[ARCHIVED THREAD] - ... (Page 1 of 5)
Posted: 10/30/2015 2:38:55 AM EDT
| ... |
|
I really only scanned that wall of dribble, but here's my response:
Yes, guns are made for killing. It sounds horrible if you live under the fallacy that all killing is murder, but those of us that live in reality are grateful to have such an efficient way to protect ourselves and others from those that mean to do us harm. Also, I'd like to see some stats regarding this claim: Put it this way: If guns really conferred stability and protection, we’d be the safest, most peaceful nation on Earth. We are, instead, the most violent and deadly. Again, stats please: Do you wish to pretend otherwise? To claim that guns are effective for safety, or self defense, or a warped sense of patriotism? This is not merely laughable, it’s the opposite of the truth, of established fact. Do unarmed people fare better against murderers and rapists? And, for the 87,000,000th time, liberal e-journalist goes right for the 'manhood card' when discussing guns. They sure think about dick a lot. |
|
Quoted:
"They bring nothing of positive, uplifting value: no kindness, no strength, no peace, no divinity, no sense of community or human connection." Wrong. Guns are the only thing stopping strong folks from putting on plate mail, rounding him up and making him a serf. Guns are freedom, strength, and peace to the weak of the world. They SHOULD be banned so the strong may rule again. |
|
Quoted:
Wrong. Guns are the only thing stopping strong folks from putting on plate mail, rounding him up and making him a serf. Guns are freedom, strength, and peace to the weak of the world. They SHOULD be banned so the strong may rule again. Quoted:
Quoted:
"They bring nothing of positive, uplifting value: no kindness, no strength, no peace, no divinity, no sense of community or human connection." Wrong. Guns are the only thing stopping strong folks from putting on plate mail, rounding him up and making him a serf. Guns are freedom, strength, and peace to the weak of the world. They SHOULD be banned so the strong may rule again. Well, that's like, your opinion, man. |
|
Quoted:
That's nice and all, but I also own guns that are specifically designed to shoot paper targets. Could I kill you with a target air rifle? Maybe, but that's not the point. The author however would not care, and simply appears to like the sound of his own voice. Author needs to man up and Molan Labe. Stop being a Beta. |
|
Quoted:
YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD......................................((LINK)) "Guns are, in a word, perfect. Guns are unparalleled, really; they are small masterpieces of precision engineering, one of humanity’s most deliberate, perfectly designed tools. There is simply no denying a gun’s intention, no possible misunderstanding of its reason for existing. Unlike cars, knives, drugs, alcohol or any other freely available, potentially deadly items which can (and do) kill lots of people, guns are the only commercially available instrument in the world that we designed specifically for the purpose of the eradication of life. A gun’s nature is, as they say in the tech world, baked in to the hardware. It understands nothing else. Which is to say: Guns are death made physical, palpable in the hand. They are our basest, least sacred energies – hate, fear, paranoia – compressed into metal and explosives. No one holds or fires a gun without some fundamental understanding of this fact – that he could, if he so desired, kill anything he wanted, right now, in an instant – and that’s essentially all you’re supposed do with it. The fact that most gun owners do not do this, and manage to resist using their guns for what we specifically created them to do, is merely incidental, and actually a kind of failure: it denies the gun’s primary objective. Gun owners actually know this, as a warped point of pride. “Hey, I own lots of guns and don’t kill things.” How nice for you. Tell it to all the dead. If past mass shootings are any indication, gun sales in America will enjoy a nice sales surge after the Oregon massacre. Because of course the answer to all the gun deaths is always... more guns. As the nature of a gun is the abject destruction of life, to use it merely for target practice or for “pleasure” is, essentially, to do it a disservice; you are thwarting its objective, insulting the lethal disposition we ourselves poured into the molten metal. Much like a sports car that “begs” to be driven fast, or an expensive designer dress that begs to be worn to an extravagant gala, a gun begs only to be fired at another living thing, to annihilate it. And eventually, it will be. This is why we have the headlines all wrong: Guns are not being abused or wielded incorrectly in America. They are not “falling into the wrong hands,” ill-begotten by “evil people” and “crazies” and “psychopaths.” This is not true in the slightest. Just the opposite, actually. When yet another mass killing occurs, when another woman is murdered by her ex-husband (which happens every single day in America, BTW), when another despondent teen kills herself with her dad’s gun (ditto), when more males – and it is almost always males – shoot each other in the street, when more schoolchildren die at the hands of effortlessly well-armed adults, these are not tragedies. It’s exactly what we expect to happen. The guns are, in a very real way, just fulfilling the destiny we instilled into them. They are doing exactly what we designed them to do, what we demand they do, as physical extensions of our fear and rage. You can’t shove 10 billion tons of carcinogens into the atmosphere and not expect massive outbreaks of cancer. You can’t put 300 million precision tools of death into the culture and not expect their latent, intrinsic objective to be realized, every single day. This is why all religious and spiritual traditions the world over agree: Guns are for cowards. They provide only the thinnest illusion of authority, the ugliest veneer of control, the most artificial aspect of authentic manhood. Proof? Simple: Just remove any gun fetishist’s (or terrorist’s, or mass shooter’s) stockpile of weapons, and watch what happens. They are instantly deflated, lost, rendered vulgar and human. All illusions of power and machismo vaporize, leaving only the base energies of hate and fear they often don’t understand, much less know how to transmute into something like kindness and love. Do you wish to pretend otherwise? To claim that guns are effective for safety, or self defense, or a warped sense of patriotism? This is not merely laughable, it’s the opposite of the truth, of established fact. Put it this way: If guns really conferred stability and protection, we’d be the safest, most peaceful nation on Earth. We are, instead, the most violent and deadly. We are viewed the world over as the most dazzling of bullies, and of hypocrites: We pretend to promote the values of democracy, peace and freedom the world over, and yet we kill one another – and anyone who disagrees with us – more horrifically, and more consistently, than any terrorist cult could ever imagine. The bottom line is simple enough: America is, by every metric you can name, a far worse place for all our guns. They bring nothing of positive, uplifting value: no kindness, no strength, no peace, no divinity, no sense of community or human connection. Quite the opposite. Guns are the antithesis of love and compassion; they advance the human experiment not at all, and in fact, shatter and humiliate it with every pull of the trigger." This is a PSA from one of San Francisco's finest.
|
|
To claim that guns are effective for safety, or self defense, or a warped sense of patriotism? This is not merely laughable, it’s the opposite of the truth, of established fact.
Guns are not effective for safety or self-defense? Shit, I guess I've been doing it wrong and better get rid of all these guns then. Seriously though, if that statement is true, why do the police carry guns? Why do the Secret Service? Why were people at the Oregon college calling the police to report the shooting? Isn't it because they wanted some people with guns to show up and stop the shooter? The author of this drivel is divorced from reality. |
|
I actually love these articles / blogs from libtards. They assume that their projections of how they would use firearms are reality.
Anyone recall that vapid cunt from a year or so ago who got a ccw and went and sat in a Starbucks? Carried in there and fantasized about killing everyone there? I love picturing pajama boy writing about these things he has no fucking clue about. Only his feels and what he would do if he was armed. Which is commit murder. Making up their little fantasy worlds while sitting in Starbucks drinking their queer drinks in their sandals and greasy hair. I am smart, read how smart I am. I am smart. I AM! Fucking assholes. |
This is the same douchebag that called Obama a "lightworker" and an "enlightened being."
http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/morford/article/Is-Obama-an-enlightened-being-Spiritual-wise-2544395.php |
|
Quoted:
I actually love these articles / blogs from libtards. They assume that their projections of how they would use firearms are reality. Anyone recall that vapid cunt from a year or so ago who got a ccw and went and sat in a Starbucks? Carried in there and fantasized about killing everyone there? I love picturing pajama boy writing about these things he has no fucking clue about. Only his feels and what he would do if he was armed. Which is commit murder. Making up their little fantasy worlds while sitting in Starbucks drinking their queer drinks in their sandals and greasy hair. I am smart, read how smart I am. I am smart. I AM! Fucking assholes. That quite literally has NEVER happened in my near 2 decades of CCW, hasn't crossed my mind. The gun at my hip is out of mind, I know it's there because it's supposed to be there like a wallet, keys, or cell phone. Am I the only one who considers carrying a normal, sane function of my day to day affairs--these libtards make it seem like some kind of transformation happens when you do ![]() ![]()
|
|
Quoted:
That quite literally has NEVER happened in my near 2 decades of CCW, hasn't crossed my mind. The gun at my hip is out of mind, I know it's there because it's supposed to be there like a wallet, keys, or cell phone. Am I the only one who considers carrying a normal, sane function of my day to day affairs--these libtards make it seem like some kind of transformation happens when you do ![]() ![]() ![]() Quoted:
Quoted:
I actually love these articles / blogs from libtards. They assume that their projections of how they would use firearms are reality. Anyone recall that vapid cunt from a year or so ago who got a ccw and went and sat in a Starbucks? Carried in there and fantasized about killing everyone there? I love picturing pajama boy writing about these things he has no fucking clue about. Only his feels and what he would do if he was armed. Which is commit murder. Making up their little fantasy worlds while sitting in Starbucks drinking their queer drinks in their sandals and greasy hair. I am smart, read how smart I am. I am smart. I AM! Fucking assholes. That quite literally has NEVER happened in my near 2 decades of CCW, hasn't crossed my mind. The gun at my hip is out of mind, I know it's there because it's supposed to be there like a wallet, keys, or cell phone. Am I the only one who considers carrying a normal, sane function of my day to day affairs--these libtards make it seem like some kind of transformation happens when you do ![]() ![]() ![]() Liberals have a Mental disorder. I put it on if I'm leaving the house, everyday. It's like my drivers license, and insurance. Never leave home without it. |
|
Quoted:
YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD......................................((LINK)) Unlike cars, knives, drugs, alcohol or any other freely available, potentially deadly items which can (and do) kill lots of people, guns are the only commercially available instrument in the world that we designed specifically for the purpose of the eradication of life."
|
| Why do liberals feel the need to humanize guns? Guns do not think, do not remember, do not dream and certainly do not feel anger or pleasure. They do not have wants or desires. Guns do not murder or save people. It is the person behind the gun that kill people. Blame the person, not an inanimate object made of steel, wood or plastic. |
|
Quoted:
That quite literally has NEVER happened in my near 2 decades of CCW, hasn't crossed my mind. The gun at my hip is out of mind, I know it's there because it's supposed to be there like a wallet, keys, or cell phone. Am I the only one who considers carrying a normal, sane function of my day to day affairs--these libtards make it seem like some kind of transformation happens when you do ![]() ![]() ![]() Quoted:
Quoted:
I actually love these articles / blogs from libtards. They assume that their projections of how they would use firearms are reality. Anyone recall that vapid cunt from a year or so ago who got a ccw and went and sat in a Starbucks? Carried in there and fantasized about killing everyone there? I love picturing pajama boy writing about these things he has no fucking clue about. Only his feels and what he would do if he was armed. Which is commit murder. Making up their little fantasy worlds while sitting in Starbucks drinking their queer drinks in their sandals and greasy hair. I am smart, read how smart I am. I am smart. I AM! Fucking assholes. That quite literally has NEVER happened in my near 2 decades of CCW, hasn't crossed my mind. The gun at my hip is out of mind, I know it's there because it's supposed to be there like a wallet, keys, or cell phone. Am I the only one who considers carrying a normal, sane function of my day to day affairs--these libtards make it seem like some kind of transformation happens when you do ![]() ![]() ![]() She was writing or blogging for some minor outlet. It was both hilarious and disturbing. She bought a Glock and first thing she did was carry in a Starbucks. Wrote how pulse pounding the power to just start killing everyone was. How horrific. How easy it would be. There was an epic thread about it here. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD......................................((LINK)) Unlike cars, knives, drugs, alcohol or any other freely available, potentially deadly items which can (and do) kill lots of people, guns are the only commercially available instrument in the world that we designed specifically for the purpose of the eradication of life." http://img13.deviantart.net/606d/i/2014/073/c/6/bow_and_arrow_by_juciely-d7a67vu.png Bwahahahahah, how about spears, and swords too? BTW that's a nice bow. |
|
You can’t put 300 million precision tools of death into the culture and not expect their latent, intrinsic objective to be realized, every single day. So there are approximately 10,000 murders with guns a year? That 300 million is probably on the low side too. But even if it was 1 gun for each murder that's roughly .000033% of tools of death used for murder. |
|
Quoted: So there are approximately 10,000 murders with guns a year? That 300 million is probably on the low side too. But even if it was 1 gun for each murder that's roughly .000033% of tools of death used for murder. Quoted: You can’t put 300 million precision tools of death into the culture and not expect their latent, intrinsic objective to be realized, every single day. So there are approximately 10,000 murders with guns a year? That 300 million is probably on the low side too. But even if it was 1 gun for each murder that's roughly .000033% of tools of death used for murder. |
|
Quoted:
No one holds or fires a gun without some fundamental understanding of this fact – that he could, if he so desired, kill anything he wanted, right now, in an instant – and that’s essentially all you’re supposed do with it. https://i.imgur.com/TZegSkL.png projection is such a nasty little bitch |
|
Quoted:
projection is such a nasty little bitch Quoted:
Quoted:
No one holds or fires a gun without some fundamental understanding of this fact – that he could, if he so desired, kill anything he wanted, right now, in an instant – and that’s essentially all you’re supposed do with it. https://i.imgur.com/TZegSkL.png projection is such a nasty little bitch All I get out of these kind of articles is that liberals are some seriously deranged, dangerous, mentally ill individuals that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near anything sharper than safety scissors. |
|
Quoted: This is the same douchebag that called Obama a "lightworker" and an "enlightened being." ![]() http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/morford/article/Is-Obama-an-enlightened-being-Spiritual-wise-2544395.php Quoted: This is the same douchebag that called Obama a "lightworker" and an "enlightened being." ![]() http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/morford/article/Is-Obama-an-enlightened-being-Spiritual-wise-2544395.php Here's where it gets gooey. Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul. ![]() |
|
Quoted: Wrong. Guns are the only thing stopping strong folks from putting on plate mail, rounding him up and making him a serf. Guns are freedom, strength, and peace to the weak of the world. They SHOULD be banned so the strong may rule again. Quoted: Quoted: "They bring nothing of positive, uplifting value: no kindness, no strength, no peace, no divinity, no sense of community or human connection." Wrong. Guns are the only thing stopping strong folks from putting on plate mail, rounding him up and making him a serf. Guns are freedom, strength, and peace to the weak of the world. They SHOULD be banned so the strong may rule again. You misunderstand. Strength alone does not bring one power. Many strong men have defended the weak and kept them safe. Malice, malevolence, disdain for weakness, ambition and love of misery is what you describe. Oh, to be able to assert my indomitable will upon those who do not possess my lust for power and love of watching other suffer! |
|
Quoted: ![]() Quoted: Quoted: This is the same douchebag that called Obama a "lightworker" and an "enlightened being." ![]() http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/morford/article/Is-Obama-an-enlightened-being-Spiritual-wise-2544395.php Here's where it gets gooey. Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul. ![]() Ho Lee Fuck There are some seriously deranged motherfuckers out there. |
|
The left is mentally ill and out of touch with reality...
When I look at a gun I don't see it as a device for killing...Honestly as hokey as it sounds oftentimes I am first attracted to many of them for their engineering/aesthetics/craftsmanship. There is just something about a well made firearm that has attention to detail in terms of fit and finish that I like and there have been times a firearm purchase has been made based solely on that. |
| Meh. I'm glad we're dropping the "We just want common sense gun safety" mask and getting right to the real argument. I appreciate the other side finally being open and honest about what they want. Maybe it will finally open a few eyes on our side and get them off the couch and put of the basement - not to mention making it abundantly clear to the fudds that they can't get away by throwing other gun owners under the bus. |
|
Quoted:
You misunderstand. Strength alone does not bring one power. Many strong men have defended the weak and kept them safe. Malice, malevolence, disdain for weakness, ambition and love of misery is what you describe. Oh, to be able to assert my indomitable will upon those who do not possess my lust for power and love of watching other suffer! No before the gun the weak were enslaved by the strong, even in Republics and Democracies. Men of strength held weak men as slaves and women were chattel. The gun is the only thing that lets equality exist. |









