[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Seriously Boobs (Page 1 of 5)
Posted: 10/18/2012 7:38:07 PM EDT
|
Let us be honest. Pie is great and all, but I seriously believe all pie is exactly the same. It's a hole and if not used correctly at the exact angles and vibrational frequencies conducive to orgasm it is useless. On the other hand boobs each have their own distinctive identities. No 2 are the same and each has it's own character that cannot be like that of any other you have come into contact with. Their mere shape and presence can achieve win, while pie until actually partaken of is basically a broken promise.
By this reasoning with the assistance of a bottle of jack single barrel stock, I have come to the scientific conclusion that Boobs>Pie. That is all. |
|
Quoted:
Let us be honest. Pie is great and all, but I seriously believe all pie is exactly the same. It's a hole and if not used correctly at the exact angles and vibrational frequencies conducive to orgasm it is useless. On the other hand boobs each have their own distinctive identities. No 2 are the same and each has it's own character that cannot be like that of any other you have come into contact with. Their mere shape and presence can achieve win, while pie until actually partaken of is basically a broken promise. By this reasoning with the assistance of a bottle of jack single barrel stock, I have come to the scientific conclusion that Boobs>Pie. That is all. Nope. Boobs are ok to look at, but very rare is the set that is even halfway as useful as pie. |
|
Quoted:
the number of times I have used boobs to get off? maybe less that 4 (and you know how) the number of times I have used the pie to get off? about 10,000. yeah, I think pie wins this debate. ![]() Wrong thinking here good sir. At last count I have partaken of 23 types of pie. Each was different, but the physics to each was the same. The pie is rarely different, the keeper of the pie is just more skilled. Boobs on the other hand are everywhere. Your average straight male thinks about sex every 10sec, the physical stimulus is 87% more likely to be tits than pie due to their frequency of being in our line of sight. Math does not lie.
|
|
Quoted:
Let us be honest. Pie is great and all, but I seriously believe all pie is exactly the same. It's a hole and if not used correctly at the exact angles and vibrational frequencies conducive to orgasm it is useless. On the other hand boobs each have their own distinctive identities. No 2 are the same and each has it's own character that cannot be like that of any other you have come into contact with. Their mere shape and presence can achieve win, while pie until actually partaken of is basically a broken promise. By this reasoning with the assistance of a bottle of jack single barrel stock, I have come to the scientific conclusion that Boobs>Pie. That is all. No pie make you sad. Pie good. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: the number of times I have used boobs to get off? maybe less that 4 (and you know how) the number of times I have used the pie to get off? about 10,000. yeah, I think pie wins this debate. ![]() Wrong thinking here good sir. At last count I have partaken of 23 types of pie. Each was different, but the physics to each was the same. The pie is rarely different, the keeper of the pie is just more skilled. Boobs on the other hand are everywhere. Your average straight male thinks about sex every 10sec, the physical stimulus is 87% more likely to be tits than pie due to their frequency of being in our line of sight. Math does not lie. ![]() Math may not lie, but that factoid has long since been debunked, and is nonsense. |
|
Quoted: I respectfully disagree. There is magic pie out there, continue your quest sir.Let us be honest. Pie is great and all, but I seriously believe all pie is exactly the same. It's a hole and if not used correctly at the exact angles and vibrational frequencies conducive to orgasm it is useless. On the other hand boobs each have their own distinctive identities. No 2 are the same and each has it's own character that cannot be like that of any other you have come into contact with. Their mere shape and presence can achieve win, while pie until actually partaken of is basically a broken promise. By this reasoning with the assistance of a bottle of jack single barrel stock, I have come to the scientific conclusion that Boobs>Pie. That is all. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
pie > boobs > ass. I can deal with a flat chested girl that has a great ass...but a flat ass, well I just have to pass no matter the boobage Ass> boobs you are a wise man. ![]() This I can deal with a Flat chest....Flat or Fat ass Im not gonna even think about it. |
|
Quoted:
I once dated a woman who had a boob job and they messed up and she didnt have nipples anymore. She didnt mention this til I discovered it and it caught me off guard. Wrap your head around that one. You trying to mess up my good vibes guy how bout you knock that shit off. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
...I seriously believe all pie is exactly the same.... No. Not even....just....no. word! there is no substitute for good pie. a woman who knows how to work her g-spot to our mutual advantage is a treasure like no other. boobs are nice, no doubt, but i'll take pie every day of the week, thanks. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
...I seriously believe all pie is exactly the same.... No. Not even....just....no. The OP has not been with more then 2 women in my estimation. It is all diffrent and some is great and some is mediocre ![]() +1 I agree apparently the OP is very inexperienced. Just like hand boobs, no two pies are the same, some are awesome and some are mediocre, sadly usually crazy goes with awesome. I had one awesome that wasn't crazy, I should have married her. |