[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Gay Service Members Pride Parade... (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 12/4/2011 3:50:20 PM EDT
They all fall under the Department of the Navy.... 
|
|
Originally Posted By Miracle_Pants: Pride parades are stupid. Although, this is the first time I've seen a pic of one that didn't involve ass less chaps and shirt less queers covered in glitter. So I guess, good on them for that at least. Someone with the handle of Miracle_Pants should know that chaps, by definition, are assless. |
|
No room for women or gay men in the military in my opinion.
Not because I want to discriminate, but instead because soldiers + lovers = disasters. If women were stronger on average then the military should be women, no men, and no lesbian women. However, that is not the case... |
|
Quoted: Originally Posted By Miracle_Pants: Pride parades are stupid. Although, this is the first time I've seen a pic of one that didn't involve ass less chaps and shirt less queers covered in glitter. So I guess, good on them for that at least. Someone with the handle of Miracle_Pants should know that chaps, by definition, are assless. True enough but it helps to drive home the imagery. I suppose I could have said ass-less leather pants but chaps is less letters. |
|
Quoted:
No room for women or gay men in the military in my opinion. Not because I want to discriminate, but instead because soldiers + lovers = disasters. If women were stronger on average then the military should be women, no men, and no lesbian women. However, that is not the case... What a wonderfully well thought out position. 
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Originally Posted By Miracle_Pants: Pride parades are stupid. Although, this is the first time I've seen a pic of one that didn't involve ass less chaps and shirt less queers covered in glitter. So I guess, good on them for that at least. Someone with the handle of Miracle_Pants should know that chaps, by definition, are assless. True enough but it helps to drive home the imagery. I suppose I could have said ass-less leather pants but chaps is less letters. You needed to use the word "ass" because you wanted to "drive home the imagery"?  |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
No room for women or gay men in the military in my opinion. Not because I want to discriminate, but instead because soldiers + lovers = disasters. If women were stronger on average then the military should be women, no men, and no lesbian women. However, that is not the case... What a wonderfully well thought out position.
Sorry I don't believe piling love affair shit on top of military shit going on. |
|
Yet you did click on this thread... hmmmmm.... is your subconscious trying to suggest something to you????
|
This thread fails to deliver 
|
Quoted:
Originally Posted By Miracle_Pants:
Pride parades are stupid. Although, this is the first time I've seen a pic of one that didn't involve ass less chaps and shirt less queers covered in glitter. So I guess, good on them for that at least. Someone with the handle of Miracle_Pants should know that chaps, by definition, are assless. I've a pair of crotchless bottomless leather pants as well as shorts......... pants=chaps shorts=chinks 
|
|
Any one in the military has my respect. The fact they are different from me is irrelivant. They are putting their life on the line while we sit here and play on our computer and being HE MAN. Any one who can carry an AR, shoot a torpedo, drop a bomb or gut shoot a towel head is higher in the food chain than we computer fuckers. |
|
Quoted:
Fine by me, they are willing to give their lives for this country if needed. That's more than I can say for a lot of people in this country gay or straight. Ditto. I've served with a couple gay guys. They were good Marines. I don't care what they did on liberty. Oh well. |
|
Kim jong Il's personal bodyguards? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No room for women or gay men in the military in my opinion. Not because I want to discriminate, but instead because soldiers + lovers = disasters. If women were stronger on average then the military should be women, no men, and no lesbian women. However, that is not the case... What a wonderfully well thought out position.
Sorry I don't believe piling love affair shit on top of military shit going on. So because they are gay they must all be taken instead of single? Are they going to have a slap match if they break up in the middle of combat? What about all the straight men with women back home? They must never think of their relationships or let it interfere with judgement/emotions. |
|
Quoted: That's pretty much how I look at it. One of our medics in AFG was queerer than 10 three-dollar bills but as soon as a vic got hit he was on theFine by me, they are willing to give their lives for this country if needed. That's more than I can say for a lot of people in this country gay or straight. ground running to help (And risking stepping on some fairly nasty shit while he was doing it). He saved the lives of at least two guys in our unit and several of the Marines we were attached to. |
|
Unprofessional. Being in the military is all about professionalism, if you want to succeed. Being gay these days is all about making a statement.
This is my theory on don't ask don't tell... The military is a professional work place, therefore you should not be talking about your sex life anyways. If you are, you obviously are not doing what you are supposed to be doing. So what, big fucking deal that your entire unit doesn't know that you are a sodomite. It doesn't matter, we are there to do a job, not talk about buttsex. |