exist. Even with the top of the line flite control that has groups half of what other loads pattern.

https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/media/fed-flitectrl-9p-pattern.jpg


Shotguns rule over rifles for CQB. I have spoken.


View Quote



Do you know the distance of that pattern?
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:31:57 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Do you know the distance of that pattern?
View Quote



Don't bother, I think we have a high school kid in the thread who isn't old enough to purchase a shotgun. He stole the pic from LuckyGunner.  
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:33:57 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Do you know the distance of that pattern?
View Quote


He doesn't. I shot three different shotguns with 9 pellet flight control Sunday. The targets were paper hostage targets at 10 yards. No wads or shot cups hit the hostage. All the bad guys were hit with all 9 shot, right in the sweet spot and it was done in approx 1 second from low ready. My HD load is 8 pellet which doesn't have the flier issue, but even if I was forced to use 9 pellet, I am confident that I can quickly, surgically remove the top of sumdood's grape without harming anyone else.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:38:15 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Memes and disingenuousness is what you get here for justification.

I have spoken.

View Quote



Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:49:29 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



It's quite a job cleaning the grill after the lunch rush, isn't it?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quite well actually. Those that know know. Those that pretend for winning arguments or for personal justifications pretend.



It's quite a job cleaning the grill after the lunch rush, isn't it?



I just assumed he put his helmet back on and went back to coloring.  
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 1:59:39 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Shotguns weakest link is reload time

Weakest link for any long gun is the whole "needs two hands" thing, and for some is the oal

Perfect defense gun is situational/location affected too
View Quote


I’d say capacity versus reload.

I shoot a lot of flurries and have gotten decent at +2, +2, +2 in pretty quick succession
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 2:02:15 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


@Gunnie357 thanks, that's all good info and makes sense.

I set up my Rattler for HD because I'm a former 3gunner. I wanted something I was familiar with (AR rifle) as I shot a billion rounds through the platform in training and matches. I thought something that's use would occupy as little of my mind during a bad event made the most sense. I wanted something that could do work inside the house (big house, I have a ~25 yard shot possibility front door to back) but still reach out as far as I can see in my wooded neighborhood.  I get the idea of "get both" but was thinking any second of indecision on what to grab during an event would slow me down.

My neighbor became an active shooter a few months ago and killed 2 cops in my front yard. So got to put the theories to the test. My mind was all fucked up and listening and calling 911 but I was able to be pretty instantly comfortable with the rifle in my hands. I didn't need it thank goodness, but was nice to know it was something that could do work.

Upon reflection, I mostly posted up between my door and my kids and trained the rattler at the window next to the direction they would be coming from. I could have used almost anything. Part of me is now thinking the 12 gauge semi would be a good option, as if things transitioned outside and/or more than 50 yards away they aren't really my problem anymore.

I haven't shot much shotgun in a while but an SLP/A300 manual of arms is in my brain there somewhere. Hell I could quad load at one point
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I have done shoot no shoot close proximity with shotguns. Sighting method is generally the only difference making one shot or the other between the two. One needs height over bore compensated 2” high the other needs a 2-3” opening for pellets. Sighting system with either can be the same if you set them up the same. Now change that to outdoor surgical precision and I agree with you the shotgun begins to quickly be the wrong tool unless you have the ability to transition to slug and even then it’s not as good for me at distance but realistically how many of those are being made even by teams. I won’t disagree this is a rifle world at this stage in the tactical community but there’s still quite a few who kick doors and serve warrants who gravitate to a shotgun for indoor work.

Also I believe a big portion of why that rifles rule in the CQB community is their overall mission. If your training regularly for a variety of scenarios and multiples of those scenarios means a rifle is the better tool for the team then it just makes the most sense to spend all the time on it because it is effective in all of the scenarios. Rather than the mission drive the gear and everyone be 100% on each it makes more sense to say this works for them all and we can maximize time with it. Lots of places did the same with sub guns they weren’t the best in every scenario but if in every training you ran a Mp5 or a UMP you got pretty damn good at making it work at everything. Plus at this stage many of the instructors are GWOT operators who spent many years behind rifles it’s what they know and what they perfected so it’s what they teach to others. Similarly it’s what the average folks who took classes requested so there’s less shotgun classes available these days.

Look at the number of LE agencies who’ve dropped shotguns all together if we can spend X amount of ammo per officer in ammo for long guns and we can say ok we only have to buy M193 vs M193 and Flite control Buck and Truball Slugs means we can have mediocre training with both or moderately ok with one.

ETA: the 2-3” gets smaller as range decreases 10yds is a damn long shot inside most houses least in my area.


@Gunnie357 thanks, that's all good info and makes sense.

I set up my Rattler for HD because I'm a former 3gunner. I wanted something I was familiar with (AR rifle) as I shot a billion rounds through the platform in training and matches. I thought something that's use would occupy as little of my mind during a bad event made the most sense. I wanted something that could do work inside the house (big house, I have a ~25 yard shot possibility front door to back) but still reach out as far as I can see in my wooded neighborhood.  I get the idea of "get both" but was thinking any second of indecision on what to grab during an event would slow me down.

My neighbor became an active shooter a few months ago and killed 2 cops in my front yard. So got to put the theories to the test. My mind was all fucked up and listening and calling 911 but I was able to be pretty instantly comfortable with the rifle in my hands. I didn't need it thank goodness, but was nice to know it was something that could do work.

Upon reflection, I mostly posted up between my door and my kids and trained the rattler at the window next to the direction they would be coming from. I could have used almost anything. Part of me is now thinking the 12 gauge semi would be a good option, as if things transitioned outside and/or more than 50 yards away they aren't really my problem anymore.

I haven't shot much shotgun in a while but an SLP/A300 manual of arms is in my brain there somewhere. Hell I could quad load at one point

Regardless of what you use you have to be comfortable and confident in your abilities with it. If that means the rattler run it if that’s means a 12 gauge run it.

I recall reading your story about all that before. If your comfort is and was there with the rifle then I vote run the rifle. The rifle is going to serve your needs if you’re training with it.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 2:15:11 PM EDT
[#39]
“Gun” violence pushed around the news cycle has brought the ban language out to the forefront yet again; bringing what’s old back into the limelight. First it was lever-actions and now shotguns. If the manufacturer’s don’t climb on this horse with a solid auto-loader and get riding, they’re going to fall way behind in the race. So far, Beretta has really showed up and seems to have set a very high bar. I keep saying if Glock made a auto-loader, it would be hailed as the greatest thing EVAR and right now would be the best time it could have happened. Maybe KelTec will stop with the pump nonsense and make a proper tube feed auto-load KS7 type bullpup…
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 2:48:13 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Do you know the distance of that pattern?
View Quote

40 ft. /13.333 yards. The average distance of a bedroom in a home in the US.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 2:54:50 PM EDT
[#41]
I've always thought:  Benelli M2.  When you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf@$ker in the room.  Pronto.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 2:58:47 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


It's been more than two or three.

And it was you who said "the best" use something else for CQB...and yet here I have some of the best who are using a shotgun to protect their home.



Not if you understand how to mitigate it. Which is one of the things those guys were in my class to learn.



I don't think you understand capacity very well. Pistols and your typical AR do not generally force someone to stop with a single application. It generally takes multiple applications at close range to accomplish the task of physically incapacitating the person who is trying to kill you. The shotgun when loaded intelligently and wielded with a little bit of skill accomplishes that goal with a single trigger press with more reliability than pistols or typical carbines.

That is, in fact, one of the primary reasons those guys were in my class. They've shot a lot of people with ARs. They've also seen shotguns work at close range. They made their choice.



Actually with a proper pattern, you most certainly can do that. And in some of my classes we actually set up targetry that requires that kind of shot because entanglement with occupants of the home is more common in home defense situations than most think. This is one of the reasons why I continue to yell into the void in the internet about the folly of depending on pattern spread as a means of hoping you hit shit, because in the real world all that spread you are hoping will hit the dude with a couple of pellets just makes it more difficult to be accountable for your foreground and background when you are forced to shoot inside your own home.



As I said, I simulate entangled shooting with a shotgun regularly in class. And if I had to take a shot with entanglement involved for real, I'd much sooner have my shotgun in hand than my carbine because my shotgun doesn't have offset to worry about.



I would. In a heartbeat. At the sort of distances where a real-life entangled shot actually happens, it's at pretty close range...and with proper ammunition selection you can accomplish that with a shotgun just the same as with a pistol. In fact, here's a police officer doing exactly that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omTcmMa1hxc



"extended shootouts" rarely occur in home defense situations.

Generally once someone cuts loose with a 12 gauge whoever is left standing seeks their entertainment elsewhere.



If I am defending my home, it won't be a last stand. At least not for me.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Just because two or three guys take a shotgun course for home defense, that doesn’t mean that that makes the shotgun the best home defensive weapon.\


It's been more than two or three.

And it was you who said "the best" use something else for CQB...and yet here I have some of the best who are using a shotgun to protect their home.


You still have more recoil


Not if you understand how to mitigate it. Which is one of the things those guys were in my class to learn.


, you still have low capacity


I don't think you understand capacity very well. Pistols and your typical AR do not generally force someone to stop with a single application. It generally takes multiple applications at close range to accomplish the task of physically incapacitating the person who is trying to kill you. The shotgun when loaded intelligently and wielded with a little bit of skill accomplishes that goal with a single trigger press with more reliability than pistols or typical carbines.

That is, in fact, one of the primary reasons those guys were in my class. They've shot a lot of people with ARs. They've also seen shotguns work at close range. They made their choice.


and you still cannot be 100 percent surgical if having to take someone out in very close proximity to a family member.


Actually with a proper pattern, you most certainly can do that. And in some of my classes we actually set up targetry that requires that kind of shot because entanglement with occupants of the home is more common in home defense situations than most think. This is one of the reasons why I continue to yell into the void in the internet about the folly of depending on pattern spread as a means of hoping you hit shit, because in the real world all that spread you are hoping will hit the dude with a couple of pellets just makes it more difficult to be accountable for your foreground and background when you are forced to shoot inside your own home.


Sure it will work if you barricade yourself in a bedroom or take up a position in a stairwell but if your wife is struggling with an intruder in the kitchen, a shotgun isn’t the best choice to chance a shot that you may need to take.


As I said, I simulate entangled shooting with a shotgun regularly in class. And if I had to take a shot with entanglement involved for real, I'd much sooner have my shotgun in hand than my carbine because my shotgun doesn't have offset to worry about.


I don’t think anyone here would prefer a shotgun over a rifle in that scenario.


I would. In a heartbeat. At the sort of distances where a real-life entangled shot actually happens, it's at pretty close range...and with proper ammunition selection you can accomplish that with a shotgun just the same as with a pistol. In fact, here's a police officer doing exactly that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omTcmMa1hxc


Also, it isn’t the best firearm for an extended shootout if it ever got to that.


"extended shootouts" rarely occur in home defense situations.

Generally once someone cuts loose with a 12 gauge whoever is left standing seeks their entertainment elsewhere.


If for argument’s sake you ever wanted to make a quote unquote “Last Stand!”, would a shotgun be your first choice or a proper rifle?


If I am defending my home, it won't be a last stand. At least not for me.



I love reading your stuff.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:02:40 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

40 ft. /13.333 yards. The average distance of a bedroom in a home in the US.
View Quote


Your bedroom is 40 FEET across? Mine is pretty sizeable at 22'x 19'. The entire house is 62'x44'. (not counting the glassed in patio)  Are you sleeping in a four car garage?
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:04:34 PM EDT
[#44]
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:27:33 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Your bedroom is 40 FEET across? Mine is pretty sizeable at 22'x 19'. The entire house is 62'x44'. (not counting the glassed in patio)  Are you sleeping in a four car garage?
View Quote

About 10 yards give or take from one wall to the bathroom. 40 ft is not that large. A jobsite dumpster is that long.
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:30:22 PM EDT
[#46]
Annnnnnnd this thread just cost me money

Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:32:25 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



I just assumed he put his helmet back on and went back to coloring.  
View Quote

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:36:49 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Annnnnnnd this thread just cost me money

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/281590/Tiger_Stripe-2842320.jpg
View Quote

Sexy I’d like to give one a whirl I really like the 1301 that’s the A300 right?
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:36:49 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Annnnnnnd this thread just cost me money

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/281590/Tiger_Stripe-2842320.jpg
View Quote


Noice...
Link Posted: 6/6/2023 3:39:43 PM EDT
[#50]
Look at the Beretta A300 Ultima Patrol.  

This is mine at 25y....25/27 pellets in the torso.  The slug shots above are me zeroing the HS507 on top.
Attachment Attached File

Page / 14
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top