Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
9/22/2015 10:11:11 PM EDT
On now.  Murphy pops up big here; if it can go wrong it will.

Some of the emergencies and escapes are a bit contrived, but MY GOD the cinematography is fantastic.

The scene where the debris cloud hammers the ISS is phenomenal.

Pretty good science in the zero-G effects.
9/22/2015 10:13:01 PM EDT
[#1]
Best sci fi I've seen in a very long time.

Wait...are you talking about gravity, Gravity the movie, or the movie "Interstellar" in which gravity played a central role, along with the character Murphy?

9/22/2015 10:13:44 PM EDT
[#2]
F=G([m1*m2]/D^2)

Oh, you are talking about the movie... never mind.
9/22/2015 10:14:56 PM EDT
[#3]

9/22/2015 10:15:15 PM EDT
[#4]
After playing many hours of Kerbal Space Program this movie gave me a special level of glee and horror.
9/22/2015 10:16:51 PM EDT
[#5]
A pretty good movie overall. I wish the ending was better though.
9/22/2015 10:18:59 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:
A pretty good movie overall. I wish the ending was better though.
View Quote


You no like Sandra half naked?
9/22/2015 10:20:14 PM EDT
[#7]
I watched a special on space junk, and the BS that China caused by shooting down a satellite.
9/22/2015 10:23:53 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:


You no like Sandra half naked?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
A pretty good movie overall. I wish the ending was better though.


You no like Sandra half naked?


She is wearing a shirt and shorts, your definition of half naked is different from mine. That boy haircut though
9/22/2015 10:28:19 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Quoted:
Best sci fi I've seen in a very long time.

Wait...are you talking about gravity, Gravity the movie, or the movie "Interstellar" in which gravity played a central role, along with the character Murphy?

View Quote


The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.
9/22/2015 10:33:21 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Quoted:


The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Best sci fi I've seen in a very long time.

Wait...are you talking about gravity, Gravity the movie, or the movie "Interstellar" in which gravity played a central role, along with the character Murphy?



The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.

Are you like, a scientist?
9/22/2015 10:34:13 PM EDT
[#11]
I have it on DVR, still haven't watched it.
Maybe I'll free up some time and give it a fo...
9/22/2015 10:34:24 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:


Pretty good science in the zero-G effects.
View Quote


9/22/2015 10:47:56 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Quoted:


The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Best sci fi I've seen in a very long time.

Wait...are you talking about gravity, Gravity the movie, or the movie "Interstellar" in which gravity played a central role, along with the character Murphy?



The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.


Don't forget the mega-tesla rotating magnetic field inducing a billion amps of current from your head to your asshole.

9/22/2015 10:58:04 PM EDT
[#14]
Both movies had sciency flaws, but Chris Nolan > George Clooney
9/22/2015 11:02:52 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:


View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Pretty good science in the zero-G effects.




Mysteries of #Gravity: Why Bullock's hair, in otherwise convincing zero-G scenes, did not float freely on her head.

Mysteries of #Gravity: When Clooney releases Bullock's tether, he drifts away. In zero-G a single tug brings them together.

Mysteries of #Gravity: How Hubble (350mi up) ISS (230mi up) & a Chinese Space Station are all in sight lines of one another.

Mysteries of #Gravity: Nearly all satellites orbit Earth west to east yet all satellite debris portrayed orbited east to west

Mysteries of #Gravity: Satellite communications were disrupted at 230 mi up, but communications satellites orbit 100x higher.
9/22/2015 11:14:04 PM EDT
[#16]
There was so much science fail in that movie, I had to turn off the engineer part of my mind.

One day I need to watch it again, to see if even a single science thing was correct.

Great cinematography, decent acting, but oh, soooooooo much science fail.
9/22/2015 11:15:07 PM EDT
[#17]
Gravity had absolutely stunning visuals, but was a lot more fiction than science.

The reason NASA first cancelled the final Hubble repair mission was that it was impossible to get from Hubble's orbit to the ISS if the thermal tiles on the shuttle were damaged.  The mission was only later reinstated due to pressure from scientists and the public.  The EVA from the wrecked shuttle to ISS is not just difficult, but impossible as it would require much more fuel than any backpack thruster system could provide.  

I consider Gravity to be like Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge in that most of the movie was a dream sequence inside of the dying stars head.  Since it is impossible for her and her commander to travel from the shuttle to ISS, that means they didn't.  Instead, she died slowly outside of the shuttle as her oxygen ran out while dreaming of a one-in-a-million chance of survival that was in fact no chance at all.
9/22/2015 11:16:00 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote History
Quoted:
F=G([m1*m2]/D^2)

Oh, you are talking about the movie... never mind.
View Quote


Good one, thanks for the laugh.

When I read the thread title your response is what I thought of.
9/22/2015 11:16:49 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Quoted:
I consider Gravity to be like Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge in that most of the movie was a dream sequence inside of the dying stars head.  Since it is impossible for her and her commander to travel from the shuttle to ISS, that means they didn't.  Instead, she died slowly outside of the shuttle as her oxygen ran out while dreaming of a one-in-a-million chance of survival that was in fact no chance at all.
View Quote



I like this
9/22/2015 11:18:57 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Quoted:


Mysteries of #Gravity: Why Bullock's hair, in otherwise convincing zero-G scenes, did not float freely on her head.

Mysteries of #Gravity: When Clooney releases Bullock's tether, he drifts away. In zero-G a single tug brings them together.

Mysteries of #Gravity: How Hubble (350mi up) ISS (230mi up) & a Chinese Space Station are all in sight lines of one another.

Mysteries of #Gravity: Nearly all satellites orbit Earth west to east yet all satellite debris portrayed orbited east to west

Mysteries of #Gravity: Satellite communications were disrupted at 230 mi up, but communications satellites orbit 100x higher.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Pretty good science in the zero-G effects.




Mysteries of #Gravity: Why Bullock's hair, in otherwise convincing zero-G scenes, did not float freely on her head.

Mysteries of #Gravity: When Clooney releases Bullock's tether, he drifts away. In zero-G a single tug brings them together.

Mysteries of #Gravity: How Hubble (350mi up) ISS (230mi up) & a Chinese Space Station are all in sight lines of one another.

Mysteries of #Gravity: Nearly all satellites orbit Earth west to east yet all satellite debris portrayed orbited east to west

Mysteries of #Gravity: Satellite communications were disrupted at 230 mi up, but communications satellites orbit 100x higher.



I bet you are a  hoot at parties.
9/22/2015 11:22:20 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Quoted:



I bet you are a  hoot at parties.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Pretty good science in the zero-G effects.




Mysteries of #Gravity: Why Bullock's hair, in otherwise convincing zero-G scenes, did not float freely on her head.

Mysteries of #Gravity: When Clooney releases Bullock's tether, he drifts away. In zero-G a single tug brings them together.

Mysteries of #Gravity: How Hubble (350mi up) ISS (230mi up) & a Chinese Space Station are all in sight lines of one another.

Mysteries of #Gravity: Nearly all satellites orbit Earth west to east yet all satellite debris portrayed orbited east to west

Mysteries of #Gravity: Satellite communications were disrupted at 230 mi up, but communications satellites orbit 100x higher.



I bet you are a  hoot at parties.


Mysteries of #Gravity:  Why Bullock, a medical Doctor, is servicing the Hubble Space Telescope.


9/22/2015 11:29:38 PM EDT
[#22]
Dumb movie
9/22/2015 11:32:10 PM EDT
[#23]
9/22/2015 11:35:30 PM EDT
[#24]
My wife and I watched it on our flight to Japan. We hit some turbulance just as the shuttle was getting hammered.

Soundtrack was great and the effects were good too.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
9/22/2015 11:43:55 PM EDT
[#25]
Are you like, a scientist?
View Quote

No, but I have read my Niven.
9/22/2015 11:46:45 PM EDT
[#26]
I really enjoyed Gravity. visually stunning and a great theater experience.

but yea, the orbital mechanics were just oh...so wrong.
9/22/2015 11:55:24 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote History
Quoted:


The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Best sci fi I've seen in a very long time.

Wait...are you talking about gravity, Gravity the movie, or the movie "Interstellar" in which gravity played a central role, along with the character Murphy?



The Sandra Bullock movie.  Interstellar, while interesting, bordered on being too touchy feely for me.  And I'll say it again:  You've just landed on a water planet BARELY outside the event horizon of a black hole, you have calculated the time dilation relativistic effect, but you DON'T EVEN CONSIDER the tidal effects?  C'mon, man.  That and McConaughey's blithe comment about how he can just swing the ship around a neutron star to decelerate.

Not to mention that the tidal effects would pretty much rip apart the plant to begin with and he better hope that neutron star isn't spinning or his orbit ain't gonna be nothin' like what he expects.


How can you possibly say all that after sayingy gravity had great zerog effects???????.?
9/23/2015 1:08:25 AM EDT
[#28]
Tars87%