User Panel
Posted: 10/10/2014 11:01:58 PM EDT
|
|
|
The Federation and Star Trek's civilization are far inferior technologically to those in Star Wars.
|
|
|
View Quote Oh please. That's a thread about the entire Empire vs the entire Federation. This is strictly a ship duel.
|
|
|
Not to be geeky, but if the star trek ship arrives 'in peace' and the Empire ship's shields aren't up, couldn't they beam a photon torpedo into the center of the star destroyer and blow it up from the inside?
Once shields are raised then I guess it's a slug fest and may the highest firepower win - and I don't know enough about the respective universes to know whose side shoots bigger jolts of energy.... |
|
Empire has no transporter capability nor corresponding shield technology.to block transport. One magnetic containment vessel containing a suitable quantity of antimatter beamed aboard the Star Destroyer and POOF!. Federation starship wins.
|
|
Quoted:
Not to be geeky, but if the star trek ship arrives 'in peace' and the Empire ship's shields aren't up, couldn't they beam a photon torpedo into the center of the star destroyer and blow it up from the inside? Once shields are raised then I guess it's a slug fest and may the highest firepower win - and I don't know enough about the respective universes to know whose side shoots bigger jolts of energy.... View Quote Federation hasn't figured out circuit breakers and only barely came up with the idea of homing torpedoes. Leave it to them to beam a missile instead of a bomb into the middle of ship. Of course, they'll only even think to do it just moments before losing their own shields, and at least 20 minutes after an electrical panel explodes killing half the bridge crew. |
|
ISD butt-fucks Jean-Luc "Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey" Picard.
Oh, and as for the "beam a torpedo on board before the ISD's shields are up" malarkey, do you really think an ISD's shields are EVER down, unless you pound on them until they go down? Fuck no. Enterprise may roll up without her shields up and try to make nice, but the Empire doesn't play that shit. |
|
The big question is the transporters. If the federation can use them to put Kirk abourd the star destroyer he is only a few drop kicks away from control of the ship.
|
|
Give Data a lightsaber and he could clear the whole ship himself.
|
|
Beaming is not happening when both ships have shields. Federation is going to get smoked by turbolaser batteries or by the multiple squadrons of TIE fighters and bombers carried by the ISD.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
C'mon, don't be rediculous. They'll have Vera, too. Maybe some grenades. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Serenity.... and itty bitty cannon and one swinging cod? C'mon, don't be rediculous. They'll have Vera, too. Maybe some grenades. Tell me you brought them. |
|
Quoted: Beaming is not happening when both ships have shields. Federation is going to get smoked by turbolaser batteries or by the multiple squadrons of TIE fighters and bombers carried by the ISD. View Quote So, we have Phasers > Lasers > Star War shields. Seeing as the shields in Star Trek actually stopped the more powerful Phaser fire until failure. So we have ST Shields (limited) > Phasers > Lasers > SW shields. In all situations, Empire tech falls short every time to Fed gear.
|
|
I wonder how the Borg would handle a star destroyer?
A star destroyer would beat any variant of Enterprise until Q shows up, then favoritism puts Picard ahead. |
|
|
Quoted:
There's a Star Trek episode joking about a ship with lasers. And of all the star wars battles, seems the best they had were deflector shields that were easily pierced with lasers. So, we have Phasers > Lasers > Star War shields. Seeing as the shields in Star Trek actually stopped the more powerful Phaser fire until failure. So we have ST Shields (limited) > Phasers > Lasers > SW shields. In all situations, Empire tech falls short every time to Fed gear. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Beaming is not happening when both ships have shields. Federation is going to get smoked by turbolaser batteries or by the multiple squadrons of TIE fighters and bombers carried by the ISD. So, we have Phasers > Lasers > Star War shields. Seeing as the shields in Star Trek actually stopped the more powerful Phaser fire until failure. So we have ST Shields (limited) > Phasers > Lasers > SW shields. In all situations, Empire tech falls short every time to Fed gear. Turbolasers are clearly not lasers despite the name. They do not project beams or travel at the speed of light. They function more like cannons. The ISD also has missile and torpedo batteries and carries bombers. Whatever argument you make about the level of technology involved the Federation is going to be outgunned. |
|
Quoted:
Star Wars doesn't have transporters.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Star Wars doesn't have transporters.... Quoted:
The Federation and Star Trek's civilization are far inferior technologically to those in Star Wars. Plus Star Wars shields seem to only work well at keeping air inside the hangar bays. |
|
Quoted: Turbolasers are clearly not lasers despite the name. They do not project beams or travel at the speed of light. They function more like cannons. The ISD also has missile and torpedo batteries and carries bombers. Whatever argument you make about the level of technology involved the Federation is going to be outgunned. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Beaming is not happening when both ships have shields. Federation is going to get smoked by turbolaser batteries or by the multiple squadrons of TIE fighters and bombers carried by the ISD. So, we have Phasers > Lasers > Star War shields. Seeing as the shields in Star Trek actually stopped the more powerful Phaser fire until failure. So we have ST Shields (limited) > Phasers > Lasers > SW shields. In all situations, Empire tech falls short every time to Fed gear. Turbolasers are clearly not lasers despite the name. They do not project beams or travel at the speed of light. They function more like cannons. The ISD also has missile and torpedo batteries and carries bombers. Whatever argument you make about the level of technology involved the Federation is going to be outgunned. |
|
It was the one where the probe wiped everyone's memory and the alien imposter wore the commander rank. When they got to the space station, the comment was made they could fire until their laser banks ran dry and not even penetrate the navigational shields.
Quoted: There's a Star Trek episode joking about a ship with lasers. And of all the star wars battles, seems the best they had were deflector shields that were easily pierced with lasers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Beaming is not happening when both ships have shields. Federation is going to get smoked by turbolaser batteries or by the multiple squadrons of TIE fighters and bombers carried by the ISD. So, we have Phasers > Lasers > Star War shields. Seeing as the shields in Star Trek actually stopped the more powerful Phaser fire until failure. So we have ST Shields (limited) > Phasers > Lasers > SW shields. In all situations, Empire tech falls short every time to Fed gear. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Plus Star Wars shields seem to only work well at keeping air inside the hangar bays. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Star Wars doesn't have transporters.... Quoted: The Federation and Star Trek's civilization are far inferior technologically to those in Star Wars. Plus Star Wars shields seem to only work well at keeping air inside the hangar bays. |
|
Hmmm....
Federation tech seems superior to empire tech on some fundamental things disregarding the woo woo stuff. But a star destroyer is basically an aircraft carrier and a federation starship is sort of a heavily armed science vessel. Call it a frigate or a destroyer on it's best day. The ability of the star destroyer to project air/space power means it chews up the shields and defenses of the starship at a distance while never coming under direct fire. Win goes to the Star Destroyer assuming there is no radical difference in shield/deflection technology. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Star Wars doesn't have transporters.... Quoted:
The Federation and Star Trek's civilization are far inferior technologically to those in Star Wars. Or Replicators. Star wars has weaponry capable of destroying stars, and machinery capable of harnessing the power of stars as well. Transporters are cool and all, but how much time does it take for a federation ship to cross a galaxy? Star wars hyperdrives do it very quickly in comparison. Aside from lasers and turbolasers, there were plenty of other more direct and powerful munitions in the star wars universe. I'd personally rather see the imperium of man fight either of them, though. |
|
In before a bunch of people try to actually compare physical tech capabilities from two fictional universes with totally different laws of physics.
(star destroyer obviously) |
|
Enterprise separates into it's two parts and simultaneously attacks the star destroyer's bridge and propulsion.
Even with the tie fighters they couldn't find the Millenium Falcon stuck to it's backside. I still think the star destroyer would rape the Enterprise quickly, but a smart Federation captain could make it interesting. |
|
|
I laugh at the people who claim the shields in ST stop incoming shots but the SW shields don't.
Nearly every time Enterprise took a hit on her shields, consoles were blowing up and vital ship systems were degraded or just plain knocked offline. |
|
You guys forget Enterprise has Met-aphasic shielding rendering them untouchable and unseen. It also has transporters and photon torpedoes the empire has no chance. Shit enterprise can fly into a suns corona and throw a feast from replicators. When everyone waits whatever out they can drink green non synthahol and throw a virtual bonfire party in the halodeck. Good luck empire tit suckers.
|
|
Technologies wise. Astrophysist Michio Kaku says the Federation in Star Trek is a class 2 civilization, and Star Wars is a class 3 civilization.
So I'd have to go with Star Wars tech over Star Trek.
|
|
You mean the one that Picard hallucinated? |
|
Quoted:
You guys forget Enterprise has Met-aphasic shielding rendering them untouchable and unseen. It also has transporters and photon torpedoes the empire has no chance. Shit enterprise can fly into a suns corona and throw a feast from replicators. When everyone waits whatever out they can drink green non synthahol and throw a virtual bonfire party in the halodeck. Good luck empire tit suckers. View Quote Nobody in the star destroyer wears a red shirt. Game over. |
|
Quoted: I laugh at the people who claim the shields in ST stop incoming shots but the SW shields don't. Nearly every time Enterprise took a hit on her shields, consoles were blowing up and vital ship systems were degraded or just plain knocked offline. View Quote Ha. I am a Star Trek fan and enjoy the franchise. But I always am thinking "WTF????" when the Enterprise shields are fully operational, they take a hit from a torpedo and shit is sparking and blowing up everywhere and people are being tossed around from one side of the room to the other side.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.