User Panel
Attached File
The Tuberville romp: Sessions activated? Things are coming together. Q 36 - Admiral Rogers and the Delegate Recount Coup. From Q 2637 Notice a pattern? seem they all lost Potus support (optics?) except MR, we now can assume one important things: When MR visited TT, his key communication was not only the illegal spying, but as shown by Kagan in her SC opinion and dropped by Q, the Delegate Recount Scam was still Active (Q36). MR prevented the Election from being Rigged, Is everything we are seeing unfold related to Exposure that they tried to: Deny Potus the Presidency in a Full Coup Consipiracy. Is MR the intel counter coup thwarter and chief witness? If exposed will Q 2637 list confirm the people that took charge of peaceful transition and (Gov w/Potus) that was threatened? almost like now that he lost the senate race, he can get back to work |
|
Attached File
|
|
Quoted: Twatter rumor is Amazon had magazines in the backpacks. This one, and was unable to verify. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327949/FE8059F1-0E5E-4433-B0D0-D98C6772A66D-1503423.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This is just getting creepy. Like lesbos having Mini Mouse stickers. I am thinking this is all secret handshake shit. I think most Hollyweird and the money people are sold lock stock and barrel to the cabal. Twatter rumor is Amazon had magazines in the backpacks. This one, and was unable to verify. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327949/FE8059F1-0E5E-4433-B0D0-D98C6772A66D-1503423.jpg I think these are symbolisms they all understand. Some just to poke us normies out in the open. |
|
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/8f90fc8687a949ce5009a6b5aaaa5e035cc40b9c-1504678.JPGhttps://media.8kun.top/file_store/f2ae105b21eff067e90864714df7937c5edd6917ce0915b58a5ecf8868e464bc.png The Tuberville romp: Sessions activated? Things are coming together. Q 36 - Admiral Rogers and the Delegate Recount Coup. From Q 2637 Notice a pattern? seem they all lost Potus support (optics?) except MR, we now can assume one important things: When MR visited TT, his key communication was not only the illegal spying, but as shown by Kagan in her SC opinion and dropped by Q, the Delegate Recount Scam was still Active (Q36). MR prevented the Election from being Rigged, Is everything we are seeing unfold related to Exposure that they tried to: Deny Potus the Presidency in a Full Coup Consipiracy. Is MR the intel counter coup thwarter and chief witness? If exposed will Q 2637 list confirm the people that took charge of peaceful transition and (Gov w/Potus) that was threatened? https://media.8kun.top/file_store/cc11002c5b3a2168ea495daa61da4f7e66acbf347aacaf6f75c02c10c30d44ff.png almost like now that he lost the senate race, he can View Quote Activate Sessions. |
|
Quoted: https://media.8kun.top/file_store/b6c6a1aaa600eb0842c9cd11ae16cd0b52546494192855c309773ec1ee129682.png Imagine you’re a compromised politician like Pelosi or Schiff etc >>Epstein, China, Iran and a dozen other countries have damaging material about you. You are forced to be their puppet. >>Military intel becomes aware of this. Starts making lists >>Create a back channel to all puppets in power >>Tell them their is a way out if they play the game >>Play their puppet part (Anti-trump) while US mil/law enforcement take down the puppet masters View Quote https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidents-executive-order-hong-kong-normalization/ |
|
Ron gets it too
We wondered what would drop this week and like usual, it's a silent fart in an elevator. People are starting to sense it and some will drop like flies. We Are The News Now. Time to drop this to the normies everywhere. |
|
Trumps EO on the CCP
Time to start digging for ourselves. Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: View Quote with lists of who qualifies as an agent of the CCP. |
|
From the above EO:
(C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or View Quote Did we just kick Google in the nuts? YA GOTTA READ THIS EO, IT'S AMAZING. |
|
Quoted: That was posted WAY back in the original thread, I don't remember much about it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This goes way back to the early SAP thread. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/318573/Ec15y-cU0AAbdOA_jpg-1503011.JPG That was posted WAY back in the original thread, I don't remember much about it. Moar I am in this shit with you. |
|
Ehud Barak leads a full blown Antifa insurgency in Israel in an attempt to spin the Maxwell hearing: Ehud Barak is panicking and taking Israel with him. So yesterday was the hearing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, and Ehud Barak was panicking and needed a spin so that the Israeli public won't follow The Maxwell story. With help from his "elite" buddies, with whom he consulted in a secretive meeting last week in a secluded rich neighborhood, he orchestrated massive Antifa ("black flags") riots, outside of Netanyahu's official residence in Jerusalem. The secretive meeting took place in Arik Carmon's residence, this guy is the co-founder (together with the American Billionair Bernard Marcus - co-founder of Home Depot) of the Soros tentacle known as "Israel Democracy Institute", another "foundation" that plans insurgencies and allegedly washes money. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Democracy_Institute#History Source for the meeting (Barak is in red). After the leak was published, the meeting was eventually acknowledged: https://www.facebook.com/kerenout/posts/649639788961816 The riots were assisted by the passive police force, why passive?Because a large portion of the chiefs of police are alumni of the Wexner Foundation Israel fellowship in Harvard university. Yes, LES WEXNER and HARVARD again. https://www.wexnerfoundation.org/app/StudentList/75 One journalist asked the police why they are standing down, and the official respons was "we do not owe you any answers", deep state at its finest. The rioters used the same exact tactics as US antifa, INCLUDING STACKING BRICKS BEFOREHAND AND USING THEM: source for attached images: https://www.facebook.com/groups/48012808906/permalink/10157497139853907 The videos from the riots: https://mobile.twitter.com/Segev_Yuval/status/1283233766270525440 https://mobile.twitter.com/Segev_Yuval/status/1283099334821711873 another hebrew source: https://conspil.com/2020/07/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a8%d7%95%d7%a3-%d7%9e%d7%a7%d7%a8%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%91%d7%99%d7%95%d7%9d-%d7%94%d7%a9%d7%99%d7%9e%d7%95%d7%a2-%d7%a9%d7%9c-%d7%92%d7%99%d7%9c%d7%99%d7%99%d7%9f-%d7%9e%d7%a7%d7%a1%d7%95/ https://conspil.com/2020/07/%d7%90%d7%a0%d7%98%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%94-%d7%99%d7%a9%d7%a8%d7%90%d7%9c-%d7%90%d7%a0%d7%98%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%94-%d7%90%d7%a8%d7%94%d7%91/ Now the narrative is "the riots have escalated the 2nd wave of COVID-19, now where did we here this before? Same exact methods as in the US. ____ Plus one of the lead figures in this insurgency is the deep state figure who allegedly orchestrated the Assasination of Itzhak Rabin, and is very afraid that Netanyahu will re-open the covered up files - Carmi Gilon (former head of the Israeli secret service). It appears that his involvement, and the involvement of many well connected former special forces people in violence Antifa protests are hinting to a possible False Flag against netanyahu. source (hebrew): https://www.facebook.com/kerenout/posts/651382252120903 These people are doing everything to remove Netanyahu, kill Trump's peace plan and retain their power View Quote |
|
Quoted: Trump campaigned against him. So much for Trust Sessions. View Quote Here are my thoughts on Sessions: - Sessions played a critical role in the Plan. - Cabal must be (and be remained) convinced that Trump-Sessions are at odds. - Trump Tweets against Sessions non-stop from recusal to present time. How is it going to look if Trump turns around and endorses Sessions for Senate after attacking him for 3+ years? Either Sessions is done politically and this was his final convincing act of Kabuki Theater or Trump brings him back in another role after "new facts are discovered". Either way, "Trust Sessions" can still be valid. |
|
|
Quoted:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1283113133490331648.html View Quote |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: No, there are racial Jews as well as religious Jews. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/337680/IMG_0332_PNG-1504535.JPG Perhaps "ethnic" would have been a better word choice on my part. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote
|
|
Tuberville is supposed to be on Fox business this morning if anyone wants to listen. I'm not sure what time.
|
|
Quoted: Here are my thoughts on Sessions: - Sessions played a critical role in the Plan. - Cabal must be (and be remained) convinced that Trump-Sessions are at odds. - Trump Tweets against Sessions non-stop from recusal to present time. How is it going to look if Trump turns around and endorses Sessions for Senate after attacking him for 3+ years? Either Sessions is done politically and this was his final convincing act of Kabuki Theater or Trump brings him back in another role after "new facts are discovered". Either way, "Trust Sessions" can still be valid. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Trump campaigned against him. So much for Trust Sessions. Here are my thoughts on Sessions: - Sessions played a critical role in the Plan. - Cabal must be (and be remained) convinced that Trump-Sessions are at odds. - Trump Tweets against Sessions non-stop from recusal to present time. How is it going to look if Trump turns around and endorses Sessions for Senate after attacking him for 3+ years? Either Sessions is done politically and this was his final convincing act of Kabuki Theater or Trump brings him back in another role after "new facts are discovered". Either way, "Trust Sessions" can still be valid. I don't know what to think about it. Is Sessions-is-an-enemy-of-the-administration just a head-fake? If Trump is only pretending to dislike Sessions so that Sessions can be activated for some particular role, why would Q tell us to trust him? It's not like we have some exclusive access to Q posts that the cabal doesn't. So our speculation that Sessions and Trump are only pretending to be enemies, can just as equally be speculated by anyone else. That cancels the effect altogether. I suppose it works if we remember that Trump is NOT the ringleader in all this, but just one actor in the play. I've never believed Trump is fully in-the-know of the 'plan' or its details, and often that's the only way it makes sense. "Trust Sessions" is information that is in the public domain. Trump can't just be pretending not to like the guy. Trust Sessions may mean something else entirely, or was a kernel of information released not for out benefit, but to serve some other purpose. |
|
Ive noticed long ago that a lot of topics get multiple threads on GD, and the funny part is that the second thread survives - better title, or the poster is part of the cool crowd.
Don't let it even bother you. If anything, first poster threads started by a few of us attract the anti's and that takes pressure off the other. The word still gets out. No issues with whichever anyone posts to, and often contributing to the second one with a fact or two left undiscovered is quietly participating. My pastor sermonized on masks last Sunday, hates them with a passion, wore one in the lobby. His message was don't muddy the water, work for understanding. It's not good to push off those who need to hear it. If they are attracted to attack just one poster yet won't contribute to the topic, well, ok, Im infantry. The topics I pick are generally high interest, it will get repeated, the dupe Nazis don't close them down so much now. Hmm. All is good. Other things from the EO: Shipping in and out of HK is now the same as China, that's going to have some affect. Will they get the cheap Postal Rate now? or revert to the $30 average - for a $18 knife? Amazon/Ebay/Aliexpress is likely on pins and needles now to see what is up. Banking assets: Can Fauci and Gates get profits on a vaccine who's patent rights are owned by China? I think Gilead may go belly up or be forced to make it here. In fact, MOST vaccines were said to need to move here, now? Seems mandatory to make a dime on it. Goes to medical supplies and PPE. Kick in the pants. Trump said we'd move production here. Looks that way now. Chinese computer components? Most phones and devices are made there. Boost for India now. Lenovo is toast among others, no imports? GM sourcing all those Chinese modules for vehicles like my '12 Buick is now old history. Which automaker will take it in the shorts for that? Toyota, Nissan, etc? Bearings, bolts and such are predominantly made in China. Looks like Stanley has some figuring out to do, and Craftsman will now find an US home. If you can't import, reimport, or export to, then it's big. No more junk steel from China, no chicken wings or legs there. Our grain crops weren't getting bought anyway the Chinese were choking that off using it against us. Keep in mind we have less to lose than they do - now all their property belong to us. National Emergency. 15 day countdown. And Trump never blinks. |
|
|
Quoted: Was that in or around the time of the ATL airport "blackout" too? View Quote I believe so. NO airline turns an airplane around ver the Pacific for a pax who go on the wrong flight...EVER. Remember after the OKC bombing, the FBI told British Airways to turn around and return a “suspect”. Once they did, the FBI promptly let him go and he was on the next flight out of the country. Never to be seen again. So, there was a definite reason that plane was turned around. TC |
|
Format for posting a thread:
Title: Never go full retard. Push the Overton window. Make it edgy for a normie who isn't yet that up to speed in the matrix. It's attractive - the press does it thousands of times a day. Man Bites Dog! Links: Give the link first with a catchy link title. it's the chain thingy 7th one over. Most won't - so you TL;DR a one liner to fill in but the conversation never goes far enough to answer all the questions. If you leave it a bit fuzzy there's room for others to jump in and "correct" or add to the conversation. Being too all inclusive and slick means nobody can wedge into the conversation - and there's been more than a time or two they had an important facet to bring to the table. Nobody wants a one post wonder disappearing down the spiraling tube of site resources. By getting more contributors the slam dunk snarker who gets first post is overwhelmed with information and numbers are influential. The point is that the opponents are living in an echo chamber, construct one around them here and it levels the playing field so that real discussion of details resumes which contributes to everyone's knowledge. Since this is a protected space - as was mentioned in the Fauci Thread - then exposing others to the smaller topics one at a time then redpills them in smaller bite sized topics. None of us was read in from the beginning, it was something different for many of us. It's basically a matter of exposure to enough different facets that something will click and get thru. It's like a virus. If it is programmed for a bat then it really wouldn't attach to a human. It needs a human docking system to attach and then replicate. See how I snuck that in? Examples of other things can be informative, too. It might give someone something to sideline with, but that's like cutting the padlock and then turning the rail switch at a siding. Its deliberate - like proselytizing for what design mask and then discussing what bondage graphic should go on it. Other posters need to be up to speed and prevent it, so that an argument doesn't ensue and the thread locked. That's what some who post here are getting paid to do - trash threads to prevent the dissemination of information. I think we are well aware of it now. Keeping an eye on GD for a topic now and again that is interesting deserves a post. Chrissy Teigen deleting 60,000 of her tweets may not be your cup of tea, but starting a thread on a topic helps now and again. Its not all a wretched hive of villainy, that thread on "you have 5 minutes to prepare for the mob" turned hilarious. We needed that humor. 111 days to Nov 4th. Do you have your raft and PFD handy? |
|
Tiegen being in the news again reminded me of her possible moon child with John Legend.
|
|
Tech CEO dismembered
Relevant? I submit only for scrutiny. |
|
View Quote Professional killing with almost no blood. Message sent to someone. We'll know in a few days. (kinda reminds me of John wick kind of bounty) |
|
Quoted: I don't know what to think about it. Is Sessions-is-an-enemy-of-the-administration just a head-fake? If Trump is only pretending to dislike Sessions so that Sessions can be activated for some particular role, why would Q tell us to trust him? It's not like we have some exclusive access to Q posts that the cabal doesn't. So our speculation that Sessions and Trump are only pretending to be enemies, can just as equally be speculated by anyone else. That cancels the effect altogether. I suppose it works if we remember that Trump is NOT the ringleader in all this, but just one actor in the play. I've never believed Trump is fully in-the-know of the 'plan' or its details, and often that's the only way it makes sense. "Trust Sessions" is information that is in the public domain. Trump can't just be pretending not to like the guy. Trust Sessions may mean something else entirely, or was a kernel of information released not for out benefit, but to serve some other purpose. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Trump campaigned against him. So much for Trust Sessions. Here are my thoughts on Sessions: - Sessions played a critical role in the Plan. - Cabal must be (and be remained) convinced that Trump-Sessions are at odds. - Trump Tweets against Sessions non-stop from recusal to present time. How is it going to look if Trump turns around and endorses Sessions for Senate after attacking him for 3+ years? Either Sessions is done politically and this was his final convincing act of Kabuki Theater or Trump brings him back in another role after "new facts are discovered". Either way, "Trust Sessions" can still be valid. I don't know what to think about it. Is Sessions-is-an-enemy-of-the-administration just a head-fake? If Trump is only pretending to dislike Sessions so that Sessions can be activated for some particular role, why would Q tell us to trust him? It's not like we have some exclusive access to Q posts that the cabal doesn't. So our speculation that Sessions and Trump are only pretending to be enemies, can just as equally be speculated by anyone else. That cancels the effect altogether. I suppose it works if we remember that Trump is NOT the ringleader in all this, but just one actor in the play. I've never believed Trump is fully in-the-know of the 'plan' or its details, and often that's the only way it makes sense. "Trust Sessions" is information that is in the public domain. Trump can't just be pretending not to like the guy. Trust Sessions may mean something else entirely, or was a kernel of information released not for out benefit, but to serve some other purpose. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think Vince McMahon is/has something to do with Q/the plan. He and Trump are long time friends, T gave his wife Linda a position after his election, they donated millions to his campaign. I don't believe he is doing the Q posts or flying around with him taking pictures of his watch but I think he wrote or helped write the script to "The Plan". Vince has been doing the script writing for decades for his shows and there is always a "heel" or a bad guy to hate. I think, and like many have said here, for this plan to work to take down the deep state global cabal you'd have to have had a plan in the works for years. Trump is smart and slick but there's no way in hell he's pulling this off on his own. I think he'd have to have one helluva script writer to keep the left rope a doped the whole time they are chipping away at them. I think if the whole trust Sessions deal is real it's just like in one of his scripts for wrestling and the bad guy/heel comes back with a twist and becomes the hero. I mean as much as we'd like to hate him I don't think any anons have found any dirt on him? Do I think everyone that has come and gone from the White House is a white hat? Hell no! I never understood the "Anthony Scaramucci model" and if y'all saw him pal around with Tom Arnold there's no way he's a friend of POTUS. Mc Masters, Mattis, Tillerson, Bolton ???? White/black hat? Hell I don't know. I don't care if Q is Mickey Mouse, I love coming here and reading news and tweets that I'd get no where else and sure as hell not the media. I love and thank all of you for the digging y'all do. Y'all rock. |
|
Regarding sessions. He recused himself in March 2017. I don't know the exact date, but I think it was at the beginning of the month?
If sessions were playing a role because he recused himself which would have therefore allowed the corrupt Department of Justice and FBI to continue to go after Trump for the purpose of adding more crimes they could be charged with then we need to look at the dates of some of their transgressions and crimes that have been declassified recently to see if it occurred before or after recusal date. I haven't done this yet but I'm thinking most of the egregious punishable crimes occurred before sessions even recused himself? Trump tweeted about Obama wire tapping him on March 4, 2017. I don't know if he knew this was going on prior to March 4 or not. I would think he knew about it within days but not months prior to making that tweet? Seems too coincidental for me to believe that sessions in on some master plan control by the white hats and decides to recuse himself at about the exact same time that Trump discovered he was wire tapped. I'm going choose to trust what Trump tells us. I would love nothing more than to admit how wrong I was about sessions when we discover his name was all over a bunch of really good things that happened and resulted in rounding up a bunch of criminal politicians and Department of Justice employees. But until then I'm taking mine "cue" from Trump himself. |
|
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/fd79d3e929c2f4e0eda2e39236e52a4d3609aac0-1504668.JPG Ghislaine Maxwells rumored husband has an interesting company that tracks shipping… along with interesting investors. What better way to track your "product" A Peek Inside CargoMetrics’ Bid To Build The ‘NSA of Global Trade’ An aura of mystery has long surrounded CargoMetrics Technologies, a Boston-based quantitative hedge fund that uses ship-movement data to place market bets and has secured financial backing from private-equity giant Blackstone, famed investor Paul Tudor Jones, Google founder Eric Schmidt, Israeli shipping magnate Idan Ofer, and most recently, Maersk Tankers…. https://www.cargometrics.com/a-peek-inside-cargometrics-bid-to-build-the-nsa-of-global-trade-copy/ View Quote Sounds like cheating or a form of insider trading. The fact they have Google data doe mean they know what time and which location your cell phone was made, and everywhere it has been before and after getting to you, along with what every penny you spent with any card. Where every human and piece of merchandise is (same thing to them). With everybody's habits and routines, a whole hell of a LOT of coincidental meetings could happen. Apparently at random, whenever they decide to create a coincidence or a photo op. |
|
|
Trump Administration Strips C.D.C. of Control of Coronavirus Data
Hospitals have been ordered to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and send all patient information to a central database in Washington, raising questions about transparency. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/us/politics/trump-cdc-coronavirus.html |
|
Quoted: Here are my thoughts on Sessions: - Sessions played a critical role in the Plan. - Cabal must be (and be remained) convinced that Trump-Sessions are at odds. - Trump Tweets against Sessions non-stop from recusal to present time. How is it going to look if Trump turns around and endorses Sessions for Senate after attacking him for 3+ years? Either Sessions is done politically and this was his final convincing act of Kabuki Theater or Trump brings him back in another role after "new facts are discovered". Either way, "Trust Sessions" can still be valid. View Quote I don't see how Sessions acted responsibly with respect to Trump's presidency. I read all the gushing over Sessions as similar to the wishful gushing over Meowler... That has since been shown to be incredibly inaccurate. Sessions has been a poor player in Trump and Team's objectives and there is scant realistic evidence to the contrary. Trump has called out Session's manhood and defeated him at his attempt to return to power. Sessions is FINISHED in DISGRACE IMO. |
|
Quoted: Ive noticed long ago that a lot of topics get multiple threads on GD, and the funny part is that the second thread survives - better title, or the poster is part of the cool crowd. Don't let it even bother you. If anything, first poster threads started by a few of us attract the anti's and that takes pressure off the other. The word still gets out. No issues with whichever anyone posts to, and often contributing to the second one with a fact or two left undiscovered is quietly participating. My pastor sermonized on masks last Sunday, hates them with a passion, wore one in the lobby. His message was don't muddy the water, work for understanding. It's not good to push off those who need to hear it. If they are attracted to attack just one poster yet won't contribute to the topic, well, ok, Im infantry. The topics I pick are generally high interest, it will get repeated, the dupe Nazis don't close them down so much now. Hmm. All is good. Other things from the EO: Shipping in and out of HK is now the same as China, that's going to have some affect. Will they get the cheap Postal Rate now? or revert to the $30 average - for a $18 knife? Amazon/Ebay/Aliexpress is likely on pins and needles now to see what is up. Banking assets: Can Fauci and Gates get profits on a vaccine who's patent rights are owned by China? I think Gilead may go belly up or be forced to make it here. In fact, MOST vaccines were said to need to move here, now? Seems mandatory to make a dime on it. Goes to medical supplies and PPE. Kick in the pants. Trump said we'd move production here. Looks that way now. Chinese computer components? Most phones and devices are made there. Boost for India now. Lenovo is toast among others, no imports? GM sourcing all those Chinese modules for vehicles like my '12 Buick is now old history. Which automaker will take it in the shorts for that? Toyota, Nissan, etc? Bearings, bolts and such are predominantly made in China. Looks like Stanley has some figuring out to do, and Craftsman will now find an US home. If you can't import, reimport, or export to, then it's big. No more junk steel from China, no chicken wings or legs there. Our grain crops weren't getting bought anyway the Chinese were choking that off using it against us. Keep in mind we have less to lose than they do - now all their property belong to us. National Emergency. 15 day countdown. And Trump never blinks. View Quote wise as usual my friend |
|
Quoted: Trumps EO on the CCP Time to start digging for ourselves. with lists of who qualifies as an agent of the CCP. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Trumps EO on the CCP Time to start digging for ourselves. Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: with lists of who qualifies as an agent of the CCP. Full Text Click To View Spoiler The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization Foreign Policy Issued on: July 14, 2020 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China. China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong. I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat. In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order: Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States. Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes: (a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note); (b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively); (c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.); (d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m)); (e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and (f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code. Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to: (a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China; (b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders; (c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China; (d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order; (e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121); (f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418); (g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies; (h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109); (i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong; (j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892); (k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and (l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong. Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: (a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State: (i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region; (ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following: (A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong; (B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong; (C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or (D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong; (iii) to be or have been a leader or official of: (A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii) (B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or (B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order. (iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; (v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or (vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section. (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order. Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order. Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include: (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person. Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693. Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof. Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order: (a) the term “person” means an individual or entity; (b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization; (c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and (d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age. Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order. Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order. Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)). Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, July 14, 2020. |
|
Quoted: I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think Vince McMahon is/has something to do with Q/the plan. He and Trump are long time friends, T gave his wife Linda a position after his election, they donated millions to his campaign. I don't believe he is doing the Q posts or flying around with him taking pictures of his watch but I think he wrote or helped write the script to "The Plan". Vince has been doing the script writing for decades for his shows and there is always a "heel" or a bad guy to hate. I think, and like many have said here, for this plan to work to take down the deep state global cabal you'd have to have had a plan in the works for years. Trump is smart and slick but there's no way in hell he's pulling this off on his own. I think he'd have to have one helluva script writer to keep the left rope a doped the whole time they are chipping away at them. I think if the whole trust Sessions deal is real it's just like in one of his scripts for wrestling and the bad guy/heel comes back with a twist and becomes the hero. I mean as much as we'd like to hate him I don't think any anons have found any dirt on him? Do I think everyone that has come and gone from the White House is a white hat? Hell no! I never understood the "Anthony Scaramucci model" and if y'all saw him pal around with Tom Arnold there's no way he's a friend of POTUS. Mc Masters, Mattis, Tillerson, Bolton ???? White/black hat? Hell I don't know. I don't care if Q is Mickey Mouse, I love coming here and reading news and tweets that I'd get no where else and sure as hell not the media. I love and thank all of you for the digging y'all do. Y'all rock. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Trump campaigned against him. So much for Trust Sessions. Here are my thoughts on Sessions: - Sessions played a critical role in the Plan. - Cabal must be (and be remained) convinced that Trump-Sessions are at odds. - Trump Tweets against Sessions non-stop from recusal to present time. How is it going to look if Trump turns around and endorses Sessions for Senate after attacking him for 3+ years? Either Sessions is done politically and this was his final convincing act of Kabuki Theater or Trump brings him back in another role after "new facts are discovered". Either way, "Trust Sessions" can still be valid. I don't know what to think about it. Is Sessions-is-an-enemy-of-the-administration just a head-fake? If Trump is only pretending to dislike Sessions so that Sessions can be activated for some particular role, why would Q tell us to trust him? It's not like we have some exclusive access to Q posts that the cabal doesn't. So our speculation that Sessions and Trump are only pretending to be enemies, can just as equally be speculated by anyone else. That cancels the effect altogether. I suppose it works if we remember that Trump is NOT the ringleader in all this, but just one actor in the play. I've never believed Trump is fully in-the-know of the 'plan' or its details, and often that's the only way it makes sense. "Trust Sessions" is information that is in the public domain. Trump can't just be pretending not to like the guy. Trust Sessions may mean something else entirely, or was a kernel of information released not for out benefit, but to serve some other purpose. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think Vince McMahon is/has something to do with Q/the plan. He and Trump are long time friends, T gave his wife Linda a position after his election, they donated millions to his campaign. I don't believe he is doing the Q posts or flying around with him taking pictures of his watch but I think he wrote or helped write the script to "The Plan". Vince has been doing the script writing for decades for his shows and there is always a "heel" or a bad guy to hate. I think, and like many have said here, for this plan to work to take down the deep state global cabal you'd have to have had a plan in the works for years. Trump is smart and slick but there's no way in hell he's pulling this off on his own. I think he'd have to have one helluva script writer to keep the left rope a doped the whole time they are chipping away at them. I think if the whole trust Sessions deal is real it's just like in one of his scripts for wrestling and the bad guy/heel comes back with a twist and becomes the hero. I mean as much as we'd like to hate him I don't think any anons have found any dirt on him? Do I think everyone that has come and gone from the White House is a white hat? Hell no! I never understood the "Anthony Scaramucci model" and if y'all saw him pal around with Tom Arnold there's no way he's a friend of POTUS. Mc Masters, Mattis, Tillerson, Bolton ???? White/black hat? Hell I don't know. I don't care if Q is Mickey Mouse, I love coming here and reading news and tweets that I'd get no where else and sure as hell not the media. I love and thank all of you for the digging y'all do. Y'all rock. even if vince isn't "in" on it, I am sure trump has talked to him about those type of scripts in some form or fashion and learned from it |
|
Quoted: I've said it before and I'll say it again, I think Vince McMahon is/has something to do with Q/the plan. He and Trump are long time friends, T gave his wife Linda a position after his election, they donated millions to his campaign. I don't believe he is doing the Q posts or flying around with him taking pictures of his watch but I think he wrote or helped write the script to "The Plan". Vince has been doing the script writing for decades for his shows and there is always a "heel" or a bad guy to hate. I think, and like many have said here, for this plan to work to take down the deep state global cabal you'd have to have had a plan in the works for years. Trump is smart and slick but there's no way in hell he's pulling this off on his own. I think he'd have to have one helluva script writer to keep the left rope a doped the whole time they are chipping away at them. I think if the whole trust Sessions deal is real it's just like in one of his scripts for wrestling and the bad guy/heel comes back with a twist and becomes the hero. I mean as much as we'd like to hate him I don't think any anons have found any dirt on him? Do I think everyone that has come and gone from the White House is a white hat? Hell no! I never understood the "Anthony Scaramucci model" and if y'all saw him pal around with Tom Arnold there's no way he's a friend of POTUS. Mc Masters, Mattis, Tillerson, Bolton ???? White/black hat? Hell I don't know. I don't care if Q is Mickey Mouse, I love coming here and reading news and tweets that I'd get no where else and sure as hell not the media. I love and thank all of you for the digging y'all do. Y'all rock. View Quote Probably close to the truth... When things are quite obvious, it's likely faulty to try to twist them to satisfy one's ego and wishful thinking. |
|
Quoted: Trump Administration Strips C.D.C. of Control of Coronavirus Data Hospitals have been ordered to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and send all patient information to a central database in Washington, raising questions about transparency. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/us/politics/trump-cdc-coronavirus.html View Quote that is huge |
|
Quoted: Regarding sessions. He recused himself in March 2017. I don't know the exact date, but I think it was at the beginning of the month? If sessions were playing a role because he recused himself which would have therefore allowed the corrupt Department of Justice and FBI to continue to go after Trump for the purpose of adding more crimes they could be charged with then we need to look at the dates of some of their transgressions and crimes that have been declassified recently to see if it occurred before or after recusal date. I haven't done this yet but I'm thinking most of the egregious punishable crimes occurred before sessions even recused himself? Trump tweeted about Obama wire tapping him on March 4, 2017. I don't know if he knew this was going on prior to March 4 or not. I would think he knew about it within days but not months prior to making that tweet? Seems too coincidental for me to believe that sessions in on some master plan control by the white hats and decides to recuse himself at about the exact same time that Trump discovered he was wire tapped. I'm going choose to trust what Trump tells us. I would love nothing more than to admit how wrong I was about sessions when we discover his name was all over a bunch of really good things that happened and resulted in rounding up a bunch of criminal politicians and Department of Justice employees. But until then I'm taking mine "cue" from Trump himself. View Quote "But until then I'm taking mine "cue" from Trump himself." Based on the obvious, I'll TRUST Trump a millions times more than [dis-information? ] "Trust Sessions". |
|
Quoted: "But until then I'm taking mine "cue" from Trump himself." Based on the obvious, I'll TRUST Trump a millions times more than [dis-information? ] "Trust Sessions". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Regarding sessions. He recused himself in March 2017. I don't know the exact date, but I think it was at the beginning of the month? If sessions were playing a role because he recused himself which would have therefore allowed the corrupt Department of Justice and FBI to continue to go after Trump for the purpose of adding more crimes they could be charged with then we need to look at the dates of some of their transgressions and crimes that have been declassified recently to see if it occurred before or after recusal date. I haven't done this yet but I'm thinking most of the egregious punishable crimes occurred before sessions even recused himself? Trump tweeted about Obama wire tapping him on March 4, 2017. I don't know if he knew this was going on prior to March 4 or not. I would think he knew about it within days but not months prior to making that tweet? Seems too coincidental for me to believe that sessions in on some master plan control by the white hats and decides to recuse himself at about the exact same time that Trump discovered he was wire tapped. I'm going choose to trust what Trump tells us. I would love nothing more than to admit how wrong I was about sessions when we discover his name was all over a bunch of really good things that happened and resulted in rounding up a bunch of criminal politicians and Department of Justice employees. But until then I'm taking mine "cue" from Trump himself. "But until then I'm taking mine "cue" from Trump himself." Based on the obvious, I'll TRUST Trump a millions times more than [dis-information? ] "Trust Sessions". i am on the other sun tzu side of it, trust sessions indeed we shall see now that sessions has lost-------and trump say sessions bad-----what can happen? |
|
Quoted: i am on the other sun tzu side of it, trust sessions indeed we shall see now that sessions has lost-------and trump say sessions bad-----what can happen? View Quote I'll bet your last N95 that we'll hear very little re: Sessions going forward. Sessions as an issue is likely done, another Failure on the Immense Scrap-Heap of History. |
|
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/8f90fc8687a949ce5009a6b5aaaa5e035cc40b9c-1504678.JPGhttps://media.8kun.top/file_store/f2ae105b21eff067e90864714df7937c5edd6917ce0915b58a5ecf8868e464bc.png The Tuberville romp: Sessions activated? Things are coming together. Q 36 - Admiral Rogers and the Delegate Recount Coup. From Q 2637 Notice a pattern? seem they all lost Potus support (optics?) except MR, we now can assume one important things: When MR visited TT, his key communication was not only the illegal spying, but as shown by Kagan in her SC opinion and dropped by Q, the Delegate Recount Scam was still Active (Q36). MR prevented the Election from being Rigged, Is everything we are seeing unfold related to Exposure that they tried to: Deny Potus the Presidency in a Full Coup Consipiracy. Is MR the intel counter coup thwarter and chief witness? If exposed will Q 2637 list confirm the people that took charge of peaceful transition and (Gov w/Potus) that was threatened? https://media.8kun.top/file_store/cc11002c5b3a2168ea495daa61da4f7e66acbf347aacaf6f75c02c10c30d44ff.png almost like now that he lost the senate race, he can get back to work View Quote Ole possum Jeff.... |
|
Quoted: I'll bet your last N95 that we'll hear very little re: Sessions going forward. Sessions as an issue is likely done, another Failure on the Immense Scrap-Heap of History. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: i am on the other sun tzu side of it, trust sessions indeed we shall see now that sessions has lost-------and trump say sessions bad-----what can happen? I'll bet your last N95 that we'll hear very little re: Sessions going forward. Sessions as an issue is likely done, another Failure on the Immense Scrap-Heap of History. lol ok I don't have one, I don't wear masks. |
|
Quoted: Trump Administration Strips C.D.C. of Control of Coronavirus Data Hospitals have been ordered to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and send all patient information to a central database in Washington, raising questions about transparency. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/us/politics/trump-cdc-coronavirus.html View Quote Good |
|
|
Quoted: Full Text Click To View Spoiler The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization Foreign Policy Issued on: July 14, 2020 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China. China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong. I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat. In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order: Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States. Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes: (a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note); (b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively); (c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.); (d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m)); (e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and (f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code. Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to: (a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China; (b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders; (c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China; (d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order; (e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121); (f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418); (g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies; (h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109); (i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong; (j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892); (k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and (l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong. Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: (a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State: (i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region; (ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following: (A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong; (B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong; (C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or (D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong; (iii) to be or have been a leader or official of: (A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii) (B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or (B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order. (iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; (v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or (vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section. (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order. Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order. Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include: (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person. Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693. Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof. Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order: (a) the term “person” means an individual or entity; (b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization; (c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and (d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age. Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order. Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order. Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)). Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, July 14, 2020. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Trumps EO on the CCP Time to start digging for ourselves. Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: with lists of who qualifies as an agent of the CCP. Full Text Click To View Spoiler The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization Foreign Policy Issued on: July 14, 2020 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China. China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong. I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat. In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order: Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States. Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes: (a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note); (b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively); (c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.); (d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m)); (e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and (f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code. Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to: (a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China; (b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders; (c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China; (d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order; (e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121); (f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418); (g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies; (h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109); (i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong; (j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892); (k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and (l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong. Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: (a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State: (i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region; (ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following: (A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong; (B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong; (C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or (D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong; (iii) to be or have been a leader or official of: (A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii) (B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or (B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order. (iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; (v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or (vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section. (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order. Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order. Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include: (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person. Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693. Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof. Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order: (a) the term “person” means an individual or entity; (b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization; (c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and (d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age. Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order. Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order. Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)). Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, July 14, 2020. I bet feinstein, peolosi, schumer, schiffy schiff, the governors that pompeo has a list of, are all just pissed------their master's pee pee just got slapped |
|
Quoted: I don't know what to think about it. Is Sessions-is-an-enemy-of-the-administration just a head-fake? If Trump is only pretending to dislike Sessions so that Sessions can be activated for some particular role, why would Q tell us to trust him? It's not like we have some exclusive access to Q posts that the cabal doesn't. So our speculation that Sessions and Trump are only pretending to be enemies, can just as equally be speculated by anyone else. That cancels the effect altogether. I suppose it works if we remember that Trump is NOT the ringleader in all this, but just one actor in the play. I've never believed Trump is fully in-the-know of the 'plan' or its details, and often that's the only way it makes sense. "Trust Sessions" is information that is in the public domain. Trump can't just be pretending not to like the guy. Trust Sessions may mean something else entirely, or was a kernel of information released not for out benefit, but to serve some other purpose. View Quote Here is a window into my Sessions reasoning: Let's take the Eric Trump IG Q post and the General Flynn oath post. These two posts are basically air tight in the conformation of Q. If above confirms Q, then the below (at least to me) confirms that Trump and Sessions are playing for the same team and that Sessions is a white hat who did his part as part of The Plan. Attached File |
|
Quoted: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/fd79d3e929c2f4e0eda2e39236e52a4d3609aac0-1504668.JPG Ghislaine Maxwells rumored husband has an interesting company that tracks shipping along with interesting investors. What better way to track your "product" A Peek Inside CargoMetrics' Bid To Build The 'NSA of Global Trade' An aura of mystery has long surrounded CargoMetrics Technologies, a Boston-based quantitative hedge fund that uses ship-movement data to place market bets and has secured financial backing from private-equity giant Blackstone, famed investor Paul Tudor Jones, Google founder Eric Schmidt, Israeli shipping magnate Idan Ofer, and most recently, Maersk Tankers. https://www.cargometrics.com/a-peek-inside-cargometrics-bid-to-build-the-nsa-of-global-trade-copy/ View Quote Why do I have this sick feeling these people worship Satan? |
|
not exactly "proof"
but
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.