Quoted: Well my friend you are wrong!!
The bike you drove was likely a KX 450, not a KLR. The Suzuki version the RM-Z 450.
There has never been a KLR400, or 450. If it was a KLR, it was a 250, 600(84 to 86 or 87) or 650, thats all they made.
I invite you to prove otherwise, as a freelance photojournalist specializing in off-road motorcycles,you should know what you had.
I am curious as to what you drove, go to www.bikez.com and search for a photo and post it.
Best Regards
ETA. a search there will also show there has never been a KLR 400
|
Hmmm, you're right. Searching there didn't reveal a KLR400.
Perhaps a different search would produce evidence. Here's something I found immediately on eBay:
Granted, it's not exactly the best view, but I think that even a cursory examination of the photo (provided it shows up) reveals striking similarities to a DR-Z400S (or E or whatever it is). Again, I may not remember the exact model designation, but it was a 400 and it was manufactured by Suzuki for Kawasaki.
BTW, I'm quite familiar with the new-for-2006 KX450F; Team Green has been testing them for Destry Abbott's National hare & hound and other off-road applications since October '05. The 450F is completely different than Suzuki's RM-Z450; both companies developed their respective 450cc MXers independently. The old 250Fs were the only joint-venture motocross bike that they cooperatively developed and sold.
(Sorry for the hijack, MeestaSparkle.)
ETA: I can now see that it is not designated a KLR400; it's a KLX400. My mistake; as I said previously, I wasn't 100-percent confident of the exact model designation, only of what I actually rode a few years ago.