Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
5/2/2010 4:50:08 PM EDT
Let's say that a grandparent has two grown sons.  The older son has 4 kids and the younger son has 2 kids.

Let's say that the grandparent has been doing gift transfers of  $5,000 per grandchild per year, so that it isn't taxed.  The older son has older children, so they've received a few more gift transfers than the younger grandchildren

In the interest of fairness, should all grandchildren, regardless of age, have the same amount as each other?  Or should the funds be split 50/50 between the 2 sons?  (ie I don't think it would be fair if one son had 1 kid and the other son had 10 kids, to split it equally 11 ways)

What says GD?

5/2/2010 4:54:02 PM EDT
[#1]
I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.

5/2/2010 4:54:02 PM EDT
[#2]
The grandparents can do whatever the hell they want.



If it was me (big if), I'd split it 50/50, regardless of what was given prior to death. But it's their money to decide whatever they wish.
5/2/2010 4:54:43 PM EDT
[#3]
Well intestacy laws in most places only take into account the next generation. There really should be no incentive to have more kids just to increase one's inheritance.
5/2/2010 4:55:08 PM EDT
[#4]
I'd say it's up to the grandparents to do whatever they want with their money.  My mom told me this spring that she just did her will and left everything equally to me and my three siblings.  I have 4 kids, my brother has 2, one sister has 1 and one sister has none.  She sees it as leaving it to her children and up to us to divide the rest among the kids.
5/2/2010 4:55:30 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Let's say that a grandparent has two grown sons.  The older son has 4 kids and the younger son has 2 kids.

Let's say that the grandparent has been doing gift transfers of  $5,000 per grandchild per year, so that it isn't taxed.  The older son has older children, so they've received a few more gift transfers than the younger grandchildren

In the interest of fairness, should all grandchildren, regardless of age, have the same amount as each other?  Or should the funds be split 50/50 between the 2 sons?  (ie I don't think it would be fair if one son had 1 kid and the other son had 10 kids, to split it equally 11 ways)

What says GD?



In regards to GIVING, FAIRNESS can ONLY be determined by the person doing the giving.  When it comes to getting something for free, w/o any method of earning it, or issue for establishing a reasonable entitlement, the person gaining something has NO standing in regards to the issue of fairness.

A peson can give what they want to whom they want, outside of earning or entitlement, with no regards to fairness
5/2/2010 4:55:51 PM EDT
[#6]
50/50 is fair.
5/2/2010 4:57:45 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.



1st post wins again!

It'd be a shame if a GENEROUS GIFT from a grandparent was measured against what other people got.

5/2/2010 4:59:05 PM EDT
[#8]
Give it all to the Moonie's. Problem solved.
5/2/2010 5:00:22 PM EDT
[#9]
I'd just be happy with whatever I received and enjoy my time with them while they're still alive.
5/2/2010 5:01:24 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.



Correct.  If the GPs decides to divide it evenly among the GC, it doesn't matter which son had more children.  All share equally.  

Hopefully there's no fight over something that is someone else's (GPs) property.  I've seen that too often.
5/2/2010 5:02:08 PM EDT
[#11]
50/50 between the 2 sons.

It's a personnel choice if 1 son has 10 kids and the other son has 1.
5/2/2010 5:04:50 PM EDT
[#12]
Fuck fairness...

Its the Liberals best defense.
5/2/2010 5:05:59 PM EDT
[#13]



Quoted:


I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.





No shit. And as the grandparent what would you do?



I give 50/50 to each son.



 
5/2/2010 5:07:03 PM EDT
[#14]
from the time I was 16, I expected NOTHING from my parents other than to live a long healthy life..
and really dont care what they give to who as it is NONE of my Business, NOR is my inheritance an expectation....sounds greedy to me..
5/2/2010 5:08:41 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.



Their $ . . . .
5/2/2010 5:11:53 PM EDT
[#16]


The people who earned your grandparents money should have a say in how they distribute it.

If you didn't earn it, you aren't entitled to one red cent of it.  If they decide that they want you to have part of it, well that's great.

If they decide that they want to give every bit of their money to orphans, that's entirely their business.


Speaking for myself, my parents raised me in a manner that I am able to function as an adult and am able to support myself.  

My father made a good living for himself through hard work, made a sizable amount through investments and if he decides that he wants to light it all on fire in his front yard - well, that's his money to do it with.

5/2/2010 5:12:44 PM EDT
[#17]
IMHO if one of the grandsons whines about fairness, then all of it goes to the other grandson that did not whine about fairness.  In any event, it is entirely up to the grandparents to do whatever the hell they want to, including giving it all to the moonies.

<Darth Vader Voice On> The sense of entitlement is strong with this one <Darth Vader Voice Off>
5/2/2010 5:13:37 PM EDT
[#18]
Fair ain't always equal.....





5/2/2010 5:25:17 PM EDT
[#19]
What is fair is up to the grandparents. However, if it were me...............


Each grandchild would get a small cash inheritance, some of it given directly given to them, the rest in stocks, bonds, trust etc for use in college or later on in life. The lions share of the inheritance gets split 50/50 between the sons.

It may just be me but baring some circumstances inheritance should not skip a generation.
5/2/2010 5:29:08 PM EDT
[#20]
The reason it would skip a generation is because the IRS created incentives to do so.  It doesn't matter if it's a son, a granddaughter, or 2nd cousin twice removed Zed and his moonie commune- they can all get up to $12,000 individually tax free.
5/2/2010 5:30:49 PM EDT
[#21]
1st reply nailed it.  The one with the gold makes the rules.
5/2/2010 5:31:17 PM EDT
[#22]
I'd say its fair for each kid to get the same amount that they have been getting.
5/2/2010 5:32:12 PM EDT
[#23]
Fair is whatever the grandparent decides.
5/2/2010 5:32:55 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
50/50 is fair.


According to who?

How about the father with 4 children 2 groan girls and 2 grown boys?
Girls have a total of 6 kids. (4 girls 1 boy)
Boys have a total of 4 kids. 3 girls 1 boy)

Father plans on giving only to his MALE descendants who have his last name.  That is his two sons and the one sons, son.
2 daughter get nothing.  8 grandchildren get nothing.

That is what he wants.  He is a little old fashioned but it is his money and he can do with it as he wishes.
5/2/2010 5:33:25 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.



This.
5/2/2010 5:34:25 PM EDT
[#26]
"Fair"....   God, I hate that word.
5/2/2010 5:36:01 PM EDT
[#27]
I don't look gift horses in the mouth.
5/2/2010 5:36:42 PM EDT
[#28]
OP this isn't an inheritance question as it appears that your grand parents are still alive.

Are you interested in what will happen after they pass, or if their current gifts are fair or not?
5/2/2010 6:11:16 PM EDT
[#29]
Introduce Grandparents to Scientology, end of problem with inheritance.
5/2/2010 6:15:52 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
I'd say "fair" is what the grandparent decides it is.



This right here.
5/2/2010 6:22:33 PM EDT
[#31]
First post wins
5/2/2010 6:27:18 PM EDT
[#32]
If I were that grandparent crafting my will...

I'd treat EACH grandchild as unique.  EACH grandchild would be given $5,000 for every year they are short of their 18th, into a fund they cannot touch until they turn 25...except to pay college/education based expenses.

if that means one brother has 10 kids and he gets 'more'...then too bad.

As long as Grandchild A gets as much as Grandchild B.

Then after this part of the estate is taken care of, the rest is split evenly amongst all surviving siblings.  If one sibling is dead, but has children, that sibling's share is divided equally amongst those siblings, into the same funds as before.
5/2/2010 6:29:40 PM EDT
[#33]
Fair is a fallacy.



You have no right to complain - it is their money and they will do with it what they please.  If they leave 100% to one kid and nothing to the rest, tough shit.