Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
1/27/2003 4:49:23 AM EDT
If you really want to remind everyone in your sig line that I called you a liar, why don't you start that thread you've been threatening me with for four days via e-mails?

You know, the one with the poll that asks members who the real liar is?

You get 150 words in one post and I get the same. We make our case and add the poll when we are done. It was your idea. Now follow through with it.

C'mon, what are you waiting for?

Let's get this over with.
1/27/2003 4:53:04 AM EDT
[#1]
I think he already did.
1/27/2003 4:54:02 AM EDT
[#2]
Yeah, get ANOTHER mod (you had the AUDACITY to lock a  thread [b]YOURSLEF[/b] your were PERSONALLY involved - "moderator" my butt - that someone else came and locked also) to open the thread, and lets have a FULL hearing, Eric.

Rumor is you also started a "Let's ban Wobblin" poll.

What a weenie you are. Can't handle this man to man, you and Wobblin' [b]OFF [/b] site??? Gotta launch a personal vendetta against Wobblin????

"Moderator."

My flabby ass.





1/27/2003 4:55:46 AM EDT
[#3]
Removed by mug due to poor taste, and not wanting to pi$$ off everyone in one sitting...
1/27/2003 4:55:58 AM EDT
[#4]
<---steps away from the computer to get some popcorn
1/27/2003 4:56:13 AM EDT
[#5]
No personal attacks.  Name calling has to go out the door.

1/27/2003 4:56:31 AM EDT
[#6]
Its just WRONG for a "Moderator" to be "callin' out" another member in his sig line

Where are the rest of you Mods??

Shameful.

1/27/2003 4:56:45 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
I think he already did.
View Quote


He must've scheduled a debate and forgot to invite the opposition.

ETH said he started one around midnight a few days ago but took it down quickly. Perhaps he realized it looked pretty stupid considering I had already logged off and was fast asleep.
1/27/2003 4:58:05 AM EDT
[#8]
Well, it's too early to get a bowl of popcorn.  Would it be acceptable to watch a pissin' contest over a bowl of Cheerios?

[rolleyes]
1/27/2003 4:59:32 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
[url]http://carcino.gen.nz/images/image.php/463c5922/arguing.jpg[/url]
View Quote


Priceless. Absolutely priceless. Too bad I am guilty of doing it.

LMAO!
1/27/2003 5:04:54 AM EDT
[#10]
Sorry, but if you'd like to do it, have at it!

BTW, the thread, that was locked, is to be found at:

[url]http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=165886&w=searchPop[/url]

Any member so inclined, may simply go to that thread to determine the veracity of all concerned.

That should satisfy everyone.

Your offer, [b]Wobblin-Goblin[/b], is declined.

If you could not get your point across in 5 pages of drivel, there is little reason to see what you can do in 150 words or less!

[:D]

Eric The(Truthful)Hun[>]:)]
1/27/2003 5:14:13 AM EDT
[#11]
If you need to ask why I'd call you a liar over and over in your sig line, perhaps you better follow through with your thread/poll?

So, rather than a stand-up fight, you prefer cheap-shots every time you post?

Hey, it was your idea.
1/27/2003 5:14:28 AM EDT
[#12]
Garuntman Ted Armstrongs launches another  "I'll get that wascully Hun yet...hehehehehehe"
:)
1/27/2003 5:20:03 AM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Garuntman Ted Armstrongs launches another  "I'll get that wascully Hun yet...hehehehehehe"
:)
View Quote


LOL

I get the "garuntman" part ( typical cheap Nazi association tactic with a username praising the greatest Nazi killer of all time. I "get" that part, knowing it rings as hollow as ever)

But who is this "Ted Armstrong" fellow??? I'm more of a Ted Nugent type.

[:D]

Knowing your proclivity for saying nice things about EVEN people you  disagree with, I rest assured that the "Ted Armstrong" comment is meant only in the kindest, most constructive manner.

[rolleyes] [}:D]



1/27/2003 5:20:51 AM EDT
[#14]
Hey Goblin, grab Stealth's pig, and maybe you'll be able to catch the Hun!
1/27/2003 5:25:23 AM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Hey Goblin, grab Stealth's pig, and maybe you'll be able to catch the Hun!
View Quote


DF -

The "greased pig" analogy definitely works for me in refernce to ETH, but...

...since you are a Mod, mebbe you can explain to me how ANOTHER Mod can get away with calling a member out in his sig line???

Can I have a sig line that says "ETH is a balding goatroper????"

Or is that something ONLY Mods can get away with???

I mean, where's the line? If you gonna let sig lines become personal billboards against members, where s it stop???

(Feel free to ignore this post. Its the usual approach when anyone dare question Lord Hun [rolleyes] )

1/27/2003 5:26:09 AM EDT
[#16]
People, let's stay on-topic.

This thread is about ETH and his problem with my accusation.

If he truly feels he needs to continue asking his sig line question and he was serious in his e-mails to me, he should follow through with his idea on a thread/poll.

1/27/2003 5:30:43 AM EDT
[#17]
I have the worst luck! I missed the last big pissing match and I have no popcorn or soda to watch this one with.

THISISME
1/27/2003 5:30:54 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
If you could not get your point across in 5 pages of drivel, there is little reason to see what you can do in 150 words or less!

Eric The(Truthful)Hun[>]:)]
View Quote


So what is it that you are afraid of? If you are correct that I won't be able to "get my point across" in 150 words and that you are "Truthful," where's the downside for you?

This was your idea, Hun! Don't miss out on an opportunity to prove you are right!
1/27/2003 5:32:56 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
If you really want to remind everyone in your sig line that I called you a liar, why don't you start that thread you've been threatening me with for four days via e-mails?

You know, the one with the poll that asks members who the real liar is?

You get 150 words in one post and I get the same. We make our case and add the poll when we are done. It was your idea. Now follow through with it.

C'mon, what are you waiting for?

Let's get this over with.
View Quote


So, do you still think that Jesus was a slave trader? Give it up and let it die. You sound rediculous and Garandman jumped Erics shit for no reason.

[Garandman]"Quit quoting scripture, even though you aren't quoting scripture!"[/Garandman]

[b]"It's better to let someone think you're stupid than to open your mouth and prove them right."[/b] In other words, quit running your mouth and making yourself look like an ass. If you quit now maybe everyone will forget this by next year.
1/27/2003 5:37:21 AM EDT
[#20]
Ponyboy,

This thread has nothing to do with slavery and no-one ever accused Jesus of being a slave-trader.

Let's stay on topic.

1/27/2003 5:38:54 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
In other words, quit running your mouth and making yourself look like an ass. If you quit now maybe everyone will forget this by next year.
View Quote


You are mistaken if you think I want people to forget. That is your desire apparently.


And calling me an "ass" doesn't change the facts here. Its merely trying to ignore them.

1/27/2003 5:42:38 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey Goblin, grab Stealth's pig, and maybe you'll be able to catch the Hun!
View Quote


DF -

The "greased pig" analogy definitely works for me in refernce to ETH, but...

...since you are a Mod, mebbe you can explain to me [red]how ANOTHER Mod can get away with calling a member out in his sig line???

Can I have a sig line that says "ETH is a balding goatroper????"

Or is that something ONLY Mods can get away with???

I mean, where's the line? If you gonna let sig lines become personal billboards against members, where s it stop???[/red]

(Feel free to ignore this post. Its the usual approach when anyone dare question Lord Hun [rolleyes] )

View Quote


Seems like a good point.
Erics signature would appear to violate the following in the board code;

[blue]2) No inappropriate usernames, signatures,..........

4) No pissing matches

7) No personal attacks towards ANYONE......This includes provoking someone into an attack.
[/blue]
1/27/2003 5:43:30 AM EDT
[#23]
I must have missed the whole "AWB-turned-Scripture-turned-Slavery" thread the first time around.

I'm glad I did. [rolleyes]

I just went to it and I didn't even make it through the first page before I said [size=4][b]JUST SHUT THE HELL UP ALL OF YOU!!![/b][/size=4] Holy CRAP!!! [;D]

A fuglier clusterfuck of a thread I don't think I've ever seen here.

Taking sides in that mangled mess is darn near impossible but I guess I'd say that [b]ETH[/b] was the LAST of you guys to be civil in his responses before he was jumped on like a beagle falling into a bear cage.

I just wish I didn't have to see that dungheap of a thread this early in the morning. [V]



1/27/2003 5:45:54 AM EDT
[#24]
Garandman, if you want to scrap with somebody, start another thread.
1/27/2003 5:49:10 AM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
So, do you still think that Jesus was a slave trader? Give it up and let it die. You sound rediculous and Garandman jumped Erics shit for no reason.

[Garandman]"Quit quoting scripture, even though you aren't quoting scripture!"[/Garandman]

[b]"It's better to let someone think you're stupid than to open your mouth and prove them right."[/b] In other words, quit running your mouth and making yourself look like an ass. If you quit now maybe everyone will forget this by next year.
View Quote

No!  Don't listen to this man!  It's just starting to get interesting!

[:D]
1/27/2003 5:49:38 AM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
Ponyboy,

This thread has nothing to do with slavery and no-one ever accused Jesus of being a slave-trader.

Let's stay on topic.

View Quote


Are you smoking crack? I just read the thread for the first time and the whole thing started by Garandman bitching about ETH making a comment sounding "biblical" even though it was just an analogy that apparently everyone else on the board understood. (Basically a petty bullshit attack)

Then you jumped in and instead of just letting it die, like you claimed you wanted to happen you kept going and going. Going so far as to claim that Jesus was a supporter of slavery. Don't remember that?

Surely no one would defend slavery based upon anything that Jesus said?
View Quote


Colossians 3:22-24 (KJV)
"Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God: And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ."

I don't condone slavery but the Scriptures here are telling slaves to obey their masters. I don't know if this means the Bible condones slavery but it sure as heck acknowledges it as a practice in society, atleast at that time. Some good people may understand it to mean that slavery does have its place. Another example:

Ephesians 6:5, 8-9
"Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters...Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free.
And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him."

(Bold added by Wobblin' Goblin)

Again, not that I would agree with them, but since the Bible was so clear in describing the correct relationship between slaves and their masters, some might conclude slavery was a justifiable practice.
View Quote


Your whole arguement started to go down the fucking tubes right about here. Who in their right fucking mind is going to try to use biblical text to try and support slavery, besides some skinhead neo-nazi?

You lost, you're a Raider, give it up. There's nothing more to say. You're trying to pick a fight that you can't win. It's the OK corral and Doc just walked around the corner. Your arguement is DOA. Pull up your pants, your ignorance is showing....

Get the picture?
1/27/2003 5:50:55 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
In other words, quit running your mouth and making yourself look like an ass. If you quit now maybe everyone will forget this by next year.
View Quote


You are mistaken if you think I want people to forget. That is your desire apparently.


And calling me an "ass" doesn't change the facts here. Its merely trying to ignore them.

View Quote


I'm not calling you an ass, I'm not even talking to you. Did you say something?
1/27/2003 5:53:16 AM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
Garandman, if you want to scrap with somebody, start another thread.
View Quote


I DO NOT wish to scrap with anyone.

I wish to see "moderators" to be MODERATE(ing)


1/27/2003 5:55:47 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:

I'm not calling you an ass, I'm not even talking to you. Did you say something?
View Quote



My apologies.

I had mistakenly thought that "quoting me" ([garandman]....[/garandman] ) was the same as illiciting a response from me.

[:D]

1/27/2003 6:02:09 AM EDT
[#30]
Wobblin-Goblin,
I just read the thread as well, you lost an
argument and now your crying like a woman.
This thread makes you look even more foolish.
Your a small fish and no one would have remembered
you from the old thread in question. But now
you have brought on the attention that you crave.
Attention Whore comes to mind, but for NOW, I will
not start the name calling.
ETH most always handles him self in a positive manner.
So if he called you a name or hurt your feelings,
You deserved it. Grow up and move on.[noclue]
1/27/2003 6:03:30 AM EDT
[#31]
Quoted:
Quoted:

I'm not calling you an ass, I'm not even talking to you. Did you say something?
View Quote



My apologies.

I had mistakenly thought that "quoting me" ([garandman]....[/garandman] ) was the same as illiciting a response from me.

[:D]

View Quote


No, while I agree with the principal of your argument, I disagree with your initial attack on ETH. I also believe that biblical texts and scripture should not be thrown around non-chalantly, but his analogy was something completely different and I don't belive it was out of line.

If I say "There is a fox in the hen house" that doesn't mean that I live on a farm, or if "I smell a rat" that doesn't mean that I need to call an exterminator. See what I'm saying?

Basically I'm saying that your attack was uncalled for, but that isn't the basis of my arguement. It's about WG jumping in on the misunderstanding and then claiming that Jesus supported slavery. Him trying to make that one point has poisoned his whole arguement...
1/27/2003 6:03:32 AM EDT
[#32]
I know better than to tangle with garandman when he’s in one of his crabby moods when he starts to lash out at everyone.

Garandman has a flabby ass! [ROFL2]
THISISME
1/27/2003 6:04:42 AM EDT
[#33]
LOL...VERY childlike [baby] . Looks like the two of you have been looking for the chance to pile on ETH together for awhile. You didn't win.
1/27/2003 6:06:21 AM EDT
[#34]
Ponyboy, so what in my quotes that you have pasted is so off base? I quoted Scripture and commented on it.

Again, let's stay on topic. This thread has nothing to do with slavery, Garandman, or any other person other than ETH.

Gman, do you hear me? Let's stay on topic.
1/27/2003 6:08:01 AM EDT
[#35]
What a load of petty childish crap.  The three of you need to get over it and let it die.
1/27/2003 6:11:26 AM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Ponyboy, so what in my quotes that you have pasted is so off base? I quoted Scripture and commented on it.

View Quote


Yes, you quoted scripture and equated it to Jesus supporting slavery. Doesn't that strike you as a little silly?

1/27/2003 6:16:46 AM EDT
[#37]
If somebody can copy and paste any quote of mine that says I think the Bible "approves" of slavery, I will step forward and issue a retraction and apology.

All I said was that based on every Scripture verse that dealt with slavery the Bible either did not condemn it or actually reinforced the idea that slaves needed to remain slaves and should obey their masters.

Based on what the Bible said about slavery, I commented that some good, Christian people could decide that slavery was a justifiable practice.

I even said that I was uncomfortable with that assessment.

Eric's beef with me has precious little to do with slavery. It has to do with a comment he made about homosexuality.
1/27/2003 6:20:39 AM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:


Gman, do you hear me? Let's stay on topic.
View Quote



Sorry, dude.

This ones all yours.

1/27/2003 6:24:28 AM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
<---steps away from the computer to get some popcorn
View Quote


pass the beernuts!

anyone want to start a pool as to when garandman bites ETH's ear?  ooooppps sorry was having a tyson flashback [:D]

mike
1/27/2003 6:31:10 AM EDT
[#40]
Quoted:I DO NOT wish to scrap with anyone.
View Quote


[BS2]

I wish to see "moderators" to be MODERATE(ing)
View Quote


I just want to remind everyone that at one time Garandman used to be a moderator of the GD forums.  He quit/was removed after being "accussed" of locking threads that did not agree with his strong religious views.

That's about how I remember it anyways...

Sgtar15
1/27/2003 6:32:14 AM EDT
[#41]
Is there a moderator in the house?

I guess I was not the only person that could not get their CRACK perscription filled this morning.
1/27/2003 6:34:56 AM EDT
[#42]
Quoted:
Quoted:


Gman, do you hear me? Let's stay on topic.
View Quote



Sorry, dude.

This ones all yours.

View Quote


Don't run now...you'll only die tired![;)]

Sgtar15
1/27/2003 6:37:32 AM EDT
[#43]
Quoted:
I just want to remind everyone that at one time Garandman used to be a moderator of the GD forums.  He quit/was removed after being "accussed" of locking threads that did not agree with his strong religious views.

That's about how I remember it anyways...

Sgtar15
View Quote



You are ABSOLUTELY WRONG on this. Don't talk about what you don't know.

I stepped down [b]OF MY OWN VOLITION,[/b] against the wishes of Ed Avila and Goatboy, BECAUSE I WAS TOO OPINIONATED. BECAUSE I was being divisive, which is something a Mod should NOT be.

You can check with the Avilas on this. If you actually care for the truth in this matter.

I'm NOT asking for ANYTHING I ahven't ALREADY done myself.

And I NEVER locked any thread I was personally involved in. That's an ETH trick. Can I expect to see you actually criticise him for doing that to Wobblins thread? Prolly not.

DOn't talk about what you don't know.

But like Wobblin' said - quit making this about me, cuz it AIN'T about me.

1/27/2003 6:39:56 AM EDT
[#44]
..religion  [rolleyes]
1/27/2003 6:44:53 AM EDT
[#45]
ETH locked a thread ?[shock]

I don't believe it! [rolleyes]
1/27/2003 6:51:17 AM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
ETH locked a thread ?[shock]

I don't believe it! [rolleyes]
View Quote


He did.

Pending someone elses review.

A staff member came along and confirmed.

Its at the end of the thread that Eric linked to (above)

I may be pigheaded, but I'm no liar.

But its in the unwritten rules of moderating that you NEVER lock a thread youa re personally engaged in.


Here it is, in Lord Hun's own words:

Originally by Eric The Hun:
Time's up.

Thread is locked, pending a review by others!

Eric The(Un-Happy)Hun
View Quote


Really - I'm outta this now. Please LEAVE me out of it, youse guys.


1/27/2003 6:51:24 AM EDT
[#47]
A thread involving three supposedly "Christian" men, at least two of which are unabashedly "fundamentalist," and it turns into a "I'm holier than you are" fest?

No WONDER most of us want a separation between church and state.

And no WONDER the Muslims hate the Jews, the Catholics hate the Protestants, etc. etc. etc.

Hey, you [b]three[/b]:  Grow the fuck up.
1/27/2003 6:59:07 AM EDT
[#48]
He shoots..He scores.

Have a nice day Garandman.  Glad your back [kiss]

Sgtar15
1/27/2003 7:00:30 AM EDT
[#49]
Quoted:
He shoots..He scores.

Have a nice day Garandman.  Glad your back [kiss]

Sgtar15
View Quote


Peace.

gman [b]OUT.[/b]


1/27/2003 7:01:45 AM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
Quoted:
ETH locked a thread ?[shock]

I don't believe it! [rolleyes]
View Quote


He did.

Pending someone elses review.

A staff member came along and confirmed.

Its at the end of the thread that Eric linked to (above)

I may be pigheaded, but I'm no liar.

But its in the unwritten rules of moderating that you NEVER lock a thread youa re personally engaged in.

View Quote


I know you are no liar Garandman,

Hell must have frozen over then.
You guys all know ETH has (almost never) locked any threads.
So the one time he does, you guys are all up set.
My, my, my, what ever do the rest of you really
think about bendover, beekeeper and doublefeed then.

I personally have never cared about any of my threads
getting locked. Its not like any of them are a
work of art.

And according to the way some here believe,
if you can't touch it, smell it, taste it or fuck it,
then does it really exist ?
That was for all the atheists out there.[nuts]
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page