Posted: 3/12/2004 11:40:33 AM EDT
|
Quoted: Ballistics on this thing are WORSE than on the P90. Which means they SUCK. My thoughts exactly... A small-caliber, high velocity round, but of a non-fragmenting AP design... General concept behind the weapon is to go for a 'shotgun effect' of many small bullets being quickly fired into the target. If your target isn't wearing armor, you're worse off than having a 14.5" AR at long range... |
|
Quoted: Very specific tool for a very specific application. I'm not dying that I can't have one. it's badass looking but the teeny round sounds boring If it shot 45-70 then it'd be cool! |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Very specific tool for a very specific application. I'm not dying that I can't have one. it's badass looking but the teeny round sounds boring If it shot 45-70 then it'd be cool! Well a more likely mission purpose application would be terrorists with a bus load of hostages wearing body armor. The MP7 would allow for rapid shot placement that would defeat the armor in a dynamic entry where first hits are more critical than terminal hits from a weapon compact enough to be used within tight confines. Again, a tool for a very specific application. |
|
I agree, I don't like the caliber. I wish H&K would stop pushing new caliber weapons. Honestly, if they made a MP7 .40S&W variant, I'd do anything to get one. Oh man... .40S&W in a small machine pistol... Mmmmmm... But, I dislike bullpups more than anything, so the MP7 wins just because it's not a bull-cr... I mean pup. |
|
Quoted: Honestly, if they made a MP7 .40S&W variant, I'd do anything to get one. Oh man... .40S&W in a small machine pistol... Mmmmmm... . Know what, man's got a point. That magwell honostly looks near the same as one for a USP. I see no reason why you [i]couldn't[/i] chamber it for 9mm or .40 SW. And that would rock. |
