Posted: 6/20/2017 2:59:06 PM EDT
|
Desert Storm-Beginning of a new Era in Geopolitics
Every nation that keeps an eye on the US capabilities got a sinking sensation in their stomachs in 1991 when we vaporized the 6th largest air force and 4th largest army in a matter of hours. That included MiG-29, MiG-25, and Mirage F1s piloted by 10-year combat vets in the war with Iran, flying against US pilots with no combat experience. Legions of Iraqi armor personnel in Soviet tanks were turned into smoking remains with escharred carcasses melted into their hulls within a few days. Air defense networks were fried, missiled, and bombed with overwhelming ECM and precision-guided bombs, rendering their ability to see their airspace with radar coverage into blindness. The legitimate questions other nations' leadership and security counsels asked themselves was, "How can this be? What are we doing to address this? What are the solutions? If the Americans decide to invade our airspace, what can we do?" They looked at everything from a total solution approach, starting with intelligent thinking. They realized that trying to challenge the US where our strengths are is a fool's errand, so they would have to resort to asymmetric approaches, while doing what they could to bolster their hardware. A big problem for them was that the USSR had collapsed, and development of new technologies to counter Western weapons came to a standstill. These nations were able to buy older Soviet technology for better prices as things were sold off by Russian and Ukrainian officers, but any semblance of a continuing logistics support agreement was questionable at best. They would have to make due with other methods of combating the West. Islamic Terrorism-the tool of Distraction In order to throw the West off balance, terrorism would serve as a primary actor until they could get back on their footing with Russia's military-industrial complex, which was compromised by dissolution of the Soviet Republics and the command infrastructure, as well as the flight of many of their scientists to the West. They would also have to advance as many illegal intelligence assets into positions of access inside the US, in order to gain as much political, military, and technical information as possible to thwart any US encroachment on their territories. The Russians, Chinese, and Iranians already had small armies of doubles in the US IC and DoD, so penetrating and exploiting the US in that regard was nothing new. They also had scores of embedded assets in the global transportation network, to include baggage handlers, gate attendants, food services, and even pilots. In order to prevent the US from exerting its natural military might in the wake of Desert Storm in Asia, a series of asymmetric attacks against US interests abroad and at home would distract US attention to a counter-terrorism effort. Striking embassies all over in regions ranging from Africa to Saudi Arabia, while attacking US Navy warships with small boats laden with explosives would work much better than trying to go toe-to-toe with our aircraft and tanks. By launching attacks within the US, they could simultaneously get us to focus internally and be even more confused, with plenty of statist opportunists ready to pass anti-American legislation. If only they could find trained Jihadis to carry out mass attacks....(WTC 1993, OKC Bomb, 9/11). The New Axis Powers Coalition Russia, China, Iran, Syria, and North Korea realized that in order to check the power of the US in their regions of influence, they would have to cooperate, because divided...they would never be able to counter the US. They see the US in the mold of a conquering oppressor, the new evil capitalist empire with a war machine unparalleled in history that could easily wipe their militaries off the face of the battlefield, after witnessing the brutalizing of Iraq's Soviet and Western-equipped military in a matter of days. Russia and China entered into a cooperation and then strategic partnership starting in 1992. Syria has been a customer of the Russian and former-Soviet MIC for decades, as Iran has been with China. Iran and Syria have already been strategic partners since the Iran-Iraq War, both allied against Saddam. Syria and Iran have trained many of the violent jihad saboteurs and assassins via Syrian camps and Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps soldiers. Aggressive Political and Ideological Warfare They then manipulated the weaknesses of the US partisan political system and got several Manchurians in the WH. A high-level foreign agent who appoints every ally of Iran, Syria, Russia, and China into the WH, DoD, Congress, and Federal Bureaucracies could do more to defeat the US than any instrument of battle. Enter William Jefferson Clinton and Barrack Hussein Obama. Remember all the Chinese money spent on Clinton's campaign illegally that the FBI Director refused to call off the investigations into? Remember the John Huang , the Lincoln Bedroom rental, and TS SCI clearances given to Chinese intelligence officials, as well as positions in US Dept of Commerce? In a pro-US Administration, they can rely on their assets in the IC and DoD to thwart and distract that Presidency, while attacking it via the presstitute establishment, and populating its NSC with the usual suspects who were recruited as doubles long ago. So now as the US prosecutes an aggressive foreign policy, we do it with embedded enemy agents of influence at the highest levels in government, holdovers from the last illegitimate Presidency. You have agents of Russia, Iran, Syria, and China working in the CIA, NSA, NRO, FBI, etc. that have been emplaced to defeat any foreign policies that would threaten the new axis powers. Secretary Gates killed the F-22, with Obama's support, for example. Gates then went on to become President of Boy Scouts of America (The Russians have always seen BSA as a threat because it teaches leadership and common American values to youth). Gates' #1 mission was to demoralize BSA from within and get potential recruits to never want to join by using the gay agenda as a weapon against it. It never had anything to do with individual rights, just like they did with agitating the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s to cause internal strife in the US. You see why General Flynn had a target on his back even before the Inauguration, since he came from DIA and was highly critical of the corruption within the IC, with real proposals for change that would finally put the President and Commanders back in a position of knowing what's going on at the ground level. Flynn was to end the policies of Bush and Obama, which have been detrimental to our IC and also focused too much on the terrorist distraction, rather than anticipating the moves of foreign states. John McCain on the F-22. John McCain, for example (Keating 5 corrupt Senator that was allowed to stay in the Senate after being caught red-handed.) The tactic that the Axis Powers have directed their assets in US Government and DoD to use so that they appear to be tough on defense is to promote lower tech solutions (like drones and the A-10), while cutting funding for the systems that make America more formidable on the battlefield than anyone else, primarily our overmatch programs like the F-22. Slate: "They Scrapped the F-22!" Agitation Additionally, as part of the overall strategy, they have really upped the ante on agitating their leftist products of the US school system and US presstitute media corps, working hard to divide the Nation from within so they can gain more footing in their regions while the US fights itself internally. Since the Democrat Party already does this and has a vast infrastructure built to engage in violence, they're the natural choice to agitate once again. If you step back and analyze all of this from a historical, intelligence, and geopolitical perspective, knowing the cultures and habits of different actors, things fall into place and the puzzle becomes a very clear picture. Along with this, you have the supra nationalist bankers trying to manage events to their liking, delegitimizing national sovereignty, promoting global currencies, and unleashing massive migrant crises on Europe. "What's that England? You want out of our global model for governance? We'll see how you deal with an onslaught of terrorist attacks." |