User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/31/2017 9:41:52 PM EDT
[#1]
10gbit @ 300M currently.
100gbit @ 100M supposedly when it becomes standard. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/31/2017 11:06:11 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
10gbit @ 300M currently. 100gbit @ 100M supposedly when it becomes standard. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/1/2017 10:25:05 AM EDT
[#3]
Its currently being done with multiple fibers bonded together. Those specs list 100gbit using MPO @ 300M. But the future specs I've seen for OM3 @ 100gbit don't list any caveats like MPO being required.
The next iteration of ethernet will be 40gbit before they work on 100gbit. I guess that 10x leap was just too much. I'm sure they've done the math and proven mathematically the fiber can support that speed in theory. Kind of reminds me of 4mbit, 10mbit, and 16mbit token ring. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/1/2017 6:24:19 PM EDT
[#4]
That pretty much settles what I'm running in this house when the Cat-6A either goes bad or becomes obsolete.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/1/2017 7:37:29 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That pretty much settles what I'm running in this house when the Cat-6A either goes bad or becomes obsolete. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/1/2017 7:38:50 PM EDT
[#6]
I figure 10g is going to be enough for quite some time. I don't see people really utilizing 1g as is. Copper termination is cheap and simplistic compared to fiber.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2017 12:35:05 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I figure 10g is going to be enough for quite some time. I don't see people really utilizing 1g as is. Copper termination is cheap and simplistic compared to fiber. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2017 10:49:14 AM EDT
[#8]
I have seen 400G for a single pair as a standard. I think that was for 10M length.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/3/2017 3:17:17 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have seen 400G for a single pair as a standard. I think that was for 10M length. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2017 9:12:29 PM EDT
[#10]
Do any of these future specs have names?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/4/2017 10:08:51 PM EDT
[#11]
Could put in single mode fiber to be sure
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 11:11:08 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do any of these future specs have names? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 11:11:48 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Could put in single mode fiber to be sure |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 6:29:44 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Get yo' selft on the RFC mailing list bruh. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 6:34:51 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So it's IETF. That's a start. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 9:07:39 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, what do you do that you think you're going to need 100Gbps LAN? Still, though, this Cat-6A has 19 years of life left. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 9:37:32 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Plan for the future. Still, though, this Cat-6A has 19 years of life left. Point is, if you want "future proof" then you're better off installing conduit to make replacing facilities easier than trying to install some projected future used facilities. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2017 10:16:29 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I figure 10g is going to be enough for quite some time. I don't see people really utilizing 1g as is. Copper termination is cheap and simplistic compared to fiber. There is really no reason to run fiber in the home for 10Gb in my opinion. I am running 1Gb right now and even moving 16TB's of data over the last few months for Plex it was plenty fast. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2017 2:03:50 AM EDT
[#19]
You know, you guys are right. This is stupid. I've currently got 10 Gbps ability with twisted pair and that will do.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2017 12:04:16 PM EDT
[#20]
I am all for doing things for fun but I think you are wise to stay with 10Gb for now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2017 1:57:05 PM EDT
[#21]
Actually, I'm still on gigabit. I just put Cat-6A STP in so that in ten years, I could just drop a 10G switch in and call it good.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2017 5:10:05 PM EDT
[#22]
That works too.
I am only using Cat5E at my house right now as I intend to test the 30m limit of it with 10Gbe at some point. I am going to dig the trench for my fiber run to the shop on Sunday and hope to have it up and running by the weekend after that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2017 10:07:33 PM EDT
[#23]
I have been running CAT6A through the house in anticipation of upgrading to 10G.
10G RJ45 NICs are coming sown in price ($100 for dual port 10G intels) but 10G RJ45 switches are still expensive and buggy for ones less than $1K SPF+ switches are a lot cheaper and SPF+ NICS are really cheap used on ebay. I am thinking of buying a mikrotik 24 port rj45 gig switch + 2x SPF+ switch ($120 Mikrotik CSS326 Switch) and using 10G fiber to connect my server and my workstation to the rest of my 1G network Most drives today will easily saturate a 1G network link. Some NVME drives can saturate a 10G link. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
