Posted: 4/16/2010 6:53:13 PM EDT
|
a segment, where a selected poster is brought on for say a minute or two to justify his asshattery.
call it the "SMOD, (suck my own dick) Minute", "INAF, (i'm not a fucktard) Moment". i.e. like the o.p. of this thread: http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=1028583 |
|
Quoted:
call out thread? no, not a call out thread, but what i think would be some funny shit to hear someone justify themselves on air for posting something that becomes an "epic fail" thread here. like that poster that started the thread about following the guy that cut him off and screamed "nnnnnnooooOOOOOOoooooooo". and only have it last 60 seconds. that's it. |
|
Quoted:
What asshattery? So he works for a union and GM and he want to thank the people who bought GM. So what? Didn't buy GM, he's not thanking you. It sounds like you have a problem with him. yeah come on...... dude knows what the majority of people here think about gm and the uaw. you can't possibly believe that he sincerely did not expect the responses posted did you? you don't have to respond....opsec and all... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
What asshattery? So he works for a union and GM and he want to thank the people who bought GM. So what? Didn't buy GM, he's not thanking you. It sounds like you have a problem with him. yeah come on...... dude knows what the majority of people here think about gm and the uaw. you can't possibly believe that he sincerely did not expect the responses posted did you? you don't have to respond....opsec and all... He probably did, but should someone who has a controversial stance not post? It's not like he is throwing insults or throwing lies. You can feel free to disagree with him, but to put him in the same boat as the "Noooo" post is absurd. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What asshattery? So he works for a union and GM and he want to thank the people who bought GM. So what? Didn't buy GM, he's not thanking you. It sounds like you have a problem with him. yeah come on...... dude knows what the majority of people here think about gm and the uaw. you can't possibly believe that he sincerely did not expect the responses posted did you? you don't have to respond....opsec and all... He probably did, but should someone who has a controversial stance not post? It's not like he is throwing insults or throwing lies. You can feel free to disagree with him, but to put him in the same boat as the "Noooo" post is absurd. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What asshattery? So he works for a union and GM and he want to thank the people who bought GM. So what? Didn't buy GM, he's not thanking you. It sounds like you have a problem with him. yeah come on...... dude knows what the majority of people here think about gm and the uaw. you can't possibly believe that he sincerely did not expect the responses posted did you? you don't have to respond....opsec and all... He probably did, but should someone who has a controversial stance not post? It's not like he is throwing insults or throwing lies. You can feel free to disagree with him, but to put him in the same boat as the "Noooo" post is absurd. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm What do you mean by hmmmmm? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What asshattery? So he works for a union and GM and he want to thank the people who bought GM. So what? Didn't buy GM, he's not thanking you. It sounds like you have a problem with him. yeah come on...... dude knows what the majority of people here think about gm and the uaw. you can't possibly believe that he sincerely did not expect the responses posted did you? you don't have to respond....opsec and all... He probably did, but should someone who has a controversial stance not post? It's not like he is throwing insults or throwing lies. You can feel free to disagree with him, but to put him in the same boat as the "Noooo" post is absurd. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm What do you mean by hmmmmm? ok...i'll spell it out for you.... considering the majority of responses to the o.p. of the "gm" thread, i'd go out on a limb and state that a lot would agree that, yes, it's rather absurd of the o.p. to post that. see, i'm remembering the threads of those that had the balls enough to swallow their pride and post about not wanting to apply for help because of a tough spot they were currently in. those people weren't bragging about receiving taxpayer handouts and gloating about it. yeah, boasting about a bailout funded job and that "noooooOOOOoooooo" thread, are pretty equivalent in absurdity. your opinion, as well as others, may vary, but do not dictate the opinion of the board. |
|
Quoted:
ok...i'll spell it out for you.... considering the majority of responses to the o.p. of the "gm" thread, i'd go out on a limb and state that a lot would agree that, yes, it's rather absurd of the o.p. to post that. see, i'm remembering the threads of those that had the balls enough to swallow their pride and post about not wanting to apply for help because of a tough spot they were currently in. those people weren't bragging about receiving taxpayer handouts and gloating about it. yeah, boasting about a bailout funded job and that "noooooOOOOoooooo" thread, are pretty equivalent in absurdity. your opinion, as well as others, may vary, but do not dictate the opinion of the board. When did he brag about receiving taxpayer handouts? He didn't. You took you bias of GM and put it on Chevyguy. He worked there before the bailout, and he still works there. He is not responsible for the bailout. Thanks for spelling out what hmmmmmmmm really means 
|