User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:21:39 PM EDT
[#1]
SHOULD BE FUN
[PUKE] |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:36:48 PM EDT
[#2]
I don’t know.
But I do believe the Republicans blew the 1996 Election on purpose. Dole; The Original Tin Man. He didn’t come alive until After the election. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:36:55 PM EDT
[#3]
Hillary is their idea of a strong candidate? LOL. Maybe they're throwing the 2008 election too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:40:47 PM EDT
[#4]
Back around this time in 1991, things looked pretty much the same for both parties. Bill Clinton didn't even start his campaign until October of that year. Don't count the Democrats out quite yet for 2004, I am sure they will (unfortunately) come up with a viable candidate, and then resort to their usual enlightened campaign tactics.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:44:43 PM EDT
[#5]
Frist will run and win in '08, my kitty told me so [:D]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:51:37 PM EDT
[#6]
I seriously doubt that a woman will ever make it to the office of the President of the United States of America.
Not in my lifetime anyway. Hillary running for President does not bother me a bit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:54:20 PM EDT
[#7]
Or...
To really piss off the Dems... Jeb for Prez in 2008... Let the Bushwhacking continue... Besides, IIRC he's more conservative than GW... Frist, maybe... But then again, the last SML to run got his butt whipped... Whatever happened to JC Watts??? That guy would make a good Clinton-counter... Pro gun/individual rights too... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:55:11 PM EDT
[#8]
Here's what I think
[url]http://ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=189989[/url] Sgtar15 |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:55:30 PM EDT
[#9]
Watts is "taking a break" i think he's resting up for something bigger in the future, he would get my vote
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 8:58:08 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted: Frist will run and win in '08, my kitty told me so [:D] He doesn't come across as Presidential material. Kinda like if you take George Bush Sr. and John Kerry and smoosh them together real hard... then comb the hair real neat. Yeah, kinda like that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 10:36:21 PM EDT
[#11]
No party will take a pass on the Presidency. Individual politicians might, but not the party. Donors might take a hike if it looks grim and dampen fundraising.
This Hillary thing is overrated. She barely polls 50% in New York, for goodness' sake. She doesnt' stand a chance in a real election. Half the country has a visceral hatred of her and her husband. No free passes for presidential contenders. She is good at funraising but does not have the magic touch to reach out like Bill does. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 10:45:25 PM EDT
[#12]
I really like JC Watts and always said he would be the 1st black Pres. But he has some local baggage that the Dems would make into a huge deal.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 10:50:32 PM EDT
[#13]
I think they are and the Clinton's are doing their best to overshadow the party right now. She does not want to run against an incumbant president. Also it is rare for a 2 term president to be followed by the same party.
She will get the DNC nomination in 08' and has a better than 50/50 shot at winning. Who do we have? Cheney? Won't run for health problems. She's a money raising dynamo and wildly popular. She is the biggest threat to any patriot. She is more manipulative and power hungry than her husband. Guns are not the only thing she will fuck us on, social programs up the ass. Legislation that will cost billions. And the biggest fuck in the ass.... Her husband will be running the country behind the scenes. The Dems know this and this is why she will win. Clinton will get 3 terms maybe 4 defacto! Be afraid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2003 11:45:11 PM EDT
[#14]
[red]Waaay over the line. Please don't post comments about assassinating a President here.[/red]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:13:40 AM EDT
[#15]
Quoted: [red]Highly inappropriate quote edited out. --thebeekeeper1[/red] [tin foil hat]These are two words that should never be put into the same sentance on any gun board[/tin foil hat][BD] |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:22:15 AM EDT
[#16]
[b]RebelGray[/b], I don't think that's a wise thing to post. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:32:04 AM EDT
[#17]
I think the democrats are in the process of and have in some cases already changed the republican party from within. The 2008 election will be a moot point as the democrats will be effectively fielding candidates for BOTH parties.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:35:31 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted: I think the democrats are in the process of and have in some cases already changed the republican party from within. The 2008 election will be a moot point as the democrats will be effectively fielding candidates for BOTH parties. HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![shock] Imbroglio said something that made sense!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:37:37 AM EDT
[#19]
Imbroglio in '08'
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:42:39 AM EDT
[#20]
essentially what I think is someone's pulling chains from within, and whoever it is doesn't like freedom. Essentially they're using bush to play his gun card and make it look like he supports guns. He gives guns back for a while and in the meantime throws in shit like the homeland defense department(KGB) to make it look like they want to keep us safe(bullshit). He gets re-elected because of him giving back guns. Then in 2004 he throws in the patriot act 2 which allows secret arrests and all that crap. Then in 2008 and a democrat takes office and seizes our guns. We have no defense, no freedom and we have the homeland defense department, FBI and ATF to worry about and essentially we're under a sort of medium fascist rule. Well maybe someone's not doing it deliberately but that's where it's headed...... like it or not. Basically the government is playing chess to buy time and keep people fooled that they give a shit about our safety.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:44:09 AM EDT
[#21]
what man would vote for that skanky ice queen
I will say one thing that will piss u off but Clinton (bill) has personality and was a great speaker/liar. he is still a scumbag but has alot of charisma that is why he was president hitlery has none of these features and is disgusting she won't be president, in these scary times with war no one wants a women. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:46:31 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted: essentially what I think is someone's pulling chains from within, and whoever it is doesn't like freedom. Essentially they're using bush to play his gun card and make it look like he supports guns. He gives guns back for a while and in the meantime throws in shit like the homeland defense department(KGB) to make it look like they want to keep us safe(bullshit). He gets re-elected because of him giving back guns. Then in 2004 he throws in the patriot act 2 which allows secret arrests and all that crap. Then in 2008 and a democrat takes office and seizes our guns. We have no defense, no freedom and we have the homeland defense department, FBI and ATF to worry about and essentially we're under a sort of medium fascist rule. Well maybe someone's not doing it deliberately but that's where it's headed...... like it or not. Basically the government is playing chess to buy time and keep people fooled that they give a shit about our safety. well shit like this isn't going to make me sleep any better tonight. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 12:56:04 AM EDT
[#23]
I heard that exact same question somewhere last week. The Democrat efforts for 2004 looks so weak right now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 1:26:01 AM EDT
[#24]
Well it's good to know that after Hitlery there is no other Klinton to take the helm.
I highly doubt that old Chelsea has political aspirations. What about Tom D[red][b]ASSHOLE[/b][/red]? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 1:28:08 AM EDT
[#25]
...more people, more problems.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/6/2003 4:59:21 AM EDT
[#26]
Quoted: essentially what I think is someone's pulling chains from within, and whoever it is doesn't like freedom. Essentially they're using bush to play his gun card and make it look like he supports guns. He gives guns back for a while and in the meantime throws in shit like the homeland defense department(KGB) to make it look like they want to keep us safe(bullshit). He gets re-elected because of him giving back guns. Then in 2004 he throws in the patriot act 2 which allows secret arrests and all that crap. Then in 2008 and a democrat takes office and seizes our guns. We have no defense, no freedom and we have the homeland defense department, FBI and ATF to worry about and essentially we're under a sort of medium fascist rule. Well maybe someone's not doing it deliberately but that's where it's headed...... like it or not. Basically the government is playing chess to buy time and keep people fooled that they give a shit about our safety. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2003 7:05:50 AM EDT
[#27]
I agree with most of you guys. If Bush's popularity keeps going up, Republican party will win no matter who runs on the Dem. side in 2008. If this is the case, Hitlery will not run when she know that she would lose. 2008 is her chance: by that time she has gathered more support (not because she's good, but because of her hubby). I don't think that she runs in 2012 because her hubby's influence (read: favors he did as Prez to other Representatives and Senators) would be less, because of the ever-changing Senate and House seats; therefore, less support, unless suddenly she does something that her party thinks she deserves so. Of course, if other Dem. candidates emerge and overtake her, then all bets are off, and her dream as a First Female Pres in US goes bye bye. Now, as far as Republican candidate is concerned (assuming Bush wins 2004), the war vs. terrorists go as plan, economy is improving( it improves somewhat now), then Republican party will win again in 2012. Of course, whoever runs 2012 will have the support of Bush. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2003 7:25:40 AM EDT
[#28]
Quoted: Quoted: I think the democrats are in the process of and have in some cases already changed the republican party from within. The 2008 election will be a moot point as the democrats will be effectively fielding candidates for BOTH parties. HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![shock] Imbroglio said something that made sense!!! And that's why we call the "Big two" parties... Tweedly-dee, and tweedely-dum... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/7/2003 7:26:04 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted: Quoted: I think the democrats are in the process of and have in some cases already changed the republican party from within. The 2008 election will be a moot point as the democrats will be effectively fielding candidates for BOTH parties. HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![shock] Imbroglio said something that made sense!!! |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
