User Panel
Quoted: If Neutron is fitted with a capsule they will be removing the faring for that flight. View Quote Given it has to be expended to make the 15000kg payload, that would work since it won't be worrying about re-entry and landing. That will make it much more expensive than Falcon and Crew Dragon, but a possible additional option to add to the menu. |
|
Quoted: I guess it worked. No fireball disappointment View Quote The Atlas and Centaur stages worked fine (as expected). The Starliner itself still has a series of tests to pass, some of which it has already failed although the failures did not force a mission scrub, yet. It's still got to rendezvous with the ISS, dock, depart, deorbit and successfully land. Even if the rest of the mission goes to profile, Boeing's got to figure out why the first orbital maneuvering unit failed immediately after start and the second unit shut down unexpectedly after 20-something seconds, before the third finally finished the orbital insertion burn. |
|
View Quote The 2 on the right are pulling out. |
|
|
So, two of the 12 thrusters failed, the temperature control system malfunctioned, and the docking mechanism didn’t work the first time?
Amazing job, Boeing!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Great job…by 1960s-1970s standards. *laughs in SpaceX* View Quote It really comes across as several generations difference of tech. The metaphor I use, if anyone here is a fan of Babylon 5. Dragon capsule is like a battle proven White Star and Starliner is a Hyperion Class Cruiser they are still working the bugs out of. Babylon 5: ISA White Star | Ship Breakdown Babylon 5: Hyperion Class Heavy Cruiser | Ship Breakdown |
|
I didn't like someone could make a rocket that looked more stupid than Blew Origin and along comes Boeing. That think looks like something Russia would build.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Stop making fun of my Kerbal game. I have so many mods that I'm too lazy to find the right parts. Kharn View Quote I would never, I can't seem to figure that game out to save my life. I keep putting a shit ton of power on the thing and going full blast, my GF says I'm compensating for something. |
|
|
|
De-orbit and landing webcast:
Boeing #Starliner Spacecraft Deorbit Burn and Landing (Official NASA Broadcast) |
|
How close does this thing hit the landing zone?
Meters or kilometers? |
|
|
I'd be happy to have a second crew service vehicle. I'm less than amused this one turned into this and it's curious this one had some engine anomalies.
Until they had a perfect mission I would not want to ride in that thing |
|
It's been hazy today. I can't make out the mountains very well.
|
|
I remember all the Rees when SpaceX did all their displays in meters. Boeing does the same.
|
|
Other than for repositioning the space station, there is no need for Starliner. It is inferior in every way to the Space X Crew Dragon.
|
|
View Quote Cool planes. My friend works them, and says they're a lot of fun. |
|
It's been hazy today. I can't make out the mountains very well. We heard the sonic boom but it was too dark to see.
|
|
|
yeah but how many POC were involved in its launch and recovery?
Lets get to the part that matters, NASA. |
|
Quoted: Other than for repositioning the space station, there is no need for Starliner. It is inferior in every way to the Space X Crew Dragon. View Quote Using the thrusters on a crew capsule just to reposition a space station is kind of stupid. ION engines like that used on Dawn and other recent interplanetary probes are the way to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: So, two of the 12 thrusters failed, the temperature control system malfunctioned, and the docking mechanism didn’t work the first time? Amazing job, Boeing!! View Quote I'm at a conference in San Antonio. There are a couple of Johnson Space Center dudes here. From what I understand they, Boeing, completed docking after expending all their backup systems. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Makes Roscosmos look bad. Now we have two options, where as they have one ancient version that no one will touch. View Quote Well - sorta. They've never finished the human spaceflight rating for the Atlas V, as they were intending to launch it with the new ULA Vulcan booster, which doesn't quite exist yet. I don't think Starliner has received a human spaceflight certification yet, either. All the remaining Atlas V boosters have already been sold, so ULA would need to cancel someone else's Atlas V launch to try to squeeze in another Starliner Launch to, for instance, get it certified for human spaceflight. |
|
Even if BO delivers all the engines they said they would tomorrow. How many years and millions of dollars would it cost to get Vulcan-Centaur certified to carry crew?
|
|
Quoted: Two options plus Orion and soon to be Starship. I do not take great pleasure for how far the once-mighty Soviet space program has fallen. View Quote I wouldn't except they tried to flex nuts on us. They forgot how we kept them afloat, hired their experts and bought their engines. A pimp's love is different than that of a square but a ho's gotta remember who feeds them |
|
Quoted: Even if BO delivers all the engines they said they would tomorrow. How many years and millions of dollars would it cost to get Vulcan-Centaur certified to carry crew? View Quote I think it is being man-rated from the get-go. Centaur already is and the BE-4 has to be for the New Glenn. |
|
|
Quoted: I remember all the Rees when SpaceX did all their displays in meters. Boeing does the same. View Quote I don't understand the hate for metric. Everyone else in the world, including US military and science, use metric. I understand not wanting to retool our whole machining industry, but lets move on |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.