Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 9/3/2009 5:08:12 AM EDT

Every time I read this it makes me smile and reminds me the inadequacy of their choices are why the haters hate...


http://membres.lycos.fr/shooter/glock/glock4.html



100,000-Round 9mm Torture Test

Written by Chuck Taylor

On four occasions since 1990, I've written articles about a continuing evaluation I've been conducting to ascertain the longevity of the Glock Model 17 9mm pistol. The first of these, appearing in the February, 1993, issue of Combat Handguns, contained my findings as to the weapon's performance and durability after 33.000 rounds fired. At this juncture, I stated:

   * "I carried it in the rain, snow, dust and mud. I carried it when the temperatures were over 100 degrees and when they were 40 below.

   * "I presented the gun more than 10.000 times from it's plastic slide holster, speed loaded it 2.000 times, performed over 5.000 tactical loads, shot it weak-handed in excess of 2,500 times and field-stripped it 250 times.

   * "From the beginning, I resolved to grind it into the dirt, abuse it like no gun I ever had."

   * "Why? To find out the truth about Glocks, for once and for all...

   * "And I succeeded in doing just that. In a 30-month period, I fired 33.000 rounds, all factory loads, of every imaginable type made–– and it ate them all, almost without a single malfunction. I say 'almost' because on the 32,994th round, I finally had one–– a failure to feed! And this in spite of the fact that I cleaned the gun every 10.000 rounds whether it need it or not!

   * "100 rounds short of the 5.000th shot, both factory-provided magazines ceased to hold the slide open after the last shot, although they both continued to function normally otherwise. At round number 11.000 a second set did the same and was replaced by another.

   * "By the 500th holster presentation, the left side of the front site was so badly worn that a proper site picture was no longer possible. It was subsequently replaced with a steel version.

   * "By round number 16.000, I could see steel through the finish–– but it never did rust, although it was exposed repeatedly to rain, snow, perspiration and even blood.

   * "The trigger pull, originally 5.5 pounds, got smoother and a bit lighter, but it never did double or demonstrate a glitch of any kind.

   * "And after all this, it still shoots into 3 inches at 25 meters, not much different than when it was new."

Impressed, to say the least, I was still determined to see the test though to the point where the gun failed. So, although the piece had passed the 33.000-round mark without significant negative results or breakage, I continued the test.

The months went by and the test continued. By the end of the summer, 1993, the gun had shot 50.000 rounds without a hitch. Among my additional observations published in Glock Autopistols 1995, were these:

"And now, after 50.000 rounds, nothing has really changed. It still:

   * "Functions reliably. In fact, not a single additional stoppage has occurred.

   * "Prints inside the 9-ring of a 25-meter pistol target, exactly as it did when it was new.

   * "Shows no additional finish wear.

     "Exhibits no bore corrosion.

"Clearly, the Glock M-17 is a heck of a pistol and, as a survival instrument, is well worthy of our consideration. It is well-designed, well-made and capable of surviving a wide variety of environmental conditions. It will feed the entire spectrum of bullet shapes and functions reliably with virtually all power levels of 9mm ammunition. In addition, it resists corrosion magnificently and its design causes minimal wear on working parts, giving it an unbelievable long service life.

"Ugly? Maybe, maybe not! It depends on what's important to you–– cosmetics, or function. Regardless, it's my opinion that the Glock 17 is not only a winner, but may well be the world's best 9mm pistol. Obviously, only time will tell, but in the meantime, I've got 25.000 more rounds of 9mm ammunition to run through it to find out."

25.000 more
And the test continued. By February, 1995, the 25.000 rounds were expended, bringing the total to an unbelievable 75.000! Yet, the gun was still going strong, showing no indications whatsoever of impending failure. I replaced nothing–– no springs, firing pins, connectors or any other parts. In fact, viewed from the broad perspective, the gun had actually outlived it's magazines–– six two-mag sets at that point.

Truthfully, I had run out of things to do to the gun. Short of running over it with a car or freezing it into a solid block of ice–– both which I regarded as silly, since they fail to mirror real-world conditions and therefore prove nothing–– I had repeatedly exposed the gun to everything. In the July, 1995, issue of Combat Handguns and Summer, 1995, issue of Glockster, I said:

   * "After more than 70.000 holster presentations, I can detect no additional finish wear from that which appeared by 20.000 presentations.

   * "The bore is still without corrosion or excessive wear; the piece still shoots inside the 9-ring of a 25-meter pistol target, using the offhand Weaver Stance. In fact, to determine if any deterioration of intrinsic accuracy had occured, I fired it from 35 meters in a Ransom Rest–– the worst groups were 2 inches!

   * "As an example of its practical accuracy capability, I offer the following. With the test gun, I was able to perform the following:

1. "Reliably get center-hits on a 18 x 30-inch steel silhouette target at 75 meters, knocking down five such silhouettes in under ten seconds.

2. "Take a whitetail deer with a single shot behind the shoulder at a laser-measured 70 meters.

3. "Successfully pass the ASAA Handgun Combat Master test with it, presenting it from concealed carry, shooting a score of at least 383 out of a possible 400."

My other observations at that time included:

   * "Internal parts exhibited no real wear or deterioration.

   * "The polycarbonate frame, though it had at one spot worn smooth from holster contact, appeared intact and without discernible deterioration.

   * "After more than 50.000 speed loads and an equal number of tactical loads, the magazine well was scarred somewhat but still serviceable.

   * "While the 56,103rd round blew a primer, the gun was undamaged. The resulting stoppage, a Type 3 (Feedway) was quickly cleared and the weapon returned to service.

   * "The trigger remained at 5.1 pounds, a reduction from it's original poundage of only 0.4 pounds. It was still smooth and had a crisp let-off.

   * "It was discovered that magazine service life could be dramatically increased by loading only 15, rather than the rated 17, rounds of ammunition. If a 'Plus-Two' floorplate is utilized, then–– and only then–– should a full 17 rounds be loaded. This prevents the follower spring from being fully compressed, thus causing it to soften and finally 'set', as the expression goes.

   * "The Trijicon (tritium) sights installed early in the test were still completely serviceable."

It looked like the test was over. The pistol had survived an incredible 75.000 rounds and was completely intact. I had my desired data-base–– the Glock M-17 was irrefutably a terrific pistol. In fact, I was so impressed that I concluded my article in Combat Handguns with this statement:

"Pretty, it ain't, especially after all it's been through. On the other hand, beauty is said to be in the eye of the beholder, and to me, the Glock is a tool, not an objet d'art. This being the case, we must view it differently–– function, not aesthetics, is the prime criteria. Viewed from this perspective, there can be no doubt that the Glock M-17 looks mighty good indeed."

Well, I just couldn't leave it alone. My curiosity about just how long the gun could survive continued to be intense. So, from my stores, I broke out an additional 25.000 rounds of assorted 9mm ammo and continued the test.

And now, the fall of 1995, after having fired a total of 100.000 rounds of virtually all kinds of ammunition...

Nothing has changed! The gun looks the same, feels the same, functions the same as it did before. I've done everything within reason to this gun. I've carried it all over the world, quite literally in every environmental condition known to man–– the steaming jungles of Latin America, the windblown deserts of the southwestern U.S., the 40-below zero tundra of Alaska in the winter.

And it worked–– every time. In fact, since I discovered that loading 15, rather than the rated 17, rounds into the magazine prevented the follower spring from softening, I haven't had a single malfunction. Both magazines used in this last 25.000 portion of my test remain strong and completely serviceable. And, by way of confirmation, I replaced the old springs in the magazines that failed during the test with new ones from Glock, and they, too, function perfectly.

I am especially impressed by the lack of apparent finish wear, even after over 100.000 holster presentations. The gun looks exactly as it did at 20.000! I've actually worn out several holsters, finally selecting the M-D Labs "Thunderbolt" (which I codesigned with M-D honcho Kevin McClung) and matching mag carrier as the best. It's super-fast, yet secure and highly concealable, and being made of Kydex, it's by far the toughest rig now in existence.

The magazine well, although slightly scarred from in excess of 100.000 insertions, also remains entirely functional and looks much like it did in the early stages of the test.

Internal parts, too, look the same. I just can't find any discernible signs of deterioration. The piece shoots just as accurately as it did before and functions flawlessly.

So, in conclusion, the Model 17 9mm continues to defy wear, tear, corrosion and...well, me! I've thrown the whole book of tricks at this gun and yet, as this is written, it continues in service. Obviously, the Model 17 is a terrific handgun–– so terrific that I'd quite willingly bet my life on this one, even after all it's been through. What better recommendation can I give, eh?


Copyright 1995 by Harris Publications, Inc.
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 5:13:56 AM EDT
[#1]
Wow, 1995?  The Glock haters from the M&P and HK camps should take a look at this.  The M&P made it to the 50k mark, with a few malfs and the HK is under 30k and is at something like 7 or 8 malf already.


Either way, this is gonna bring in the koolaid drinkers from all 3 sides.  IBTSS.
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 5:19:15 AM EDT
[#2]
This always impressed me. I bet a few Glocks were sold based on this.
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 5:22:46 AM EDT
[#3]

There's another portion of the Chuck Taylor test but I can't find it online, I remember reading it in a Glock Annual in 1999 or 2000 but I lost those issues during a move to Michigan.  As I remember, the G17 test continued and the test was at WELL over 100,000 rounds by then and Taylor was using some 'creative' methods of testing like leaving it in salt water for extended periods.  He was intent on breaking it...

After the near 10 year abuse ADCO's BigBore put his Glock through I think the haters need to rethink themselves... http://www.theprepared.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=90&Item


Edit:  If anyone can find the original ARFcom BigBore thread I'd love to have a link to it...
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 7:29:39 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Edit:  If anyone can find the original ARFcom BigBore thread I'd love to have a link to it...


Sorry, they're in the Archives.

Anyone remember my Glock 21 thread?
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 1:04:18 PM EDT
[#5]
2. "Take a whitetail deer with a single shot behind the shoulder at a laser-measured 70 meters."




With a 9mm?



No kidding?



(rhetorical)



Link Posted: 9/3/2009 2:05:44 PM EDT
[#6]
ammo was cheaper back then. might cost a bit more to test a gun like that now. if anyone has 100K + rounds of 9mm they could send me, i would love to do my own test through my 17c.
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 2:31:45 PM EDT
[#7]
I shot that glock at a ASAA class in 2001 and it shot fine

Link Posted: 9/3/2009 6:39:30 PM EDT
[#8]
Actually, in the October 2008 issue of GUNWORLD in an article titled, "The Secret of Glock's Success" (pages 20 through 29), Chuck Taylor indicates twice in that article that his "test" Glock 17 now has 270,000 rounds through it. Since that was nearly a year ago, I'd bet that "number" has gotten a bit larger, too.

Other than the numerous, annoying, and quite frankly rude, editorial "comments" made throughout the article by the magazine's "blow-hard" editor, Jan Libourel, it is a very interesting and well-written piece.

It is abundantly clear that Chuck Taylor has developed a genuine admiration for the Glock 17 and even if you absolutely despise the Glock design, you have to admit that 270,000 rounds through one pistol with no major parts being replaced is a phenomenal testament to both its quality and durability.

Considering that many folks would be doing well to put 50,000 rounds through all of their guns in a lifetime, the "average" Glock 17 oughtta be good for five or maybe even six "lifetimes" if taken care of. Sounds like an "heirloom" to me.

Looks like good ole Gaston designed one helluva damned fine pistol.

Link Posted: 9/3/2009 7:44:27 PM EDT
[#9]
Kelly McCann (Jim Grover) has a Model 19 which he claims has over 750,000 rounds through it.

He seems like a no BS kind of guy, but 750,000 is a lot of fucking rounds.

There is a pic of it on this page:

http://www.kellymccanncombatives.com/?itemCategory=34163&siteid=314&priorId=0
Link Posted: 9/3/2009 10:27:14 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Kelly McCann (Jim Grover) has a Model 19 which he claims has over 750,000 rounds through it.

He seems like a no BS kind of guy, but 750,000 is a lot of fucking rounds.

There is a pic of it on this page:

http://www.kellymccanncombatives.com/?itemCategory=34163&siteid=314&priorId=0


Yep. That's not ammo bill that I'd wanna foot either.

Hmmm...

If he fired 50,000 rounds per year through that Glock 19 it would take him fifteen years to do so. Kind of hard to imagine, but possible (and painful?) I suppose.

That's gotta be one "beat"    little gun.
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 3:56:29 AM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Kelly McCann (Jim Grover) has a Model 19 which he claims has over 750,000 rounds through it.

He seems like a no BS kind of guy, but 750,000 is a lot of fucking rounds.

There is a pic of it on this page:

http://www.kellymccanncombatives.com/?itemCategory=34163&siteid=314&priorId=0


An that's an old 2-pin. 750K is a lot!

I'm not an engineer, so I don't know, but there's something about the Glock design that seems to "eliminate" the wear and tear other guns sustain during the act of firing. Where is all that energy and slide/frame battering going when a Glock is fired?
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 4:02:01 AM EDT
[#12]


My Series-1 G17 shoots fine.  It's what sits in my BOB.
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 5:01:08 AM EDT
[#13]
I'm also interested - and never heard before - about the 15 rounds in a magazine.
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 5:27:50 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:

I'm not an engineer, so I don't know, but there's something about the Glock design that seems to "eliminate" the wear and tear other guns sustain during the act of firing. Where is all that energy and slide/frame battering going when a Glock is fired?


I'll bite...

Kinetic energy can be dissipated by vibration and oscillation, the polymer frame is seen flexing and vibrating on high speed video dissipating energy and the polymer material itself provides mechanical damping and efficient energy dissipation...

Check out the high speed photography in the History Channel episode of Lock and Load featuring a Glock 18:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp_2xVzz_14


Edited to add:  I believe it's the frame oscillations that create the problems with the Glock .40's and frame mounted lights.  The frame vibrates 'differently' due to the weapon light which prevents energy dissipation and causes the reliability issues that many have reported... <hey, it's a theory... >



Link Posted: 9/4/2009 5:42:11 AM EDT
[#15]
DarkStar––

Nice video; great high speed camera work in it.

I definitely believe that the flex of the polymer frame has a lot to do with Glock's durability. But, do other polymer framed pistols have the kind of round count life that the Glock has?

Are there USPs out there with that many rounds on them? The USP is not striker fired, so perhaps there is more wear on them with their hammer fired design.

Will M&Ps go hundreds of thousands of rounds? I know of that one that was traveling around that made it past 60,000 before they had to stop due to a crack forming on the slide. M&P probably hasn't been around long enough to tell.

Other polymer designs like the PX4, FN's pistol, SIG P250, etc. probably aren't old enough or in as much widespread use to ever really get a good number on them.

Link Posted: 9/4/2009 5:54:00 AM EDT
[#16]
ok, DarkStar....
















I'm inpressed
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 4:33:03 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
I shot that glock at a ASAA class in 2001 and it shot fine


So did I!

I shot Chuck's Glock 17 sometime in the early/mid 90's, when it had put around 55,000 rounds downrange, and he called it "Excalibur".

It had serious mojo being Chuck's handgun.
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 6:30:18 PM EDT
[#18]
I have approximately 250 rounds through my glock 17 EDC peice.

Need to shoot more. Mostly WWB or rem 9mm...

1 stoppage due to a half-charged rem 9mm round though.

Link Posted: 9/4/2009 6:51:07 PM EDT
[#19]
A classic!
Link Posted: 9/4/2009 9:55:28 PM EDT
[#20]
makes me want a G17...
Link Posted: 9/5/2009 4:23:03 PM EDT
[#21]
Ha-Ha Glocks are the best pistols out there
Link Posted: 9/6/2009 7:32:23 PM EDT
[#22]
Thanks for the reminder.
Link Posted: 9/6/2009 8:08:38 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Ha-Ha Glocks are the best pistols out there


This.
Link Posted: 9/7/2009 11:34:35 AM EDT
[#24]
I too attended a ASAA class that the agency I worked for put us through. If I remember right the Glock in question was given to Mr. Taylor by Gaston himself. I've held this particular Glock. If memory serves it's a 2 letter 2 digit beginning with an "A". This I believe was in '95 or '96.
Link Posted: 9/7/2009 5:24:44 PM EDT
[#25]
I aquired an old well used first gen G17 a few years ago. Was not a Glock fan at all, and only got this one for my 'police issue handgun collection'.

I can say that the recoil spring was packed up/worn out, and the guide rod was broken when I got it. I fired a few mags full from it as I received it, and despite the worn out spring and busted guide rod, it worked perfectly!

I still have just the one old Glock pistol, but have complete faith in it. I did replace the early two piece recoil system with new parts, and got it some new mags.

Good guns, the G17. I need to get new sights installed on this one, the original plastic ones are about worn off!

Link Posted: 9/7/2009 9:04:34 PM EDT
[#26]
I love BigBore's drop out of the airplane test.

I was breaking down my Glock 26 tonight, and was trying to explain to wife that it never jams...a great little handgun. She just looked at me and said "whatever."
Link Posted: 9/9/2009 2:55:21 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
I love BigBore's drop out of the airplane test.

I was breaking down my Glock 26 tonight, and was trying to explain to wife that it never jams...a great little handgun. She just looked at me and said "whatever."


Women.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top