Posted: 7/18/2017 12:52:48 PM EDT
 Incredible: This Innovative CPR Dummy Comes With A Second Dummy That Audibly Mourns Its Dead Son |
|
Quoted:
I understand with a single responder, but do you agree with the practice if there are 2? I grew up with 15&2 or 10&1. Quoted:
Quoted:
The focus is more and more on compressions. I grew up with 15&2 or 10&1. Responder is still with ventilations. |
|
Quoted:
Responder or bystander? Responder is still with ventilations. Is the new standard because it is more effective, or because bystanders are clumsy, stupid, tend to freak out, etc.? I.e. - If you have 2 bystanders with the correct mindset and technique, is the victim better served with 15&2? |
 First Aid Fail - The Office US |
|
Quoted:
Single bystander vs. 2 assisting bystanders. Is the new standard because it is more effective, or because bystanders are clumsy, stupid, tend to freak out, etc.? I.e. - If you have 2 bystanders with the correct mindset and technique, is the victim better served with 15&2? Quoted:
Quoted:
Responder or bystander? Responder is still with ventilations. Is the new standard because it is more effective, or because bystanders are clumsy, stupid, tend to freak out, etc.? I.e. - If you have 2 bystanders with the correct mindset and technique, is the victim better served with 15&2? A few minutes of slightly unoxygenated blood getting circulated is orders of magnitude better than nothing. Plus it makes less to teach and remember. Just push hard and fast. |
|
Quoted:
Didn't a recent study conclude that, after a very short period of time, CPR is useless? And that the only reason they still teach it is because of the need to be seen "doing something!" Your chances of surviving a cardiac arrest without a significant decrease in quality of life requires at least the first, but at best both. |
