Posted: 6/7/2004 9:41:46 AM EDT
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3766863.stm
|
|
Tolkien covered this already, though his geography is a little off. Fill in the English Channel, and you have The Shire. Numenor would be offshore a few hundred miles southwest. "But these things come not into the tale of the Drowning of Numenor, of which now all is told. And even the name of that land perished, and Men spoke thereafter not of Elenna, nor of Andor the Gift that was taken away, nor of Numenore on the confines of the world; but the exiles on the shores of the sea, if they turned towards the West in the desire of their hearts, spoke of Mar-nu-Falmar that was whelmed in the waves, Akallabeth the Downfallen, Atalante in the Eldarin tongue." "And tales and rumours arose along the shores of the sea concerning mariners and men forlorn upon the water who, by some fate or grace or favour of the Valar, had entered in upon the Straight Way and seen the face of the world sink below them, and so had come to the lamplit quays of Avallone, or verily to the last beaches on the margin of Aman, and there had looked upon the White Mountain, dreadful and beautiful, before they died." A clear description of the Bermuda Triangle... |
yea ok man, get a life and a clue. You just cant assume its Atlantis because of some crappy sat images. Your proof is mearly speculation and until you do get proof dont post a topic stating that 'Atlantis found' as fact when in 'fact' it isnt and dont expect not to get shit on because of it. Later |
EDIT: check out the article, the pic doesn't look like anything |
I buy it. People said the same about Troy for a very long time before its discovery. We'll find it, or evidence of it someday. Legends like this are almost always rooted in truth. |
