Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 5
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:19:14 PM EDT
[#1]
If this gets argued at the federal level does the result set precedence? (As opposed to the state level)
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:19:20 PM EDT
[#2]
Let the plantiffs pay for the fees
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:20:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You have always been able to do so. No one would bother as it is a frivolous lawsuit you are certain to lose. Now if your goal was to bankrupt a company, and you were a municipality that didn't mind filing multiple frivolous suits against a company until they could no longer afford to defend themselves and went out of business. Well you have just won your objective without winning a case.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this is legal prescedence for me to sue Government Motors/Ford/Chrysler/Toyota/etc when some drunk hits me?  They should have known vehicles are dangerous and therefore they are liable for its criminal use.


I'll be here waiting for the Sandy Hook families to turn in their dangerous motor vehicles.

You have always been able to do so. No one would bother as it is a frivolous lawsuit you are certain to lose. Now if your goal was to bankrupt a company, and you were a municipality that didn't mind filing multiple frivolous suits against a company until they could no longer afford to defend themselves and went out of business. Well you have just won your objective without winning a case.


I was really trying to point out the blatant hypocrisy of the families for political reasons, but yes, I do know what they're actually doing, and with the upcoming election cycle panic nearly here, I think they'll have a hard time bankrupting anyone anytime soon.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:20:47 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Judge is wrong.  I thought the FOPA granted immunity from these things.
View Quote


No, it was a later G. W. Bush law. Clinton used the courts to attacks guns in this manner.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:20:58 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Wasn't this backed by the brady idiots? I hope they get slammed for lawyer fees when it fails.
View Quote

I doubt that is Ct law. It is law in CO and that is why lucky gunner "won" attorney fees that they will never receive. Arguably Lonnie and Sandy Phillips won that suit anyway, as I am certain it was a PR stunt that went exactly the way they knew it would. Have you noticed the PR campaign being waged against Bernie on behest of the Hillary camp regarding his vote for the plcaa?
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:21:11 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You have always been able to do so. No one would bother as it is a frivolous lawsuit you are certain to lose. Now if your goal was to bankrupt a company, and you were a municipality that didn't mind filing multiple frivolous suits against a company until they could no longer afford to defend themselves and went out of business. Well you have just won your objective without winning a case.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
So this is legal prescedence for me to sue Government Motors/Ford/Chrysler/Toyota/etc when some drunk hits me?  They should have known vehicles are dangerous and therefore they are liable for its criminal use.


I'll be here waiting for the Sandy Hook families to turn in their dangerous motor vehicles.

You have always been able to do so. No one would bother as it is a frivolous lawsuit you are certain to lose. Now if your goal was to bankrupt a company, and you were a municipality that didn't mind filing multiple frivolous suits against a company until they could no longer afford to defend themselves and went out of business. Well you have just won your objective without winning a case.


BINGO.

The Lawful Commerce in Arms act was specifically to prevent these cases from even going to a discovery phase.   The entire point of these lawsuits in the '90s was to bankrupt and disrupt firearms businesses by burying them in lawyers and paperwork, not to actually win cases.


Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:22:09 PM EDT
[#7]
Fuck that judge.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:22:33 PM EDT
[#8]
The "should" know?  How?


Didn't the mother buy the guns?
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:22:50 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just heard this on the news

this is very very bad
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 


This.  Fuck 'em.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:23:26 PM EDT
[#10]
(a) FindingsCongress finds the following:
(1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
(2) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not members of a militia or engaged in military service or training, to keep and bear arms.
(3) Lawsuits have been commenced against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms that operate as designed and intended, which seek money damages and other relief for the harm caused by the misuse of firearms by third parties, including criminals.
(4) The manufacture, importation, possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition in the United States are heavily regulated by Federal, State, and local laws. Such Federal laws include the Gun Control Act of 1968, the National Firearms Act [26 U.S.C. 5801 et seq.], and the Arms Export Control Act [22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.].
(5) Businesses in the United States that are engaged in interstate and foreign commerce through the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, importation, or sale to the public of firearms or ammunition products that have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce are not, and should not, be liable for the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse firearm products or ammunition products that function as designed and intended.
(6) The possibility of imposing liability on an entire industry for harm that is solely caused by others is an abuse of the legal system, erodes public confidence in our Nation’s laws, threatens the diminution of a basic constitutional right and civil liberty, invites the disassembly and destabilization of other industries and economic sectors lawfully competing in the free enterprise system of the United States, and constitutes an unreasonable burden on interstate and foreign commerce of the United States.
(7) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, and private interest groups and others are based on theories without foundation in hundreds of years of the common law and jurisprudence of the United States and do not represent a bona fide expansion of the common law. The possible sustaining of these actions by a maverick judicial officer or petit jury would expand civil liability in a manner never contemplated by the framers of the Constitution, by Congress, or by the legislatures of the several States. Such an expansion of liability would constitute a deprivation of the rights, privileges, and immunities guaranteed to a citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
(8) The liability actions commenced or contemplated by the Federal Government, States, municipalities, private interest groups and others attempt to use the judicial branch to circumvent the Legislative branch of government to regulate interstate and foreign commerce through judgments and judicial decrees thereby threatening the Separation of Powers doctrine and weakening and undermining important principles of federalism, State sovereignty and comity between the sister States.
(b) PurposesThe purposes of this chapter are as follows:
(1) To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and their trade associations, for the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended.
(2) To preserve a citizen’s access to a supply of firearms and ammunition for all lawful purposes, including hunting, self-defense, collecting, and competitive or recreational shooting.
(3) To guarantee a citizen’s rights, privileges, and immunities, as applied to the States, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to section 5 of that Amendment.
(4) To prevent the use of such lawsuits to impose unreasonable burdens on interstate and foreign commerce.
(5) To protect the right, under the First Amendment to the Constitution, of manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and trade associations, to speak freely, to assemble peaceably, and to petition the Government for a redress of their grievances.
(6) To preserve and protect the Separation of Powers doctrine and important principles of federalism, State sovereignty and comity between sister States.
(7) To exercise congressional power under article IV, section 1 (the Full Faith and Credit Clause) of the United States Constitution.(a) In general
A qualified civil liability action may not be brought in any Federal or State court.

(b) Dismissal of pending actions
A qualified civil liability action that is pending on October 26, 2005, shall be immediately dismissed by the court in which the action was brought or is currently pending.
View Quote
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:24:49 PM EDT
[#11]
Gonna have to overturn US v Miller then.....
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:31:12 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The law says you can't, but we disagree with the law, so the law is moot.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Judge is wrong.  I thought the FOPA granted immunity from these things.


The law says you can't, but we disagree with the law, so the law is moot.


Typical liberal logic.  So why not sue ford because the Mustang is to fast and powerful, or beer makers for putting too much alcohol in malt liquor?
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:33:28 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So... Bushmaster shouldn't have sold a rifle that has been sold to civilians since 1965.

View Quote

SEAL's bought the first AR rifles to enter unofficial service from the Baltimore, Maryland Montgomery Wards along with Smith and Wesson Combat Masterpiece revolvers and ammunition for both. Roy Boehm was brought up on inquest for misuse of government funds over the purchase, it was dropped when the President issued the SEAL's a priority one status. The point being, the AR was being sold to the general public before the Military officially adopted it.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:34:04 PM EDT
[#14]
After this lawsuit are they going to sue the pharmaceutical companies for making these mind altering drugs?

Here is a list of names and drugs these kids were taking, Unfortunately not listed for the CT killer.

http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/stop-big-government/gun-news-rifle-manufacturer-john-noveske-mysteriously-killed-shortly-after-005014
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:35:26 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Those of you living in Connecticut have a name to add to your list it would seem......You DO have a list don't you?
View Quote



They don't make list in CT they only get put on them.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:39:10 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



They don't make list in CT they only get put on them.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Those of you living in Connecticut have a name to add to your list it would seem......You DO have a list don't you?



They don't make list in CT they only get put on them.




Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:44:39 PM EDT
[#17]
Judicial feels
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:46:01 PM EDT
[#18]
So this means we can sue manufacturers of things when their products are used in crimes/accidents, just so long as we make some b.s. excuse.  So I can sue Jeep/Chrysler for a car accident because Jeeps are military vehicles and should never have been sold to the public?  The families of 9/11 can sue the plane manufacturers because airplanes have a long history of military use and civilians shouldn't be operating them, amiright?  This could go on and and on with retarded arguments like Leftists come up with.  

The AR15 is legal, you can't sue because you "feel" it should be illegal.  What kind of crap is that?  That really opens up suits about anything you wish was different about the world.  A little part of me wishes there'd be some economic catastrophe or big war just so that our country would get some sense knocked back into it.  Blah.  Anyway, I'm off to Connecticut to sue some phone companies because I don't think cell phones should be legal because of texting & driving deaths.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:46:28 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So... Bushmaster shouldn't have sold a rifle to a distributer who sold that rifle to a retailer who sold that rifle to a woman who passed a background check that has been sold to civilians since 1965.
View Quote

Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:48:32 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Activist judges...

When will it be time?
View Quote


It's been time.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:49:36 PM EDT
[#21]
Shit suit.  They should have to put up a large bond to file these suits to be sure the defense gets paid
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:50:01 PM EDT
[#22]
Rule of law
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:52:56 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So while we are at it let's hit alcohol and vehicle companies because people don't know how to control themselves and drive drunk and kill folks because of their products.
View Quote



we need reasonable back ground checks, before selling someone a 6000lb vehicle that can plow thru a school bus.... drunk driving history, history of speeding, have too many wrecks? your too high risk... go ride the bus, we wont sell you a car.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:56:40 PM EDT
[#24]
It will be overturned

Hopefully BM will follow the path of the ammo company that was wrongfully sued for the Aurora shooting and sue the family. The ammo co won legal fees.

I really wish this judge would face immediate punishment for obviously ignoring federal law. Not some obscure law from the 1800s, but a very clear law that she willingly violated.

Link Posted: 4/14/2016 2:58:12 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



we need reasonable back ground checks, before selling someone a 6000lb vehicle that can plow thru a school bus.... drunk driving history? go ride the bus, we wont sell you a car.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
So while we are at it let's hit alcohol and vehicle companies because people don't know how to control themselves and drive drunk and kill folks because of their products.



we need reasonable back ground checks, before selling someone a 6000lb vehicle that can plow thru a school bus.... drunk driving history? go ride the bus, we wont sell you a car.


Time to sue Ferrari for selling cars that are too fast for the public to own.

Let's sue all the beer companies for selling alcohol knowing that it it will result in thousands of deaths per year.

Let's sue tobacco companies for selling cancer sticks (even though they put warnings on their products (like gun manufacturers)).
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:00:03 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Those of you living in Connecticut have a name to add to your list it would seem......You DO have a list don't you?



They don't make list in CT they only get put on them.




http://www.noozsaurus.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Gun-lines-firearm-gun-registration_1388417797521_4955477_ver1.0_640_480.jpg

i dont understand what is so funny about this
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:05:27 PM EDT
[#27]
how about remove the judge for judicial activism?
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:08:42 PM EDT
[#28]
Oh fuck.
 
Once again, feels trump laws.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:10:11 PM EDT
[#29]
I thought the rifle was left in the car.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:11:20 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Are there any militaries that issue a semi-auto only AR?
View Quote


Nope.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:11:59 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Activist judges...

When will it be time?
View Quote


It's going to take time but the water has just begun to heat up.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:15:11 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:16:00 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just heard this on the news

this is very very bad
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 


^^this
The exact same thing happened to the families who brought suit against the ammunition suppliers who sold the Aurora theater shooter his ammo.
The suit was killed and now the families are on the hook for hundreds of thousands in legal fees.
One family was on the news saying it will bankrupt them and they will have to sell their house.

Not one fuck found to give...
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:16:27 PM EDT
[#34]
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:19:39 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Let the plantiffs pay for the fees
View Quote


Tim McGraw would just have another show to cover them on the backend.  Anything left, I'm sure Beyoncé and Neil Young will pick up.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:20:35 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Oh fuck.   Once again, feels trump laws.
View Quote


TRUMP THREAD!
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:26:45 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Its not really legislating from the bench, yet. All the judge said was the case can be argued. If the case is subsequently argued and she rules the federal law doesn't apply when it so clearly does in this case then it would be legislating from the bench
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll take legislating from the bench for 1000...

Its not really legislating from the bench, yet. All the judge said was the case can be argued. If the case is subsequently argued and she rules the federal law doesn't apply when it so clearly does in this case then it would be legislating from the bench


Semantics. Law says you can't, judge says fuck that law, you can. Judge has already bypassed the legislation.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:27:19 PM EDT
[#38]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:

Those of you living in Connecticut have a name to add to your list it would seem......You DO have a list don't you?






They don't make list in CT they only get put on them.








http://www.noozsaurus.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Gun-lines-firearm-gun-registration_1388417797521_4955477_ver1.0_640_480.jpg




 
There's maybe 50 people in that line.  And compared to how many AR owners in Connecticut?  Do you think any state is going to have a 100% non compliance with an assault rifle registration?  Should Florida or Arizona pass such a law, there will be people in a similar line.  There will always be people either willing or cowed into compliance by orders from Big Brother.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:29:12 PM EDT
[#39]
The FLCA is an immunity statute. As a general rule, issues of immunity are decided at the outset of a case, as in the OP. Also, a denial of immunity is usually immediately appealable, putting the case on hold while the immunity issue is dealt with on appeal. FLCA is plain as dirt, and it is hard to imagine the denial of immunity being upheld on appeal.

I wonder if Bushmaster can seek injunctive relief in federal court. I assume a Connecticut gun dealer is included as a defendant or the case would be in federal court on diversity grounds anyway.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:30:45 PM EDT
[#40]
The lawyers are making money off this
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:31:14 PM EDT
[#41]
Barb should be removed from the bench for blatantly violating her oath by ignoring the law as it's written.

I believe some of these lefty activist judges are making ridiculous rulings because they believe (or at least hope) that a Dem will be elected in November, which will tilt the Supreme Court to a libtard majority. If Hillary or Bernie wins, we are in deep shit.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:31:22 PM EDT
[#42]
Wow.
Time to start suing auto manufacturers.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:31:57 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The lawyers are making money off this
View Quote


The Plaintiffs' lawyers probably aren't and probably won't. The gunmaker and seller's lawyers are probably getting paid by the hour.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:32:06 PM EDT
[#44]
Judges that would rather further their agendas instead of using common sense.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:33:01 PM EDT
[#45]
If you want to learn more about the Koskoffs, read the book DAMAGES by Barry Werth. The firm is as slimy as a personal injury firm gets.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:34:57 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



this... they should be posting about the co family that got schlonged for $200.000.00 + in legal fees when they lost.   also, any gun company that gets sued and wins would be stupid to not go after legal fees.... because its a good warning to others who start thinking about suing for the same thing.  its not like it can hurt their image with liberals by going after legal fees from the families, as liberals hate them anyway, and dont give a shit about the victims, or their families, they just want guns banned.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just heard this on the news

this is very very bad
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 



this... they should be posting about the co family that got schlonged for $200.000.00 + in legal fees when they lost.   also, any gun company that gets sued and wins would be stupid to not go after legal fees.... because its a good warning to others who start thinking about suing for the same thing.  its not like it can hurt their image with liberals by going after legal fees from the families, as liberals hate them anyway, and dont give a shit about the victims, or their families, they just want guns banned.


Was going to post this.
When the case is lost, and BM sues for fees, those "financially supporting and pushing the families" will mysteriously wash their hands of it, and leave the families on the hook.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:36:32 PM EDT
[#47]
Punish gunmakers by bleeding them to pay legal fees, even knowing the legal challenge against them will not prevail.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:37:01 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


^^this
The exact same thing happened to the families who brought suit against the ammunition suppliers who sold the Aurora theater shooter his ammo.
The suit was killed and now the families are on the hook for hundreds of thousands in legal fees.
One family was on the news saying it will bankrupt them and they will have to sell their house.

Not one fuck found to give...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just heard this on the news

this is very very bad
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 


^^this
The exact same thing happened to the families who brought suit against the ammunition suppliers who sold the Aurora theater shooter his ammo.
The suit was killed and now the families are on the hook for hundreds of thousands in legal fees.
One family was on the news saying it will bankrupt them and they will have to sell their house.

Not one fuck found to give...


I'd love nothing more than to see the bushmaster plaintiffs get totally bankrupt and live out their remaining days camped out underneath an overpass,

but the Aurora shit stains got their asses handed to them because of CO state law that allowed the defendants to recoup their expenses.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:37:02 PM EDT
[#49]
Maybe someone should send the plaintiffs a thumbnail sketch of what happened to the family in CO.

They may have no clue about it.
Link Posted: 4/14/2016 3:39:02 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I'd love nothing more than to see the bushmaster plaintiffs get totally bankrupt and live out their remaining days camped out underneath an overpass,

but the Aurora shit stains got their asses handed to them because of CO state law that allowed the defendants to recoup their expenses.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just heard this on the news

this is very very bad
No it's not. It will go through the courts, BM will win, and counter sue to reclaim their attorney's fee, crippling the families that sued them financially. Then we will find out who is financially supporting and pushing the families to do this.
 


^^this
The exact same thing happened to the families who brought suit against the ammunition suppliers who sold the Aurora theater shooter his ammo.
The suit was killed and now the families are on the hook for hundreds of thousands in legal fees.
One family was on the news saying it will bankrupt them and they will have to sell their house.

Not one fuck found to give...


I'd love nothing more than to see the bushmaster plaintiffs get totally bankrupt and live out their remaining days camped out underneath an overpass,

but the Aurora shit stains got their asses handed to them because of CO state law that allowed the defendants to recoup their expenses.

you guys really think they will get up in front of the country and sue the newtown parents?
Page / 5
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top