User Panel
Posted: 10/3/2004 11:47:27 AM EDT
www.fbodaily.com/archive/2004/10-October/03-Oct-2004/FBO-00687867.htm or procnet.pica.army.mil/FBO/SrcSgt/W15QKN-05-X-0425/W15QKN-05-X-0425.htm W15QKN-05-X-0425 FedBizOpps notice Date: 2004-10-01 Description: The US Army at TACOM-ARDEC is seeking information about commercial, off-the- shelf, non-developmental item (NDI) pistols, which can meet the Army’s needs (with only minor modifications if required) for a future handgun system. The focus of the future handgun system (FHS) is to augment close quarters battle and security/force protection operations, and to offer significant improvements over the current handgun system. Additionally, the FHS will support the requirement for a personal defense weapon. The FHS will provide increases in terminal ballistic potential, durability, and reliability over the currently fielded M9/9x19mm and M11/9x19mm pistols. Specific features and characteristics of the FHS will include, but are not limited to, an integral accessory rail, enhanced day/night sighting capability, configurable grips (to suit the individual soldier’s need), and will permit the use of a sound suppressor when the threat/mission requires. The FHS will use munitions that are optimized for Army full-spectrum contingencies/applications. The FHS will also have a suitable, multi-configurable, holster(s) and ammunition carrier(s). Information about existing production pistols and/or pistols of this type that are currently in development and associated ammunition that offers increased terminal ballistic potential is desired. Interested parties are requested to submit a description of their product(s) along with other available information (sketches, drawings, specifications, brochures, and/or test results that describe current capability/on-going development) to: U.S. Army ARDEC, ATTN: David J. DeCandia, Contract Specialist, U.S. Army TACOM, Picatinny Center for Contracting and Commerce, AMSTA-AQ-APD, Building 10, Picatinny Arsenal, N.J. 07806-5000 EMAIL ADDRESS - [email protected]. This Market Survey is for information and planning purposes only, and does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP). This Market Survey is not to be construed as a commitment by the U. S. Government. If a formal solicitation is generated at a later date, a solicitation notice will be published. No award will be made as a result of this Market Survey. All information is to be submitted at no cost or obligation to the Government. The Government reserves the right to reject, in whole or in part, any private sector input as a result of this Market Survey. Respondents will not be notified of the results of this survey or results of information submitted. Please submit your responses NLT 1700 EST, 1 November 2004. |
|
Sounds like a somewhat modified Kimber Series I with rail to me, or maybe even a...gasp...Colt in similar form.
|
|
BING, BING,BING,BING,BING,BING,BING,BING,BING,BING!!!
Lumpy wins the Cupie Doll. This is probably the payback to H&K for building the plant outside Benning! |
|
Notice they want increased terminal balistic potential? New caliber baby!
|
|
The USP would probably be a better choice... Personally, I'd rather see a Beretta 92 with accessory rail... Remember: .45ACP is NOT an option... Fortunately, neither is Glock... |
|
|
New bullet design, or a multiple-caliber pistol (just change bbls) most likely... 9mm NATO is as mandatory as 5.56mm -> Not going annyhere... |
|
|
Being that the increased lethality requirement was issued as part of the pistol market survey, leads me to believe that they are considering other options. It would be nice to move towards a better caliber, or at least make expanding ammo legal under UCMJ.
|
|
I happen to love my HK boat anchor thank you very much |
|
|
Notice they are looking for "increased terminal ballistics and lethality" over the Beretta and Sig 9mms...nothing at all said about the .45. They will play with some new stuff, but most likely it will be a .45 when it all shakes out. |
|
|
Cheap 10mm WOO!!! |
|
|
10mm NATO = .40S&W |
||
|
Thats the fight to take to Geneva, the military cannot make that decision. If that linternational law was appealed or revoked, then it would give the enemy the ability to use bullets against me that are designed to kill, and I dont like the thought of getting hit with a nosler partition in combat. I like the FMJ bullets as they are. |
|
|
*SHIVER* Make it go away mommy....make it go away.... |
|||
|
It sounds like it could be a sig 226/229. They could easily change the .357 barrel out with a .40 and use the same slide, frame, magazines etc and have two in one.
|
|
SVI/STI(type) with interchangeable breechfaces?
9mm 9x23 .40 .357 .38 Super 10mm .45 You could probably build the grip in several configurations since it is a modular piece. Just a thought. 96Ag |
|
It will be an HK XM-8 cut down to pistol configuration firing a 556 from a 5 in barrell
|
|
Sounds like a P2000, P99, or the new Beretta to me. With the "configurable grips" requirement, those are about the only choices out there. And I bet polygonal rifling will be argued as a way to get better performance out of 124gr ball.
BTW, for you guys getting all excited about them maybe going back to .45 or even a 1911 style, I think you should start picturing a pile of burning puppies or something, cuz I don’t think it'll happen. |
|
Walther P99 with night sights and a threaded barrel , and get rid of the proprietary rail.
Or the 9mm USP with the threaded barrel, with night sights of course. Kinda screwed on the grip but oh well...it meets every other requirement. |
|
Its the Hague Convention, to which the US was never signatory anyway, which banned projectiles designed to cause suffering. Commonly this is thought to mean expanding, but thats a legal opinion, its doesn't clearly state that. The people we go to war against will probably not care about the convention. If the UCMJ were to be changed today, we could issue JHPs tonight. JAG ruled that NSW could use 230 JHPs in the HK Mk23, so long as it was used against terrorists and the like. |
||
|
I would like to see the 10mm be the service cartridge. |
|||
|
The international law on ammo is the Hague, and we never signed (although we complied). |
||
|
Glock!
A perfect pistol for military issue if there ever was one. 33 total parts, low-maintenence, rust-proof tenifer, and utter reliability. For those about to say "Ka-boom", screw you! Not a problem with the 9 years I had my Glock 22 .40cal or the 5 years with my Glock 17 9mm. |
|
Forget the kaboom... Glock's single-action pull is worse than most makers double-action pull... No manual safety... No hammer... Sorry, PASS... |
|
|
Add 'no restrike capability'. |
||
|
You are probably better going strait into "tap rack bang" anyway . . . |
|||
|
Implied by 'no hammer' |
|||
|
Sounds like the Walther P99 or HK P2000 are the best candidates. Both are great and I don't think they could go wrong with either one.
|
|
While things do change, Glock had the opportunity to enter the last re-test for continuation of the M9 contract. They refused because they were not willing to divulge details of their Tenifer finish nor to allow other manufacturers to be allowed to supply parts if needed. Remember, should the military need a bunch more handguns in a big hurry...a la WWII...they can, and will, farm out production in a heartbeat to anyone capable of delivering guns quickly. Still, there are a great many ground troops who would love to see the Glock adopted, and Glock just might change its mind about the other stuff. |
|
|
Dave, some striker fired pistols, such as the P99, have a restrike capability. |
||||
|
++ But then, that wuold be too easy & fiscally efficient. |
|
|
+1 |
||
|
Glock safe action trigger-The 5 pound single-action-like trigger is a key merit, every trigger pull is the same unlike a DA/SA. Plenty of competition shooters (IPSC, IDPA, etc) have no problem winning/scoring high with it. Besides, have you tried a Beretta DA/SA trigger? This issue is wholly personal taste. Manual Safety-In a defensive combat weapon I like having no switch to flip in the split-second I need to use it or forgetting it altogether. Hammer (restrike capability)-Though I've never had the need to restrike, like DonS mentioned, the doctrine for misfires is tap-rack-bang. The benefit of having a pistol that is striker-fired, non DA/SA, with no external hammer or manual safety (or decocker) is fewer parts as evident in the 33 total parts in the Glock. Have you ever looked inside an HK USP or Sig? For a military weapon this is a salient point. I would venture to say theoretically, that Glocks used in military service would almost never need major parts replacement in their entire service life and the low maintenance is selling factor. |
|
|
|
Kel-Tec P-32.
If you are going to fuss about bullets being less lethal, why don't you just use a less lethal round. stupid line of crap. |
|
|
||
|
What more could I ask for? This: HKp2000 |
||
|
|
||
|
Proof you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Have you even shot a Glock? |
|
|
Who cares about the actual requirements for the contract when they could just get glocks and have perfection??? BTW, it's time for another installment of "ask a glock fanatic": Dear Glock Fanatic: I'm looking for a 6 inch .44 magnum revolver in stainless steel. Which one do you recommend? Signed, Searching for a revolver. --- Dear Searching for a Glock Get a glock. They rule. Everything else suxxors. Signed, The Glock Fanatic. |
|||
|
You can scare your enemy with the looks of the pistol, same goes for the XD. I think a standard USP would fit the bill just fine or the beretta 92 vertec to replace the old style beretta. |
||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.