Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 4/30/2002 5:05:10 AM EDT
THE NEW YORK POST
April 30, 2002

ARE WE SAFER?
By DANIEL PIPES

http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/46759.htm

-- ARE Americans taking the necessary steps to protect themselves from
further attacks?
This question comes to mind on reading a news dispatch titled, "Iran
Enthusiastically Celebrates the American ‘Humiliation' at Tabas 22 Years
Ago."

It refers to Tabas, a remote desert town in Iran - the site of a U.S.
military disaster. On April 25, 1980, a rescue team sent by President Jimmy
Carter to spring 49 Americans held hostage in the U.S. embassy in Tehran had
to abort when two U.S. aircraft collided at Tabas, leaving eight soldiers
dead.

To this day, Iran's militant Islamic leadership keeps the memory of that day
alive. Last week, the government bused thousands of militiamen to Tabas
where they prayed and shouted slogans like "Death to America" and "Death to
Israel." It will build a museum in Tabas exclusively devoted to chronicling
the failed U.S. mission. Iranian television news informs viewers that the
failure "proves the weakness of the United States."

The disaster has gone down the memory hole for Americans. But it's Americans
(and Israelis and other Westerners) who really should be recalling the Tabas
incident, for it marked a major turning point.

It was when the current round of militant Islam's war against the West took
its first fatalities. "Death to America" proved to be not an empty slogan
but the battle cry of this era's most vibrant and dangerous extremist
ideology.

In retrospect, it is clear that the eight deaths at Tabas were the very
first in a sequence that has continued for over two decades. Consider just
some of the attacks on Americans:

* April 1983: U.S. embassy in Beirut bombed, killing 63.

* October '83: U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut bombed, killing 241.

* December '83: U.S. embassy in Kuwait bombed, killing 6.

* January '84: Malcolm Kerr, president of the American University of Beirut,
assassinated.

* April '84: Hezbollah attacks the environs of a U.S. airbase in Spain,
killing 18 servicemen.

* September '84: U.S. embassy in Beirut again bombed, killing 16.

* December '84: Two Americans murdered on a hijacked plane in Tehran.

* June '85: U.S. seaman killed on a hijacked plane in Beirut.

And on and on. More recent incidents include the World Trade Center bombing
of February '93, the two attacks on U.S. soldiers in Saudi Arabia in '95 and
'96, the two U.S. embassies blown up in East Africa in August '98 and the
USS Cole bombed in Yemen in October 2000. In all, some 600 Americans lost
their lives to militant Islam before September 2001.
Link Posted: 4/30/2002 5:05:43 AM EDT
[#1]
All of these were highly publicized incidents, dominating the headlines and
furrowing brows about an effective counterterrorism policy. But they did not
inspire action. The U.S. government neither attacked the enemy nor changed
policies. For example, the 241 dead at the Marine barracks bombing (the
largest number of Americans killed by militant Islam before 9/11) brought
forth no retaliation at all and the World Trade Center bombing prompted no
review of immigration procedures.

In short, although Americans were repeatedly attacked, they barely
responded. One can hardly blame the militant Islamic groups and governments
for concluding that the United States was weak, demoralized and ripe for
attack. The population was feckless, distracted and complacent, the
government incompetent.

And now? The trauma of September changed some things but not enough. The
government won't name militant Islam as the enemy but hides behind the
euphemism of "terrorism." The CIA and FBI remain largely unchanged. Airline
security is a sham. Israel is constrained from rooting out the Palestinian
terrorist infrastructure.

As the sense of vulnerability and resolve of seven months ago dissipates,
Americans are returning to business as usual. Sept. 11 increasingly feels
like a remote nightmare without much relevance to the present circumstances.

To which I predict: If things proceed in this direction, there can only be
one certain result - further assaults perpetrated by militant Islam. The
carnage begun that awful day in the Iranian desert in 1980 will not run its
course until Americans understand how much they need to fear and loathe
militant Islam. We can only hope this happens sooner rather than later, so
that the number of casualties to come will be smaller rather than larger.
Link Posted: 4/30/2002 5:11:16 AM EDT
[#2]
Lots of arrests, lots of deportations.

A little safer.
Link Posted: 4/30/2002 5:43:33 PM EDT
[#3]
what do i care?
i always operate in condition yellow
Link Posted: 4/30/2002 6:38:51 PM EDT
[#4]
To that article, I would add that today, as compared with 2001-09-11, it seems that anti-American hatred among Muslims has grown.

And rather than respond to the anti-Americans with simple-minded fear and loathing, as advocated by the author, I would recommend the more sophisticated tactic of analyzing the motivations of those who threaten us.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top