Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/15/2017 11:03:15 PM EDT
I currently have a 24-105 lens that has a .25 reproduction ratio. I was looking at the canon 100mm 2.8 macro. It has a reproduction ratio of 1.

If i dont really plan on photographing things the size of the sensor or smaller would the macro lens add anything?

If i photograph something that is around four times the size of the sensor like a flower would it end up being the same size on the sensor regardless of using the macro or 24-105 lens? Assumimg the pic is framed the same with the whole flower visible.
6/15/2017 11:38:38 PM EDT
[#1]
If i dont really plan on photographing things the size of the sensor or smaller would the macro lens add anything?
View Quote
You don't have to restrict yourself to photographing tiny objects.  The last time I used my macro lens it was for shooting faces.   And for achieving good boca behind the subject.

Actually that's what I like most about shooting macro - not necessarily shooting tiny objects and making them look big (although that's fun too), but having an extreme narrow field of focus.  (which is something that a macro lens is good at)
6/15/2017 11:46:36 PM EDT
[#2]
I use my Tamron 90mm 2.8 for a ton of stuff.
6/15/2017 11:47:59 PM EDT
[#3]
I have the 100mm 2.8 and it's a great lens. There's a bit of a learning curve but once you get the hang of it you can get some amazing results. Macro opens up a whole new world of detail which can get addictive. Just understand that your depth of field will take hit and if you stop down (F11-F22),  you're also going to need some good lighting.

For flowers, the extra magnification will bring out a new dimension of detail. A quick Google search will show you what you can expect from this lens and you can decide if it is right for you.
6/16/2017 2:09:27 AM EDT
[#4]
Nobody has mentioned the actual benefit of a macro lens yet.

They allow you to focus a lot closer than other lenses. A result of this is as was mentioned above, a shallower depth of focus, and all that goes along with it.

But, they also work just fine as a regular lens, I use mine as a portrait lens.



It also functions as a short telephoto



And of course, it does macro stuff.

DSC_3283-Edit by Zack, on Flickr

robber fly crop w by Zack, on Flickr

bee stack close w by Zack, on Flickr

DSC_3166-Edit by Zack, on Flickr

DSC_5778-Edit by Zack, on Flickr

DSC_4047-Edit by Zack, on Flickr
6/16/2017 5:23:55 AM EDT
[#5]
Yup.  100mm (or the Nikon 105mm f/2.8) are fantastic portrait or general photography lenses.  Razor freaking sharp glass, but they are designed for that.  Just a solid all around lens really.
6/16/2017 12:46:34 PM EDT
[#6]
I have an 85mm 1.8 that gives a nice bokeh but it doesnt focus very close. I will probably shoot with what i have now and if i find situations where the lenses are holding me back I'll look into the lens more.

Canon is supposed to be releasing an 85mm 1.4 is L lens in a few months. It wont be macro  but it will interesting to see how it compares. Should be a very nice lens.
6/16/2017 5:12:38 PM EDT
[#7]
Zack.

You have some great images!
6/16/2017 5:23:20 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
I have an 85mm 1.8 that gives a nice bokeh but it doesnt focus very close. I will probably shoot with what i have now and if i find situations where the lenses are holding me back I'll look into the lens more.

Canon is supposed to be releasing an 85mm 1.4 is L lens in a few months. It wont be macro  but it will interesting to see how it compares. Should be a very nice lens.
View Quote
Use extension tubes with your 85mm 1.8 to focus closer.  You won't be able to focus ton infinity with them on but for macro work it is a cheap way to modify the minimum focus distance.