User Panel
Great write up and info. Thanks Jim!
|
|
|
Thanks for the in depth look!
You know, I would probably pony up the cash for a world class optic like this.....but not as long as they are as heavy as they are. The whole RazorII line seems very impressive, and every one of them is a pig. I hope genIII brings the weight down. |
|
|
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Thanks for the in depth look! You know, I would probably pony up the cash for a world class optic like this.....but not as long as they are as heavy as they are. The whole RazorII line seems very impressive, and every one of them is a pig. I hope genIII brings the weight down. View Quote They are only 8-9 ounces heavier than similar scopes. Once mounted you don;t feel the difference. I went from S&B 5-25s to the Razor II and feel no difference in how my rifle feels when carrying it or balance. Granted if you are putting together a light weight hunting rifle the scope isn;t the one to pic but neither would the other similar scopes either coming in at 39-40 ounces. Good write up Jim. |
|
http://www.teamblaster.net
|
Oh, I thought these had perfect tracking, looks like one needs a correction factor for longer ranges.
|
|
|
Great review. I just ordered one with the same recticle.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Rob01:
They are only 8-9 ounces heavier than similar scopes. Once mounted you don;t feel the difference. I went from S&B 5-25s to the Razor II and feel no difference in how my rifle feels when carrying it or balance. Granted if you are putting together a light weight hunting rifle the scope isn;t the one to pic but neither would the other similar scopes either coming in at 39-40 ounces. Good write up Jim. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Thanks for the in depth look! You know, I would probably pony up the cash for a world class optic like this.....but not as long as they are as heavy as they are. The whole RazorII line seems very impressive, and every one of them is a pig. I hope genIII brings the weight down. They are only 8-9 ounces heavier than similar scopes. Once mounted you don;t feel the difference. I went from S&B 5-25s to the Razor II and feel no difference in how my rifle feels when carrying it or balance. Granted if you are putting together a light weight hunting rifle the scope isn;t the one to pic but neither would the other similar scopes either coming in at 39-40 ounces. Good write up Jim. Well 8 or 9 oz is still over a half pound. And I could feel the difference. The 3-18 is the model I would be interested in, and it isn't much lighter than the one Jim tested here. Especially compared to Leupy. Let's just agree on the facts. It's a world class optic, that needs a diet. The bottom line is no matter which you pick from the RazorII family, they are substantially heavier than their competitors. |
|
|
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Well 8 or 9 oz is still over a half pound. And I could feel the difference. The 3-18 is the model I would be interested in, and it isn't much lighter than the one Jim tested here. Especially compared to Leupy. Let's just agree on the facts. It's a world class optic, that needs a diet. The bottom line is no matter which you pick from the RazorII family, they are substantially heavier than their competitors. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By foursixty:
Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Thanks for the in depth look! You know, I would probably pony up the cash for a world class optic like this.....but not as long as they are as heavy as they are. The whole RazorII line seems very impressive, and every one of them is a pig. I hope genIII brings the weight down. They are only 8-9 ounces heavier than similar scopes. Once mounted you don;t feel the difference. I went from S&B 5-25s to the Razor II and feel no difference in how my rifle feels when carrying it or balance. Granted if you are putting together a light weight hunting rifle the scope isn;t the one to pic but neither would the other similar scopes either coming in at 39-40 ounces. Good write up Jim. Well 8 or 9 oz is still over a half pound. And I could feel the difference. The 3-18 is the model I would be interested in, and it isn't much lighter than the one Jim tested here. Especially compared to Leupy. Let's just agree on the facts. It's a world class optic, that needs a diet. The bottom line is no matter which you pick from the RazorII family, they are substantially heavier than their competitors. the only scope that is close on price which is lighter is the ATACR. other then that, the competition is $1000+ more . at that point its not comparing apples to apples anymore |
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
the only scope that is close on price which is lighter is the ATACR. other then that, the competition is $1000+ more . at that point its not comparing apples to apples anymore View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Thanks for the in depth look! You know, I would probably pony up the cash for a world class optic like this.....but not as long as they are as heavy as they are. The whole RazorII line seems very impressive, and every one of them is a pig. I hope genIII brings the weight down. They are only 8-9 ounces heavier than similar scopes. Once mounted you don;t feel the difference. I went from S&B 5-25s to the Razor II and feel no difference in how my rifle feels when carrying it or balance. Granted if you are putting together a light weight hunting rifle the scope isn;t the one to pic but neither would the other similar scopes either coming in at 39-40 ounces. Good write up Jim. Well 8 or 9 oz is still over a half pound. And I could feel the difference. The 3-18 is the model I would be interested in, and it isn't much lighter than the one Jim tested here. Especially compared to Leupy. Let's just agree on the facts. It's a world class optic, that needs a diet. The bottom line is no matter which you pick from the RazorII family, they are substantially heavier than their competitors. the only scope that is close on price which is lighter is the ATACR. other then that, the competition is $1000+ more . at that point its not comparing apples to apples anymore Why won't the fans simply admit they are heavy? I just bought a Vortex, not a a Razor, but I'm a fan of the company. But I'm not blinded by brand loyalty. You pick any RazorII you wish and compare it to other brands in the same mag range, and it will be heavier 95% of the time. If you think the glass is worth the tradeoff then more power to you. We all have different needs and preferences. I simply don't think any riflescope needs to weigh over 2.5lbs. I know the glass is excellent. When they make them a reasonable weight I will buy one. No hate. Simply how I see it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Why won't the fans simply admit they are heavy? I just bought a Vortex, not a a Razor, but I'm a fan of the company. But I'm not blinded by brand loyalty. You pick any RazorII you wish and compare it to other brands in the same mag range, and it will be heavier 95% of the time. If you think the glass is worth the tradeoff then more power to you. We all have different needs and preferences. I simply don't think any riflescope needs to weigh over 2.5lbs. I know the glass is excellent. When they make them a reasonable weight I will buy one. No hate. Simply how I see it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By foursixty:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Thanks for the in depth look! You know, I would probably pony up the cash for a world class optic like this.....but not as long as they are as heavy as they are. The whole RazorII line seems very impressive, and every one of them is a pig. I hope genIII brings the weight down. They are only 8-9 ounces heavier than similar scopes. Once mounted you don;t feel the difference. I went from S&B 5-25s to the Razor II and feel no difference in how my rifle feels when carrying it or balance. Granted if you are putting together a light weight hunting rifle the scope isn;t the one to pic but neither would the other similar scopes either coming in at 39-40 ounces. Good write up Jim. Well 8 or 9 oz is still over a half pound. And I could feel the difference. The 3-18 is the model I would be interested in, and it isn't much lighter than the one Jim tested here. Especially compared to Leupy. Let's just agree on the facts. It's a world class optic, that needs a diet. The bottom line is no matter which you pick from the RazorII family, they are substantially heavier than their competitors. the only scope that is close on price which is lighter is the ATACR. other then that, the competition is $1000+ more . at that point its not comparing apples to apples anymore Why won't the fans simply admit they are heavy? I just bought a Vortex, not a a Razor, but I'm a fan of the company. But I'm not blinded by brand loyalty. You pick any RazorII you wish and compare it to other brands in the same mag range, and it will be heavier 95% of the time. If you think the glass is worth the tradeoff then more power to you. We all have different needs and preferences. I simply don't think any riflescope needs to weigh over 2.5lbs. I know the glass is excellent. When they make them a reasonable weight I will buy one. No hate. Simply how I see it. I am not blinded by brand loyalty but with reality. I have used many scopes in the 5-25 range on my match rifles and when I went to the Razor II it was heavier obviously by spec and holding it in one and hand another in the other hand you can feel it but the feel on the rifle was not heavier. Maybe if you put it on a 6 pound hunting rifle but on a 16 pound long range precision rifle you won't feel it. For the overall package of features and glass at $2500 or less you can't beat it even with the extra ounces. If you want to spend another $500-1000+ to save 8 ounces then have at it but for my long range precision rifles it fits the bill just perfect. |
|
http://www.teamblaster.net
|
Originally Posted By popnfresh:
Oh, I thought these had perfect tracking, looks like one needs a correction factor for longer ranges. View Quote What brand do you know of that is perfect 100% of the time? Will save you the answer. None. I know my three Razor IIs track right on through my testing and actual shooting but no company is perfect. I know of many others that track right on as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2VVOfnirFc |
|
http://www.teamblaster.net
|
Originally Posted By Rob01:
I am not blinded by brand loyalty but with reality. I have used many scopes in the 5-25 range on my match rifles and when I went to the Razor II it was heavier obviously by spec and holding it in one and hand another in the other hand you can feel it but the feel on the rifle was not heavier. Maybe if you put it on a 6 pound hunting rifle but on a 16 pound long range precision rifle you won't feel it. For the overall package of features and glass at $2500 or less you can't beat it even with the extra ounces. If you want to spend another $500-1000+ to save 8 ounces then have at it but for my long range precision rifles it fits the bill just perfect. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Why won't the fans simply admit they are heavy? I just bought a Vortex, not a a Razor, but I'm a fan of the company. But I'm not blinded by brand loyalty. You pick any RazorII you wish and compare it to other brands in the same mag range, and it will be heavier 95% of the time. If you think the glass is worth the tradeoff then more power to you. We all have different needs and preferences. I simply don't think any riflescope needs to weigh over 2.5lbs. I know the glass is excellent. When they make them a reasonable weight I will buy one. No hate. Simply how I see it. I am not blinded by brand loyalty but with reality. I have used many scopes in the 5-25 range on my match rifles and when I went to the Razor II it was heavier obviously by spec and holding it in one and hand another in the other hand you can feel it but the feel on the rifle was not heavier. Maybe if you put it on a 6 pound hunting rifle but on a 16 pound long range precision rifle you won't feel it. For the overall package of features and glass at $2500 or less you can't beat it even with the extra ounces. If you want to spend another $500-1000+ to save 8 ounces then have at it but for my long range precision rifles it fits the bill just perfect. Lol the 3-18 weighs twice what a Mk 6 weighs. |
|
"You know what I think, don't really matter what I think. Once that first bullet goes past your head, politics and all that shit, just goes right out the window." -Hoot
|
Was speaking about the 4.5-27x in the review.
|
|
http://www.teamblaster.net
|
Originally Posted By Rob01:
Was speaking about the 4.5-27x in the review. View Quote The 3-20 S&B is listed at 910grams (32.1oz) on swfa website. The 3-18 Razor is listed at 46.8 I believe. I realize the review ( a good review I might add ) was for the 4.5-27. There is simply no denying they are very porky. BigJimFish mentioned it was the heaviest optic he had ever tested. But I don't have a hunting rifle or a 16lb "precision rifle". Don't have any use for either. I have an spr-ish rifle and that is why I would be interested in something like the 3-18, if it wasn't an anchor. Vortex isn't stupid. And with people spending big money to shave oz and lbs off their rifles I feel like Vortex will respond with lighter optics. ETA: I only mentioned S&B because you said that's what brand you used prior to the Razor. I realize they are in different price ranges. But bottom line is I could pick some cheaper, and some more expensive and the RazorII would still be way heavier. I realize it has to be fantastic, or you would have gone back to your S&B. I'm in no way doubting the quality. I'm not rich, but if I wanted a high-end optic I could buy one. And when they bring the weights down, it just might be a Vortex. |
|
|
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites.
anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. |
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, doesn't own one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. View Quote Maybe I and others are crazy? Maybe Jim mentioned it for the helluva it? Maybe they need to make them heavier? Obviously it doesn't matter right? Have you ever thought about how many more they might sell, and how many more people would "run" them if they weren't pigs? This conversation is going nowhere. Your argument is asinine at best. Typical Vortex fan. Got the best scope in the world. It has zero faults. |
|
|
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Maybe I and others are crazy? Maybe Jim mentioned it for the helluva it? Maybe they need to make them heavier? Obviously it doesn't matter right? Have you ever thought about how many more they might sell, and how many more people would "run" them if they weren't pigs? This conversation is going nowhere. Your argument is asinine at best. Typical Vortex fan. Got the best scope in the world. It has zero faults. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By foursixty:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, doesn't own one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. Maybe I and others are crazy? Maybe Jim mentioned it for the helluva it? Maybe they need to make them heavier? Obviously it doesn't matter right? Have you ever thought about how many more they might sell, and how many more people would "run" them if they weren't pigs? This conversation is going nowhere. Your argument is asinine at best. Typical Vortex fan. Got the best scope in the world. It has zero faults. lol relax. im not arguing, just pointing out something ive noticed and as far as the "heavy" gen 2 razor, people cant get their hands on them fast enough |
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
I've got a couple Gen II razors I'm not a fan boy, and the weight doesn't particularly bother me. They have been adopted by a huge chunk of the top PRS shooters. Would it be nice if they were lighter? Sure, but it doesn't break the scope for me.
|
|
I got it at the Costco.
Proud Member Team Ranstad |
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
lol relax. im not arguing, just pointing out something ive noticed and as far as the "heavy" gen 2 razor, people cant get their hands on them fast enough View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By foursixty:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, doesn't own one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. Maybe I and others are crazy? Maybe Jim mentioned it for the helluva it? Maybe they need to make them heavier? Obviously it doesn't matter right? Have you ever thought about how many more they might sell, and how many more people would "run" them if they weren't pigs? This conversation is going nowhere. Your argument is asinine at best. Typical Vortex fan. Got the best scope in the world. It has zero faults. lol relax. im not arguing, just pointing out something ive noticed and as far as the "heavy" gen 2 razor, people cant get their hands on them fast enough I've noticed people buying cheaper stuff and claiming whatever drawback it has doesn't exist also. We will agree to disagree. Damn near 47oz for a 3-18 is uncalled for. My opinion. And I'm not alone. I will just buy different brands and we will both be tickled. |
|
|
ive been pondering the weight a bit. the weight could be part of its robust design. these things can take a true beating . i believe more so then other brands
|
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
I would sell my Mk6 in a heartbeat if the vortex 3-18 wasn't so damn heavy. Its literally double the weight.
|
|
"You know what I think, don't really matter what I think. Once that first bullet goes past your head, politics and all that shit, just goes right out the window." -Hoot
|
my 4.5-27 is on a .338lm . the weight is my friend
|
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. View Quote Still, 3 fricking lbs. I own 2 vortex, and still go dayum over 3 lbs. Txl |
|
The new racism is anything that might hurt a Democrat politically..
Free Grizzledumpferdach!!!!! |
Originally Posted By TxLewis:
Still, 3 fricking lbs. I own 2 vortex, and still go dayum over 3 lbs. Txl View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TxLewis:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. Still, 3 fricking lbs. I own 2 vortex, and still go dayum over 3 lbs. Txl the weight used to bother me a little as far as the number. but over all it doesn't anymore. and at 3 lbs they still sell like hotcakes |
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
the weight used to bother me a little as far as the number. but over all it doesn't anymore. and at 3 lbs they still sell like hotcakes View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By TxLewis:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. Still, 3 fricking lbs. I own 2 vortex, and still go dayum over 3 lbs. Txl the weight used to bother me a little as far as the number. but over all it doesn't anymore. and at 3 lbs they still sell like hotcakes Apparently not, I have mine in the EE for less than anywhere I've seen online and I haven't gotten a single message about it |
|
|
Originally Posted By Marksman14:
Apparently not, I have mine in the EE for less than anywhere I've seen online and I haven't gotten a single message about it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Marksman14:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By TxLewis:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. Still, 3 fricking lbs. I own 2 vortex, and still go dayum over 3 lbs. Txl the weight used to bother me a little as far as the number. but over all it doesn't anymore. and at 3 lbs they still sell like hotcakes Apparently not, I have mine in the EE for less than anywhere I've seen online and I haven't gotten a single message about it there are few precision shooters here. sell it on snipers hide |
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
there are few precision shooters here. sell it on snipers hide View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By Marksman14:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
Originally Posted By TxLewis:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. Still, 3 fricking lbs. I own 2 vortex, and still go dayum over 3 lbs. Txl the weight used to bother me a little as far as the number. but over all it doesn't anymore. and at 3 lbs they still sell like hotcakes Apparently not, I have mine in the EE for less than anywhere I've seen online and I haven't gotten a single message about it there are few precision shooters here. sell it on snipers hide Unfortunately I dont have an account there. Maybe I'll have to change that. I have an EBR2-C listed for 2150 or so. Thought it was gonna sell in a day. Huge fail. |
|
|
thats a good price. a lot of the prs guys like that christmas tree recticle
|
|
No free nation has ever been conquered that did not first fail from within.
|
I have had mine for a few months now and I am extremely happy with it.
Sure they are a bit on the chunky side, but the way I kind of look at it to is that if weight is your primary concern precision rifles probably arent for you anyways. It's hard for me to complain considering that even with a 3lb scope that is on the high side of the weight spectrum, a lot of semi-platform rifles that people are building are still lighter than an M40A5 or M24, or similar configuration all things considered. |
|
|
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. View Quote The problem is that I won't spend over $2K on one to try it out since it is heavy just to realize that it is too heavy for my use and take a loss selling it. I asked about a lighter optic in their industry forum and the rep said he would pass it on so we will see what happens. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Rob01:
What brand do you know of that is perfect 100% of the time? Will save you the answer. None. I know my three Razor IIs track right on through my testing and actual shooting but no company is perfect. I know of many others that track right on as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2VVOfnirFc View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By popnfresh:
Oh, I thought these had perfect tracking, looks like one needs a correction factor for longer ranges. What brand do you know of that is perfect 100% of the time? Will save you the answer. None. I know my three Razor IIs track right on through my testing and actual shooting but no company is perfect. I know of many others that track right on as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2VVOfnirFc According to a PRB test, 4 out of 18 scopes did indeed track perfectly up to 20 mils of adjustment. http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/08/13/tactical-scopes-mechanical-performance-part-1/ http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/08/13/tactical-scopes-mechanical-performance-part-1/ |
|
|
Eu
Originally Posted By Gadsden1776:
According to a PRB test, 4 out of 18 scopes did indeed track perfectly up to 20 mils of adjustment. http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/08/13/tactical-scopes-mechanical-performance-part-1/ http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/08/13/tactical-scopes-mechanical-performance-part-1/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Gadsden1776:
Originally Posted By Rob01:
Originally Posted By popnfresh:
Oh, I thought these had perfect tracking, looks like one needs a correction factor for longer ranges. What brand do you know of that is perfect 100% of the time? Will save you the answer. None. I know my three Razor IIs track right on through my testing and actual shooting but no company is perfect. I know of many others that track right on as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2VVOfnirFc According to a PRB test, 4 out of 18 scopes did indeed track perfectly up to 20 mils of adjustment. http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/08/13/tactical-scopes-mechanical-performance-part-1/ http://precisionrifleblog.com/2014/08/13/tactical-scopes-mechanical-performance-part-1/ Not just one scope like the "test". I was talking ALL their scopes. Every scope produced. My three Razor II scopes track perfectly as does the scope in the video. Doesn't mean everyone will and same for every other brand. Name a brand and I have either had a tracking issue with one or know a good friend who has including S&B and Nightforce. And that "test" said that IOR was perfect. Their are notoriously known for major tracking issues. |
|
http://www.teamblaster.net
|
Originally Posted By jlficken:
The problem is that I won't spend over $2K on one to try it out since it is heavy just to realize that it is too heavy for my use and take a loss selling it. I asked about a lighter optic in their industry forum and the rep said he would pass it on so we will see what happens. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jlficken:
Originally Posted By bikerman9967:
one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. The problem is that I won't spend over $2K on one to try it out since it is heavy just to realize that it is too heavy for my use and take a loss selling it. I asked about a lighter optic in their industry forum and the rep said he would pass it on so we will see what happens. Honest opinion, not just trying to sell mine. I've handled a few rifles with this scope on it, and I have never once noticed the weight. Mostly due to where the weight is on the rifle, and also they were on appropriate rifles. If you're making a light weight hunting rig, this ain't the scope for you. If you're building a 16" compact AR10/SR25 style rifle, this is overkill. If you're looking to mount it on a 20" SR25, like an ECR, you're all set. If you're putting it on a 10lbs tactical bolt gun, like an FN SPR, you're fine. The extra pound on a rifle like that isn't even noticeable. |
|
|
Originally Posted By jlficken: It will be going on my AE Covert so I don't know that an extra pound will really matter. I am curious why they re-assemble them when they arrive? Is it just a second QA process? http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee30/jlficken/2015-06-26%2015.45.28_zpswtvgha5t.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jlficken: Originally Posted By Marksman14: Originally Posted By jlficken: Originally Posted By bikerman9967: one thing ive noticed on here and other sites. anyone who says the weight of the vortex is a big issue, has never owned one. the guys who run them, don't complain about the weight. The problem is that I won't spend over $2K on one to try it out since it is heavy just to realize that it is too heavy for my use and take a loss selling it. I asked about a lighter optic in their industry forum and the rep said he would pass it on so we will see what happens. Honest opinion, not just trying to sell mine. I've handled a few rifles with this scope on it, and I have never once noticed the weight. Mostly due to where the weight is on the rifle, and also they were on appropriate rifles. If you're making a light weight hunting rig, this ain't the scope for you. If you're building a 16" compact AR10/SR25 style rifle, this is overkill. If you're looking to mount it on a 20" SR25, like an ECR, you're all set. If you're putting it on a 10lbs tactical bolt gun, like an FN SPR, you're fine. The extra pound on a rifle like that isn't even noticeable. It will be going on my AE Covert so I don't know that an extra pound will really matter. I am curious why they re-assemble them when they arrive? Is it just a second QA process? http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee30/jlficken/2015-06-26%2015.45.28_zpswtvgha5t.jpg Probably won't notice much, both of mine are on pretty heavy guns. One is a 26" M40 contour. The extra pound at that point is trivial. |
|
I got it at the Costco.
Proud Member Team Ranstad |
Originally Posted By TeeRex:
I've got a couple Gen II razors I'm not a fan boy, and the weight doesn't particularly bother me. They have been adopted by a huge chunk of the top PRS shooters. Would it be nice if they were lighter? Sure, but it doesn't break the scope for me. View Quote |
|
|
Prices have just dropped on these. MSRP for standard reticles, including the newly added EBR-7, is $1999. Horus H59 and Tremor3 are more expensive.
|
|
|
"And then I woke up."
"You can go to the desert, but you're not going to get there by accident." |
Originally Posted By ziarifleman:
Oh, that's nice. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.