Quoted: One incident was the result of psychotic rage, bordering on terrorism. The other resulted from negligence during a high-risk apprehension. |
No offense meant to any ARFCOM'r who wears the blue for Fairfax, but the deal w/ Dr. Culosi is just more ammunition
for my intense dislike for their leadership.
Their propensity to duck, cover and bury the truth under a purported veil of "It's still under investigation" and just
plain CTA (cover
THEIR ass) maneuvering is old news to anybody who has been in the area long enough.
In Dr. Culosi's case, WTF is up with a SWAT team raiding a house because they think he might be moonlighting as a
bookie for sport bets? The man was an optometrist who worked out of a Wal-Mart front - not Rambo.... and gets
shot by a still unidentified officer who ignored one of the most basic of firearms handling rules. How is that a high
risk take-down?
But I shouldn't be surprised... this is the same department who, during the still-unsolved murder investigation for
my fiancee, asked me during my interview whether I thought that she would have committed suicide.
Sure she did - she shot herself multiple times in the back!
I better quit before I get my blood-pressure up too much.......