User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:48:44 PM EDT
[#1]
Give em hell!
Thanks NOLO! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:49:22 PM EDT
[#2]
Thus begins the journey, in for the long haul. Thank you for the effort.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:51:22 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I was proud to contribute. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:52:19 PM EDT
[#4]
Thank You,
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:55:25 PM EDT
[#5]
Awesome
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:55:29 PM EDT
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 4:57:06 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thank You, |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:00:04 PM EDT
[#8]
Thanks for fighting this and fighting for us!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:01:05 PM EDT
[#9]
How did I miss the funding drive? Where can I donate?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:03:01 PM EDT
[#10]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:03:30 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How did I miss the funding drive? Where can I donate? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:05:21 PM EDT
[#12]
Good.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:06:07 PM EDT
[#13]
Thanks to everyone involved with this effort.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:06:22 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://i.imgur.com/cV3oeEx.gif |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:06:28 PM EDT
[#15]
I'm in
$$ incoming |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:06:35 PM EDT
[#16]
Thank you Sir!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:08:28 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:09:26 PM EDT
[#18]
Rad
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:14:04 PM EDT
[#19]
Dillo donations .
Well spent and in for the next round also. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:16:34 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We are either a nation of laws or we aren’t. We need to know sooner rather that later. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sweet Jesus.... "as purported acting Attorney General" 84. Defendant acting Attorney General Whitaker’s appointment violated 28 USC § 508(a) as he was not the Deputy Attorney General when Attorney General Sessions resigned. 85. Acting Attorney General Whitaker signed the Final Rule, and because his appointment is unlawful under § 508(a), the Final Rule is of no force and effect because acting Attorney General Whitaker has no authority to exercise the powers of the office he purports to hold. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:17:36 PM EDT
[#21]
The icing on the cake:
Trump cannot just change this rule as he did because of Trump 
For those who did NOT read the lawsuit: On January 30, 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 13771. This EO is titled Reducing Regulation and Controlling RegulatoryCosts and mandates that "for every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination." 12 81. This EO mandates that when an "agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it shall identify at least two existing re gulations to be repealed." 82. However, no such information is included in the proposed rule and therefore, the proposed rule violates EO 13771 and should be rescinded and/or voided. How sweet is that irony 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:17:53 PM EDT
[#22]
Thank you, Counselors, and thanks, Mark LaRue.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:19:29 PM EDT
[#23]
Thanks again for everything you do!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:21:24 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The icing on the cake: Trump cannot just change this rule as he did because of Trump
For those who did NOT read the lawsuit: On January 30, 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 13771. This EO is titled Reducing Regulation and Controlling RegulatoryCosts and mandates that "for every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination." 12 81. This EO mandates that when an "agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it shall identify at least two existing re gulations to be repealed." 82. However, no such information is included in the proposed rule and therefore, the proposed rule violates EO 13771 and should be rescinded and/or voided. How sweet is that irony 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:21:38 PM EDT
[#25]
Subscribed
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:22:03 PM EDT
[#26]
In!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:22:22 PM EDT
[#27]
Thank You!
@LaRue_Tactical , and @NoloContendere , and to all those who donated! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:22:49 PM EDT
[#28]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:23:10 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thank you, Counselors, and thanks, Mark LaRue. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:24:46 PM EDT
[#30]
In on 2.
God speed! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:26:53 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And Alan (wolfwood) we are a team! I just sent a PM. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:31:49 PM EDT
[#32]
OST...
...mostly just so that I don’t miss part deux of LaRue’s special edition of Texas “Nolo ‘dillos”! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:34:33 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Mark LaRue will say when. Just watch. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
How did I miss the funding drive? Where can I donate? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:34:58 PM EDT
[#34]
Thank you very much to all that are involved. Give the commie bastards hell!
Oh, and in for funding info. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:36:51 PM EDT
[#35]
In.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:37:07 PM EDT
[#36]
OST.
"knock'em out John!" |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:39:21 PM EDT
[#37]
Thanks, Nolo.
Will be watching for the LaRue fundraiser. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:39:29 PM EDT
[#38]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:39:58 PM EDT
[#39]
If this lawsuit is mainly aimed at whether the Attorney General is actually the Attorney General, and whether it violates an executive order for reduction of regulations, then this suit won't go anywhere. It must be based on the illegality of the ATF's rule changing the 1934 act. That alone will be an extremely hard sell in a court system that only occasionally recognizes the 2nd Amendment at all.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:42:26 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If this lawsuit is mainly aimed at whether the Attorney General is actually the Attorney General, and whether it violates an executive order for reduction of regulations, then this suit won't go anywhere. It must be based on the illegality of the ATF's rule changing the 1934 act. That alone will be an extremely hard sell in a court system that only occasionally recognizes the 2nd Amendment at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:54:31 PM EDT
[#41]
Outstanding. Thank you, gentlemen.
Nice slap at Feinstein in the Complaint as well.
I’ll be sending in funds to LaRue when indicated. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:54:38 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If this lawsuit is mainly aimed at whether the Attorney General is actually the Attorney General, and whether it violates an executive order for reduction of regulations, then this suit won't go anywhere. It must be based on the illegality of the ATF's rule changing the 1934 act. That alone will be an extremely hard sell in a court system that only occasionally recognizes the 2nd Amendment at all. plus, it goes against a Trump EO
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 5:56:03 PM EDT
[#43]
Quoted:
The final bump stock rule has been published. We filed this bump stock case on behalf of David Codrea and several other plaintiffs in D.C. As some of you may know Dave is a writer at ammoland. I'd like to take this time to thank LaRue Tactical for its fundraising efforts and all our donors. We could not be doing this without your help. Here's to a new year of reclaiming what has been stolen from us. Please take a look at the suit which is linked to below https://www.scribd.com/document/396418931/Filed-Bumpstock-Complaint-Redacted ETA fuck it. Don't matter now. Good on them for helping the case. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:00:52 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If this lawsuit is mainly aimed at whether the Attorney General is actually the Attorney General, and whether it violates an executive order for reduction of regulations, then this suit won't go anywhere. It must be based on the illegality of the ATF's rule changing the 1934 act. That alone will be an extremely hard sell in a court system that only occasionally recognizes the 2nd Amendment at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:01:46 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Aw shucks. That's it guys. Just pack it up. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If this lawsuit is mainly aimed at whether the Attorney General is actually the Attorney General, and whether it violates an executive order for reduction of regulations, then this suit won't go anywhere. It must be based on the illegality of the ATF's rule changing the 1934 act. That alone will be an extremely hard sell in a court system that only occasionally recognizes the 2nd Amendment at all. I'm not a lawyer but I was thinking the same thing/had the same question(s). there are legal procedures that the .gov must follow. Laws are made by elected representatives, not regulatory agencies. My gut feeling is that Trump did this so that it would be decided in the courts and then there will be an actual legal opinion on it. The ATF has already ruled multiple times that they weren't machine guns, now the courts will say that as well......I hope. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:07:07 PM EDT
[#46]
WOW! I only got about halfway through so far, but can't wait to finish it.
Great work!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:10:34 PM EDT
[#47]
One of these days I hope to have the pleasure to buy Len Savage a beer. Or a bourbon. Or a scotch.
Or all 3. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:12:05 PM EDT
[#48]
Larue's bumpstock sales must have taken a substantial hit to elicit this response.
Serious question, are any manufacturers involved in this? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:12:30 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One of these days I hope to have the pleasure to buy Len Savage a beer. Or a bourbon. Or a scotch. Or all 3. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/27/2018 6:13:16 PM EDT
[#50]
It's SOP to attack on multiple fronts in a case like this. The court can decide in your favor for any of them they wish to use so you put them all in there.
AG in violation of Constitutional succession Ruling in violation of EO Violation of APA re rulemaking Violation of APA re arbitrary and capricious Etc... The courts tend to go from the lowest to the highest in arguments so they would have to rule in favor of the .gov on most of it before even tackling the statutory language aspect that is truly the heart of it in my mind. Either we are a nation of laws written by an elected legislature or one of executive fiat. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
