User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:54:02 PM EDT
[#1]
This a troll?
Edit: Page 5 ownage. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:54:14 PM EDT
[#2]
Can't tell us who requested the info?
Pardon me while I go put on my skeptical pants. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:55:09 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BTW: This is a perfect subject to throw a couple of hand grenades into the room then run out of.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:55:49 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
We received an official email from a .gov agency (sorry, I can't say which) |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:55:55 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You paid your taxes on any winnings from the annual Arfcom Giveaway, right? That counts as income. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Glad I've never participated in one of the group buys. That counts as income.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:56:04 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BTW: This is a perfect subject to throw a couple of hand grenades into the room then run out of. https://www.ar15.com/lib/modules/buildFeedbackModal.html?u=174335 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:56:19 PM EDT
[#7]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:56:28 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....  
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:56:30 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Right? They doing the Staff huddle RFN instead of before posting this so they could actually respond and tell use all WHAT THE FUCK is going on!? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:56:42 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So what positive things have happened since the brownells buy? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:57:09 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. Seems very fishy. A gov’t agency can certainly subpoena such info, and arfcom must comply and provide the info, and the gov can certainly have a Judge signed non-disclosure order attached. But Federal LE agencies generally don’t send out official “don’t do that” emails. Plus, what a chicken shit explanation. A group of folks getting together to buy stuff, MIGHT not pay state sales tax, so no more group buys??? Might as well shut down all of the EE, because some guy MIGHT buy a gun and shoot someone. That’s either the most bored Federal Agent in the country stirring up shit to look like he’s doing work, or there’s more to the story. Or someone is being dishonest. Seems like if this is true, arfcom should lawyer up and fight it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:57:21 PM EDT
[#12]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:57:47 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yea, where’s the rest of the group of staffers, mods and admin ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:57:54 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The agency's family asked for privacy. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:58:04 PM EDT
[#15]
In for the shit show this will turn into!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:58:43 PM EDT
[#16]
Franchise Tax Board got to you, huh?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:59:06 PM EDT
[#17]
In on 5
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 7:59:24 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:00:27 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Class action? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. ETA beat ?? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:00:46 PM EDT
[#20]
lol.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:01:19 PM EDT
[#21]
They bent the knee twice, now it's all gargling the balls from here on
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:01:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Government ruins everything. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:01:22 PM EDT
[#23]
What if we say we're all handicapped and instead of "group buy", we call it a "purchase assist group"?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:01:40 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. What is your retainer? Not even kidding. My company lawyers would probably look at me cross eyed if I tried to explain this to them. I can give you my references. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:02:37 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What if we say we're all handicapped and instead of "group buy", we call it a "purchase assist group"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:02:41 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:02:52 PM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. Dear Arfcom: I really don't care if you change the site, even drastically so; but don't lie to us... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:02:57 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BTW: This is a perfect subject to throw a couple of hand grenades into the room then run out of. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:02:59 PM EDT
[#29]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:03:05 PM EDT
[#30]
Well whoever gets their PM first, post up which agency doesn't want us to know that they are looking into us?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:03:07 PM EDT
[#31]
... Weird post is weird
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:03:39 PM EDT
[#32]
 next thing arf is going to do is send any pic with a pistol brace to the ATF.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:03:40 PM EDT
[#33]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:03:52 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This a troll? Edit: Page 5 ownage. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:04:19 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well whoever gets their PM first, post up which agency doesn't want us to know that they are looking into us?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:04:43 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I’ll hire you to represent me. What is your retainer? Not even kidding. My company lawyers would probably look at me cross eyed if I tried to explain this to them. I can give you my references. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. What is your retainer? Not even kidding. My company lawyers would probably look at me cross eyed if I tried to explain this to them. I can give you my references. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:04:46 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We had to give a record of all the sales and participants, so you'll receive an IM if you are affected. If you don't receive one by Friday, you are unaffected. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:04:47 PM EDT
[#38]
Why isn't there some other site staff here actually explaining what's happening?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:05:15 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't want to catch a ban. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:05:21 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't want to catch a ban. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well whoever gets their PM first, post up which agency doesn't want us to know that they are looking into us? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:05:26 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't want to catch a ban. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:06:07 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:06:09 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why isn't there some other site staff here actually explaining what's happening? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:06:20 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, this is really a fishy situation; I'm betting it was Glorious Comrade Brownells's decision to shut it down, and NOT actually a .gov... Dear Arfcom: I really don't care if you change the site, even drastically so; but don't lie to us... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. Dear Arfcom: I really don't care if you change the site, even drastically so; but don't lie to us... This thread...if a troll thread as I can only believe it is, seems quite...odd. It is a troll thread, right? What was the other "troll thread" that one of the site staff or mods made a couple years back that caused quite the commotion? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:06:47 PM EDT
[#45]
They couldn't try to make it look like Brownells is causing all these changes more if they tried.
WTF. I can't imagine old arfcom will remain much longer with things like this going down every week, and even daily it seems. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:07:08 PM EDT
[#46]
a .gov agency request this? you sure?....they don't get anonymity like that, doesn't work that way
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:07:12 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
next thing arf is going to do is send any pic with a pistol brace to the ATF.Last thing imma do is trust Brownells with that kind of info... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:07:16 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why isn't there some other site staff here actually explaining what's happening? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:07:22 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'll hire you to represent me. What is your retainer? Not even kidding. My company lawyers would probably look at me cross eyed if I tried to explain this to them. I can give you my references. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Uhh--hate to get like, LAWYER like and stuff but.. 1. No subpoena, they can fuck themselves. 2. Unless said subpeona SPECIFICALLY said you cannot disclose the agency involved, then under Public Records laws in every state I am aware of, and under FOIA, then you CAN disclose said agency. 3. If the subpoena HAD a "Shut up who it is clause", then you SHOULD be afforded a right to challenge the non-disclosure. This whole sounds fucky, and I do this for a living.....
I pay to enjoy this website because I deal with fuckwits, addicts, and liars ALL DAY LONG; this website was for general enjoyment and to talk gun stuff. You disclose MY personal info absent a subpoena that I as an aggrieved party have a right to challenge, and we are going to have a problem. What is your retainer? Not even kidding. My company lawyers would probably look at me cross eyed if I tried to explain this to them. I can give you my references. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/13/2019 8:07:53 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't want to catch a ban. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File