Posted: 12/4/2011 4:38:26 PM EDT
S.E.C.  
and the Big Ten SUCKS! Especially Ohio State  
That is all |
|
Quoted: Quoted: S.E.C. and the Big Ten SUCKS! Especially Ohio State That is all What this guy says...... OHIO St does suck.... I'm probably the biggest SEC fan on this board, but I have to respectfully disagree here. OSU had a great team/season this year, with the exception of a single game. They had a big mathematical gap to close with 'Bama, and their impressive performance last night came danged close to doing just that (look at the final numbers). I'm sure most of their fans are feeling bad/cheated right now –– no need for the pouring of salt on fresh, open wounds. JMHO. Edited: Never mind. See below. 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
S.E.C.
and the Big Ten SUCKS! Especially Ohio State
That is all What this guy says...... OHIO St does suck.... I'm probably the biggest SEC fan on this board, but I have to respectfully disagree here. OSU had a great team/season this year, with the exception of a single game. They had a big mathematical gap to close with 'Bama, and their impressive performance last night came danged close to doing just that (look at the final numbers). I'm sure most of their fans are feeling bad/cheated right now –– no need for the pouring of salt on fresh, open wounds. JMHO. I think you are thinking of the wrong OSU...
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: S.E.C. and the Big Ten SUCKS! Especially Ohio State That is all What this guy says...... OHIO St does suck.... I'm probably the biggest SEC fan on this board, but I have to respectfully disagree here. OSU had a great team/season this year, with the exception of a single game. They had a big mathematical gap to close with 'Bama, and their impressive performance last night came danged close to doing just that (look at the final numbers). I'm sure most of their fans are feeling bad/cheated right now –– no need for the pouring of salt on fresh, open wounds. JMHO. I think you are thinking of the wrong OSU... D'oh!  Yep, with all the O(k)SU vitriol toward 'Bama tonight, I thought this was some unwarranted taunting. Color me embarrassed.  Please carry on, nothing to see here...  |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
S.E.C.
and the Big Ten SUCKS! Especially Ohio State
That is all classless  No, screw Ohio State. The entire sports world dumped on Florida (and the SEC) for weeks leading up to the complete and utter destruction of Ohio in the 2007 BCS game. We in the SEC (and especially Florida) have not and will not forget that. And just to remind you all, we continue to dominate the BCS. SEC is, unquestionably, the dominant conference of the last decade at least. And your crappy state can keep Ron Zook. |
|
Quoted:
It might even be fun to watch a crappy FL team beat Ohio State this year. +1 - With a freshman QB no less. Although Urban Meyer has probably already pulled some strings for Ohio State to win so he can pull some talent out of Fla since he won't be able to find any in his area of recuiting. And Michigan in the Sugar bowl?? WTF  Guess 100,000 paying fans can "almost" buy you a shot in the National Championship game. So many other teams deserve that spot.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
C'mon man. There are plenty of other threads devoted to that.Apparently a lot of sucking happens at Penn state as well. 
+1 - as much as I think Penn State is just another over rated Big Ten team that incident shouldn't reflect on the whole university. |
|
Quoted:
... No, screw Ohio State. The entire sports world dumped on Florida (and the SEC) for weeks leading up to the complete and utter destruction of Ohio in the 2007 BCS game. We in the SEC (and especially Florida) have not and will not forget that. And just to remind you all, we continue to dominate the BCS. SEC is, unquestionably, the dominant conference of the last decade at least. And your crappy state can keep Ron Zook. There's nothing wrong with hating Ohio State. Most of the Big Ten does too. |
|
Quoted:
For being the almighty hand picked by God best conference in the history of humanity you sure are fixated on the Big 10. Because a Big Ten Team can lose five games and ESPN still has a circle jerk session on how they should be in the National Championship, but an SEC team can lose one or two and drop out of the top ten. Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, Missippi State would beat any Big Ten team they are matched with this year, but yet Michigan goes to the Sugar bowl (please). Everyone knows you can't spell "sugar" without UGA.
Six times in a row. Come on guys have some respect.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: For being the almighty hand picked by God best conference in the history of humanity you sure are fixated on the Big 10. Because a Big Ten Team can lose five games and ESPN still has a circle jerk session on how they should be in the National Championship, but an SEC team can lose one or two and drop out of the top ten. Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, Missippi State would beat any Big Ten team they are matched against this year, but yet Michigan goes to the Sugar bowl (please). Everyone know you can't spell "sugar" without UGA. Six times in a row. Come on guys have some respect. Umm what ESPN are you watching?? All I hear them talk about is the SEC, and how bad every other conference is... The reason GA isn't in the Sugar bowl is two fold. One the rules say a conference can only have a max of 2 teams in the BCS. Thats not the big 10's fault. 2 They lost to BSU, so deal with it. As to all your middle of the road SEC teams would beat every single big 10 team,  |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For being the almighty hand picked by God best conference in the history of humanity you sure are fixated on the Big 10. Because a Big Ten Team can lose five games and ESPN still has a circle jerk session on how they should be in the National Championship, but an SEC team can lose one or two and drop out of the top ten. Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, Missippi State would beat any Big Ten team they are matched against this year, but yet Michigan goes to the Sugar bowl (please). Everyone know you can't spell "sugar" without UGA. Six times in a row. Come on guys have some respect. Umm what ESPN are you watching?? All I hear them talk about is the SEC, and how bad every other conference is... The reason GA isn't in the Sugar bowl is two fold. One the rules say a conference can only have a max of 2 teams in the BCS. Thats not the big 10's fault. 2 They lost to BSU, so deal with it. As to all your middle of the road SEC teams would beat every single big 10 team,
The only having two teams in the BCS is a crock. Georgia did lose to BSU (a quality team) and then won 10 in a row in the SEC after a loss to South Carolina. Michigan couldn't even beat their in-state rival. So your saying your Mighty "Big Ten" badgers could beat say our two loss Arkansas? 
Put down the pipe man
|
|
Quoted: That's what you guys said when the Badgers beat McFadden's Arkansas and Auburn the year before but you don't remember that do you? If you think it would be a route you an ignorant homer. WI would easily matchup with your middle of the road teams, LSU, AL probably not even close, but the rest yeah. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: For being the almighty hand picked by God best conference in the history of humanity you sure are fixated on the Big 10. Because a Big Ten Team can lose five games and ESPN still has a circle jerk session on how they should be in the National Championship, but an SEC team can lose one or two and drop out of the top ten. Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, Missippi State would beat any Big Ten team they are matched against this year, but yet Michigan goes to the Sugar bowl (please). Everyone know you can't spell "sugar" without UGA. Six times in a row. Come on guys have some respect. Umm what ESPN are you watching?? All I hear them talk about is the SEC, and how bad every other conference is... The reason GA isn't in the Sugar bowl is two fold. One the rules say a conference can only have a max of 2 teams in the BCS. Thats not the big 10's fault. 2 They lost to BSU, so deal with it. As to all your middle of the road SEC teams would beat every single big 10 team, The only having two teams in the BCS is a crock. Georgia did lose to BSU (a quality team) and then won 10 in a row in the SEC after a loss to South Carolina. Michigan couldn't even beat their in-state rival. So your saying your Mighty "Big Ten" badgers could beat say our two loss Arkansas? Put down the pipe man |
|
Quoted: Quoted: That's what you guys said when the Badgers beat McFadden's Arkansas and Auburn the year before but you don't remember that do you? If you think it would be a route you an ignorant homer. WI would easily matchup with your middle of the road teams, LSU, AL probably not even close, but the rest yeah. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: For being the almighty hand picked by God best conference in the history of humanity you sure are fixated on the Big 10. Because a Big Ten Team can lose five games and ESPN still has a circle jerk session on how they should be in the National Championship, but an SEC team can lose one or two and drop out of the top ten. Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, Missippi State would beat any Big Ten team they are matched against this year, but yet Michigan goes to the Sugar bowl (please). Everyone know you can't spell "sugar" without UGA. Six times in a row. Come on guys have some respect. Umm what ESPN are you watching?? All I hear them talk about is the SEC, and how bad every other conference is... The reason GA isn't in the Sugar bowl is two fold. One the rules say a conference can only have a max of 2 teams in the BCS. Thats not the big 10's fault. 2 They lost to BSU, so deal with it. As to all your middle of the road SEC teams would beat every single big 10 team, The only having two teams in the BCS is a crock. Georgia did lose to BSU (a quality team) and then won 10 in a row in the SEC after a loss to South Carolina. Michigan couldn't even beat their in-state rival. So your saying your Mighty "Big Ten" badgers could beat say our two loss Arkansas? Put down the pipe man  |