The Resister - Special Forces Underground
PO Box 35046
Fayetteville NC 28303
USA
Current Issue $15.00
Four Issues ...$50.00 (one year)
Terms: Cash, money order, or check.
(Pelase leave 'PAY TO THE ORDER OF" blank:)
Please allow 5 weeks for your distribution to begin. Please be sure to include your name, and address.

Resister Radio is now heard on WFAI 1230 AM Fayetteville, NC on Sundays between 10:30 and 11:00 AM, and on KTLD 1110 AM, Alexander, LA, on Thursdays between 09:30 and 10:00 AM.

I Am Not Getting Paid For This.

Then there were weeks of shuttling up and down the East coast and in and out of the Midwest, at considerable (and, frankly, unaffordable) personal expense, trying to help the self-described “right” overcome their “little problem.” What is the “right” wing’s little problem? Incompetence. Whereas the Left knows they themselves are evil, the “right” does not know that they themselves are incompetent -- which simplifies the Left’s tireless advancement of their willful acts of destruction. Never mind to whom I’ve been going around trying to help. It is sufficient to know that my help is contingent upon recognition of the following six points:

(1) Stop being polite to the enemy.
(2) Stop believing the enemy thinks like us.
(3) Stop believing that lie called the Declaration of Independence.
(4) Stop believing the Constitution can be restored.
(5) Recognize that were are in a race war (or a Holy War, depending upon the audience -- they are the same thing, really).
(6) Accept that we are living in a Communist country.

Numbers 1, 2 and 5 are easy for most people to accept, most accept 6 as a given, and the more intelligent among dissidents recognize the truth of number 4. Not that the Constitution itself is bad or shouldn’t be restored to its original form. As a law establishing a form of government the Constitution is a neutrality, even though it is based upon a very wicked idea -- that “the People” are capable of governing themselves. Which proposition, of course, derives from number 3. And I am not even talking about the fatuous notion that “all men are created equal,” a proposition so ludicrous -- and in its application so evil -- that it may be dismissed on its face with a derisive snort. No, I am talking about the other evil imbedded in the Declaration of Independence; the proposition that “...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” To which I respond, “Since when?”

More Liberal Lies by SFC Steven M. Barry, USA (Ret.)

Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because Liberals are so stupid it is easy work.

So it was with especial delight at the prospect of a fresh pelt that I read the Fayetteville Iskra editorial, “Dividing Lines: America isn’t a race, but a great idea put into practice.”

Ignoring their impossibly convoluted “definition” of the word “minority,” we grip the club, aim on the phrase, “Politics of inclusion...”, then swing with finality on the Iskra’s editorial collective’s skull, being their conclusion, “...this country isn’t built on shared ancestry....”

The name of the club here being swung is John Jay, president of the revolutionary Continental Congress, author of five essays of the Federalist Papers (under the pen-name “Publius”), and first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

In Federalist Papers #2 Jay wrote, “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people -- a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their customs and manners.” (Emphases added.)

For all you Liberals and former Dewey Camp (i.e., government school) inmates, “one... people” and “same ancestors,” means a particular race. That particular race would be European Whites.

Not Negroes, not Mestizos, not Asians, not “others.” Regardless, we need look no further than to the Liberals’ god, Karl Marx, to discover whose “shared principles” Iskra’s editorial collective referred to in praesenti.

Shut-Up, Shipman by SFC Steven M. Barry, USA (Ret.)

1. RMKS./ A copy of this was faxed to the local NAACP office. They called right back. SMB

Since its founding by radical Socialists and Communists in 1909, the National All-African Communist Party (NAACP) has billed itself as a so-called "civil rights" organization.

Never mind that the true definition of civil rights, according to Anglo-Saxon common law from which they derive, are those rights appertaining the acquisition and disposition of property. The NAACP, throughout its execrable history as the leading organization serving the interests of "Colored People," consistent with its Communist origins, has been pleased to redefine civil rights to mean egalitarian Snivel Rights.

That should come as no surprise, given that Anglo-Saxon legislative and judicial systems are an utterly alien concept to Blacks. Nor should we be surprised that Fayetteville NAACP chairman, Ray Shipman, demands that what few shreds of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence remain after Black "inclusion" be simply swept aside to satisfy NAACP's snivels.

That some female on the City Council named Shaw entertained Shipman's gabbling speaks volumes about the inherently destructive influence of women in government and nothing about Shipman's parasitic demand, "Resolve the situation." [Ebonics to English translation: "Gimme yo money!"]

Some time ago, Fayetteville Iskra editorialist, Gene Smith (of all people!), wrote an op-ed detailing that the firing of the "Fayetteville Four" was due not to "racism" but because of their incompetence. I checked with sources inside the Fayetteville Police Department and found that (for the first time) Smith was right. Sadly, Smith never addressed why Blacks are on the FPD at all.

Typical of Snivel Rights activists, NAACP chairman Shipman backed up his "request" with a blatant threat. "I think we [meaning Blacks] need to get some agitation here. I think we've sat by long enough." Predictably, "our" City Council, "representative" weasels that they are, groveled and scraped and begged forgiveness, whining for Shipman's mercy.

In a sane society the City Council's response to Shipman would have been, "We'll take the 'or else.'" Then again, in a sane society, Shipman would never have been allowed to speak.

Thinking Aloud About Suppressed History by Dr. Susan L.M. Huck and SFC Steven M. Barry, USA (Ret.)

Ladies First

"Holocaust," as was explained in an earlier edition of this publication, actually means "completely consumed by fire." The Branch Davidian families knew a real "holocaust. In fact, it was the winners of World War II who pioneered the burning-alive of hundreds of thousands of women, children, and old people, sometimes in a single day.

The "virtuous" the Western Allies, toward the end of World War II, devised the proper "mix" of high-explosives and incendiaries to create previously unknown "firestorms," tornadoes of flame that could -- and did -- consume central hearts of whole cities. The purpose was not to destroy a military target, but to kill the maximum number of civilians.

The campaign was initiated as Operation Gomorrah on July 24, 1943, and in ten days, nearly ten square miles of the city of Hamburg was completely destroyed by fire. (The German raid on Coventry destroyed 100 acres, about one-eighth of a square mile.) The destruction merely increased as the end of the war loomed. Pouring four thousand tons of bombs on the city of Dresden killed about 350,000 civilians; the city was known to be packed with refugees fleeing the Red Army. Nearby Chemnitz and Magdeburg were incinerated by British and American bombers for the purpose of killing refugees from Dresden.

American author Martin Caidin described just a portion of the horror. "They are no longer recognizable as human beings as they dash along streets through which the tar and asphalt run like lava. The universe drowns in its fire. These hapless creatures manage to run several hundred feet, or perhaps only twenty or fifty feet... their shoes catch fire and their feet are nothing more than sticks of flame. They writhe and thrash madly on the bubbling, burning tar as the fire sets aflame their hair and skin, rushes into their mouths and burns out their tongues...."

These German cities provided many of the "atrocity pictures" of "Holocaust® victims." (It was intended to append here a list of about a hundred names of women and children named Anna who were killed in this manner, as a counterpoint to "Anne Frank." There simply isn't enough space to contrast just those victims of a real holocaust against the poster child of Diary of Anne Fraud.)

Firebombing was perfected over the last two years of the war by Royal Air Force General Arthur "Bomber" Harris, although the inspiration and "intellectual author" of mass incineration of civilians was Winston Churchill. Truly it is said that "the winners write the history books." SLMH//

A Word About Incompetence

Personally, I am sick and tired of listening to Jews whine and kvetch about their Holocaust®, and when I am afflicted by it my reaction ranges, depending upon how much tolerance I was graced with that day, from studied indifference to remarking that, if killing Jews was the Germans' aim for locking them up they were uncharacteristically inefficient about the whole thing and criminally wasteful with precious logistics in time of war, because all the Germans had to do was lock the Pests in efficiently dehumidified and comfortably heated barracks for five days unfed and let them die of thirst.

I don't know the precise capacity of any given camp, but 20,000 is given for Auschwitz I, 26,000 for Auschwitz II, and 15,000 for Auschwitz III, so the "death camp" complex had a capacity of 61,000. Now, assuming transportation quotas permitted 61,000 to arrive on schedule every five days, in the Auschwitz complex alone using the "school solution" suggested in the paragraph above, 4,453,000 customers per year could have been "serviced" (to use the latest U.S. Air Force term for bombing and killing their racial kindred in Serbia at the behest of Jews) at Auschwitz alone. And since this is a "death camp" there would be no need for such space and logistics wasting amenities as bunks and tables in the barracks (let alone kitchens, latrines, hospitals, laundries, etc.) so the barracks could have, if efficiency was our goal, easily accommodated, oh, four times their inefficiently designed capacity, and then 17,812,000 customers per year could have been "serviced." Given that, at that time, there were only about (figures vary) 4 million Jews under Germany's control in liberated Europe (the JewSSR evacuated over 2 million from Poland and "Russia" ahead of the invading Anti-Bolshevik Liberators) I could have, if I had been tasked with our race's Holy Mission, solved Europe's Problem -- at a single camp complex -- in just over two months. If there was any rationale behind the Judeo-Communist inspired Nuremberg Show Trials, it should have been for fraud, waste, and abuse! Because, according to the 30 June 1965 edition of the Jewish newspaper Aufbau, the Quisling government in Bonn had received, from "victims" of the "Holocaust®," 3,375,000 applications for "restitution." You do the math.

Dr. Huck mentions that "the winners write the history books." That is commonly known. But Jew War II is the first example in history of the defeated being prohibited from publishing their apologia, and worse, having entire subsequent generations systematically brainwashed (or the intractable cowed by force) into believing (or pretending, in public, to believe) that their race is evil for having defended themselves against a declared enemy. That's right, children. In 1933 the World Jewish Congress, a front for the Jewish-Bolshevik-run Communist International, declared war, in the name of all of God's Pets, on Germany. But, after Germany was forced into war against the "Allies," whose Jewish-dominated governments were openly fawning and protective of their Judeo-Bolshevik brethren in Moscow, Germany's "crime" then became that of objecting to having their declared enemies running around loose and unsupervised inside their own (or conquered) borders. America, however, is more moral than that.

For example: Upon learning that China has declared the United States their mortal enemy and that they are preparing for "inevitable" war against us, we let the gooks come and go as they please instead of exterminating the Mongol Menace. If we didn't they might call us names!

Connections

Speaking of history being written, then apologia suppressed, by the "winners," I get a chuckle whenever I hear "patriots" squeal and swoon dreamily about the "American Revolution" and the (at this time, very stupidly considered) possibility of its reenactment. What "revolution?" That was no "revolution," that was a civil war. A revolution is defined as, "A complete overthrow of the established government... a forcible substitution of a new... form of government." (OED, 2nd ed. XIII.) Was the government of King George III overthrown? No. Was a new form of government substituted in the rebellious colonies? Not really. We established the same Parliament composed of the same breed of corrupt scoundrels (Congress), the same King and executive Ministries (the President and his Departments), and, for practical purposes, the same legislative system. (The Bill of Rights was different, but not new.) Power was more diffused, being replicated in the several sovereign states, but not of a different form. What we had then, between 1775 and 1781, was a civil war; our only civil war. A civil war is defined as that which occurs "among fellow-citizens within the limits of one community." (Ibid, III.) You had Rebels and you had Loyalists, but, for practical purposes, they were all -- excluding mercenaries, opportunists and interlopers invited by both sides to join in the despoiling -- Englishmen.

To be sure, there were undercurrents of revolution, in the (Marxist) sense of "social evolution (sic) and class struggle," particularly in the way the thing was planned out and organized by its leadership. Just one example: Noah Webster, not long after the smoke cleared, set himself about the task of inventing, out of whole cloth, an entirely new "American character," instead of simply leaving things alone and letting one develop naturally. His first effort was to tinker with the King's English. Webster's Dictionary of the American Language (get it?) altered the spelling of words, like from honour to honor and centre to center, for the expressed purpose of severing the concept of any cultural or racial ties to the "old world" in the minds of young students. He changed words because, in his own words, he was, "confident that such an event is an object of vast political consequence." He also eliminated the study of the classics, and thereby the necessity of the languages to read them, from the classroom. The result? Even classics from a common culture or racial past, such as Beowolf, became incomprehensible to the "educated." Instead, students were fed a steady diet of indigenous proletarian "literature," all the better for the kiddies to, again, in Webster's words, "lisp the praise of liberty and of those illustrious heroes and statesmen who have wrought a revolution...." In short, Webster believed that language and education were for the purpose of ideological indoctrination, not cognitive thought, and, one suspects, would have been great chums with John Dewey and would have approved of "outcome based education" and Orwell's vision of "Newspeak."

The consequence? American bomber crews, brainwashed over generations by proletarian "education," were prodded like cattle (goyim) into Jew War II to "fight for democracy" (Judeo-Bolshevism) and save "Uncle Joe" (International Communism) and didn't give a second thought to mindlessly incinerating MILLIONS of their cultural and racial kindred during the course of their terroristic firebombings of German cities.

Class, dismissed. SMB

So, do you think Barry speaks for the Special Forces, or anyone other than himself?

he speaks for himself i assure you. Sargeant first class retired? WTF. if he was a 20yr E7 he was probably a shitbird. im a little suprised at AUG for posting that garbage especially in view of some of the good stuff he brings to the board.

What was the point of posting not just a single article, but the entire publication?

Barry is viewed as a punk ass by most of his SF "peers". I'm not sure but his claim to being retired is news to me. He was kicked out of SF.