Reasons they may prefer AWB:
- Maybe AWB makes the AR a more notorious firearm, thus increasing its demand.
- Maybe AWB allows them to produce preban configurations that they can sell for greater profit margins
- Maybe After having invested in tooling for postban AR's, this equipment would be worthless after a potential AWB sunset. (though these costs are forgone in an accounting sense)
Reasons they may NOT prefer AWB:
- Maybe AWB may make for inefficiencies in production due to different parts that would otherwise be universal. (ie. bayo lugs on gas blocks)
- Maybe Legal consequences (in a time of crazy reckless lawsuits) that go along with selling preban parts to unknown buyers.
Hey, just ideas open for discussion, add to the list if you have any ideas! J
View Quote
No the problem is not manufacturing. They are made exactly the same but the end process is just 1 step shorter (no flash suppressor) and one step longer (mill bayo lug that is the only difference between making a pre-ban and a post ban rifle.
So really they save time and money both as it takes longer to thread a barrel for a Flash Suppressor then it would to mill the bayo lug off of the front sight. Also a saw would be cheaper then an index and Outside threader.
Also they have been able to expand their product lines because of the AWB. Non-telescoping stocks, and muzzle breaks.
And that I think back the price has not changed really. In the 1987 American Rifleman (May or June) I believe the price of a preban Colt AR-15 Sporter II HBar was $759.00 the Bushmaster XM15A2 sells for around $750.00-$800.00 here in the midwest.
So if you take into account 1987 dollars to 2002 dollars the price has either stayed the same or dropped slighly, relative to inflation and buying value of the dollar.
However if you look at rifles which are PreBan some of the better examples top $3000.00 for the Colt 6520 Gov. Carbine