[ARCHIVED THREAD] - New World Order (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 5/31/2011 5:54:58 PM EDT
| Found tons of theories on you tube what does everything think about these theories? |
|
Makes for good movies, but beyond that it's childish nonsense. How many times in 2,000 years was anyone ever able to bring all of Europe under a singular control? Not even Rome in its heyday could do it, nor Hitler, nor Alexander. No one's going to take over the world, any time soon. |
|
Quoted:
Makes for good movies, but beyond that it's childish nonsense. How many times in 2,000 years was anyone ever able to bring all of Europe under a singular control? Not even Rome in its heyday could do it, nor Hitler, nor Alexander. No one's going to take over the world, any time soon. Also gives Alex Jones a raging clue. |
|
Quoted:
Makes for good movies, but beyond that it's childish nonsense. How many times in 2,000 years was anyone ever able to bring all of Europe under a singular control? Not even Rome in its heyday could do it, nor Hitler, nor Alexander. No one's going to take over the world, any time soon. How do you know that it wasn't all by plan? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Damn you! I wanted to post that  |
|
|
Quoted:
Makes for good movies, but beyond that it's childish nonsense. How many times in 2,000 years was anyone ever able to bring all of Europe under a singular control? Not even Rome in its heyday could do it, nor Hitler, nor Alexander. No one's going to take over the world, any time soon. They tried to do it militarily, with force. This time around it'll be economically, the governance structure and context is already sewn in place. They don't have to force anyone into line if they're all signing up to participate in the big boys club. |
| Most of the time people open their mouths to speak about the new world order, bs surely follows. However, the UN was established to eventually become a world government. The inner circle of the CFR, especially in the older days, are pretty supportive of world government. That said, they have failed miserably. It has not materialized and certainly will NOT materialize. The internet has made sure of that. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Mass media and technology are changing the world at an ever increasing rate. Who knows what the future holds? Technology, specifically the internet, spells doom for anyone trying to centralize authority in the dead of night. People do love their security. |
|
The New World Order concept is what gets the morons of the world to vote for the Obamas of the world. The people who actually pull the strings know that it has no chance of working and they will make no attempt to even implement it. Their real goal is becoming painfully obvious..... world destabilization thereby causing a major decrease in the worlds population. |
|
Quoted:
The New World Order concept is what gets the morons of the world to vote for the Obamas of the world. The people who actually pull the strings know that it has no chance of working and they will make no attempt to even implement it. Their real goal is becoming painfully obvious..... world destabilization thereby causing a major decrease in the worlds population. I don't think they realize it has failed. They are still parading around like there is no internet. |
See if this makes SENSE instead of your youtube theories. 
http://www.soros.org/ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/default.asp |
|
Some organizations have existed for hundreds of years and have spent generations trying to achieve their mission. Members join, work for that mission, die and are replaced by more members working for those goals.
Generation after generation. Whether the members of those organizations know what they are really working for or not doesn't matter because generally only a few control the entire organization. Can there be a group trying to form a "New World Order"? Very possibly. For what purpose is unknown. It could very well be for their publicly stated mission. Or not. The ability to handling data and commerce quickly, efficiently, and on such a large scale to control the world has not existed until recent times with the advent of the digital age. If it is going to happen, it will probably happen soon. |
|
Quoted: Some organizations have existed for hundreds of years and have spent generations trying to achieve their mission. Members join, work for that mission, die and are replaced by more members working for those goals. Generation after generation. Whether the members of those organizations know what they are really working for or not doesn't matter because generally only a few control the entire organization. Can there be a group trying to form a "New World Order"? Very possibly. For what purpose is unknown. It could very well be for their publicly stated mission. Or not. The ability to handling data and commerce quickly, efficiently, and on such a large scale to control the world has not existed until recent times with the advent of the digital age. If it is going to happen, it will probably happen soon. Consider that the same people were behind combining the European countries together..........it has been a total faailure and has only had the effect of further destabilizing the world. Why would anyone believe that it would be successful on a world wide basis? |
  |
|
Quoted:
Some organizations have existed for hundreds of years and have spent generations trying to achieve their mission. Members join, work for that mission, die and are replaced by more members working for those goals. Generation after generation. Whether the members of those organizations know what they are really working for or not doesn't matter because generally only a few control the entire organization. Can there be a group trying to form a "New World Order"? Very possibly. For what purpose is unknown. It could very well be for their publicly stated mission. Or not. The ability to handling data and commerce quickly, efficiently, and on such a large scale to control the world has not existed until recent times with the advent of the digital age. If it is going to happen, it will probably happen soon. If it was going to happen, it would have happened 45 to 60 years ago. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Some organizations have existed for hundreds of years and have spent generations trying to achieve their mission. Members join, work for that mission, die and are replaced by more members working for those goals. Generation after generation. Whether the members of those organizations know what they are really working for or not doesn't matter because generally only a few control the entire organization. Can there be a group trying to form a "New World Order"? Very possibly. For what purpose is unknown. It could very well be for their publicly stated mission. Or not. The ability to handling data and commerce quickly, efficiently, and on such a large scale to control the world has not existed until recent times with the advent of the digital age. If it is going to happen, it will probably happen soon. Consider that the same people were behind combining the European countries together..........it has been a total faailure and has only had the effect of further destabilizing the world. Why would anyone believe that it would be successful on a world wide basis? Two ways to control a country or multiple countries. Religion or commerce. War is generally a result of one of those two causes. Consider our Federal Reserve Bank? Who owns it and who controls it? How many nations have the same situation in their countries? (Unknown owners of a national bank.) That may be a method of control through commerce. The Muslims almost over ran Europe prior to Columbus. They are more deeply entrenched in Europe now than they were then. That may be a method of control through religion. Times change, methods change, but sometimes motives don't. It's more probable and possible today than it was in earlier times. Whether it will happen, I can't say. |
|
if the government was such a big conspiracy and these people believed it they wouldn't be voting because it would be pointless. The USA would NOT benefit from a world government. Until that becomes true then it wont happen. The rest of the world would like it because they can steal all our wealth but so called "sercret puppetmasters" of the country would have no interest in sharing the power and wealth. |
|
Quoted:
if the government was such a big conspiracy and these people believed it they wouldn't be voting because it would be pointless. The USA would NOT benefit from a world government. Until that becomes true then it wont happen. The rest of the world would like it because they can steal all our wealth but so called "sercret puppetmasters" of the country would have no interest in sharing the power and wealth. I think that is pretty much true unless a group or organization - the so called secrcet puppetmasters - are connected internationally through allegiance to some organization or family. |
|
Quoted:
if the government was such a big conspiracy and these people believed it they wouldn't be voting because it would be pointless. The USA would NOT benefit from a world government. Until that becomes true then it wont happen. The rest of the world would like it because they can steal all our wealth but so called "sercret puppetmasters" of the country would have no interest in sharing the power and wealth. This |
|
Quoted: The one world gov will happen someday. It might be 10 or 100 years away but it will happen. The people who control the money will make it happen. It'll never happen. No one gets along well enough to even set the mechanism in motion, let alone actually effectively control that many people. Pure, drunken delusion. |
|
Quoted:
Makes for good movies, but beyond that it's childish nonsense. How many times in 2,000 years was anyone ever able to bring all of Europe under a singular control? Not even Rome in its heyday could do it, nor Hitler, nor Alexander. No one's going to take over the world, any time soon. Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.- Mayer Amschel Rothschild
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Makes for good movies, but beyond that it's childish nonsense. How many times in 2,000 years was anyone ever able to bring all of Europe under a singular control? Not even Rome in its heyday could do it, nor Hitler, nor Alexander. No one's going to take over the world, any time soon. They tried to do it militarily, with force. This time around it'll be economically, the governance structure and context is already sewn in place. They don't have to force anyone into line if they're all signing up to participate in the big boys club. Money only works until one side gets pissed and bullets start flying...which will be about week #2 after the Illuminati/Bilderberg/Boogeyman does something that an irascible country doesn't like, or just two neighbors start spatting and force is required. There is no mechanism to control the world without force. Money is voluntary, things like bombs and natural resources are ultimately more tangible. There are about 190 countries in the world. No one will EVER, EVER, EVER get all of them under a singular control. |
|
I work in the federal sector.
I think all those theories are crap. In fact, we'd probably be better off if some all powerful behind the scenes secret worldwide organization was running things because then at least somebody would probably know what the fuck they were doing. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Mass media and technology are changing the world at an ever increasing rate. Who knows what the future holds? Technology, specifically the internet, spells doom for anyone trying to centralize authority in the dead of night. Just like it spelled doom for Obama. How could anyone vote for such an inexperienced man to be President of the United States. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink |
|
I was wondering when the Psalm would come up. |
|
the best years of wrestling during my generation in my opinion. quit watching after that storyline ended but i was getting a little too old to watch it anyway.
|
