User Panel
Quoted: READ THE ARTICLE. She quit her job and relied on him for support. Idiot businessman set himself up, she may have taken some advantage, but he made the opening. View Quote So he should be punished for 100% paying for her lavish lifestyle? Did he force her to stop working? Doubt And now 50mil because she must "maintain the lifestyle" |
|
Quoted: I agree with judges. He let her quit her job, paid all her bills, big ring, proposal/acceptance just didn't sign a prenup. View Quote In my mind the refusal to sign the prenup would have been the basis to refuse her claim. If they would have come to a contractual agreement I would have been ok with it. |
|
That’s $1,644.00 a day for pussy, every fucking day.
You know the pussy you can get for $1,644.00. You don’t need the pussy for the whole 24 hour day so you could spend day $300.00 for pre breakfast pussy. You could spend another $300.00 for after lunch pussy. You would still have over $1,000 for after supper pussy!!! Every day of the fucking year. |
|
|
Quoted: That’s $1,644.00 a day for pussy, every fucking day. You know the pussy you can get for $1,644.00. You don’t need the pussy for the whole 24 hour day so you could spend day $300.00 for pre breakfast pussy. You could spend another $300.00 for after lunch pussy. You would still have over $1,000 for after supper pussy!!! Every day of the fucking year. View Quote This should be used as a rent vs. buy example in high school math class. When the feminist's complain, just use it as further justification. |
|
People wonder why the MGTOW movement is so huge in Canada... this is why, lol.
|
|
Under Ontario law, an unmarried couple are considered common-law spouses if they have cohabited — lived together in a conjugal relationship — continuously for at least three years. But that doesn’t necessarily mean living in the same home, the court found.
War on men. A lot of women should be getting dumped in Canada right before for third year “anniversary” |
|
|
|
|
The smart billionaires are using relationship contracts now.
(Skip to 13:50) Are contracts for SuperYacht owner 'girlfriends' real? |
|
The Left has destroyed rule of law. Pretty soon people will stop pretending that the social contract holds any value to them
|
|
|
Quoted: The Left has destroyed rule of law. Pretty soon people will stop pretending that the social contract holds any value to them View Quote |
|
And that is why it is not worth fucking in a place that legally has palimony. That said, this does not even meet that definition because palimony applies to unmarried live in relationships.
Common law marriage, when done correctly, is not a bad thing. If you say you are married, the community can treat you as married - with all the joint and several liability that entails. Don't say your married and your not - no matter how many years you live under the same roof. Common law marriage allows for marriage without a government approved minister or judge. Why should you need the government to bless your marriage. |
|
Quoted: the fed gov gives states a kickback on some of what's collected, too View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Facts... It creates a huge .gov parasite that exists simply to make itself larger. the fed gov gives states a kickback on some of what's collected, too Yep. It's disgusting. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I agree with judges. He let her quit her job, paid all her bills, big ring, proposal/acceptance just didn't sign a prenup. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/EgcB5I3-51.gif The ink did not even get wet on that contract Can you imagine being told you purchased something not based on any transaction, but on the salesman's belief that you would be making the transaction. There again, as someone pointed out above, 6 mil maybe cheap for this dude. |
|
|
She refused to marry him and then sued him for support under the premise that they were married under common law.
Dude got swindled. |
|
|
|
I don't agree with the ruling...but the guy fucked a whore long term then was surprised to learn that she is a total money grubbing shitbag besides being whore. Who would have guessed?
|
|
Damn. Paying 10 years for a 3 year mistake.
That is 6 million bucks. Fuck all that. |
|
|
Quoted: And almost certainly a lot better. So he paid a loooooooot of money for "companionship" Does God forgive us for banging Tinder sluts if it's our only option due to unjust courts and vow-breaking women? Should I make a thread in the religious forum? View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: I agree with judges. He let her quit her job, paid all her bills, big ring, proposal/acceptance just didn't sign a prenup. View Quote He also didn't marry her, which is when you need a prenup. Are Women independent or not? They want to be equal to men then start acting like it. People like you are the problem with this nation. Maybe next go around you'll be a man. |
|
Quoted: This is the ground work for a time when the majority of men refuse to marry because of unfair divorce. View Quote He didn't get married, so what you said has nothing to do with this case. How tough is it to actually read an article before you comment? A marriage is a contract, and she refused to sign the prenup. I guess now in Canada someone can now refuse to sign a contract, but as long as you have a cooch it's still binding. |
|
|
X and Y chromosomes do not matter until divorce time. Dumbass should have used a different pronoun.
|
|
A man who can pay $50k a month can afford to make one hell of a killdozer. That might get you a black market T-82.
|
|
I hear that there are entire tracts of land up there that have never seen a human footprint.
|
|
For being rich and successful the guy is a first class sucker.
Paid for her and her previous mistakes for 15 years all the while asking her to sign a pre-nup and she refused. Know when to pull that handle fellas. Know when to pull it |
|
Quoted: For being rich and successful the guy is a first class sucker. Paid for her and her previous mistakes for 15 years all the while asking her to sign a pre-nup and she refused. Know when to pull that handle fellas. Know when to pull it View Quote Yeah. If she's not willing to marry someone like that who's been generous w/o the prenup, there's a good chance she's up to something he won't like. |
|
Quoted: This is the ground work for a time when the majority of men refuse to marry because of unfair divorce. View Quote In my opinion it's worse than that. Marriage rates in the western world are already in the toilet. Divorce rape is real. Now you can get relationship raped? Good luck with that. Where have all the good men gone indeed |
|
Quoted: I agree with judges. He let her quit her job, paid all her bills, big ring, proposal/acceptance just didn't sign a prenup. View Quote Fuck that robed POS and the woman. The bitch can go out and get a fuckin’ job like the rest of us. Alimony is state sanctioned and enforced slavery, that’s all it is. |
|
Quoted: Common law marriage, when done correctly, is not a bad thing. If you say you are married, the community can treat you as married - with all the joint and several liability that entails. Don't say your married and your not - no matter how many years you live under the same roof. Common law marriage allows for marriage without a government approved minister or judge. Why should you need the government to bless your marriage. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Western society is founded on the family, and the ordered hierarchy it brings. The push of this kind of thing is to make marriage and families so risky, so dangerous, that they never form. Men are just laborers that pay ever growing taxes, women breeders, and the kids are either sacrificed to moloch, or used by the state in its vast indoctrination camp system. Welcome to hell. View Quote Interestingly, these sorts of laws and practices that are very punitive towards men spiked, at least in this country, in the wake of widespread women's suffrage, according to John Lott. |
|
Quoted: Say what? An imbecile is not that stupid. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Under Ontario law, an unmarried couple are considered common-law spouses if they have cohabited — lived together in a conjugal relationship — continuously for at least three years. But that doesn’t necessarily mean living in the same home, the court found. “Lack of a shared residence is not determinative of the issue of cohabitation,” the Appeal Court said. “There are many cases in which courts have found cohabitation where the parties stayed together only intermittently.” Say what? An imbecile is not that stupid. Hmmm, I wonder if any other common law jurisdiction interprets cohabitation in such a manner, or if there is even any substantial and largely accepted precedent for it under the common law in Ontario (I know the court said "many cases", but courts have had many instances of being completely FOS). I'm curious if this is a novelty or innovation on the part of the court. |
|
|
You should not need a license in the first place.
Anyway, Texas does not have alimony so part of this is irrelevant. That said, community property has it's own pitfalls. Right now 100% of my income comes from separate property. 95% of my assets are separate property. But I bet a divorce would still be bloody as hell. |
|
|
Quoted: You should not need a license in the first place. Anyway, Texas does not have alimony so part of this is irrelevant. That said, community property has it's own pitfalls. Right now 100% of my income comes from separate property. 95% of my assets are separate property. But I bet a divorce would still be bloody as hell. View Quote Marriage is a business relationship so an official recognition of that state is required. |
|
Quoted: She looks like she could be his mom lol https://i.ibb.co/T1NqD8F/BF7-BFCDB-79-FE-4-AED-BBED-E786-C4-ADB196.png View Quote That's a rough 38 |
|
If this man decides to send her head in a box to the judge's residence via courier at 9pm I would completely understand.
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.