Posted: 5/9/2014 7:15:51 PM EDT
| http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Wagner-Order1.pdf |
|
Quoted:
Yes. I think yes based on the statement however I would like to see any contravening evidence. I also think the defendant shot too soon, his case would be more cut and dry had there been a weapon in the "victims" hand or had the victim actually attacked him. If I were to do the same as the defendant I would have had to shoot several old/off their meds/addict assholes in Citrus County. I typically wave smile and watch them like a hawk as leave. He also screwed up by not filing a police report on the attempted kidnapping the day before when the "victim" refused to allow them to leave the apartment whilst threatening violence. |
|
Quoted:
Yes. I think yes based on the statement however I would like to see any contravening evidence. I also think the defendant shot too soon, his case would be more cut and dry had there been a weapon in the "victims" hand or had the victim actually attacked him. If I were to do the same as the defendant I would have had to shoot several old/off their meds/addict assholes in Citrus County. I typically wave smile and watch them like a hawk as leave. He also screwed up by not filing a police report on the attempted kidnapping the day before when the "victim" refused to allow them to leave the apartment whilst threatening violence. |
|
Quoted:
I think yes based on the statement however I would like to see any contravening evidence. I also think the defendant shot too soon, his case would be more cut and dry had there been a weapon in the "victims" hand or had the victim actually attacked him. If I were to do the same as the defendant I would have had to shoot several old/off their meds/addict assholes in Citrus County. I typically wave smile and watch them like a hawk as leave. He also screwed up by not filing a police report on the attempted kidnapping the day before when the "victim" refused to allow them to leave the apartment whilst threatening violence. Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes. I think yes based on the statement however I would like to see any contravening evidence. I also think the defendant shot too soon, his case would be more cut and dry had there been a weapon in the "victims" hand or had the victim actually attacked him. If I were to do the same as the defendant I would have had to shoot several old/off their meds/addict assholes in Citrus County. I typically wave smile and watch them like a hawk as leave. He also screwed up by not filing a police report on the attempted kidnapping the day before when the "victim" refused to allow them to leave the apartment whilst threatening violence. A "vehicle" was being used as a weapon. " wave smile and watch them" all you want but tell me what you would do when they overtly attack. |
|
Quoted:
A "vehicle" was being used as a weapon. " wave smile and watch them" all you want but tell me what you would do when they overtly attack. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes. I think yes based on the statement however I would like to see any contravening evidence. I also think the defendant shot too soon, his case would be more cut and dry had there been a weapon in the "victims" hand or had the victim actually attacked him. If I were to do the same as the defendant I would have had to shoot several old/off their meds/addict assholes in Citrus County. I typically wave smile and watch them like a hawk as leave. He also screwed up by not filing a police report on the attempted kidnapping the day before when the "victim" refused to allow them to leave the apartment whilst threatening violence. A "vehicle" was being used as a weapon. " wave smile and watch them" all you want but tell me what you would do when they overtly attack. Did you read it? The statement indicated that the vehicle was stopped and that he was exiting the car. Remember it was the shooters statement so the whole piece about how he was almost hit may have been an exaggeration. Again, I think it was likely a good shoot, but it seems a bit gray to me and I can see why it might be prosecuted. |
|
Quoted:
Did you read it? The statement indicated that the vehicle was stopped and that he was exiting the car. Remember it was the shooters statement so the whole piece about how he was almost hit may have been an exaggeration. Again, I think it was likely a good shoot, but it seems a bit gray to me and I can see why it might be prosecuted. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes. I think yes based on the statement however I would like to see any contravening evidence. I also think the defendant shot too soon, his case would be more cut and dry had there been a weapon in the "victims" hand or had the victim actually attacked him. If I were to do the same as the defendant I would have had to shoot several old/off their meds/addict assholes in Citrus County. I typically wave smile and watch them like a hawk as leave. He also screwed up by not filing a police report on the attempted kidnapping the day before when the "victim" refused to allow them to leave the apartment whilst threatening violence. A "vehicle" was being used as a weapon. " wave smile and watch them" all you want but tell me what you would do when they overtly attack. Did you read it? The statement indicated that the vehicle was stopped and that he was exiting the car. Remember it was the shooters statement so the whole piece about how he was almost hit may have been an exaggeration. Again, I think it was likely a good shoot, but it seems a bit gray to me and I can see why it might be prosecuted. I think there was more than the just defendants word. The Court bases these findings on the Defendant's testimony, the testimony of the blood spatter analyst, and photographs indicating the proximity of the vehicles, and the position of the victim's body, and the testimony of the witnesses, including Ms. Allison who is the victim's mother, regarding Mr. Elkins mental problems and prior violent tendencies, |
