User Panel
|
If the people who've sworn to defend the Constitution are opposing you, that might say something about you.....
|
|
|
INSURRECTIONISTS: The people who believe in the Constitution and the republic, state's rights, the rule of law, accountability of government to the people, equal protection under the law, American culture, borders, traditional family, American values, American greatness and exceptionalism, election integrity, success through hard work, etc...
DEFENDERS OF THE COUNTRY AND THE GOVERNMENT: The people that advocate for socialism, open borders, the watering down of American culture, racism as policy, destruction of traditional family, unlimited genders, "equity" rather than equality, non-citizen voting, social division, etc... That Alinski guy sure had things figured out. |
|
Quoted: I mean, that's what the leader of the Oath Keepers did. https://amgreatness.com/2021/09/25/times-reveals-fbi-role-in-january-6/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Divide and conquer. Hate the so-called right? Then embrace the government and its woke military and idiots like the FBI. Federal gov, with the help of Big Tech, is gearing up for a full blown civil war. I mean, that's what the leader of the Oath Keepers did. https://amgreatness.com/2021/09/25/times-reveals-fbi-role-in-january-6/ that article is about Proud Boys, it only mentions OK at the very end. |
|
Quoted: Anything according to the southern poverty law center is bullshit View Quote This isn't really about SPLC. DHS has had deep concerns regarding the military, both active and former, for about 12 or 13 years that I'm aware. Remember the "handbook" that they produced that was leaked and identified former military as a threat to national security and then just went away? Here's a pro tip.....it never went away. It was just marked appropriately to make leaking a federal crime. I have close friends, former seniors in Fed LE, and one it particular has candidly told me that former military members are a more significant threat to national security than Jihadis. At first blush this angered me but I also don't have access to the level of Intel that she did. So this perception may have some level of validity to it. There's a lot of angry people out there and let's be honest.....a former commando with years of combat experience definitely poses more of a threat than a skinny jeans wearing Antifa cunt....just saying. The difference obviously is rarely do former Mil members operationalize and go to work. |
|
This photograph’s caption tells me all I need to know about the level of journalistic competence here.
Attached File |
|
Quoted: This isn't really about SPLC. DHS has had deep concerns regarding the military, both active and former, for about 12 or 13 years that I'm aware. Remember the "handbook" that they produced that was leaked and identified former military as a threat to national security and then just went away? Here's a pro tip.....it never went away. It was just marked appropriately to make leaking a federal crime. I have close friends, former seniors in Fed LE, and one it particular has candidly told me that former military members are a more significant threat to national security than Jihadis. At first blush this angered me but I also don't have access to the level of Intel that she did. So this perception may have some level of validity to it. There's a lot of angry people out there and let's be honest.....a former commando with years of combat experience definitely poses more of a threat than a skinny jeans wearing Antifa cunt....just saying. The difference obviously is rarely do former Mil members operationalize and go to work. View Quote |
|
So a bunch of dudes that swore an oath to defend the constitution are pissed at some dudes they think are destroying the constitution?
Is that about right? |
|
Quoted: story Thousands of police and soldiers people professionally trained in the use of violence and familiar with military protocols are part of an extremist effort to undermine the U.S. government and subvert the democratic process. According to an investigative report published in the Atlantic in November into a leaked database kept by the Oath Keepers one of several far-right and white supremacist militias that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 10% of Oath Keepers are current police officers or military members. Another significant portion of the group's membership is retired military and law enforcement personnel. The hate group founded by a former Army paratrooper after Barack Obama's 2008 election claimed "an improbable 30,000 members who were said to be mostly current and former military, law enforcement and emergency first responders" in 2016, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center…..SNIP View Quote They bring up the Oath Keepers, white supremacists, militia, police, military, etc. What they really mean: Anyone who owns a gun, shoots, trains, and has a “background”…..we know who you are. I wouldn’t be surprised if within the next year or so, they start going after training companies hard, maybe even trying to pull out the old Patriot Act and Terrorist Organizations. |
|
Quoted: This isn't really about SPLC. DHS has had deep concerns regarding the military, both active and former, for about 12 or 13 years that I'm aware. Remember the "handbook" that they produced that was leaked and identified former military as a threat to national security and then just went away? Here's a pro tip.....it never went away. It was just marked appropriately to make leaking a federal crime. I have close friends, former seniors in Fed LE, and one it particular has candidly told me that former military members are a more significant threat to national security than Jihadis. At first blush this angered me but I also don't have access to the level of Intel that she did. So this perception may have some level of validity to it. There's a lot of angry people out there and let's be honest.....a former commando with years of combat experience definitely poses more of a threat than a skinny jeans wearing Antifa cunt....just saying. The difference obviously is rarely do former Mil members operationalize and go to work. View Quote All of that government policy and the accompanying memos were written by SPLC and ADL for the government and fed agencies as an outside contractor and policy advisory group. During the Trump administration they banned SPLC as a policy advisor to fed agencies because of this propaganda. SPLC is an NGO partisan “advisory” group to government much like “Center for a New American Security” is a partisan “advisory” group on national security policy. Government no longer develops it’s own policy, it buys it from influence peddlers and political meddlers. |
|
|
To democrats the phrase "the democratic process", translates as "one party rule". Anything that gets in the way of their effort of having a single party ruling with the goal of evolving into international government, is subversive.
|
|
|
Quoted: All of that government policy and the accompanying memos were written by SPLC and ADL for the government and fed agencies as an outside contractor and policy advisory group. During the Trump administration they banned SPLC as a policy advisor to fed agencies because of this propaganda. SPLC is an NGO partisan “advisory” group to government much like “Center for a New American Security” is a partisan “advisory” group on national security policy. Government no longer develops it’s own policy, it buys it from influence peddlers and political meddlers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This isn't really about SPLC. DHS has had deep concerns regarding the military, both active and former, for about 12 or 13 years that I'm aware. Remember the "handbook" that they produced that was leaked and identified former military as a threat to national security and then just went away? Here's a pro tip.....it never went away. It was just marked appropriately to make leaking a federal crime. I have close friends, former seniors in Fed LE, and one it particular has candidly told me that former military members are a more significant threat to national security than Jihadis. At first blush this angered me but I also don't have access to the level of Intel that she did. So this perception may have some level of validity to it. There's a lot of angry people out there and let's be honest.....a former commando with years of combat experience definitely poses more of a threat than a skinny jeans wearing Antifa cunt....just saying. The difference obviously is rarely do former Mil members operationalize and go to work. All of that government policy and the accompanying memos were written by SPLC and ADL for the government and fed agencies as an outside contractor and policy advisory group. During the Trump administration they banned SPLC as a policy advisor to fed agencies because of this propaganda. SPLC is an NGO partisan “advisory” group to government much like “Center for a New American Security” is a partisan “advisory” group on national security policy. Government no longer develops it’s own policy, it buys it from influence peddlers and political meddlers. The Network Contagion Research Institute is another one of those groups. Their bullshit "research" was behind the boogaloo bulletin around the time of VCDL Lobby Day 2020. It doesn't matter much what you call yourself when assholes like these get to officially define who you are and what you're about. I can only assume law enforcement in general take such intelligence bulletins as gospel. edit for grammar |
|
And then Biden was quoted as saying, "lets piss them all the fuck off with the shitshow in Afganistan."
I don't think the veterans are going to abstain like they did during the soviet revolution. And. Why is this causing somebody concern, again? |
|
Quoted: story Thousands of police and soldiers people professionally trained in the use of violence and familiar with military protocols are part of an extremist effort to undermine the U.S. government and subvert the democratic process. According to an investigative report published in the Atlantic in November into a leaked database kept by the Oath Keepers one of several far-right and white supremacist militias that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 10% of Oath Keepers are current police officers or military members. Another significant portion of the group's membership is retired military and law enforcement personnel. The hate group founded by a former Army paratrooper after Barack Obama's 2008 election claimed "an improbable 30,000 members who were said to be mostly current and former military, law enforcement and emergency first responders" in 2016, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Three Percenters, another militia present at the Capitol on Jan. 6, also draws a substantial portion of its members from law enforcement, both military and civilian. Larry Brock, a pro-Trump rioter arrested with zip-tie handcuffs, allegedly for taking hostages, is a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who posted content from the Three Percenters online. The militia movement is a militarized stream of the American far-right. Its members promote an ideology that undermines the authority and legitimacy of the federal government and stockpile weapons. When militia members have a professional background with the military or police, it enhances the ability of these groups to execute sophisticated and successful operations. It also helps them convey a patriotic image that obscures the security threat they present. View Quote If only it were so; then there would be hope for a future where the republic is free, and the government lives within the powers delegated to it by the constitution. Alas, the article is just more progressive dehumanization of patriots by The Atlantic. |
|
Quoted: They're also the ones with the police and military on their side. Propaganda like this is just making excuses for purging white male conservatives from the ranks. America will be much safer when all of LE and the military looks like this. https://i.imgur.com/2Cu1NSf.png View Quote Is that the front steps of the 88? |
|
|
Quoted: This isn't really about SPLC. DHS has had deep concerns regarding the military, both active and former, for about 12 or 13 years that I'm aware. Remember the "handbook" that they produced that was leaked and identified former military as a threat to national security and then just went away? Here's a pro tip.....it never went away. It was just marked appropriately to make leaking a federal crime. I have close friends, former seniors in Fed LE, and one it particular has candidly told me that former military members are a more significant threat to national security than Jihadis. At first blush this angered me but I also don't have access to the level of Intel that she did. So this perception may have some level of validity to it. There's a lot of angry people out there and let's be honest.....a former commando with years of combat experience definitely poses more of a threat than a skinny jeans wearing Antifa cunt....just saying. The difference obviously is rarely do former Mil members operationalize and go to work. View Quote Poses a threat to WHO, though? That's the question. If he poses a threat to a bunch of authoritarian socialists who wipe their asses with the Constitution, then who's the bad guy? All that these assholes need to do to make that threat go away is abide by the constitution, obey the law, and not try to persecute their fellow countrymen. You know, like the rest of us are expected to do. No, this is just the oligarchy using mercenaries to defend themselves. |
|
|
Quoted: If freedom loving Americans are a threat in your world, you're wrong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This isn't really about SPLC. DHS has had deep concerns regarding the military, both active and former, for about 12 or 13 years that I'm aware. Remember the "handbook" that they produced that was leaked and identified former military as a threat to national security and then just went away? Here's a pro tip.....it never went away. It was just marked appropriately to make leaking a federal crime. I have close friends, former seniors in Fed LE, and one it particular has candidly told me that former military members are a more significant threat to national security than Jihadis. At first blush this angered me but I also don't have access to the level of Intel that she did. So this perception may have some level of validity to it. There's a lot of angry people out there and let's be honest.....a former commando with years of combat experience definitely poses more of a threat than a skinny jeans wearing Antifa cunt....just saying. The difference obviously is rarely do former Mil members operationalize and go to work. Well, as a freedom-loving American, I tend to agree. The problem is that our federal govt has become so vast, omnipotent, and omnipresent that it attracts people who believe it should be vast, omnipotent, and omnipresent. That kind of mind believes in order and planning over all else, despises independence, and fears exercise of individual judgement and independence. So it's not so much that the DHS etc. people truly believe all veterans are terrorists; it's that they believe anyone not on board with The Plan is wrong and therefore evil. It's kinda like during Hurricane Katrina when Walmart and others sent 18-wheelers full of water and supplies -- and FEMA bureaucrats were stopping them, saying "Hold up, this isn't part of The Plan!" Bureaucrats simply don't think nimbly or in terms of results and initiative; they think in terms of The Plan, The Plan right or wrong. |
|
A racist, leftist radical site wrote an article blaming others for being exactly who they are. Another projection article on a leftist site. What a shock.
|
|
Quoted: Well, as a freedom-loving American, I tend to agree. The problem is that our federal govt has become so vast, omnipotent, and omnipresent that it attracts people who believe it should be vast, omnipotent, and omnipresent. That kind of mind believes in order and planning over all else, despises independence, and fears exercise of individual judgement and independence. So it's not so much that the DHS etc. people truly believe all veterans are terrorists; it's that they believe anyone not on board with The Plan is wrong and therefore evil. It's kinda like during Hurricane Katrina when Walmart and others sent 18-wheelers full of water and supplies -- and FEMA bureaucrats were stopping them, saying "Hold up, this isn't part of The Plan!" Bureaucrats simply don't think nimbly or in terms of results and initiative; they think in terms of The Plan, The Plan right or wrong. View Quote |
|
Quoted: To democrats the phrase "the democratic process", translates as "one party rule". Anything that gets in the way of their effort of having a single party ruling with the goal of evolving into international government, is subversive. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: To democrats the phrase "the democratic process", translates as "one party rule". Anything that gets in the way of their effort of having a single party ruling with the goal of evolving into international government, is subversive. Exactly. We need militias, they have a purpose to preserve democracy from a tyrannical (Marxist) government: As designed, the militias were to be the means by which threats from an excessively powerful central government were to be repulsed. We see this in Patrick Henry’s own arguments against the new constitution when he concluded that without locally-controlled arms to oppose the armies of a national government, the member states themselves would be defenseless. In response to the suggestion that citizens could assert their rights by assembling the people in a legislative body, Henry sarcastically declared: "Oh, Sir, we should have fine times indeed, if to punish tyrants, it were only necessary to assemble the people! Your arms wherewith you could defend yourselves are gone. … Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all? A [federally-controlled] standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny: And how are you to punish them? Will you order them to be punished? Who shall obey these orders?" ROCK6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: I couldn't even read through the whole thing. I reads like bad Chinese propaganda. At the bottom of the article: "Arie Perliger receives funding from the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Defense." Also: https://www.uml.edu/fahss/criminal-justice/faculty/perliger-arie.aspx |
|
Quoted: The Network Contagion Research Institute is another one of those groups. Their bullshit "research" was behind the boogaloo bulletin around the time of VCDL Lobby Day 2020. It doesn't matter much what you call yourself when assholes like these get to officially define who you are and what you're about. I can only assume law enforcement in general take such intelligence bulletins as gospel. edit for grammar View Quote All these organizations do is provide validity. There USG, at the upper echelons, is comprised of hard corp Marxists. That ws verified and confirmed with the resistance of the Trump administartion by virtually every organ of the State. These simply use these "studies" to validate their agenda. That's all. The agenda is happening regardless of what SPLC has to say but it is convenient to be able to point to a "study" based on "research" so that the Dem foot soldiers have talking points in everyday conversation in the hope they can sway additional people. |
|
Labels like hate group, hate speech, white supremist, militia, racist, have no meaning anymore because everything that is not Marxist / leftist friendly is tagged with it. You disagree at any level you are a domestic terrorist, you own a gun you are the militia, you want rule of law you are a racist.
Articles like this are nothing more than the leftist echo chamber trying to prove this fantasy shit actually exists at some actual capacity in this country. |
|
Quoted: All these organizations do is provide validity. There USG, at the upper echelons, is comprised of hard corp Marxists. That ws verified and confirmed with the resistance of the Trump administartion by virtually every organ of the State. These simply use these "studies" to validate their agenda. That's all. The agenda is happening regardless of what SPLC has to say but it is convenient to be able to point to a "study" based on "research" so that the Dem foot soldiers have talking points in everyday conversation in the hope they can sway additional people. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The Network Contagion Research Institute is another one of those groups. Their bullshit "research" was behind the boogaloo bulletin around the time of VCDL Lobby Day 2020. It doesn't matter much what you call yourself when assholes like these get to officially define who you are and what you're about. I can only assume law enforcement in general take such intelligence bulletins as gospel. edit for grammar All these organizations do is provide validity. There USG, at the upper echelons, is comprised of hard corp Marxists. That ws verified and confirmed with the resistance of the Trump administartion by virtually every organ of the State. These simply use these "studies" to validate their agenda. That's all. The agenda is happening regardless of what SPLC has to say but it is convenient to be able to point to a "study" based on "research" so that the Dem foot soldiers have talking points in everyday conversation in the hope they can sway additional people. Seems plausible. I'll admit I have no idea how this stuff really works, but I can smell the bullshit like everyone else. |
|
|
|
Quoted: story Thousands of police and soldiers people professionally trained in the use of violence and familiar with military protocols are part of an extremist effort to undermine the U.S. government and subvert the democratic process. According to an investigative report published in the Atlantic in November into a leaked database kept by the Oath Keepers one of several far-right and white supremacist militias that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 10% of Oath Keepers are current police officers or military members. Another significant portion of the group's membership is retired military and law enforcement personnel. The hate group founded by a former Army paratrooper after Barack Obama's 2008 election claimed "an improbable 30,000 members who were said to be mostly current and former military, law enforcement and emergency first responders" in 2016, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Three Percenters, another militia present at the Capitol on Jan. 6, also draws a substantial portion of its members from law enforcement, both military and civilian. Larry Brock, a pro-Trump rioter arrested with zip-tie handcuffs, allegedly for taking hostages, is a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who posted content from the Three Percenters online. The militia movement is a militarized stream of the American far-right. Its members promote an ideology that undermines the authority and legitimacy of the federal government and stockpile weapons. When militia members have a professional background with the military or police, it enhances the ability of these groups to execute sophisticated and successful operations. It also helps them convey a patriotic image that obscures the security threat they present. View Quote Projecting their reason for action… |
|
|
Stay home and stop looting businesses and burning cars and you won’t have to worry about the violent police and militias. The right tends to be nice family/church going folks who just want to live a peaceful life. But if poke the sleeping bear you will likely get an unhappy response.
|
|
Quoted: Not Chinese propaganda but democrat party propaganda disseminated by their owned media. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I couldn't even read through the whole thing. I reads like bad Chinese propaganda. Not Chinese propaganda but democrat party propaganda disseminated by their owned media. |
|
Quoted: I couldn't even read through the whole thing. I reads like bad Chinese propaganda. View Quote Yup. These people are fucking pathetic. Just keep laying down your propaganda and excuses for your movement's violence and snuffing-out of liberty. The more you project, the more that you alienate an increasing number of people, as well as polarizing your fellow countrymen. You've done well at bringing us to the brink of what you've been desiring all along. Time will tell how it all shakes out, but I am embarrassed for you and your pathetic state. I would pity you, but you are beneath pity and contempt. At this point there is nothing redeeming about you. Seriously Pathetic Leftist Commies |
|
It's sad that most dumb fucks can't see through the medias bullshit.
|
|
Well duhhh.
When you train men to overthrow tyrannical fascist regimes, don't be surprised when they try to overthrow your own tyrannical fascist regime. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.