Posted: 3/10/2016 7:43:53 PM EDT
|
I'm not a fan of Trump, and I certainly don't like the way some of the protestors have been physically treated, but why aren't the protesters protesting outside the venue instead of 'crashing' the event with only one thing in mind. Surely the organizers who have paid for the venue are entitled to hold their event the way they planned without interruption? |
|
Quoted:
I'm not a fan of Trump, and I certainly don't like the way some of the protestors have been physically treated, but why aren't the protesters protesting outside the venue instead of 'crashing' the event with only one thing in mind. Surely the organizers who have paid for the venue are entitled to hold their event the way they planned without interruption? Because they have a better chance of getting sucker punched inside. |
|
The reason we have such self centered, shrill, obnoxious people in the US can be directly blamed on lack of beat downs. Back in The Day, men expected and knew they would get punched in the face for "certain" behavior. There were lines that were not crossed because they knew, and society approved, of the fist to the face. Now days, you just get arrested. |
|
I could care less how they are treated. They are there to cause trouble, nothing more. Good riddance no matter how they are drug/beaten. Special snowflakes get a special treatment.
I'm no Trump fan either, I'll vote for Cruz but these people thinking they are imune to what they create (hate) are are full of shit. |
|
Quoted:
The reason we have such self centered, shrill, obnoxious people in the US can be directly blamed on lack of beat downs. Back in The Day, men expected and knew they would get punched in the face for "certain" behavior. There were lines that were not crossed because they knew, and society approved, of the fist to the face. Now days, you just get arrested.
How did that work out in March 1965? |
|
Quoted:
Trump and Trump supporters calling for beating-up vocal opponents remind me of a certain leader and lock-step followers from history... Can't put my finger on it... The "Trump is Hitler" was last week's GOPe meme. Get with the program. Didn't you get the memo? This week it's "mathematically unlikely" |
| The protesters are protesting outside. There are others that go inside to disrupt a formal event. The people in the event have often traveled great distances and waiting in lines for hours to be able to see the event. Then you have a criminal behaving in a criminal manner and disrupting the event for all the people. I have no problem if they are manhandled as a way to stop their criminal behavior. |
|
They are there to stop free speech and to silence him. What would have happened at FBHO rallies if small groups of conservative white males made sure he could not speak? How would his crowds react after 17 interruptions? How would the media react? Who would be the bad guys? Know your enemy. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The reason we have such self centered, shrill, obnoxious people in the US can be directly blamed on lack of beat downs. Back in The Day, men expected and knew they would get punched in the face for "certain" behavior. There were lines that were not crossed because they knew, and society approved, of the fist to the face. Now days, you just get arrested. Ugh, so unpresidential! Just like Trump! Romney 2016 |
|
Quoted: The protesters are protesting outside. There are others that go inside to disrupt a formal event. The people in the event have often traveled great distances and waiting in lines for hours to be able to see the event. Then you have a criminal behaving in a criminal manner and disrupting the event for all the people. I have no problem if they are manhandled as a way to stop their criminal behavior. Yeah, not sure about the 'criminal' part. |
|
Quoted:
How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Quoted:
Quoted:
I say kick the shit out of them. No, I'm not very PC. LofuckingL How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Brown has always been a popular color. |
|
Quoted:
How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Quoted:
Quoted:
I say kick the shit out of them. No, I'm not very PC. LofuckingL How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? How about you worry about your fucking head commie, Hat? |
|
Quoted:
How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Quoted:
Quoted:
I say kick the shit out of them. No, I'm not very PC. LofuckingL How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Thanks for self-identifying. |
|
Quoted: Yeah, not sure about the 'criminal' part. Quoted: Quoted: The protesters are protesting outside. There are others that go inside to disrupt a formal event. The people in the event have often traveled great distances and waiting in lines for hours to be able to see the event. Then you have a criminal behaving in a criminal manner and disrupting the event for all the people. I have no problem if they are manhandled as a way to stop their criminal behavior. Yeah, not sure about the 'criminal' part. In Kentucky it is a misdemeanor to intentionally disrupt an organized event. We still had protesters inside the Trump rally in Louisville last week but I doubt they were charged. 525.150 Disrupting meetings and processions in the second degree. (1) A person is guilty of disrupting meetings and processions in the second degree when, with intent to prevent or disrupt a lawful meeting, procession, or gathering, he or she does any act tending to obstruct or interfere with it physically or makes any utterance, gesture, or display designed to outrage the sensibilities of the group. (2) Disrupting meetings and processions in the second degree is a Class B misdemeanor. |
|
I liked it better back when if you acted up like that it was just understood you were gonna get tuned up for it.
There is a big difference between protesting outside an event, and purposefully going inside the event with the sole intention of disruption. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted: How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Quoted: Quoted: I say kick the shit out of them. No, I'm not very PC. LofuckingL How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? I think a red maple leaf insignia on the sleeves of the people deserving an ass-kicking might work. ![]() |
|
Quoted:
How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? Quoted:
Quoted:
I say kick the shit out of them. No, I'm not very PC. LofuckingL How would you identify who to kick the shit out of? Maybe you ought to make uniforms so you can tell who's on your side and who's not. Maybe you can all wear the same color shirt? There's that thing again, as said in another thread, y'all are more angry at Trump supporters than Bernie or Hitlery supporters, and that says a lot about a person. For the record, I agree with M4Real, some people need the shit kicked out of them. Now, kindly STFU and clean up your own front yard before you complain about ours. |


