Quoted:
I have a huge problem with instructors who won't qualify a person who can shoot the standard qualification, but who can't manage what the instructor personally believes OUGHT to be the minimum.
No different than a sheriff deciding that the statutory qualifications are too lenient, and denying people. Both are wrongful, IMO, the instructor probably more so since the (hypothetical) sheriff is at least an elected official.
The minimum is awfully easy, but I wouldn't give my money to an instructor who required more.
The Sheriff is a politician and bound by laws. He is also protected by laws.
The instructor is not protected by the govt. limits for lawsuits. He is an open door, should something bad happen. An instructor is the one saying your are competent enough to pass the test. He is the one putting his butt on the line. It is more than just shooting, but making sure you understand the legal requirements. Is it wrong then for instructors to offer a 2 day class, or 3 day class, which is beyond the minimum?
Let's say you sent your kid to a driving school, so he could get the required hours for instruction. Now, the school required your kid to have 10% more hours and pass the mock DMV tests at 90%. Would you be complaining about your kid being able to meet the min., but not being able to satisfy the instructor's requirements?
As a LE instructor, I will always make my guys qualify at a higher percentage than what is required. That is how I work. They don't like it? Well, learn how to shoot and come back and we'll talk about it
Of course, I will help fix the problems so they can meet my standard.