Do any of you really think your "run of the mill" letters to our elected officials will do any good???
Here are two I'm sending.
Dear Senator
The United States is a Constitutional Federal Republic. It is not a democracy wherein the majority may infringe upon the unalienable rights of the individual.
The duty of the state, as clearly explained in our originating doctrine, the Declaration of Independence, is to protect our rights, not to rule, regulate, or license no matter what whim of the day, or pretend concern for our health and well being.
I do not buy guns to go hunting, or for sporting events. I have purchased my firearms for the inevitable tyranny. History is replete with tyrants not only using, but manufacturing events in order to obtain some agenda; be it a call to war, the elimination of a political enemy, or the destruction of the rights of the People. Our Founders were clear in their warning of such misdeeds.
Tyranny comes in many forms, and if you ignore the fact that our government has experimented on children, slaughtered hundreds of thousands of children in this endless war on terror, and forced parents to vaccinate their children with admitted poisons, I suggest that you have violated your oath of office.
Our government has been out of hand for decades. I will no longer abide, or condone the clearly unlawful, and tyrannical acts of this legislature, or that of the federal government. I will work diligently to have each and every one of you removed from office.
This is my line in the sand. You have taken an oath to protect, and defend the Constitution. I took that oath in defense of my country. I have not been relieved of that duty, and I expect that there is no reason, or condition that has relieved you of that oath.
If you care to debate the rule of law with me in private, or a public forum, I will be glad to oblige.
Respectfully, LUGERMAN
And this one too to any so-called "gun rights" origination here in NJ.
Dear NJ Pro Gun Organization
I asked someone I know if there was anyone in the pro-gun community in NJ who was not mired in the misconception that the state has any authority to do whatever it chooses, and renege on its true mandate, and responsibility; protect the rights of the citizen.
I have been prospecting around the supposed pro-gun community and I find that our prospects for a peaceful solution look dim. I say this because I've come to the conclusion that, in general, the community is truly ignorant of our system of law, and have bought into every misdeed, and corruption that has been presented to them by the courts, the schools, and the majority of the legal community.
The 2nd Amendment guarantee's us nothing at all as you know. The word can be nothing more than a warning to the state that this is an unalienable right that may not be trespassed, and that the states obligation is to protect the right, not to infringe upon it, or make it into a privilege by regulation and license. If it does so the citizen soldier will take up arms to maintain the "security of a free state". It is our responsibility to remain free. We should not depend on courts that have taken upon themselves the unauthorized power to interpret the rule of law, nor can we expect that a totally corrupt political system will honor its oath of office.
We have 2 solutions in law.
1. The sheriff is the highest elected official in the county, and may lawfully bind anyone who infringes upon the right of the citizen. Sheriff Richard Mack has made his life's work the education of the sheriff's throughout the country.
2. The Militia is the only duly authorized law enforcement body enumerated in the Constitution, and with the sole power to arrest upon "probable cause" anyone who commits a felony, including a violation of the oath of office. Immunity is another doctrine created by judicial fiat and holds no account in the law. Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. has attempted for years to persuade the pro-gun community that the revitalization of the Militia is the lawful in the enforcement of the law when the courts abandon their mandate.
These 2 methods are blatantly ignored by organizations such as the NRA. I've yet to hear a valid reason from them as to why they refuse to argue suits based on the Militia, why they won't back a citizen for governor who will execute the law, and why they are not promoting Sheriff Mack in his attempt to educate the sheriff's throughout the country.
I would like to know where your organization stands on the right to keep and bear arms.
Respectfully, LUGERMAN
Well Boys, what are your thoughts?
I've been a letter writer to our NJ elected officials since 1973 and all I get is the standard BS for the last 40 years!
Maybe it's time for a change!!