Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 6/20/2016 3:47:48 PM EDT
Basically, it was planned false-flag terrorist attacks against the US civilian population and the military. The objective was to blame Cuba and rally support for military action against Cuba. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed this idea to the Kennedy administration. It was rejected, but this should enrage you.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:50:43 PM EDT
[#1]
Makes one wonder about other "events".
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:51:10 PM EDT
[#2]
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:51:43 PM EDT
[#3]
I don't believe anything to government says about anything, ever. Saves a lot of time.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:52:05 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".
View Quote

Everyone that gets hammered and rammed down our throats but others that have fallen by the wayside.

Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:54:01 PM EDT
[#5]
FP dun NI
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:54:57 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".
View Quote


F&F cough cough
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 3:55:02 PM EDT
[#7]
link?
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:02:03 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Basically, it was planned false-flag terrorist attacks against the US civilian population and the military. The objective was to blame [insert resource-rich nation] and rally support for military action. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed this idea to the Kennedy administration. It was rejected that time, but this should enrage you.
View Quote


Added tinfoil. Also, here is the link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods#Origins_and_public_release





PS. Also see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Deception_flight_.28Saturday.2C_15_April.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:03:26 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:04:00 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



They should arrest everyone responsible!

Oh wait.  It was over 50 years ago.  They're all dead.

View Quote


And no doubt their nefarious mentality died with them!

Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:04:27 PM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:05:57 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.
View Quote


Corruption and adultery were the priorities.  Much like when his alleged bastard son Bill Clinton was in office.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:07:10 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".
View Quote
^^This.

have they suggested something like this again and it wasn't rejected?and if they did would it ever come out like this or would it be hidden forever?
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:07:29 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


And no doubt their nefarious mentality died with them!

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

They should arrest everyone responsible!

Oh wait.  It was over 50 years ago.  They're all dead.



And no doubt their nefarious mentality died with them!



And I suspect it was only declassified because JFK rejected the plan.

I wonder when will we know about the plans JFK accepted - nevermind the covert actions approved by FGWB and FBHO, those we probably won't learn about in our lifetimes.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:14:39 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.
View Quote

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:18:41 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?

Oh please, you're telling me that United States of America didn't have the military resources to neutralize those launchers?

Who let those launchers be built in the first place?  Oh yeah JFK.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:18:58 PM EDT
[#17]
Op, you appear to be extremely naive.  It wasn't, ever, an operation, it was a study. I guarantee you there are studies for every conceivable scenario.  Some are weird, some are scary.  

But they are studies necessary because it's important to consider ways to accomplish things before actually doing them.  

If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:20:17 PM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
Basically, it was planned false-flag terrorist attacks against the US civilian population and the military. The objective was to blame Cuba and rally support for military action against Cuba. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed this idea to the Kennedy administration. It was rejected, but this should enrage you.
View Quote


One of many pushed, including the bay of pigs.

If you want your boss to pick your favorite project, you offer him a horrifically shitty one too.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:20:24 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



They should arrest everyone responsible!

Oh wait.  It was over 50 years ago.  They're all dead.

View Quote

Responsible for what?  What was the crime?  It's a study, not an operation in any sense of the word.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:21:11 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.
View Quote




Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:21:22 PM EDT
[#21]
For anyone interested, "The brothers" is one of the most fascinating books I have ever read about the period and what really led some of those decisions.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:22:15 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.





Cute emoticon, zero substance.  

Typical.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:24:15 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Cute emoticon, zero substance.  

Typical.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.





Cute emoticon, zero substance.  

Typical.


I'm sorry they didn't accept your study
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:25:46 PM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:29:28 PM EDT
[#25]
OP, what did you think about the rest of Loose Change?
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:29:34 PM EDT
[#26]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Op, you appear to be extremely naive.  It wasn't, ever, an operation, it was a study. I guarantee you there are studies for every conceivable scenario.  Some are weird, some are scary.  



But they are studies necessary because it's important to consider ways to accomplish things before actually doing them.  



If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.
View Quote
OR maybe, this was tame compared to the stuff they ACTUALLY did, so they release this to allay any fear of the government.



See, it is all in how you look at it. When you start down the road of even considering such stuff, one can never really be sure.



 
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:31:00 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





Good links.

You seemed to be well versed in disinformation.


View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Basically, it was planned false-flag terrorist attacks against the US civilian population and the military. The objective was to blame [insert resource-rich nation] and rally support for military action. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed this idea to the Kennedy administration. It was rejected that time, but this should enrage you.


Added tinfoil.

Also, here is the link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods#Origins_and_public_release

PS. Also see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Deception_flight_.28Saturday.2C_15_April.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO





Good links.

You seemed to be well versed in disinformation.



Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:33:35 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I'm sorry they didn't accept your study
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.





Cute emoticon, zero substance.  

Typical.


I'm sorry they didn't accept your study

Zero substance and now lame humor attempt.  

Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:35:05 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Zero substance and now lame humor attempt.  

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.





Cute emoticon, zero substance.  

Typical.


I'm sorry they didn't accept your study

Zero substance and now lame humor attempt.  



Perhaps next time if you submit a powerpoint...
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:36:09 PM EDT
[#30]
Direct link:

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf

Read item 7 and down, especially 8A.  There is the link to 9/11.

Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:45:46 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?



No.  The nukes and missiles were not deployed until after the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:47:41 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Perhaps next time if you submit a powerpoint...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If this was such a totalitarian, scary government, you'd have never heard of the paper.






I'm sorry they didn't accept your study

Zero substance and now lame humor attempt.  



Perhaps next time if you submit a powerpoint...

And suddenly it's open mike night at chuckles.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:50:37 PM EDT
[#33]
Truthers can choke on unwashed homeless cock.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 4:58:49 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Truthers can choke on unwashed homeless cock.
View Quote

This is an accurate statement.  There's nothing as repulsive as the unwarranted smugness of a true believer, who willingly accepts ever more bizarre theories as prior theories become untenable, as long as they get to believe the government did it.  

It's one thing to distrust the government.  It's entirely another thing to decide to believe ANYTHING if the government is the bad guy.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 5:01:48 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".
View Quote


Exactly. Some of the tinfoil hatters ideas are sounding more and more plausible.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 5:10:05 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I don't believe anything to government says about anything, ever. Saves a lot of time.
View Quote

Well since the JFK assassination anyway.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 5:25:30 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Basically, it was planned false-flag terrorist attacks against the US civilian population and the military. The objective was to blame [insert resource-rich nation] and rally support for military action. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed this idea to the Kennedy administration. It was rejected that time, but this should enrage you.


Added tinfoil. Also, here is the link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods#Origins_and_public_release

http://extraordinaryintelligence.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Operation-Northwoods-Document-3.jpg

http://www.dc911truth.org/images/evidence/northwoods/northwoods4.gif

PS. Also see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Deception_flight_.28Saturday.2C_15_April.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO


LOL, Wikipedia is like the digital Comrade Britannica

Free to edit, taken as truth by anyone with an IQ under 100, and you never have to pay to print new editors and round up the old ones to burn.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 5:32:50 PM EDT
[#38]
And all that happened was he lost his job as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs?

Intererdasting
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 5:40:53 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


LOL, Wikipedia is like the digital Comrade Britannica

Free to edit, taken as truth by anyone with an IQ under 100, and you never have to pay to print new editors and round up the old ones to burn.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Basically, it was planned false-flag terrorist attacks against the US civilian population and the military. The objective was to blame [insert resource-rich nation] and rally support for military action. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff pushed this idea to the Kennedy administration. It was rejected that time, but this should enrage you.


Added tinfoil. Also, here is the link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods#Origins_and_public_release

http://extraordinaryintelligence.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Operation-Northwoods-Document-3.jpg

http://www.dc911truth.org/images/evidence/northwoods/northwoods4.gif

PS. Also see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Deception_flight_.28Saturday.2C_15_April.29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO


LOL, Wikipedia is like the digital Comrade Britannica

Free to edit, taken as truth by anyone with an IQ under 100, and you never have to pay to print new editors and round up the old ones to burn.


That's right, the only truth can be found on Fox and CNN ;)

FYI Wiki has a rather Westernized version of history (at least on the episodes where I know alternate viewpoints). It's just that it isn't batshit-hawk-neocon like a lot of GD posters.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 5:46:06 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".
View Quote


Yup...
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 6:05:07 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


F&F cough cough
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".


F&F cough cough

F&F only makes sense to me as an operation designed to arm the Sinaloa Cartel so as to keep down the Zetas (the majority of F&F guns went to the Sinaloas - despite all the cartels wanting more guns). Gun control was a convenient plus.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 6:26:56 PM EDT
[#42]
I love how the boot lickers ignore uncomfortable facts in the name of troofers.

Link Posted: 6/20/2016 6:52:32 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I love how the boot lickers ignore uncomfortable facts in the name of troofers.

View Quote

I love how tinfoilers have a limited vocabulary.  Hold hands with me and jump off idiots cliff, OR you are a bootlicker.  

There is no other option.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 8:58:56 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No.  The nukes and missiles were not deployed until after the Bay of Pigs invasion.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?

No.  The nukes and missiles were not deployed until after the Bay of Pigs invasion.


We didn't find out till 1992.

Long after the world thought the Cuban Missile Crisis had ended, with Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s withdrawal of his medium-range nuclear missiles announced on October 28 — and two days after President John F. Kennedy announced the lifting of the quarantine around Cuba — the secret crisis still simmered. Unknown to the Americans, the Soviets had brought some 100 tactical nuclear weapons to Cuba — 80 nuclear-armed front cruise missiles (FKRs), 12 nuclear warheads for dual-use Luna short-range rockets, and 6 nuclear bombs for IL-28 bombers. Even with the pullout of the strategic missiles, the tacticals would stay, and Soviet documentation reveals the intention of training the Cubans to use them
.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 9:18:58 PM EDT
[#45]
And yet ARFCOMers will label you a "psycho" or "conspiracy nut" if you even suggest that events like Sandy Hook were false flags, intended to destroy our beloved 2A.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 9:25:26 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

F&F only makes sense to me as an operation designed to arm the Sinaloa Cartel so as to keep down the Zetas (the majority of F&F guns went to the Sinaloas - despite all the cartels wanting more guns). Gun control was a convenient plus.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".


F&F cough cough

F&F only makes sense to me as an operation designed to arm the Sinaloa Cartel so as to keep down the Zetas (the majority of F&F guns went to the Sinaloas - despite all the cartels wanting more guns). Gun control was a convenient plus.


They had another operation run out of FL and perhaps others.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 9:27:19 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


We didn't find out till 1992.
.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Cuba could have  been dealt with at the bay of pigs, JFK was a weak president who's cabinet was comprised of equally weak yes men.

Cuba already had operatating nuke launchers in case of invasion.
Which American cities would you trade for "dealing" with Cuba?

No.  The nukes and missiles were not deployed until after the Bay of Pigs invasion.


We didn't find out till 1992.

Long after the world thought the Cuban Missile Crisis had ended, with Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s withdrawal of his medium-range nuclear missiles announced on October 28 — and two days after President John F. Kennedy announced the lifting of the quarantine around Cuba — the secret crisis still simmered. Unknown to the Americans, the Soviets had brought some 100 tactical nuclear weapons to Cuba — 80 nuclear-armed front cruise missiles (FKRs), 12 nuclear warheads for dual-use Luna short-range rockets, and 6 nuclear bombs for IL-28 bombers. Even with the pullout of the strategic missiles, the tacticals would stay, and Soviet documentation reveals the intention of training the Cubans to use them
.


That is later. Timeline was:

Bay of Pigs -> USSR sends nukes to Cuba -> USSR removes some nukes

I though our government knew they didn't withdraw all of them.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 9:29:54 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Makes one wonder about other "events".
View Quote


There is no wondering about recent events in Orlando and San Bern.  Those were "i
intentionally turn a blind eye"
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 9:38:26 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That is later. Timeline was:
Bay of Pigs -> USSR sends nukes to Cuba -> USSR removes some nukes
I though our government knew they didn't withdraw all of them.
View Quote

That is only for the medium range strategic nukes, capable of hitting almost anywhere in the us.
Short range tactical nukes were already there and fully operational.  Soviet bombers and subs were there too.  Castro begged the Soviets to use them during the bay of pigs.  If had control he would have used them.

Your time line is also missing the missles in Turkey that were removed but replaced in the 90's after we found out there indeed had been nukes in Cuba ready for orders.
Link Posted: 6/20/2016 10:59:59 PM EDT
[#50]
Don't forget that of those same soviet era missiles, maybe half would leave the launch pad without blowing up, and of those, half would wouldn't survive the flight, and of those, maybe one would hit the target assuming like five were still flying.

No promises on a detonation of that one at a meaningful altitude though
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top