User Panel
[#1]
He is a complete asshole: judgmental, intolerant, bigoted, biased, lazy, foolish and violent.
Instead of doing things beneficial to humanity, like having a real job in lumbering, fossil fuels or transportation, he chose to build devices to ruin the lives of office girls who open the mail. Ted Kaczynski is just another Liberal, a Progressive, a Democrat, a Socialist. He ran from having a real job, like a little kid running from the liver and onions truck. Morally he is no different than Hillary Clinton, Charles Scumer, or any other Democrat. Put another way: he and other Liberals are the moral equivalent of HIV. Up his ass with broken glass. |
|
[#2]
Quoted:
He is a complete asshole: judgmental, intolerant, bigoted, biased, lazy, foolish and violent. Instead of doing things beneficial to humanity, like having a real job in lumbering, fossil fuels or transportation, he chose to build devices to ruin the lives of office girls who open the mail. Ted Kaczynski is just another Liberal, a Progressive, a Democrat, a Socialist. He ran from having a real job, like a little kid running from the liver and onions truck. Morally he is no different than Hillary Clinton, Charles Scumer, or any other Democrat. Put another way: he and other Liberals are the moral equivalent of HIV. Up his ass with broken glass. View Quote |
|
[#3]
D - R - I - N - K - Y - O - U- R - O - V - A - L - T - I - N - E ?
Son of a bitch! |
|
[#4]
Quoted:
Worship a murderer if you want. The faggot still wrote his key down. View Quote |
|
[#5]
Quoted:
He is a complete asshole: judgmental, intolerant, bigoted, biased, lazy, foolish and violent. Instead of doing things beneficial to humanity, like having a real job in lumbering, fossil fuels or transportation, he chose to build devices to ruin the lives of office girls who open the mail. Ted Kaczynski is just another Liberal, a Progressive, a Democrat, a Socialist. He ran from having a real job, like a little kid running from the liver and onions truck. Morally he is no different than Hillary Clinton, Charles Scumer, or any other Democrat. Put another way: he and other Liberals are the moral equivalent of HIV. Up his ass with broken glass. View Quote |
|
[#6]
Quoted:
your argument is pretty stupid. The Russians had a cipher which required a daily book of keys. It was never broken either. And no, OP isnt worshiping him. Perhaps you should calm the fuck down when you get proven wrong. View Quote |
|
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
There were a couple of articles about the Unibomber on NPR recently. They nailed him because of peculiar diction he used in his manifesto that could be matched both in his published academic writing and letters to his brother. The NSA was able to identify the creator of Bitcoin the same way, through his writing. |
|
[#9]
Quoted:
Or, I don't encrypt anything because I hold no trade secrets and/or I'm not breaking the law. View Quote You seem to lack the knowledge of why encryption is a good thing too. Do you also tell the cops that they can search your car before they ask? |
|
[#10]
Quoted:
There were a couple of articles about the Unibomber on NPR recently. They nailed him because of peculiar diction he used in his manifesto that could be matched both in his published academic writing and letters to his brother. The NSA was able to identify the creator of Bitcoin the same way, through his writing. View Quote I consider it likely at this point that he died at some point after he created it. |
|
[#11]
Not a day goes by here in GD that I don't learn something new or interesting. Thanks for posting this OP.
My wife worked her whole career life with these kinds of autistic kids. They have very low level or no social skills but are genius level smart. US government hires a bunch of these sickos to do stuff for them cause they have no concept of right or wrong. No conscious. They are some scary people. |
|
[#12]
Quoted:
Ted definitely took the black pill. He saw human life as full of trivial surrogate activities which is the cause of leftism and other psychological problems and the only way to truly end it was to get rid of technology so humans had real shit to concern themselves with, like getting food as opposed to who won a fucking emmy or who won a football game. He killed people to get his manigesto published, which it was published, to spread the message to everyone to go back to simpler times. View Quote |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
Not a day goes by here in GD that I don't learn something new or interesting. Thanks for posting this OP. My wife worked her whole career life with these kinds of autistic kids. They have very low level or no social skills but are genius level smart. US government hires a bunch of these sickos to do stuff for them cause they have no concept of right or wrong. No conscious. They are some scary people. View Quote |
|
[#15]
Quoted:
He is a complete asshole: judgmental, intolerant, bigoted, biased, lazy, foolish and violent. Instead of doing things beneficial to humanity, like having a real job in lumbering, fossil fuels or transportation, he chose to build devices to ruin the lives of office girls who open the mail. Ted Kaczynski is just another Liberal, a Progressive, a Democrat, a Socialist. He ran from having a real job, like a little kid running from the liver and onions truck. Morally he is no different than Hillary Clinton, Charles Scumer, or any other Democrat. Put another way: he and other Liberals are the moral equivalent of HIV. Up his ass with broken glass. View Quote |
|
[#16]
|
|
[#17]
Quoted:
I didn't realize that he was a part of the program until very recently. It explains a lot. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, if they hadn't fried his fucking brain during the MKUltra program, who knows what he could have accomplished. “According to the conventional wisdom, Theodore John Kaczynski, whose IQ while in the fifth grade was measured at 167, who became one of the youngest Harvard-educated STEM professors in America, and the man whom the FBI dubbed the Unabomber, was simply mentally ill—a paranoid schizophrenic. But the conventional wisdom is mistaken. From the fall of 1959 through the spring of 1962, Harvard psychologists, led by Henry A. Murray, conducted a disturbing and ethically indefensible experiment on twenty-two undergraduates. One of these students, whom they dubbed "Lawful," was Ted Kaczynski (Harvard and the Making of the Unabomber). Murray's experiment was intended to measure how people react under stress. He subjected his unwitting students to intensive interrogation—what Murray himself called "vehement, sweeping, and personally abusive" attacks, assaulting his subjects’ egos and most-cherished ideals and beliefs. One wonders what effect these experiments had on Kaczynski, the brilliant but vulnerable boy who, in 1958, had entered Harvard College at the age of 16. Is it likely they confirmed his nascent belief in the evil of science and led to his decline into mental illness and murder?” You take a vulnerable person and subject them to that... you just might create a monster. |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
I doubt it. I would seriously hope the article was written by someone Please stop doing this to the English language. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
[#19]
He is a complete sociopath. He is also a genius. Prisons are full of people like him. He is probably happier now in his tiny isolated cell in Florence super max than he has been his entire life. He no longer has the burden of interacting with society and can instead read his books and write incessantly on the reams of paper provided to him. A pathetic existence for the sane, but absolute bliss for someone like him.
|
|
[#21]
It sucks that we cannot marvel at this guys intelligence without being accused of sympathising with his cause. But I guess that is a whole other discussion on intelligence. If you feel like you need to argue or ask what I mean about that, you are on the bottom side of the equation.
|
|
[#22]
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
Never knew much about the unibomber except that sketch of a dude with a hoodie and sunglasses. Just got done reading the wikipedia page on him. This made me lol Who can argue with that?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Never knew much about the unibomber except that sketch of a dude with a hoodie and sunglasses. Just got done reading the wikipedia page on him. This made me lol Throughout the document, Kaczynski addresses leftism as a movement. He defines leftists as "mainly socialists, collectivists, 'politically correct' types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like,"[80] states that leftism is driven primarily by "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization,"[76] and derides leftism as "one of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world. So the circle will continue with the libs. |
|
[#25]
I'd be OK with letting him out if he would leave airlines alone.
|
|
[#26]
|
|
[#27]
|
|
[#28]
|
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
Quoted:
It sucks that we cannot marvel at this guys intelligence without being accused of sympathizing with his cause. But I guess that is a whole other discussion on intelligence. If you feel like you need to argue or ask what I mean about that, you are on the bottom side of the equation. View Quote Paranoia es no bueno. |
|
[#31]
|
|
[#33]
Quoted:
Why does he have multiple ciphers for certain letters? http://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/files/2016/09/Unabomber-List-of-Meanings.png View Quote Dude was by most measures a genius when it came to mathematics. Things that are fun for some people, are term papers or a doctoral thesis for others. Newton didn't re-derive calculus because he was bored, he did it to win a bet. Both Feynman and Von Neumann genuinely enjoyed high level mathematics. |
|
[#34]
History is filled with murderous people who are praised. It all depends on what side the populous falls on.
|
|
[#35]
Quoted:
Why does he have multiple ciphers for certain letters? http://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/files/2016/09/Unabomber-List-of-Meanings.png View Quote |
|
[#36]
Quoted:
History is filled with murderous people who are praised. It all depends on what side the populous falls on. View Quote He is just a fascinating character. Fascinating by his insanity. Like all the documentaries about Ted Bundy and that Zodiac character and the green river person. It's like driving on the road and seeing a major car / motorcycle wreck ahead of you and body parts everywhere and telling yourself, I am not going to look, I am not going to look yet you look anyway when you get close. |
|
[#37]
|
|
[#38]
Your reaching.
|
|
[#39]
Quoted:
Why does he have multiple ciphers for certain letters? http://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/files/2016/09/Unabomber-List-of-Meanings.png View Quote |
|
[#40]
Quoted:
There were a couple of articles about the Unibomber on NPR recently. They nailed him because of peculiar diction he used in his manifesto that could be matched both in his published academic writing and letters to his brother. The NSA was able to identify the creator of Bitcoin the same way, through his writing. View Quote |
|
[#41]
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Gonna assume you and others are not referring to a one-time pad that's short enough to memorize, because that would be ... really suboptimal.
I think we are talking about different kinds of keys here. Y'all can keep your clever substitution ciphers (and keys). They're fun, but weaken as more text is passed through (letter/atom frequency analysis). On the other hand, a truly different mind could come up with successive, ordered, and heterogeneous substitutions that made it more better. Or maybe broke it. (Because unexpected flaw + math + computational power = wide open). Who knows for sure. |
|
[#44]
Quoted:
There were a couple of articles about the Unibomber on NPR recently. They nailed him because of peculiar diction he used in his manifesto that could be matched both in his published academic writing and letters to his brother. The NSA was able to identify the creator of Bitcoin the same way, through his writing. View Quote The Identification of person through his writing style is called stylometry. It does have it own sets of problems when trying to ID an anonymous person. You need prolific writing materials from the anonymous person as well as his writing when he used his real identity. In the case of the bitcoin creator those materials were available. Also there was only a handful people in the world at that time have the ability and knowledge to create cypto currency. So it wasn't hard for the nsa to figure out who he was. There is a documentary on netflix called banking on bitcoin. A person on the show ID the creator of bitcoin using stylometry. Of course when confronted if he is the creator of bitcoin he denied it. |
|
[#45]
Quoted:
As I said, a fascinating character. An advanced level of math and science merged with the Dark Ages mindset. No electricity or water in the cabin. You need a high 3-digit IQ to process this shyte. View Quote |
|
[#46]
Quoted:
Gonna assume you and others are not referring to a one-time pad that's short enough to memorize, because that would be ... really suboptimal. I think we are talking about different kinds of keys here. Y'all can keep your clever substitution ciphers (and keys). They're fun, but weaken as more text is passed through (letter/atom frequency analysis). On the other hand, a truly different mind could come up with successive, ordered, and heterogeneous substitutions that made it more better. Or maybe broke it. (Because unexpected flaw + math + computational power = wide open). Who knows for sure. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So, you have your private key committed to memory, do ya? I think we are talking about different kinds of keys here. Y'all can keep your clever substitution ciphers (and keys). They're fun, but weaken as more text is passed through (letter/atom frequency analysis). On the other hand, a truly different mind could come up with successive, ordered, and heterogeneous substitutions that made it more better. Or maybe broke it. (Because unexpected flaw + math + computational power = wide open). Who knows for sure. I used to speak as you do. I know what it's like. |
|
[#47]
Quoted:
Nobody has identified the creator of bitcoin. I consider it likely at this point that he died at some point after he created it. View Quote |
|
[#48]
|
|
[#49]
What was it that Hannibal Lecter said to Will Graham in one of his letters?
"We live in a strange time, neither savage nor wise. Any decent society would have killed me or put me to some use by now..." That kind of sums up ol' Ted, doesn't it? |
|
[#50]
Quoted:
I remember reading at one point that he was in a Harvard Experiment. I found this on Quora, which matches what I read: “According to the conventional wisdom, Theodore John Kaczynski, whose IQ while in the fifth grade was measured at 167, who became one of the youngest Harvard-educated STEM professors in America, and the man whom the FBI dubbed the Unabomber, was simply mentally ill—a paranoid schizophrenic. But the conventional wisdom is mistaken. From the fall of 1959 through the spring of 1962, Harvard psychologists, led by Henry A. Murray, conducted a disturbing and ethically indefensible experiment on twenty-two undergraduates. One of these students, whom they dubbed "Lawful," was Ted Kaczynski (Harvard and the Making of the Unabomber). Murray's experiment was intended to measure how people react under stress. He subjected his unwitting students to intensive interrogation—what Murray himself called "vehement, sweeping, and personally abusive" attacks, assaulting his subjects’ egos and most-cherished ideals and beliefs. One wonders what effect these experiments had on Kaczynski, the brilliant but vulnerable boy who, in 1958, had entered Harvard College at the age of 16. Is it likely they confirmed his nascent belief in the evil of science and led to his decline into mental illness and murder?” You take a vulnerable person and subject them to that... you just might create a monster. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.